Introduction
The so-called “boring billion” (~1.8–0.8 Ga) was characterized by environmental stability and its conditions are thought to have delayed eukaryotic diversification (Holland, Reference Holland2006; Planavsky et al., 2014). Tectonically, this period was far from boring, since it involved the activity of the Columbia and Rodinia supercontinent (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Li, Evans, Wu, Li and Dong2012). Moreover, the evolution of Earth’s biosphere, atmosphere, and hydrosphere is thought to tie with the continental movements (Campbell and Allen, Reference Campbell and Allen2008; Santosh, Reference Santosh2010; Young, Reference Young2013). Correspondingly, recent studies have revealed that obvious chemical and geological changes occurred during the “boring billion” (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Du, Zhou, Yang and Huang2012). Javaux et al. (Reference Javaux, Beghin, Houzay and Blanpied2013) proposed that the “boring billion” was actually an “exciting time” for early eukaryotes, but direct taxonomic evidence is not very common in the early “boring billion” (Knoll et al., Reference Knoll, Javaux, Hewitt and Cohen2006; Butterfield, Reference Butterfield2007). Based on the study of microfossils from ca. 1600 Ma strata, Yin (Reference Yin1985) proposed that an obvious morphological differentiation had occurred. However, subject to photographic limitations, demonstrating characteristics of morphological differentiation are blurred. In order to portray the biological community during this critical era, the unmetamorphosed and classic Jixian section was selected for a systematic study of microfossils from the Dahongyu Formation. This involved the preparation of 914 thin sections of chert samples for examination. Consequently, a large number of microfossils were recovered.
Geological setting, stratigraphy, and age
The Yanshan Basin in North China is one of the rift basins that formed during the break-up of the Columbia supercontinent (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Yang, Li and Chen2002, Reference Lu, Li, Chen, Yu, Jin and Guo2004; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Li, Evans, Wu, Li and Dong2012). Unmetamorphosed successions of Proterozoic sedimentary rocks are widely exposed in this basin. The studied Jixian section is located in the middle of the Yanshan Basin (Fig. 1) and exceeds 10,000 m in thickness. In ascending order, it has been divided into the Changcheng, Jixian, Huailai, and Qingbaikou groups, with ages ranging from 1670 to 850 Myr (Li et al., Reference Li, Su, Zhou, Geng, Xiang, Cui, Liu and Lu2011) (Fig. 2). In the lower part of the Changcheng Group, clastic rocks are dominant. Carbonates initially emerged in the upper part of the Changcheng Group and dominated the sediments in the Jixian Group. Clastic rocks appeared again in the upper part of the Jixian section, dominating the Huailai Group and the Qingbaikou Group.
Geographic location of the Jixian section and simplified paleo-geographic map during this time of the North China Platform (modified from Chu et al., Reference Chu, Zhang, Zhang and Lyons2007).
Stratigraphic columns of the Proterozoic Jixian section with geo-chronological constraints. Geo-chronological data: Gao et al. (Reference Gao, Zhang, Yin, Shi, Wang, Liu, Liu, Tang and Song2008), Gao et al. (Reference Gao, Zhang, Liu, Ding, Wang and Zhang2009), Li et al. (Reference Li, Lu, Li, Sun, Xiang, Geng and Zhou2009, Reference Li, Zhu, Xiang, Su, Lu, Zhou, Geng, Li and Yang2010, Reference Li, Su, Zhou, Geng, Xiang, Cui, Liu and Lu2011, Reference Li, Su, Zhou, Xiang, Tian, Yang, Huff and Ettensohn2014), and Su et al. (Reference Su, Li, Huff, Ettensohn, Zhang, Zhou and Wan2010). Grypania: Yan and Liu, Reference Yan and Liu1998; Valeria lophostriata: Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009; Leiosphaeridia: Lamb et al., 2009.
The Dahongyu Formation was the last sedimentary formation of the Changcheng Group. During Dahongyu deposition, wide-spread and long-standing volcanic activities occurred (Ren, Reference Ren1987). Volcanic materials and terrestrial deposits are ubiquitous in the Yanshan Basin and exhibit obvious regional disparity. From the east to the west of the Yanshan Basin, volcaniclastic rocks thin to pinch out, and conversely carbonates become dominant. In the east of the basin, strata are 675 m thick and dominated by terrestrial clastic rocks (quartz sandstone, sandy shale, and dolomitic sandstone). In the Jixian section located in the middle of the Yanshan basin, strata are 408 m thick and composed of quartz sandstones, trachytes, and carbonates. In the Pangjiapu section located in the west of the Yanshan basin, strata are 171 m thick and dominated by carbonates, with volcanic materials and detrital rocks absent. Based on these characteristics of sediment distribution, Xu et al. (Reference Xu, Bai, Wang, Mei and Li2002a) proposed that the provenance was in the east of the Yanshan Basin. In the Jixian section, the Dahongyu Formation conformably overlies the Tuanshanzi Formation and unconformably underlies the Gaoyuzhuang Formation and comprises three sedimentary members: (1) the first member is composed of terrestrial clastic rocks, quartzite sandstones, feldspar quartzite sandstones, and dolomitic sandstones; (2) K-rich trachytes, K-rich tuffs, and volcanic breccias are the chief sediments of the second member; and (3) the third member mainly comprises various carbonates, accompanied by banded cherts (Fig. 2).
The third member of the Dahongyu Formation is 115 m thick, with a basal pebbly sandstone unit that overlies the trachytes of the second member. Thin beds of gray sandy dolostones and argillaceous-arenaceous dolostones followed upward, accompanied by banded cherts. Beds of dolostones thicken upwards and Petaliforma stromatolites appear. The upper part is mainly gray to dark-gray, thin-layered argillaceous-arenaceous dolostones with rhythmicly distributed banded cherts and tuberous stromatolites. The third member ends with thick-bedded silicified dolostones. Conophyton stromatolites at the top of the Dahongyu Formation are truncated by the overlying Gaoyuzhuang Formation. According to sequence stratigraphic information and stromatolites, the third member is inferred to have been deposited during the transgression of a sea. Unfortunately, the regressive sequence and related highstand systems tract is missing. Samples were systematically collected from the third member and most fossiliferous samples were concentrated at the upper part of the third member.
Precise chronological frameworks of the Proterozoic strata in the Yanshan basin have been established over recent years (Lu and Li, Reference Lu and Li1991; Gao et al., Reference Gao, Zhang, Yin, Shi, Wang, Liu, Liu, Tang and Song2008, Reference Gao, Zhang, Liu, Ding, Wang and Zhang2009; Li et al., Reference Li, Lu, Li, Sun, Xiang, Geng and Zhou2009, Reference Li, Zhu, Xiang, Su, Lu, Zhou, Geng, Li and Yang2010, Reference Li, Su, Zhou, Geng, Xiang, Cui, Liu and Lu2011, Reference Li, Su, Zhou, Xiang, Tian, Yang, Huff and Ettensohn2014; Su et al., Reference Su, Li, Huff, Ettensohn, Zhang, Zhou and Wan2010) (Fig. 2). The samples were collected from the upper part of the Dahongyu Formation because cherts mostly crop out from dolostones of the third sedimentary member. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages of 1625.9±8.9 Ma and 1559±12 Ma have been obtained from the second sedimentary member of the Dahongyu Formation and the Gaoyuzhuang Formation, respectively (Gao et al., Reference Gao, Zhang, Yin, Shi, Wang, Liu, Liu, Tang and Song2008; Li et al., Reference Li, Zhu, Xiang, Su, Lu, Zhou, Geng, Li and Yang2010), demonstrating the age of the third sedimentary member of the Dahongyu Formation to be ca. 1600 Ma.
Materials and methods
All fossiliferous samples in this research are silicified peloidal arenite sediments that were systematically collected from the dolostone-dominated strata of the third sedimentary member. The sampling point is located ~15 km north of Jixian County, Tianjin, China (Fig. 1, coordinate: 40.16594°N, 117.47364°E). At the outcrop scale, silicified peloidal sediments are mottled black to brownish gray in color. Uncompacted peloidal grains suggest that these materials had undergone early diagenetic cementation. These peloidal deposits are heterogenous in texture with organic-rich peloids surrounded by organic-poor silicious cements. Microfossils are abundant inside peloidal grains. Thirty-two chert samples were collected and two petrographic thin sections were made for each of the samples. Seventeen samples contain well-preserved microfossils. Subsequently, fifty thin sections were prepared for each sample and abundant microfossils were recovered, measured, and photographed using biological microscope Leica DM 5500 and Leica Application Suite 4.0.0 software.
Repository and institutional abbreviation
All illustrated specimens are in petrographic thin sections of chert. Locations and position coordinates for each specimen in this study are stored with the thin sections in the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
General characteristics of the newly studied Dahongyu microbiota
This is the first time that well-preserved silicified microfossils have been recovered from the Dahongyu Formation of the Jixian section. In total, 19 species were recognized, six species have been identified informally and seven species have been identified in open nomenclature (Table 1). Simple cyanobacterial filaments and coccoids are dominant elements, but most diversity is contributed by rare taxa. By observing their preserved state and living habits, colonially preserved microfossils and isolated individuals were recovered separately.
Synoptic listing of microfossil taxa from the Dahongyu Formation, Jixian section, indicating their size ranges and morphological characteristics. A. umishanensis=Asperatopsophosphaera umishanensis, N.=Number, L.=Length, W.=Width.
Colonies
Colonially preserved microfossils in the new microbiota are mostly simple cyanobacteria, including hormogonian and chroococcacean. Based on their state of preservation and living habit, they are mainly recognized as builders that contributed to mat-building.
Filament colonies
Filament colonies, including filamentous trichomes and sheaths, are abundant. These filaments exhibit differing living habits; some growing upwards, some were randomly scattered in the matrix, and others grew parallel to the bedding plane. Based on their morphology and size, two genera and nine species are recognized: Oscillatoriopsis (O. obtusa, O. amadeus, O. longa, and O. princeps) and Siphonophycus (S. thulenema, S. septatum, S. robustum, S. typicum, and S. kestron).
Oscillatoriopsis
Filaments of Oscillatoriopsis form macroscale aggregates as ubiquitous elements (Fig. 3.1–3.3). Based on their distributional pattern in the matrix, three different aggregates have been recovered (Figs. 3.1–3.3, 4.2). These three aggregates exhibited very different features.
Filaments of Oscillatoriopsis: (1) aggregate dominated by O. obtusa: 2012XHYD_6_11; (2) aggregate dominated by O. amadeus and O. longa: 2012XHYD_5_18; (3) aggregate dominated by O. longa and O. princeps: 2012XHYD_3_13; (4) O. longa: 2012XHYD_13_17; (5) O. princeps: 2007XHYD_1_2; (6) O. princeps: 2012XHYD_24_10. All scale bars=30 μm.
Diameter-frequency distributions of Oscillatoriopsis: (1) total diameter-frequency distribution of all Oscillatoriopsis; (2) diameter-frequency distribution of three different Oscillatoriopsis aggregates.
The first Oscillatoriopsis aggregate is composed of O. obtusa and O. amadeus (Figs. 3.1, 4.2, aggregate 1; specimens could only be assigned to particular species based on measurement because their diameters are distributed in a continuous zone). These trichomes, which are arranged closely in twos and threes, have been observed to be parallel and bend together in the same region. Their arrangement suggests that they may have been bounded together by a common envelope during the process of bending. The tentative multi-trichome nature is comparable with Eoschizothrix composite, which has been reported from the overlying Gaoyuzhuang Formation (Lee and Golubic, Reference Lee and Golubic1998).
The second Oscillatoriopsis aggregate is formed by morphologically uniform filaments (Figs. 3.2, 4.2, aggregate 2), which are O. amadeus, O. longa, and O. princeps. These filaments are short, flexible, and do not possess tapering ends. Their diameters vary from 9.8 μm to 27.3 μm and form a single main diameter-frequency distributional peak, which is 13–19 μm (Fig. 4.2, aggregate 2). This characteristic indicates that these filaments may have belonged to the same biological taxon.
Filaments of the third Oscillatoriopsis aggregates are variable in size but uniform in morphology (Fig. 3.3). Oscillatoriopsis longa and O. princeps are the key elements of this aggregate. Some O. amadeus filaments also emerged (Fig. 4). Their diameters varied from 8.2 μm to 35.8 μm and formed several distributional peaks of diameter-frequency (Fig. 4.2, aggregate 3). This nature suggests that they could belong to different biological taxa.
Siphonophycus
Five morphologic species of Siphonophycus (S. thulenema, S. septatum, S. robustum, S. typicum, and S. kestron) have been identified in the studied assemblage (Figs. 5, 6). As the most abundant filaments, Siphonophycus mostly appears in dense or loose aggregates and only a few emerge as individuals. Three different types of aggregates have been recovered according to their distributional pattern in the matrix (Figs. 5.2, 6).
Diameter-frequency distributions of Siphonophycus: (1) total diameter-frequency distribution of all Siphonophycus; (2) diameter-frequency distribution of three different Siphonophycus aggregates.
Filaments of Siphonophycus: (1) aggregate of S. thulenema, arrow indicates S. septatum: 2012XHYD_47_5; (2) aggregate of S. thulenema: 2012XHYD_47_5; (3) aggregate dominated by S. septatum and S. robustum: 2012XHYD_20_3; (4) aggregate dominated by S. septatum and S. robustum: 2008XHYD_2_1; (5) aggregate dominated by S. typicum, arrow indicates S. robustum: 2012XHYD_47_5. Scale bars are (1) 15 μm, (2) 10 μm, (3) 60 μm, (4) 50 μm, and (5) 35 μm.
The first Siphonophycus aggregate is dominated by S. thulenema, which usually arrange into small bundles of aggregates (Fig. 5.2, aggregate 1; Fig. 6.1, 6.2). Siphonophycus septatum is occasionally present within these small aggregates as a rare member (Fig. 6.2 arrow). Most S. thulenema filaments extended parallel to the bedding plane or along with the outer edge of a pelletoid (Fig. 6.1, 6.2). They do not exhibit an upward trend in growth direction, which may indicate that they were not photosynthetic organisms, or that their environment was not affected by sunlight. These aggregates are distributed in bundles, which may indicate that they were affected by water flow during their growth.
The second Siphonophycus aggregate is composed of S. robustum and S. septatum, which are common elements and usually appear together to form small aggregates (Fig. 5.2, aggregate 2; Fig. 6.3, 6.4). These aggregates usually occur within organic-poor matrix, such as cements between pelletoids (Fig. 6.3, 6.4). They sometimes grew along with the outer edge of a pelletoid (Fig. 6.3). Their distribution pattern does not exhibit a particular direction of growth, but exhibits a chaotic state. This phenomenon may suggest that they were non-photosynthetic organisms, while indicating that they lived in a hydrostatic environment without sunshine.
The third Siphonophycus aggregate is dominated by S. typicum, which is the most abundant mat builder in the newly studied Dahongyu microbiota (Fig. 5.2, aggregate 3; Fig. 6.5). In S. typicum-dominated aggregates, S. robustum is an associated member and participated in mat-building (Fig. 6.5, see arrow). In addition to these two main members, S. septatum and S. kestron are occasionally present. In organic-poor layers, filaments grew upward. In contrast, filaments exhibit a horizontal growth tendency in organic-rich layers. Due to their interactive growth, characteristic rhythms of bright and dark layers were established.
Spherical colonies
Spherical colonies are not very common in the new microbiota. They do not form a laminar plane because of their small scale. Colonially preserved spheres are generally small in size and have simple morphology. They are densely or sparsely distributed together and form small-scale clusters in the matrix. According to their morphology and size, five species have been recognized and three species have been determined informally: Glenobotrydion varioforme, Coccostratus dispergens, Eosynechococcus moorei, Gloeodiniopsis sp., Coniunctiophycus majorinum, Tetraphycus gregalis, Clonophycus sp., and Myxococcoides sp.
Colonially preserved coccoids are usually small in size and simple in morphology. Inside the matrix, they are densely or loosely distributed together and formed some small-scale clusters. Gloeodiniopsis sp. (Fig. 8), as one of the colonially preserved coccoids, is very well preserved and shows the reproduction procedure of straight splitting (Fig. 8.3). Colonies with regular spherical outlines are typical elements (Fig. 9.3–9.8). Inside the spherical colony, tens or hundreds of cells are arranged densely with or without order. These colonies are comparable with some member of modern cyanobacteria Pleurocapsa and Gloeocapsa, which can lead to the process of multiple fissions and produce baeocytes.
Isolated individuals
In the Dahongyu microbiota, isolated individuals constitute up to 20% of the content and contribute to more than half of the diversity. Based on their morphology, we recognized five species, five undetermined species, and seven undetermined forms: Myxococcoides grandis, Xiaohongyuia sinica Shi and Feng n. gen. n. sp., Dictyosphaera macroreticulta, Asperatopsophosphaera umishanensis, Leiosphaeridia minutissima, Myxococcoides sp., Leioarachnitum sp., Leiosphaeridia sp., Pterospermopsimorpha sp., and seven problematic taxa.
These isolated individuals mostly are coccoidal in morphology, accompanied with fusiform microfossils and some irregular morphological microfossils. Spherical types are mostly smooth-surfaced, although ornamented spheres, such as granular-surfaced (Fig. 10.6–10.9) and reticular-surfaced (Fig. 10.10, 10.11) forms are also very common. Besides ornaments, other morphological features, such as longitudinal rupture (Fig. 11.1–11.7), neck-like extension (Fig. 11.8), spine-like structure (Fig. 11.12), vase-shaped morphology (Fig. 11.13), spines (Fig. 11.14, 11.15), and undefined shapes (Fig. 12), also suggest that they belong to different taxa.
The small fusiform microfossil Leioarachnitum sp. has been recovered from the Dahongyu Formation in abundance (Fig. 11.1–11.5). These are also widely distributed in the overlying Jixian Group (Cao, Reference Cao2005; Shi et al., Reference Shi, Feng and Zhu2014). Most specimens of these new small fusiform microfossils are preserved as a complete envelope with a longitudinal rupture (Fig. 11.1–11.3). Additionally, some specimens have been found without the longitudinal rupture (Fig. 11.4, 11.5). The emergence of these specimens without rupture may demonstrate the state, before excystment, of these small fusiform microfossils. Therefore, small fusiform microfossils are probably different micro-organisms from those specimens of the Chuanlinggou Formation. The medial split, which indicates excystment, could attribute them to the eukaryotic domain.
Xiaohongyuia sinica Shi and Feng n. gen. n. sp. is a new taxon with irregular morphology, including but not limited to binary, lageniform, triangle, calabash, and chain-like (Fig. 12). An initial vesicle bearing a variable number of irregularly distributed outgrowths (Fig. 12.9), which were capable of secondary growth (Fig. 12.11), all suggest that they run active vegetative reproduction. The ability to modify cell shape and division-direction during vegetative growth requires complex cytoskeleton and endomembrane. Functioning cytoskeleton and flexible membranes, which are fundamental conditions to eukaryotes (Cavalier-Smith, Reference Cavalier-Smith2002), attribute Xiaohongyuia sinica Shi and Feng n. gen. n. sp. to the eukaryotic domain.
Discussion of the microbial community structure
A silicified microbial community dominated by filaments and coccoids, similar with the new Dahongyu microbiota, was the main community type in the Proterozoic (Schopf, Reference Schopf1968; Schopf and Blacic, Reference Schopf and Blacic1971; Zhang, Reference Zhang1981, Reference Zhang1985). Although microfossils lack detailed features for systematics because of their simple morphology, their preservation patterns do provide living-habits information. Based on their preservation patterns, endobenthic mat, epibenthic mat, and allochthonous have been recognized.
Endobenthic mat
Microbial mats that developed inside sediments were interpreted as endobenthic because of their living habit (Noffke, Reference Noffke2010). In this new microbiota, some Siphonophycus filaments were recognized as endobenthic because they possess evidence supporting their development within sediments. In S. thulenema-dominated mats, most filaments are distributed in organic-poor cement (Fig. 6.1, 6.2). Some of these filaments curve along with the outer edge of a pelletoid, suggesting that they grew after pelletoid formation (Fig. 6.1). Siphonophycus robustum and S. septatum also are preserved in organic-poor cements (Fig. 6.3, 6.4), and some are distributed along the outer edge of a pelletoid and show no directional properties (Fig. 6.3). Their position of preservation in the matrix is similar to interstitial filaments of Gunflintia minuta, which were reported from the Gunflint Formation (Lanier, Reference Lanier1989, fig. 5, A–D). These characteristics illustrate that they could have been endobenthic and developed inside sediments. According to Noffke (Reference Noffke2010), endobenthic mats are characteristically found in the upper intertidal zone, which is a nutrition-poor environment. Similar to modern endobenthic mats, growing positions of the endobenthic microfossils of the new microbiota also exhibit characteristics of denutrition because they were preserved in organic-poor sediments.
Epibenthic mat
Epibenthic microbial mats, which developed on top of sediments, are common microbial mats in modern supratidal environments (Noffke, Reference Noffke2010). Some Siphonophycus filaments exhibited an upward growing habit, which is the same with modern epibenthic microbial mats. In S. typicum-dominated mats, filaments intertwined to form some sort of meshwork and exhibited characteristic rhythmic bright and dark layers in their original positions (Fig. 6.5). Bright layers are 200–1000 μm thick and composed of aphanitic chalcedony and microcrystalline quartz. Filaments in bright layers are sparsely preserved in situ and are mostly perpendicular or angled to the lamina. Dark layers are 20–100 μm thick and contain abundant organic material. Filaments in dark layers are rich and tangled, but usually are not very well preserved. These rhythmic characteristics of growth have been interpreted as day-night, tidal or even yearly cycles (Monty, Reference Monty1976; Zhang and Li, Reference Zhang and Li1984). The characteristic of epitrophy suggests that these were phototrophic organisms and tended to grow on top of the sediments.
Allochthonous individuals
Isolated individuals in microbial mat biotas used to be designated as allochthonous because they neither participate in the building of microbial mats nor distribute themselves along the bedding plane like mat dwellers (Knoll, Reference Knoll1982). These individuals have also been interpreted as plankton because of their isolated distributional habits (Knoll and Calder, Reference Knoll and Calder1983; Knoll et al., Reference Knoll, Swett and Burkhardt1989, Reference Knoll, Swett and Mark1991). But, it is not sufficient to identify microfossils as plankton just because they occur as isolated individuals. It also seems impossible to recognize plankton according to their morphological features because they are mostly simple in morphology. Given the above facts, how should we interpret the outstanding flourish of isolated individuals in the new Dahongyu microbiota?
In the new Dahongyu microbiota, about 20% of the microfossils were preserved as isolated individuals and are characterized by means of their large size. Most of them are larger than 60 μm in diameter, and even formed a small frequency distributional peak at about 110 μm (Fig. 13). The largest individuals even exceed 400 μm in diameter (Fig. 10.1–10.3).
Large microfossils usually are recovered from shales by maceration in Proterozoic strata (Yan, Reference Yan1982, Reference Yan1985; Yin, Reference Yin1985). All their living habit records are lost owing to the maceration process. However, as an in-situ preserved microbiota, the Dahongyu microbiota provides detailed information to help us understand their living habits. Some isolated individuals were broken (Fig. 9.14), which indicates that they were not preserved at their original living position but probably were transported by water flow. According to the sequence stratigraphic information and stromatolites, the fossiliferous beds are located in the upper part of a transgressive sequence. They were deposited in an intertidal environment and are dominated by shallow-water carbonates. Fossil-bearing rocks containing a large amount of broken fragments of microbial mats, pelletoids, and concentrical ooids indicated a turbulent water environment, which allowed plankton habitation. Combined with environmental and taphonomic information, these broken isolated individuals could be considered as potential plankton.
In summary, this new microbiota, which contains endobenthic, epibenthic, and allochthonous elements, shows a vertical distributional view of an intertidal microbiota in the transitional time from Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic.
Regional disparity of the Dahongyu microbiota
All of the previously reported microfossils from the Dahongyu Formation were concentrated at the Pangjiapu section, which is located in the west of the Yanshan basin and is 185 km away from the Jixian section. The Dahongyu microbiotas from two localities (the Pangjiapu and the Jixian sections) both have high abundance, but also possess some obvious differences. To date, several studies have been conducted in the Pangjiapu section, with only nine taxa being recovered: Gunflintia, Huroniospora, Gloeotheceopsis aggregate, Gloeodiniopsis mattiformatum, Glenobotridion granulosum, Siphonophycus inornatum, Eohyella campbellii, Coniunctiophycus conglobatum, and Sphaerophycus sp. (Zhang, Reference Zhang1984, Reference Zhang1988; Zhang and Golubic, Reference Zhang and Golubic1987; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Yang, Yin and Shao1995). These nine taxa of the Pangjiapu section are colonial microfossils with simple morphology.
Compared with the Pangjiapu section, the newly studied Jixian section contains more diversified microfossils. Besides colonial microfossils, the Jixian section also contains abundant allochthonous microfossils, which were not present in the Pangjiapu section. As in the Pangjiapu section, in many silicified microbial mat biotas in the Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic (e.g., microbiotas from the Gaoyuzhuang Formation, Wumishan Formation, Salkhan limestone, Yusmastakhan Formation, and Dismal Lakes Group), isolated individuals usually were rare elements and only account for ~2% of microbiota (Horodyski and Donaldson, Reference Horodyski and Donaldson1980; Zhang, Reference Zhang1981, Reference Zhang1985; Sergeev et al., Reference Sergeev, Knoll and Grotzinger1995; Sharma, Reference Sharma2006). In the new Dahongyu microbiota, the content of large isolated individuals is up to 20%. The high content of isolated individuals made the Jixian section standout compared to other silicified microbiotas in Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic strata.
Gunflintia and Huroniospora have been reported from the Dahongyu Formation of the Pangjiapu section (Zhang, Reference Zhang1984), but no typical Gunflint elements have been discovered in the same formation of the Jixian section. Only some S. thulenema share a similar preservable pattern with the interstitial filaments, which have been assigned to Gunflintia minuta from the Gunflint Formation (Lanier, Reference Lanier1989). Gunflint microbiotas are considered a result of a special environment (Zhang, Reference Zhang1984). They are comprised of special components restricted to an exclusive time interval (2.1–1.7 Ga) and mostly associated with banded iron formations (Licari and Cloud, Reference Licari and Cloud1968; Knoll and Barghoorn, Reference Knoll and Barghoorn1976; Awramik and Barghoorn, Reference Awramik and Barghoorn1977; Tobin, Reference Tobin1990).
Disparity of the sedimentary environment could be the cause of biological disparity. By comparing both microbiotas of the Jixian section and the Pangjiapu section, it could be inferred that there was significant environmental disparity between the two localities. The Pangjiapu section, which is 185 km from the Jixian section, is located in the same Yanshan basin with the Jixian section. The whole Dahongyu Formation of the Pangjiapu section, which contains well-preserved microfossils, is dominated by carbonates like the third member of the Dahongyu Formation in the Jixian section. In both localities, microfossils are recovered from cherts and silicified carbonates. Besides these similarities, absence of volcanic materials and detrital rocks in the Pangjiapu section is the main difference between the two localities. As mentioned above, widespread and long-standing volcanic activities occurred and induced significant regional disparity of volcanic sediments and terrestrial inputs during deposition of the Dahongyu Formation (Ren, Reference Ren1987). Compared to the Pangjiapu section, the Jixian section is closer to the provenances and more nutrition provided by volcanic materials could have influenced the microbiota to flourish. Although there are numerous environmental possibilities that could influence size and diversity in ancient basins, nutrition is an important factor that could limit or promote the growth of microfossils in a carbonate tidal-flat environment.
Comparison with the Chuanlinggou microbiota
The ca. 1650 Ma Chuanlinggou microbiota, recovered from the underlying Changcheng Group, is well known for bearing the earliest ornamented acritarch Valeria lophostriata (Yan and Liu, Reference Yan and Liu1993; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009). The Chuanlinggou microbiota was recovered from shales, which were considered to have been deposited in a barrier-island lagoon with hydrostatic environment and sufficient terrestrial inputs (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Wang, Bai, Mei and Li2002b). Abundant microfossils have been reported from the Chuanlinggou Formation (Yan, Reference Yan1982, Reference Yan1985, Reference Yan1991; Yan and Liu, Reference Yan and Liu1993; Sun, Reference Sun2006), and most of these microfossils are smooth-surfaced (Peng et al., 2007; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009). The Dahongyu microbiota was recovered from cherts and silicified carbonates, which are chemical sediments representing littoral-neritic sea environments. Microbiotas from totally different environments, such as the Chuanlinggou and Dahongyu microbiotas, usually are composed of different microfossils. However, the presence of plentiful isolated individuals made the Dahongyu microbiota comparable with the Chuanlinggou microbiota.
These two microbiotas share main microfossil components: (1) the Chuanlinggou microbiota and the Dahongyu microbiota are both dominated by filaments and small coccoids (Xing and Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973; Yan and Liu, Reference Yan and Liu1993); (2) large spherical microfossils are abundant elements in both microbiotas (Yan and Liu, Reference Yan and Liu1993); and (3) large fusiform (or ovoidal-shaped) microfossils, which are half roll-ups of a regular ruptured envelope, are frequent microfossils in the Chuanlinggou Formation (Peng et al., 2007; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009). The same fusiform envelopes are also common microfossils in the Dahongyu microbiota (Fig 11.6–11.7).
In addition to similarities, rare microfossils differ between these two microbiotas. A new type of small fusiform microfossil (Leioarachnitum sp., Fig. 11.1–11.5) has been recovered from the Dahongyu Formation. Leioarachnitum sp. is a complete envelope with or without a longitudinal rupture, which is different from the roll-ups of half envelopes from the Chuanlinggou Formation. According to microfossil records, small fusiform microfossils are widely distributed in the overlying Jixian Group (Cao, Reference Cao2005; Shi et al., Reference Shi, Feng and Zhu2014). In addition, the ornamented acritarch Valeria lophostriata, which is present in the Chuanlinggou Formation, is absent in the Dahongyu microbiota. However, several microfossils from the Dahongyu microbiota exhibit ornament (e.g., granular, reticulate, and spiny). These ornaments are homogenetic and regular in morphology, which differ from the cracks and foldings resulting from biological decay or diagenesis. Finally, some microfossils with complex morphology, such as the Unnamed Form 1, Unnamed Form 6, and the Xiaohongyuia sinica Shi and Feng n. gen. n. sp., in the Dahongyu microbiota, are new findings that the Chuanlinggou Formation does not contain. Among them, the ability of modification in cell shape and division-direction during vegetative growth made the Xiaohongyuia sinica Shi and Feng n. gen. n. sp. different from other microbial fossils.
Significance of the new Dahongyu microbiota
On the basis of expanded documentation of complex fossils, the transitional time from Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic has already been proven as a significant era for eukaryotic evolution. Previous research suggested that main clades of green algae separated in the late Paleoproterozoic and early Mesoproterozoic (Teyssèdre, Reference Teyssèdre2006; Moczydłowska et al., Reference Moczydłowska, Landing, Zang and Palacios2011). During this era, several eukaryote-bearing strata were studied, such as the 1650 Ma McArthur Group from Australia, the 1500 Ma Kotuikan Formation from Siberia, the 1450 Ma Roper Group from Australia, the >1400 Ma Ruyang Group from North China, and the 1400 Ma Greyson Formation from United States (Xiao et al., Reference Xiao, Knoll, Kaufman, Yin and Zhang1997; Javaux et al., Reference Javaux, Knoll and Walter2001; Javaux and Marshal, Reference Javaux and Marshal2006; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009; Vorob’eva et al., Reference Vorob’eva, Sergeev and Petrov2015; Adam et al., Reference Adam, Skidmore and Mogk2016). These strata (the Kotuikan Formation from Siberia is an exception) are comparable with each other for bearing the same microfossils. The underlying Changcheng Group of the Dahongyu Formation in the Jixian section could also be considered comparable with the McArthur Group because they share Valeria lophostriata, similar age, and lithology (Yan and Liu, Reference Yan and Liu1993; Javaux and Marshal, Reference Javaux and Marshal2006).
However, the Dahongyu microbiota, together with subsequent microbiotas of the Jixian Group in the whole Yanshan Basin, exhibit totally different microbiotic components. Although, tens of thousands of microfossils have been reported from the Proterozoic Yanshan Basin (Sun, Reference Sun2006; Shi et al., Reference Shi, Feng and Zhu2014), microfossils with complex morphology or ornament are still rare or debatable. Complex eukaryotes, such as Tappania, Satka and Shuiyousphaeridium, which are abundant microfossils in several locations (Xiao et al., Reference Xiao, Knoll, Kaufman, Yin and Zhang1997; Javaux et al., Reference Javaux, Knoll and Walter2001; Javaux and Marshal, Reference Javaux and Marshal2006; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009; Vorob’eva et al., Reference Vorob’eva, Sergeev and Petrov2015; Adam et al., Reference Adam, Skidmore and Mogk2016), were absent in the Dahongyu Formation and any strata in the entire Yanshan Basin. Even Valeria lophostriata, which emerged in the underlying Changcheng Group, is absent in the subsequent strata. Although some allochthonous forms from the Dahongyu microbiota possess ornaments or odd morphology, there is a long path to follow before their eukaryotic nature can be proven because they are either too simple or too rare.
In the Proterozoic Yanshan Basin, carbonates initially emerged in the upper part of the Changcheng Group and dominated the sediments in the Jixian Group. Microbiotas, such as the Dahongyu microbiota, became the dominant or only type of microbiota in these carbonate-dominated strata of the Yanshan Basin (Shi et al., Reference Shi, Feng and Zhu2014; Fig. 5). However, based the record of several potential eukaryotes in the newly studied Dahongyu microbiota and Valeria lophostriata in the underlying Changcheng Group (Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009), it could be inferred that eukaryotic life was already well established in the transitional time and had undergone a moderate diversification. Among reported potential eukaryotes in the Yanshan Basin, the small fusiform microfossil Leioarachnitum sp. (Fig. 11.1–11.5), which is abundant in the Dahongyu microbiota, is a unique microfossil in the Yanshan Basin. It occurs in the upper part of the Changcheng Group along with the carbonate-dominated strata and is distributed in several strata of the Jixian Group (Cao, Reference Cao2005; Shi et al., Reference Shi, Feng and Zhu2014). It is worth mentioning that a well-preserved eukaryote-bearing microbiota reported from the 1500 Ma Kotuikan Formation in Siberia is not comparable with the Roper Group and the Ruyang Group. Based on these differences, it is obvious that large regional disparities of microbiotas existed between continents. These could be caused by regional disparity of depositional environment, habitat, or other conditions. Causal factors behind these disparities need further study.
Conclusions
The new Dahongyu microbiota is dominated by cyanobacteria filaments and coccoids, including endobenthic, epibenthic, and allochthonous forms, which illustrated well a vertical distributional profile of an intertidal microbiota from the transitional Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic time.
High content and large size of allochthonous forms are the defining characteristics that make the Dahongyu microbiota extraordinarily different from other microbial mat biotas recovered from cherts of this contemporary time. Most microfossils of the new Dahongyu microbiota are smooth-surfaced and morphologically simple, yet a few possess ornaments or odd morphologies that suggest their potential eukaryotic nature.
During deposition of the Dahongyu Formation, significant regional disparity of microbiotas existed within the Yanshan Basin. The newly studied Dahongyu microbiota has certain distinctions, but is mostly similar to the microbiota from the underlying Changcheng Group. Absence of typical eukaryotes from the coeval time and the presence of unique elements (especially small fusiform microfossils) make the Dahongyu microbiota and subsequent microbiotas in the Jixian Group distinct from coeval eukaryote-bearing microbiotas.
Systematic paleontology
Kingdom Eubacteria Woese and Fox, Reference Woese and Fox1977
Phylum Cyanobacteria Stanier et al., Reference Stanier1978
Class Hormogoneae Thuret, Reference Thuret1875
Order Oscillatoriales Elenkin, Reference Elenkin1949
Family Oscillatoriaceae (Gray) Kirchner, 1900
Genus Oscillatoriopsis Schopf, Reference Schopf1968, emend. Mendelson and Schopf, Reference Mendelson and Schopf1982, emend. Butterfield et al., Reference Butterfield, Knoll and Swett1994
Type species
Oscillatoriopsis obtusa Schopf, Reference Schopf1968.
Remarks
More than 100 “species” of Oscillatoriopsis have been reported, but it is problematic to distinguish or compare them. Having undergone several amendments, width was chosen as the species-level principal criterion (Butterfield et al., Reference Butterfield, Knoll and Swett1994). Although morphological species based on width have limited information regarding their biological nature, it is efficient to distinguish Oscillatoriopsis species using this diagnosis. According to the statistics of width, three morphological species from the Dahongyu Formation are present: O. obtusa (>3.0–8.0 μm in width), O. amadeus (>8.0–14.0 μm in width), and O. longa (>14.0–25.0 μm in width). In addition to this, some Oscillatoriopsis trichomes, which are more than 25 μm in width, are placed under O. princeps formally (>25–50 μm).
Oscillatoriopsis princeps Zhang and Yan, Reference Zhang and Yan1984, emend. Shi and Feng, herein
1984 Oscillatoriopsis princeps Reference Zhang and YanZhang and Yan, p. 198, pl. 1, fig. 6.
Holotype
Specimen illustrated by Zhang and Yan (Reference Zhang and Yan1984, pl. 1, fig. 6.).
Description
Multicellular, unbranched trichome without sheath. Trichomes are 25–35.8 μm in diameter (mean=29.5 μm; N=30). Single cells are 5.1–10.5 μm in length and their ratio of length to width is 0.2–0.3. Septa are not constricted.
Remarks
Oscillatoriopsis princeps was first named for its extremely large diameter (19–37.5 μm in diameter) (Zhang and Yan, Reference Zhang and Yan1984). It used to be assigned to O. longa (Butterfield et al., Reference Butterfield, Knoll and Swett1994). Considering that the holotype of O. princeps is 37.5 μm in diameter, here it is formally emended in the range of 25–50 μm in diameter and all large Oscillatoriopsis filaments from the Dahongyu Formation (25–35.8 μm in diameter) were assigned into O. princeps.
Class Coccogoneae Thuret, Reference Thuret1875
Order Chroococcales Wettstein, Reference Wettstein1924
Family Chroococcaceae Nägeli, Reference Nägeli1849
Genus Gloeodiniopsis Schopf, Reference Schopf1968, emend. Knoll and Golubic, Reference Knoll and Golubic1979
Type species
Gloeodiniopsis lamellosa Schopf, Reference Schopf1968, Bitter Spring Formation, Australia.
Gloeodiniopsis sp. indet.
Description
Colonially preserved spherical microfossils with thin, transparent, smooth-surfaced flexible wall. Single cells are 19–68 μm in diameter (N=100). Cell walls are occasionally multi-layered. Figure 8.3 displays their reproduction procedure of straight splitting. Envelope containing two cells (Fig. 8.4, 8.5) and broken envelope with a small cell (Fig. 8.6) shows the subsequent procedures of splitting, during which the daughter cells slipped out of the common envelope. Tens to hundreds of cells are loosely distributed into colonies.
Discussion
These microfossils differ from Leptoteichos golubicii and Myxococcoides grandis because some have multi-layered walls. They differ from G. lamellosa because their outer sheaths are thin and ghost-like.
Incertae sedis
Genus Clonophycus Oehler,Reference Oehler1977, emend. Oehler,Reference Oehler1978
Description
Spherical coenobium with or without a common envelope. Coenobiums range from 30–57.5 μm in diameter (N=12) and are composed of tens to hundreds of spherical cell units. Cell units 2.5–12.5 μm in diameter.
Remarks
These specimens are morphologically comparable to Clonophycus, which has been reported from the Proterozoic Balbirini Dolomite, Australia (Oehler, Reference Oehler1978).
Genus Xiaohongyuia new genus Shi and Feng
Type species
Xiaohongyuia sinica new genus new species Shi and Feng.
Diagnosis
An initial vesicle bearing a variable number of irregularly distributed outgrowths. It is characterized for its variable morphology, including but not limited to spherical, binary, lageniform, calabash and chain-like. Irregular-shaped individuals are composed of incomplete spherical parts in various directions.
Etymology
With reference to their occurrence in Xiaohongyu Valley.
Occurrence
Fossiliferous bed located ~15 m from the top of the third member of the Dahongyu Formation, in the Xiaohongyu Valley in Jixian area, Tianjin, north China.
Remarks
Ordinary cells of Xiaohongyuia Shi and Feng n. gen. are mostly spherical. Irregular-shaped individuals are a minority and are composed of incomplete spherical parts in different directions. Cross-walls between every spherical part have been observed in many irregular-shaped specimens. These cross-walls partition the whole organism into two unequal vesicles; or into gourd-, lageniform-, dumbbell-, calabash- and chain-shaped organisms. According to their variable morphology, X. sinica Shi and Feng n. sp. could undergo active vegetative reproduction. They have a tendency to develop outgrowths from the initial vesicle, sometimes to the extent of forming secondary vesicles.
Xiaohongyuia sinica new species Shi and Feng
Holotype
The microfossil illustrated in Figure 12.9 is hereby designated as holotype for this species. The holotype specimen is found in Slide 2012JXD4, Dahongyu Formation, Jixian section, Tianjin, China.
Diagnosis
Outgrowths grown in two perpendicular directions.
Description
Irregular-shaped organisms. Outgrowths grew in two perpendicular directions. They are, but not limited to, binary, lageniform, calabash, and chain-like morphologies. Single cells are in the range 15.5–45 μm in diameter (mean=29 μm; N=46).
Etymology
With reference to their occurrence in China.
Group Acritarcha Evitt, Reference Evitt1963
Genus Pterospermopsimorpha (Timofeev,Reference Timofeev1966), emend. Mikhailova and Jankauskas in Jankauskas et al., Reference Jankauskas, Mikhailova and Hermann1989
Type species
Pterospermopsimorpha pileiformis Timofeev, Reference Timofeev1966.
Pterospermopsimorpha sp. indet.
Description
Solitary spherical microfossils with a large, spherical dark inclusion. Wall is thin and transparent. Cells are 38.5–126.5 μm in diameter (mean=72.2 μm, n=15). Inclusions are 23.8–97.2 μm in diameter (mean=47.5 μm, N=15).
Remarks
We agree with Jankauskas et al. (Reference Jankauskas, Mikhailova and Hermann1989) and include all smooth-surfaced spheres with large spherical inclusions (usually bigger than two-thirds cell diameter) from the new microbiota into Pterospermopsimorpha. According to microfossil records, Pterospermopsimorpha emerged as early as late Paleoproterozoic (Yan, Reference Yan1985), but were more abundant in the late Proterozoic.
Genus Dictyosphaera Xing and Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973
Type species
Dictyosphaera macroreticulta Xing and Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973.
Dictyosphaera macroreticulata Xing and Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973
1973 Dictyosphaera macroreticulata Reference Xing and LiuXing and Liu, p. 22, pl. 1, figs. 16, 17.
2015 Dictyosphaera macroreticulata Xing and Liu; Agić et al., p. 32, fig. 2.1–2.9.
For additional synonymy see Agić et al., Reference Agić, Moczydłowska and Yin2015.
Holotype
Specimen illustrated in pl. 1, fig. 16 (Xing and Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973).
Description
Spherical cells with reticulate sculptures on their surface. Cells are 40.5–49.5 μm in diameter (mean=45 μm; N=2). Cell wall is single-layered, thick, and translucent.
Remarks
Dictyosphaera was first described from the Chuanlinggou Formation of the Jixian section (Xing and Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973), and subsequently reported from several localities in Mesoproterozoic strata in North China (Hu and Fu, Reference Hu and Fu1982; Yan and Liu,Reference Yan and Liu1993; Xiao et al., Reference Xiao, Knoll, Kaufman, Yin and Zhang1997; Li et al., Reference Li, Liu, Yin, Tang, Gao and Chen2012; Agić et al., Reference Agić, Moczydłowska and Yin2015). The new specimens are similar to the “Dictyosphaera sinica” reported from the Chuanglinggou Formation, Jixian section (Xing and Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973; Fig. 1.18, 1.19). Their reticulate sculptures are both very small and simple. Recently, Agić et al. (Reference Agić, Moczydłowska and Yin2015) emended Dictyosphaera as a monospecific genus, so we assign the new specimens to D. macroreticulata.
Genus Asperatopsophosphaera Shepeleva, Reference Shepeleva1963
Type species
Asperatopsophosphaera bavlensis Shepeleva, Reference Shepeleva1963.
Asperatopsophosphaera umishanensis Xingand Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973
1973 Asperatopsophosphaera umishanensis Reference Xing and LiuXing and Liu, p. 21, pl. 2, figs. 2, 3.
Holotype
Specimen 4-7/1858(3), illustrated by Xing and Liu (Reference Xing and Liu1973, pl. 2, fig. 2).
Description
Spherical cells with a granular surface and a dense wall. Cells are 26.7–55.4 μm in diameter (mean=35.5 μm; N=15). Some possess uneven outlines (Fig. 10.7).
Remarks
Granular ornamentation on microfossils from the late Paleoproterozoic were considered taphonomic signatures (Peng et al., 2007; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009). On this basis, the existence of the taxon A. umishanensis became debatable. According to some previously reported materials and new specimens in the Dahongyu Formation, granular-surfaced and dense-walled A. umishanensis emerged from the Dahongyu Formation, and became more abundant upwards in the Jixian Group (Xing and Liu, Reference Xing and Liu1973; Sun, Reference Sun2006). Granular ornamentation on their surface is clear and uniform, which is different from cracks and foldings resulting from biological decay or diagenesis (Zhang and Liu, Reference Zhang and Liu1991). For these reasons, we assign these specimens to A. umishanensis.
Genus Leioarachnitum Andreeva et al., Reference Andreeva1966
Type species
Leioarachnitum vittatum Andreeva et al., Reference Andreeva1966.
Leioarachnitum sp. indet.
Description
Solitary and fusiform units with a medial split that is parallel to the long axis direction. Walls are dense and opaque. Both ends taper and are rounded or blunt. Cells are 8–53 μm long (mean=31 μm; N=23) and 4–27 μm wide (mean=15 μm; N=23). Length is 2–3 times greater than the width. Some of their medial splits are open, but others are not.
Remarks
Leioarachnitum sp. has been reported as “boat-shaped microfossils” from cherts of the Gaoyuzhuang Formation, Jixian section (Cao, Reference Cao2005, p. 547). The emergence of some specimens of Leioarachnitum sp. without rupture (Fig. 11.4, 11.5) in the new microbiota may demonstrate their features before excystment. Therefore, Leioarachnitum sp. is probably a different microorganism from those roll-ups of half envelope in Chuanlinggou Formation (Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009). Medial split-bearing “Schizofusa” from the Changcheng Group has the same fusiform characteristic, but also reveals that they are rolled up “half envelopes” (Yan, Reference Yan1982, Reference Yan1985; Yan and Liu, Reference Yan and Liu1993; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Bao and Yuan2009). Unlike the “Schizofusa” specimens, Leioarachnitum sp. from the Dahongyu Formation is a whole envelope, which is in accord with the original description of “Schizofusa” (Yan, Reference Yan1982). Their medial splits have been interpreted as excystment structures of eukaryotic algae (Lamb et al., 2009), which seems reasonable for the Leioarachnitum sp. described here.
Unnamed Form 1
Description
Spherical cell with a broken, neck-like extension. Cells sizes 76–80 μm in diameter (N=3). Their walls are transparent and smooth-surfaced.
Discussion
Extensions with different morphology have been observed on Tappania, which is the characteristic microfossil in coeval strata. Detailed morphology of these specimens, especially the neck-like extensions, is needed before comparing to Tappania.
Unnamed Form 2
Description
Cells are spheroidal, occurring in pairs within a common organic wall. The outer wall is coarsely granulated. The cell pair is 25 μm in width and 41 μm in length (N=1).
Discussion
Cell pairs from the Bitter Spring Formation have been named Eozygion and then interpreted as a synonym of the Gloeodiniopsis (Schopf and Blacic, Reference Schopf and Blacic1971; Knoll and Golubic, Reference Knoll and Golubic1979). The Dahongyu specimens are different from the Bitter Spring specimens because of their granulated surface.
Unnamed Form 3
Description
Cells are spheroidal, occurring in pairs without a common envelope. The larger cell of the pair is 33 μm in length and 30 μm in width. The smaller cell is 17 μm in length and 22 μm in width (N=1). The outer surface is smooth.
Unnamed Form 4
Description
Dividing cells without any common envelope. Cells are lentiform in morphology, and are connected to each other by their elongated wall in the direction of the long axis. Cells have smooth and transparent outer surfaces. Cells vary from 39.5–49 μm in length and range from 29 to 32 μm in width (N=1). Two cells are conjoined by their elongated outer wall.
Unnamed Form 5
Description
Solitary spherical microfossils with a single spine-like structure on its surface. Cells vary in diameter from 30–34 μm (N=2). Cell wall is non-transparent and smooth-surfaced. The cell wall is approximately 2 μm in thickness.
Discussion
Unnamed Form 5 differs from other spherical microfossils by having a single spine-like structure on the surface.
Unnamed Form 6
Description
Microfossil is vase-like in shape, 336 μm in length and 248 μm in width. The neck-like structure is 70 μm in width and 50 μm in length (N=1).
Discussion
This specimen has a similar outline to the vase-shaped microfossil Cycliocyrillium torquata, which was reported from the Neoproterozoic Chuar Group (Porter et al., Reference Porter, Meisterfeld and Knoll2003, figs. 6–15). However, no reinforced margin as that in the vase-shaped microfossils (VSM) has been observed on the new specimen. VSM occur only in the Neoproterozoic. It is not appropriate to claim the relationship between the new specimen and real VSM, since only one specimen has been found in the new microbiota. Therefore, in the interim, it is considered as a new type of potential protist.
Unnamed Form 7
Description
Vesicle with short and loosely distributed spine-like ornamentation on the cell surface. Spines do not branch. Cells are 25–101 μm in diameter. Spines are 2–7 μm (N=2) in length.
Discussion
Only two poorly preserved specimens have been recovered and they have been categorized under undetermined species temporarily.
Colonially preserved spherical microfossils: (1) Glenobotrydion varioforme: 2007XHYD_47_5 (indicated as 1a) and Eosynechococcus moorei: 2007XHYD_47_5 (indicated as 1b); (2) Glenobotrydion varioforme: 2007XHYD_1_2; (3), Coccostratus dispergens: 2012XHYD_25_15; (4) Myxococcoides sp.: 2012XHYD_1_1; (5) Myxococcoides sp.: 2007XHYD_4_10. All scale bars=10 μm.
Gloeodiniopsis sp.: (1–3) aggregates of Gloeodiniopsis sp.: 2012XHYD_6_4; (4) splitting cell with a split surface (indicated by black arrow): 2012XHYD_6_4; (5) elongated envelope containing two cells: 2012XHYD_6_4; (6) broken envelope with a small cell: 2012XHYD_6_4; (7–9) cells with two or three layers of envelopes: 2012XHYD_6_4; (10–12) cells with dark inclusions: 2012XHYD_6_4. All scale bars=25 μm.
Spherical microfossils: (1, 2) Tetraphycus gregalis: 2007XHYD_3_11; (3, 4) Coniunctiophycus majorinum: (3) 2012XHYD_16_45; (4) 2012XHUD_25_13; (5–8) Clonophycus sp.: (5) 2012XHYD_25_1a; (6) 2012XHYD_16_4; (7) 2012XHYD_1_16; (8) 2012XHYD_25_11; (9) Myxococcoides grandis: 2012XHYD_6_11; (10–18) Leiosphaeridia sp.: (10) 2012XHYD_14_18; (11) 2012XHYD_25_14; (12) 2007XHYD_4_11; (13) 2012XHYD_25_13; (14) 2012XHYD_4_1; (15) 2012XHYD_20_16; (16) 2012XHYD_20_18; (17) 2012XHYD_7_25; (18) 2012XHYD_16_14; (19) Pterospermopsimorpha sp.: 2007XHYD_3_18. Scale bars are (1–11) 10 μm and (12–19) 50 μm.
Spherical microfossils: (1–5) Leiosphaeridia sp.: (1) 2007XHYD_4_19; (2) 2007XHYD_47_5; (3) 2007XHYD_3_5; (4) 2007XHYD_3_5; (5) 2012XHYD_21_8; (6–9) Asperatopsophosphaera umishanensis: (6) 2007XHYD_2_1; (7) 2007XHYD_2_1; (8) 2007XHYD_4_10a; (9) 2007XHYD_4_17; (10, 11) Dictyosphaera macroreticulta: (10) 2012XHYD_21_17; (11) 2012XHYD_16_14. Scale bars are (1–3) 50 μm and (4–18) 40 μm.
Allochthonous forms: (1–5) Leioarachnitum sp.: (1) 2012XHYD_3_16; (2) 2012XHYD_3_14; (3) 2007XHYD_3_11; (4) 2012XHYD_14_20; (5) 2012XHYD_25_14; (6, 7) Leiosphaeridia minutissima: 2012XHYD_7_25; (8) Unnamed Form 1 spherical microfossil with broken, neck-like extension: 2007XHYD_2_3a; (9) Unnamed Form 2 rough-surfaced dyad spherical microfossil: 2007XHYD_2_1; (10) Unnamed Form 3 inequable dyad spherical microfossils: 2012XHYD_14_1a; (11) Unnamed Form 4 dividing cells: 2007XHYD_2_1; (12) Unnamed Form 5 spherical microfossil with a spine-like structure: 2007XHYD_3_22; (13) Unnamed Form 6 vase-shaped microfossil?: 2012XHYD_6_4; (14, 15) Unnamed Form 7, probable acanthomorphic acritarch: 2007XHYD_4_24. All scale bars=30 μm.
Xiaohongyuia sinica Shi and Feng n. gen. n. sp.: (1) 2007XHYD_4_7; (2) 2007XHYD_4_10; (3) 2007XHYD_4_8; (4) 2007XHYD_4_21; (5) 2007XHYD_4_23; (6) 2007XHYD_4_14a; (7) 2007XHYD_4_14; (8) 2007XHYD_4_21; (9) holotype 2007XHYD_4_14; (10) 2007XHYD_4_17; (11) 2007XHYD_4_17; (12) 2007XHYD_4_10. All scale bars=30 μm.
Diameter-frequency distributions of isolated individuals of coccoidal microfossils. Gray bars indicate spherical microfossils <60 μm in diameter; black bars indicate spherical microfossils >60 μm in diameter.
Acknowledgments
This research project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41502008), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M572221), and the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB808800). We thank Z. Adam, M. Sharma, and another anonymous reviewer for their critical but inspiring comments on the manuscript. We thank the Editor B. Pratt, Associate Editor N. Butterfield, and Managing Editor S. Marcus for reviewing the manuscript and helping with format. We thank Xin Qian, Guozhen Xu, Tianyu Zhao, and Yan Zhang for their assistance during field works.
