Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T21:04:10.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The climate of antarctica in the UGAMP GCM: Sensitivity totopography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

I. Marsiat
Affiliation:
Centre for Global Atmospheric Modelling, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, 2 Earley Gate, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AU, U.K.
J. L. Bamber
Affiliation:
Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Department of Space and Climate Physics, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey RH5 6NT, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most spectral general circulation models (GCMs) use an envelope topographyto set on land surface elevations. The UK Universities Global AtmosphericModelling Programme General Circulation Model (UGAMP GCM) uses such aformulation for Antarctica, based on the US Navy 10 are minute charts of theregion. In the marginal regions of the continent, an envelope topographyconsistently overestimates the elevation leading to lower-than-observedsurface temperatures. Furthermore, errors in excess of 1000 m exist in theUS Navy data, and the UGAMP GCM treats the major ice shelves as sea ice,introducing a 12% reduction in the snow-covered area of the continent. Here,we use a new high-resolution, high-accuracy digital elevation model toimprove the representation of Antarctica in the UGAMP GCM. The effect ofchanging the land–sea mask and the topography on the surface temperature,precipitation and wind held is investigated for both summer and winter runs.Changing the land–sea mask had a dramatic effect on temperature, producing areduction of 13.3°C for the sector west of the Ross Ice Shelf. Using the newmean topography also introduces substantial differences in temperature, windspeed and precipitation for summer and winter.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1997
Figure 0

Table 1. The different experiements carried out with the UGCM

Figure 1

Fig. 1 The old land-sea mask (dark grey) and gridhoxes added to the old mask to form the new land-sea mask (light grey). Place names referred to in the text are also included.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 The summer wind-vector difference between MASK-01 and REF-01. (b) Air temperature differences at the lowest model level between the runs MASK-Ol and REF-01. The solid lines are positive differences and dashed lines are negative differences. The contour interval is 1°C. Precipitation differences between MASK-Ol and REF-01 are plotted as shaded contours in units of mm d−1 w.e. with contours plotted in white. The contour interval is 1 mm d−1.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a) The winter wind-vector difference between MASK-07 and REF-07. (b) As for Figure 2b but for the winter runs MASK-07 and REF-07.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Difference (in m) between the new and the old envelope topography. The contour interval is 100 m and negative differences are plotted with dashed lines.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Difference (in m) between the new and the old envelope topography. The contour interval is 100 m and negative differences are plotted with dashed lines.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. (a) The summer wind-vector difference between MEAN-01 and MASK-01, (b) as for Figure 2b but for the runs MEAN-01 and MASK-01

Figure 7

Fig. 7. (a) The winter wind-vector difference between MEAN-07 and MASK-07. (b) as for Figure 2b but for the runs MEAN-07 and MASK-07.