Introduction
In the global context (64,031 described species of rove beetles according to Newton, Reference Newton, Roskov, Ower, Orrell, Nicolson, Bailly, Kirk, Bourgoin, DeWalt, Decock, Nieukerken, Zarucchi and Penev2019), the New Zealand rove beetle fauna is significant and peculiar. It accounts for 936 native species with >90% of them being endemic, including some undescribed species, as estimated by Klimaszewski et al. (Reference Klimaszewski, Newton and Thayer1996). Particularly notable for the native New Zealand fauna is the absence of many major rove beetle lineages that are otherwise widespread elsewhere, for example the subtribe Philonthina of the tribe Staphylinini (Solodovnikov and Brunke, Reference Solodovnikov and Brunke2016). Equally as notable is the presence of several rove beetle groups that underwent extensive species radiation there, some of which exhibit disjunct distributions on the continents that once formed Gondwana, or were connected afterwards, such as, for example, the South America-Australia connection via Antarctica. One such example is the tribe Amblyopinini of the subfamily Staphylininae, which are extremely diverse in Australia, New Guinea, New Caledonia, New Zealand, and South America, and form several clades consisting of species from these different landmasses (Jenkins Shaw et al., Reference Jenkins Shaw, Żyła and Solodovnikov2020). After being considered as a subtribe of the tribe Staphylinini, Amblyopinini were recently returned to tribe status in the course of a broader phylogenetic study and reclassification of the subfamily Staphylininae (Żyła and Solodovnikov, Reference Żyła and Solodovnikov2020). Very soon after, Tihelka et al. (Reference Tihelka, Thayer, Newton and Cai2020) reinstated them as a subtribe Amblyopinina of the tribe Staphylinini in a study that did not show significant phylogenetic conflict with Żyła and Solodovnikov (Reference Żyła and Solodovnikov2020), even though it claimed so. The disagreement between Żyła and Solodovnikov (Reference Żyła and Solodovnikov2020) and Tihelka et al. (Reference Tihelka, Thayer, Newton and Cai2020) mainly concerns the taxonomic interpretation of the largely similar phylogenetic pattern. Here we follow the classification of Żyła and Solodovnikov (Reference Żyła and Solodovnikov2020), which seems to us better justified, especially with regard to the tribal status of Amblyopinini. In New Zealand the tribe is represented by 54 described species with an estimated 30+ species awaiting description (Solodovnikov and Brunke, Reference Solodovnikov and Brunke2016; Solodovnikov, unpublished data). As estimated in the molecular phylogeny of Jenkins Shaw et al. (Reference Jenkins Shaw, Żyła and Solodovnikov2020), the New Zealand amblyopinines form several lineages with species mainly from Australia, including Tasmania and South America (Jenkins Shaw et al., Reference Jenkins Shaw, Żyła and Solodovnikov2020, p. 438, fig. 4, clades F2–F5). This phylogenetic pattern is not translated into new classification yet—the majority of described species of New Zealand and Australian amblyopinines are still incorrectly placed in the genus Quedius Stephens, Reference Stephens1829, which, according to phylogenetic studies (Solodovnikov, Reference Solodovnikov2006; Brunke et al., Reference Brunke, Chatzimanolis, Schillhammer and Solodovnikov2016; Cai et al., Reference Cai, Wang, Liang, Yin, Thayer, Newton and Zhou2019; Jenkins Shaw et al., Reference Jenkins Shaw, Żyła and Solodovnikov2020; Tihelka et al., Reference Tihelka, Thayer, Newton and Cai2020; Żyła and Solodovnikov, Reference Żyła and Solodovnikov2020) is a north temperate group from a different tribe Quediini. The large/diverse fauna of the tribe Amblyopinini, including that of New Zealand, awaits generic reclassification (Jenkins Shaw et al., Reference Jenkins Shaw, Żyła and Solodovnikov2020). In New Zealand, only a small number of morphologically derived species have been described as new genera by earlier authors. Of them, the genus Sphingoquedius Bernhauer, Reference Bernhauer1941, currently including two species, S. strandi Bernhauer, Reference Bernhauer1941 and S. novaezeelandiae (Duvivier, Reference Duvivier1883) (Solodovnikov and Brunke, Reference Solodovnikov and Brunke2016), certainly will accommodate a substantial chunk of New Zealand amblyopinines based on the currently available phylogenetic data.
Despite having what is presumed to be a relatively long evolutionary history, amblyopinines are poorly represented in the fossil record, with just three species described, all from the wide-spread genus Heterothops Stephens, Reference Stephens1829 (Table 1). Two species are described from Dominican amber (Chatzimanolis and Engel, Reference Chatzimanolis and Engel2013) and one (doubtful) from the Florissant Formation, Colorado, U.S.A. (Scudder, Reference Scudder1900). Therefore, any new fossils of this group are of great interest, especially from the Southern Hemisphere, where the rove beetle fossil record became the subject of research only very recently (Schomann and Solodovnikov, Reference Schomann and Solodovnikov2012; Cai et al., Reference Cai, Yan, Beattie, Wang and Huang2013, Reference Cai, Beattie and Huang2015).
Described Amblyopinini fossils.
* Placement in the genus considered doubtful (Jenkins Shaw et al., Reference Jenkins Shaw, Żyła and Solodovnikov2020)
Here, we describe Sphingoquedius meto new species (Figs. 1, 2.1) as the first rove beetle from the Foulden Maar fossil-Lagerstätte, New Zealand. The beetle is assigned to the tribe Amblyopinini of the subfamily Staphylininae and compared to extant members of that diverse, biogeographically interesting tribe. The paleocological significance of this fossil is discussed.
(1) Photograph of the holotype OU46635 of Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. (2) Reconstructed line drawing of the holotype OU46635 of Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. ABTC = anterior basal transverse carina, ASR = anterior scutellar ridge, LTSIX = lateral tergal sclerites X, MD = mandibles, NR = nuchal ridge, PBTC = Posterior basal transverse carina, RS = radiating setae, SP = spur, Ta = tarsomeres, T = tergites. Antennomeres are numbered 1–8 (right antenna) and 1–11 (left antenna). Scale bar = 1.0 mm.
(1) Holotype OU46635 of Sphingoquedius meto n. sp.: head and pronotum, close up of microsculpture (inset). (2, 3) Sphingoquedius strandi Bernhauer, Reference Bernhauer1941: habitus (2); close-up of tergites III and IV (3). (4) ‘Quedius’ vividus (Broun, Reference Broun1880): elytra and tergites III and IV. (5) ‘Quedius’ inaequalipennis Lea, Reference Lea1925: tergites III, IV, and V. PR = Pronotum. Scale bars: (1) = 0.5 mm, (2–5) = 1.0 mm.
Geological setting
The Foulden Maar fossil-Lagerstätte in southern New Zealand provides an opportunity to contribute to the study of numerous arthropod groups and to reconstruct an earliest Miocene Southern Hemisphere mid-latitude lake/forest ecosystem (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kaulfuss, Conran, Bannister and Lindqvist2016). The Foulden Maar is a partly eroded maar-diatreme volcano of the Waipiata Volcanic Field, Otago, which erupted in the latest Oligocene at 23.2 Ma (Lindqvist and Lee, Reference Lindqvist and Lee2009). The maar crater is filled by a ~190 m thick sequence of lacustrine mass-flow sediments and highly fossiliferous diatomite, which represents a depositional period of ca. 130,000 years and spans the Oligocene/Miocene boundary (Fox et al., Reference Fox, Wartho, Wilson, Lee, Nelson and Kaulfuss2015; Kaulfuss, Reference Kaulfuss2017). A macro- and microflora, fish, and numerous arthropods (insects and spiders) excavated from the uppermost 10 m of the diatomite are considered to be of earliest Miocene age (Mildenhall et al., Reference Mildenhall, Kennedy, Lee, Kaulfuss, Bannister, Fox and Conran2014; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kaulfuss, Conran, Bannister and Lindqvist2016). In an overview of the fossil arthropod fauna from this site, Kaulfuss et al. (Reference Kaulfuss, Lee, Barratt, Leschen, Larivière, Dlussky, Henderson and Harris2015) mentioned several coleopteran families, including at least two rove beetle genera, one in the subfamily Osoriinae and the other a possible Pselaphinae, which so far remain undescribed.
Locality information
Foulden Maar diatomite, earliest Miocene, near Middlemarch, Otago, New Zealand (45.5269°S, 170.2191°E; New Zealand Fossil Record File I43/f8503).
Materials and methods
The fossil is an incompletely preserved dorsal compression, therefore ventral characters are not visible (Fig. 1.1). The head and prothorax are apparently directed left and downwards. Only the left presumed mesotibiae and tarsomeres are preserved (Fig. 1). The left antenna is completely preserved, the right antenna is represented by antennomeres 1–8.
The fossil was prepared using fine needles and paint brushes, and photographed under ethanol with a Canon T3 camera attached to a Nikon SMZ1000 stereomicroscope. Photomicrographs taken at several depths of field were stacked using Photoshop CS5.1 software (Adobe Systems Inc.).
Measurements were taken using ImageJ (Schneider et al., Reference Schneider, Rasband and Eliceiri2012) and are given in millimeters (mm). The following measurements were taken: TL (total body length from apex of frons to apex of abdominal segment X); EL (elytral length from apex of scutellum to posterior inner edge of elytra); HL (head length from frons to nuchal ridge); AL (antennae length)
Repository and institutional abbreviation
The type material is deposited in the Museum of the Geology Department, University of Otago (OU), New Zealand.
Systematic paleontology
Order Coleoptera Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758
Family Staphylinindae Latreille, Reference Latreille1802
Subfamily Staphylininae Latreille, Reference Latreille1802
Tribe Amblyopinini Seevers, Reference Seevers1944
Genus Sphingoquedius Bernhauer, Reference Bernhauer1941
Type species: Sphingoquedius strandi Bernhauer, Reference Bernhauer1941
Holotype
OU46635. Male(?). Foulden Maar, early Miocene (23.2 ± 0.2 Ma), near Middlemarch, Otago, New Zealand.
Diagnosis
Among all species of Amblyopinini, including two extant species that are currently formally in this genus, Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. can be diagnosed by a combination of the rather large eyes, distinct isodiametric microsculpture of the pronotum (Figs. 1, 2.1), elytra with variegate (arranged multidirectionally) setae, abdominal tergite III with posterior basal transverse carina, abdominal tergite IV with patch of radiating setae, and abdominal tergite VI with medially sinuate anterior basal transverse carina (Fig. 1).
Occurrence
Foulden Maar diatomite, earliest Miocene, near Middlemarch, Otago, New Zealand (45.5269°S, 170.2191°E; New Zealand Fossil Record File I43/f8503).
Description
Medium-sized rove beetle, characteristically elongate. Elytra approximately quadrate. Abdomen elongate, tapering to the end. Measurements: TL = 5 mm; EL = 0.6 mm, HL = 0.48 mm, AL = 1.24 mm.
Head apparently rather elongate, appearing to have a metallic shimmer; eyes, as far as discernable, occupying approximately half of head length. Nuchal ridge present dorsally (Fig. 1.2, NR). Antennae 11 segmented: all antennomeres elongate, except antennomeres 5–7, about as long as wide each. Antennomere 11 approximately twice as long as wide. Mandible(s) relatively long, acutely pointed apically (Fig. 1.2, MD).
Pronotum, with broadly rounded, indistinct hind angles, appearing somewhat metallic, with distinct isodiametric microsculpture (Figs. 1.1, 2.1).
Elytra as long as wide. Scutellum apparently with anterior scutellar ridge only (Fig. 1.2, ASR); unpunctured, except for some apparent setae in the posterior third. Elytral humerus rounded, without spines. Side of elytra with long macro setae in anterior quarter. Elytra with dense multidirectionally arranged (variegate) setation.
Abdomen (Fig. 1.2, T III to T VIII, LTSIX) tergites III to VII each with two pairs of paratergites. Tergite III with anterior and posterior basal transverse carinae (Fig. 1.2, ABTC, PBTC). Tergite IV with anterior basal transverse carina (Fig. 1.2, ABTC) and probably a pair of patches of long radiating setae (preserved on one side of tergite; Fig. 1.2, RS). Anterior basal transverse carina of tergite VI sinuate medially. Tergite VIII with medium-long radiated setae on surface and row of longer setae along apical margin. Apical portion of tergite X rounded and setose. Lateral tergal sclerites IX relatively long, inflated, with apical clusters of numerous strong and long setae (Fig. 1.2, LTSIX).
Legs not well preserved. Tibiae (presumably mesotibiae) with at least one spur apically (Fig. 1.2, SP). Tarsi (presumably mesotarsi) consisting of five tarsomeres (Fig. 1.2, T1–T5)
Etymology
The specific epithet is the Māori verb meto, to become extinct.
Remarks
The new species is tentatively assigned to the genus Sphingoquedius, however it is supported by several shared morphological characters. The recognition and definition of Sphingoquedius is likely to change in the future since the extant fauna of New Zealand Amblyopinini requires revision at the genus level.
Order Coleoptera Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758
Family Staphylinindae Latreille, Reference Latreille1802
Subfamily Staphylininae Latreille, Reference Latreille1802
Staphylininae incertae sedis
Material
OU45239. Female.
Remarks
This is the specimen earlier referred to as a stonefly (Plectoptera, Austroperlidae) by Kaulfuss et al. (Reference Kaulfuss, Lee, Barratt, Leschen, Larivière, Dlussky, Henderson and Harris2015). After further preparation and imaging, it can now be identified as a female staphylinid due to the presence of distinct valvifers at the abdominal apex. This specimen could represent a second species of fossil amblyopinine, however preservation is too incomplete to be certain.
Discussion
Systematic position of Sphingoquedius meto n. sp.—Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. is undoubtedly a rove beetle (Staphylinidae) due to the distinctive elongate habitus and discernible morphological characters: antennae 11 segmented, short elytra with the abdomen exposed, and others. Although insufficient preservation does not allow observation of certain informative characters for sub-familial placement, the overall habitus, body proportions, slender antennae, abdomen with two pairs of paratergites, and long inflated apical portions of lateral tergal sclerites X suggest its placement in the subfamily Staphylininae. The overall habitus, the distinct isodiametric microsculpture on the pronotum, multidirectionally arranged setae on the elytra, and presence of patches of radiating setae on abdominal tergites (preserved only on the fourth abdominal tergite) provide strong evidence that the fossil belongs to the tribe Amblyopinini. This combination of characters, even the long inflated apical portions of the lateral tergal sclerites IX alone, also exclude its placement in the morphologically similar and related subfamily Paederinae, or in the sister, albeit generally more distinct, subfamily Xantholininae. The only other tribe of Staphylininae that could potentially exhibit such a combination of characters is Quediini, however our fossil can be excluded from Quediini due to the scutellum with anterior scutellar ridge only (anterior and posterior scutellar ridge present in Quediini and most other tribes of Staphylininae). Exclusion of Quediini is also supported by the restriction of the recent members of this tribe to the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere only. Quediines are absent in the Southern Hemisphere (except as human-assisted introductions), whereas Amblyopinini are the dominant staphylinine group in the recent temperate fauna of the Southern Hemisphere and New Zealand in particular. Considering that the New Zealand fauna of Ambiopinini requires complete generic revision, here we can only tentatively assign this fossil to the genus Sphingoquedius (also see Introduction) based on several morphological characters justifying such a placement. These are the rather large eyes and presence of patches of radiating setae on abdominal tergites (in the fossil preserved only on tergite IV) (Figs. 1.2, 2.3). The patches of radiating setae occur in several described and undescribed recent amblyopinines in New Zealand and its Subantarctic Islands. In New Zealand, such described species are for example ‘Q.’ aucklandicus Cameron, Reference Cameron1947, ‘Q.’ latifrons Sharp, Reference Sharp1886, ‘Q.’ latimanus Broun, Reference Broun1893, and ‘Q.’ vividus (Broun, Reference Broun1880) (Fig. 2.4), and ‘Quedius’ aliiceps Cameron, Reference Cameron1948 in the Subantarctic Islands (Auckland Island). The patches of radiating setae also occur in taxa from South America and Australia (e.g., ‘Quedius’ inaequalipennis Lea, Reference Lea1925; Fig. 2.5). The multidirectionally arranged setae on the elytra also occur in several species of amblyopinines from around the tribe's distribution range, and in New Zealand in particular in ‘Quedius’ vividus. The isodiametric microsculpture on the pronotum is the most notable trait of the fossil because among all other free living Amblyopinini it occurs only in a very few recent species from New Zealand or its Subantarctic Islands: in ‘Quedius’ latimanus, ‘Q.’ aeneiventris Broun, Reference Broun1910, one undescribed species from the Snares from New Zealand, and in ‘Q.’ aliiceps (Auckland Island) from the Subantarctic Islands. However, in ‘Quedius’ latimanus and ‘Q.’ aeneiventris, it is much less developed compared to the fossil, while in ‘Q.’ aliiceps it is combined with rough punctuation (absent in the fossil). From all mentioned recent species with the isodiametric microsculpture, Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. obviously differs in various characters, including habitus. The specimen is tentatively identified as a male due to the apparent absence of valvifers, although this could be preservation bias. Based on our character assessment and knowledge of amblyopinine morphological diversity, Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. is part of the clade that includes morphologically diverse, mostly New Zealand and some Australian taxa (Jenkins Shaw et al., Reference Jenkins Shaw, Żyła and Solodovnikov2020, p. 438, fig. 4, clade F3). Therefore, Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. appears nested within a clade closer to the crown of the amblyopinine phylogeny diversity of the tribe. Detailed species- and genus-level revision of the recent amblyopinine diversity and possible new findings of better-preserved fossils may help to place this species in a recent species group where, probably, such an unusual character as the isodiametric microsculpture on the pronotum exhibited by the fossil may play an important role.
Biogeography
The fossil record of the rove beetle tribe Amblyopinini is very poor and homogenous, with only three fossils known so far, of which one is very doubtful (Table 1). The two Dominican amber fossils show a strong resemblance to the type and other species of Heterothops from North and South America. Interestingly, Heterothops is one of only two genera of Amblyopinini (the other being Ctenandropus Cameron, Reference Cameron1926) that have wide distributions, reaching the Northern Hemisphere, which is not typical in this tribe. Presumably they dispersed into the Northern Hemisphere (Jenkins Shaw et al., Reference Jenkins Shaw, Żyła and Solodovnikov2020). Those fossils are relevant for any research on the phylogeny and biogeography of Amblyopinini, especially with regards to understanding the origins of Heterothops in the Northern Hemisphere. But they are not informative for understanding the evolution of the core diversity of the tribe, which is confined to the south temperate areas of the globe.
Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. is the first fossil with such potential. It is also the first Southern Hemisphere record of Amblyopinini, and the first fossil rove beetle to be described from New Zealand. With its earliest Miocene age, it represents the fauna after the partial (Cooper and Cooper, Reference Cooper and Cooper1995) or complete (Landis et al., Reference Landis, Campbell, Begg, Mildenhall, Paterson and Trewick2008) submergence of Zealandia in the late Oligocene at 25–23 Ma. Sedimentological and paleontological data (e.g., Lee et al., Reference Lee, Lindqvist, Beu, Robinson, Ayress, Morgans and Stein2014; Mortimer and Strong, Reference Mortimer and Strong2014) and recent reviews of molecular data (e.g., Wallis and Jorge, Reference Wallis and Jorge2018) provide no support for complete inundation of land area, suggesting that at least some of the terrestrial biota survived the Oligocene maximum marine transgression. It is not the purpose of this paper to make a judgement on these issues, merely to note that our fossil could be informative in this respect. It is possible that Amblyopinini as a lineage may have persisted in New Zealand since its shared history with the rest of Gondwana (i.e., probably even predating the separation of New Zealand from Australia, ca. 80 Myr). Other Miocene insects from New Zealand also represent lineages that mainly diversified before the breakup of Gondwana and presumably persisted in New Zealand until the Miocene or to the present day, including termites (Engel and Kaulfuss, Reference Engel and Kaulfuss2017), ants (Kaulfuss and Dlussky, Reference Kaulfuss and Dlussky2015), and tettigarctid cicadas (Kaulfuss and Moulds, Reference Kaulfuss and Moulds2015). Alternatively, if the Amblyopinini lineage represented by Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. colonized New Zealand by transoceanic dispersal in the Cenozoic, this must have happened in or before the earliest Miocene. Additionally, Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. may be informative as a minimum-age fossil calibration point in any future phylogenetic studies seeking to elucidate the temporal evolution of the group in New Zealand and elsewhere.
Paleoecology
Based on sedimentological and paleontological reconstructions, Foulden Maar was a ~2 km diameter and ~300 m deep, hydrologically closed lake (Lindqvist and Lee, Reference Lindqvist and Lee2009; Kaulfuss, Reference Kaulfuss2017). Surrounding the lake was a complex Lauraceae-dominated notophyll vine rainforest with diverse understory vegetation (Bannister et al., Reference Bannister, Conran and Lee2012), in contrast to regional Nothofagus Blume, Reference Blume1851 and conifer-dominated forests growing at some distance from the lake (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kaulfuss, Conran, Bannister and Lindqvist2016). Documented foragers on the forest floor include ants, rove beetles, and other beetles (including Cerambycidae, Chrysomelidae, Curculionidae, and possibly Hydrophilidae) (Kaulfuss et al., Reference Kaulfuss, Lee, Barratt, Leschen, Larivière, Dlussky, Henderson and Harris2015). Paleoclimate estimates suggest that the mean annual temperature was between 18°C and 21°C, compared to current temperatures of between 6°C and 15°C (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kaulfuss, Conran, Bannister and Lindqvist2016). All amblyopinine rove beetles are active predators, particularly in the forest-floor leaf litter, debris, fungi, and even in the fur of mammals (Ashe and Timm, Reference Ashe and Timm1987; Solodovnikov and Jenkins Shaw, Reference Solodovnikov and Jenkins Shaw2017). Presumably, as we can guess for many recent forest-associated New Zealand amblyopinines, Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. was probably an active predator of small invertebrates in this rainforest environment, where it potentially coexisted with other as yet undiscovered amblyopinine taxa.
Conclusions
Description and systematic placement of fossil taxa contributes to the reconstruction of paleoenvironments and their associated ecology and biogeographical components. Here, we described the new species Sphingoquedius meto, the first beetle from the Foulden Maar fossil-Lagerstätte. It is from the tribe Amblyopinini, a group that dominates the Southern Hemisphere temperate forest leaf litter and other terrestrial habitats. The discovery of Sphingoquedius meto n. sp. places a minimum age on the presence of amblyopinines in New Zealand at the earliest Miocene, although we suspect their evolutionary history in this biogeographically complex region significantly predates this age. The new species may represent an amblyopinine lineage associated with the Foulden paleo-rainforest that went extinct with cooling temperatures in or after the late Miocene. It is likely that more new species of amblyopinine and other rove beetles will be discovered from Foulden Maar and other emerging New Zealand fossil deposits in the future.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the Gibson family for allowing access to the fossil site, and D. Lee for coordinating paleontological research at Foulden Maar over many years. Research at Foulden Maar was supported by the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund (grant number UOO-11 15). This work was funded by a Chinese Academy of Sciences President's International Fellowship Initiative for Postdoctoral Fellows (Grant No. 2019PB0090) to JJS, German Research Foundation (project 429296833), National Natural Science Foundation of China (numbers 31672345, 31961143002), and GDAS Special Project of Science and Technology Development (No. 2020GDASYL-20200102021, 2020GDASYL-20200301003).
