Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T11:14:54.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testing the sensitivity of geophysical proxies for climate reconstructions along a narrow precipitation gradient in the Middle Danube Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2026

Mathias Vinnepand*
Affiliation:
LIAG-Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany Université de Rennes, Géosciences Rennes, CNRS, Campus Beaulieu, bat 15, 35000 Rennes, France
Christian Laag
Affiliation:
LIAG-Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany Université de Paris, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, 1 rue Jussieu, 75238 Paris, France Department of Research and Development, Nolte Geoservices GmbH, Hanns-Martin-Schleyer-Straße 14, 48301 Nottuln, Germany
Milica G. Bosnić
Affiliation:
Chair of Physical Geography, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Kamila Ryzner
Affiliation:
LIAG-Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany
Anne-Christine Da Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Liège, SediCClim, Sart Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
Milivoj B. Gavrilov
Affiliation:
Chair of Physical Geography, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Christian Rolf
Affiliation:
LIAG-Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany
Slobodan B. Marković
Affiliation:
Division of Geochronology and Environmental Isotopes, Institute of Physics – Centre for Science and Education, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 22B, Gliwice, 44-100 Poland LAPER -Laboratory for Paleoenvironmental research, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences, KnezMihajlova 35, Belgrade, 11000 Serbia University of Montenegro, Cetinjska 2, Podgorica, 81000 Montenegro
Jordana Ninkov
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Soil and Agroecology, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21101 Novi Sad, Serbia
France Lagroix
Affiliation:
Université de Paris, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, 1 rue Jussieu, 75238 Paris, France
Christian Zeeden*
Affiliation:
LIAG-Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany
*
Corresponding authors: Mathias Vinnepand; Email: mathias.vinnepand@geologie.uni-freiburg.de; Christian Zeeden; Email: Christian.Zeeden@liag-institute.de
Corresponding authors: Mathias Vinnepand; Email: mathias.vinnepand@geologie.uni-freiburg.de; Christian Zeeden; Email: Christian.Zeeden@liag-institute.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Climate oscillations may strongly modify continental precipitation and temperature patterns, therefore understanding their history is relevant for comprehending effects of past and ongoing climate changes. For this purpose, temperature and precipitation reconstructions beyond the instrumental record are extremely useful. As widespread terrestrial archives, loess–paleosol sequences are viable targets for such analyses. Consequently, cost-efficient geophysical proxies have gained increasing attention, but little is known about their capability to reflect even narrow climatic differences. Here we assess the sensitivity of rock-magnetic and photo-spectrometric properties of topsoil samples (n = 50) along uncorrelated, mean annual precipitation (MAP: 525±1 mm/yr to 584±1 mm/yr) and mean annual temperature (MAT: 10.8±0.1 °C to 11.2±0.1 °C) gradients across the Bačka Loess Plateau (Serbia) and test a multivariate approach. Most proxies are sensitive to MAP <565±1 mm/yr, especially anhysteretic remanent magnetization (r2 = 0.81). Applying a multivariate approach to hysteresis data reveals a robust relationship between precipitation (r2 = 0.63), aridity (r2 = 0.67) and physical properties over the entire MAP range. Although the approach needs to be further tested considering different climates, regression analyses, and timescales, our study indicates that multi-proxy approaches may increase the robustness with respect to single-proxy measurements for MAP and aridity reconstructions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Quaternary Research Center.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map based on a digital elevation model (GLOBE 1.0; WGS84) showing southeastern Europe during the last glacial maximum (LGM, centered at ca. 22 ka). The Bačka Loess Plateau (BLP, Serbia), is within the Middle Danube Basin. This special setting favored the accumulation of the oldest known LPS in Europe and supports a rather homogenous mineral dust assemblage in terms of provenance (Danube and Tisza catchment, local mountain ranges), which was favorable for our study. We checked the spatial substrate homogeneity across the BLP using XRF data to constrain any loess-provenance-related study bias. Loess distribution as outlined by Lehmkuhl et al. (2021); LGM ice extent from Ehlers and Gibbard, (2004).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Distribution of mean annual precipitation (MAP) and mean annual temperature (MAT) across the Bačka Loess Plateau (Serbia) (modified after Radaković et al., 2019) derived from proximal meteorological stations (see supplement in Radaković et al., 2019, for their exact locations). A narrow but measurable MAP gradient exists between the eastern and western parts of the loess plateau. The MAT gradient is close to the measuring error and generally follows a south–north direction. Both MAP and MAT are uncorrelated—a situation that seldomly prevails across Eurasia—favoring assessment of the effects of MAP versus MAT on multivariate geophysical parameters. These have been measured on 50 samples (white dots) across the plateau, complementing Radaković et al. (2019).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Principal component analyses (PCA) with the first principal component (PC) carrying 54.1 % of the explained variance in the dataset. While this PC is clearly dominant, it is mainly driven by all considered magnetic parameters and the LOG Ca/Fe ratio that displays carbonate dissolution, re-precitation and enrichment of Fe during weathering. Both element ratios frequently applied as provenance indicators and measure for sediment inhomogeneity (LOG Ti/Zr and LOG Si/Al) govern PC2, which is clearly not dominant (only 15.7 % of the explained variance). Based on the behavior of all integrated parameters it appears as though PC1 carries the weathering signal, whereas PC2 is generally governed by sediment provenance.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (A) Classic magnetic enhancement during pedogenesis as a result of the accumulation of superparamagnetic and fine-grained, single-domain particles during soil formation (Zeeden et al., 2016). (B) Thermomagnetic experiment indicative for maghemite on a representative sample from the BLP. Between ∼230°C and 400°C χlf drops mainly due to the conversion of pedogenetically formed maghemite to hematite during heating (Gao et al., 2019). This can be used to calculate the maghemite content (dashed arrowed lines) by calculating the difference between χlf at 230°C and 400°C. For transparency, we provide the heating (red) and cooling (blue) χlf curves. Both may reflect mineral conversions and/or neo-formations in the experiment.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Comparison of selected geophysical parameters with mean annual precipitation (MAP). We coarsely grouped the parameters according to their capability to display low-coercivity minerals (e.g., magnetite, maghemite), high-coercivity minerals (e.g., hematite and goethite), and grainsize-dependent parameters (some in the other groups are also mildly magnetic- and/or grainsize dependent). Almost all parameters do not strongly increase linearly with MAP considering the slope of the initial regression lines if MAP exceeds 565 mm. From this boundary onwards the selected parameters either are not as sensitive to MAP or a different (linear) best-fit line needs to be applied considering higher MAP. The best linear fit between proxies sensitive for low-coercivity magnetic minerals below MAP 565 mm (blue regression line) applies to the ARM and the isolated part of χ assigned to ferrimagnetic minerals such as pedogenic maghemite, χtd (A) and geo- and pedogenic magnetite, χferri (B). From those proxies that are sensitive for hematite and goethite (D–F), the Hard Isothermal Remanent Magnetization (F) is most promising to reflect MAP, whereas the color-reconstructed goethite and hematite contents align worse for the investigated MAP interval. Considering the entire MAP range, the strongest linear relationship can be observed between the grainsize sensitive Δχ and MAP.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (A–C) Direct comparison between MAP, DMAI, and MAT to multi-regression analyses between frequently applied magnetic proxies in loess research that can be conducted in many laboratories and climate parameters. While the linear regressions indicate a moderate relationship to climate parameters, the more sophisticated approach using hysteresis parameters (D–F) yields a stronger relationship with more than an additional 10% of the explained variance that can be aligned to these.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Liner modeling between climate parameters and three principal components (all that exhibit Eigenvalues >1 extracted from a principal component analysis that we performed for all frequently applied magnetic proxies in loess research, all hysteresis parameters and the colorimetrically derived goethite and hematite contents) in comparison to the climatic parameters. For MAP and DMAI, this approach yields promising results, especially when considering the entire climatic transect range (e.g., MAP). We performed principal component analyses to achieve data-dimension reduction. This minimizes the risk for data overfitting during multi-regression analyses.

Figure 7

Table 1. Overview on the strengths of relationship between the investigated proxies, proxy combinations, and climate parameters. Here, we present r2 values that have been obtained between single proxies and MAP below 565 mm/yr and for the entire MAP range.

Supplementary material: File

Vinnepand et al. supplementary material

Vinnepand et al. supplementary material
Download Vinnepand et al. supplementary material(File)
File 312.3 KB