Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-r8qmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T09:11:41.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personality, prescriptivism, and pronouns

Factors influencing grammaticality judgments of gender-neutral language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2019

Evan D. Bradley ,
Maxwell Schmid  and
Hannah Lombardo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Because standard English lacks a true a gender-neutral singular pronoun, there has long been debate over how to refer to generic persons whose genders are unknown, or those who reject binary male or female identities. Singular (or epicene) ‘they’ has a long history as a pronoun to refer to individuals of unknown gender (Balhorn, 2004), and has also been adopted as a personal pronoun by those who identify as neither male nor female. Borthen (2010) argues based on a corpus study of Norwegian that, crosslinguistically, plural pronouns allow for vague reference, and that their lexical features (e.g., number, person) need not match their interpretation in context, which makes these pronouns prime candidates to be used in gender-neutral contexts. Chen and Wu (2011) contend that this is true for both singular and plural pronouns, but Borthen (2011) disputes this, arguing that the data show that for definite plural pronouns, but not singular, the antecedent need not be activated in the speaker's or addressee's mind, and thus can be inferred.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 41 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

When this article was first published it erroneously omitted the names of two other authors, Maxwell Schmid and Hannah Lombardo. This error has been corrected and a corrigendum published with further information, including the authors' biographical details. This can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078419000397.

References

American Psychological Association. 2009. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
The Associated Press. 2017. The Associated Press Stylebook (48th edn.) New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Balhorn, M. 2004. ‘The rise of epicene they.’ Journal of English Linguistics, 32(2), 79–104.Google Scholar
Barron, D. 2010. ‘The gender-neutral pronoun: 150 years later, still an epic fail.’ Online at https://blog.oup.com/2010/08/gender-neutral-pronoun/ (Accessed January 1, 2018).Google Scholar
Boland, J. E. & Queen, R. 2016. ‘If you're house is still available, send me an email: Personality influences reactions to written errors in email messages.’ PloS One, 11(3), e0149885.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A. & Phillips, W. 2003. ‘Sex, syntax, and semantics.’ In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT. pp. 61–79.Google Scholar
Borthen, K. 2010. ‘On how we interpret plural pronouns.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1799–1815.Google Scholar
Borthen, K. 2011. ‘Response to Chen and Wu's paper: Less well-behaved pronouns: Singular they in English and plural ta ‘it/he/she'in Chinese.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 411–414.Google Scholar
Chen, J. & Wu, Y. 2011. ‘Less well-behaved pronouns: Singular they in English and plural ta ‘it/he/she’ in Chinese.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 407–410.Google Scholar
Ekehammar, B. & Akrami, N. 2007. ‘Personality and prejudice: From Big Five personality factors to facets.’ Journal of Personality, 75(5), 899–926.Google Scholar
García–Cueto, E., Rodríguez–Díaz, F. J., Bringas–Molleda, C., López–Cepero, J., Paíno–Quesada, S. & Rodríguez–Franco, L. 2015. ‘Development of the gender role attitudes scale (GRAS) amongst young Spanish people.’ International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(1), 61–68.Google Scholar
Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. 1996. ‘The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.Google Scholar
John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. 1999. ‘The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.’ Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2(1999), 102–138.Google Scholar
Lee, J. F. & Collins, P. 2010. ‘Construction of gender: A comparison of Australian and Hong Kong English language textbooks.’ Journal of Gender Studies, 19(2), 121–137.Google Scholar
Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M. & Elias, C. 1978. ‘Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren't.’ American Psychologist, 33(11), 1032–1036.Google Scholar
Parks, J. B. & Roberton, M. A. 2000. ‘Development and validation of an instrument to measure attitudes toward sexist/nonsexist language.’ Sex Roles, 42(5), 415–438.Google Scholar
Prentice, D. A. 1994. ‘Do language reforms change our way of thinking?’ Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
Prewitt–Freilino, J. L., Caswell, T. A. & Laakso, E. K. 2012. ‘The gendering of language: A comparison of gender equality in countries with gendered, natural gender, and genderless languages.’ Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 268–281.Google Scholar
Sarrasin, O., Gabriel, U. & Gygax, P. 2012. ‘Sexism and attitudes toward gender-neutral language.’ Swiss Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar
Sendén, M. G., Bäck, E. A. & Lindqvist, A. 2015. ‘Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: the influence of time on attitudes and behavior.’ Frontiers in Psychology, 6.Google Scholar
Stotko, E. M., & Troyer, M. (2007). ‘A new gender-neutral pronoun in Baltimore, Maryland: A preliminary study.’ American Speech, 82(3), 262–279.Google Scholar
Stout, J. G. & Dasgupta, N. 2011. ‘When he doesn't mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism.’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757–769.Google Scholar
Strunk, W. & White, E. B. 1972. The Elements of Style (3rd edn.) London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Strunk, W. & White, E. B. 2000. The Elements of Style (4th edn.) London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S. & Hunter, B. A. 1995. ‘Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214.Google Scholar