Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T00:01:23.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization and stability of helical density snake structures in Madison Symmetric Torus tokamak plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2025

B.A. Schmall*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
N.C. Hurst
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
A.K. Keyhani
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
J.S. Sarff
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
*
Corresponding author: B.A. Schmall, baschmall@wisc.edu

Abstract

Steady, helical perturbations known as ‘density snakes’ with poloidal and toroidal mode numbers $m=1$, $n=1$ have been studied in several tokamak experiments. These three-dimensional, helical states are interesting due to their stability and persistence, including their coexistence with the sawtooth cycle. Presented here are studies of density snakes in tokamak plasmas in the Madison Symmetric Torus (MST) device. They are diagnosed using an 11-chord interferometer, internal and edge magnetic coils and impurity ion spectroscopy. Compared with observations in other tokamak plasmas, snakes in MST form with relatively high resistivity and low edge safety factor, $ q(a) \geqslant 2.2$, which moves the $q=1$ resonant surface outward in radius and probably forms a large magnetic island. As a result, the density perturbation associated with the snake is larger, the structure occupies a broader span of minor radius and the snakes are somewhat less stable. The helical structure and distribution of snake events are characterized, including whether they are best described as ideal or resistive kink modes. Finally, an analysis of their perturbation or destruction during sawtooth crashes is given.

Information

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. A typical density snake measured by the 11-chord interferometer in an MST tokamak plasma with edge safety factor $q(a) = 2.3$. The color map is interpolated between chords that sample the line-integrated electron density $\langle n_e \rangle$ at major radial locations $R$ indicated by white tick marks along the vertical axis, where $R_0$ and $a$ are the major and minor radii of the device. The oscillation is distinguishable roughly in the time span $14 \lt t \lt 17.5$ ms, after which it loses coherence due to its interaction with a sawtooth crash. Here, q(a) = 2.35.

Figure 1

Table 1. Range of plasma parameters used for the density snake experiments described here. Electron temperature is an estimate based on data gathered in other similar discharges in MST (Hurst et al. 2022).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Geometry of diagnostics used in the experiments presented here, projected onto the poloidal plane. Lines corresponding to the inteferometer and spectrometer diagnostics represent viewing chords over which the signal is integrated, whereas the deep-insertion probe line represents the span of multiple localized measurements. The spectrometer is located at toroidal angle $270^{\circ }$ relative to the poloidal cut in the shell; five of the interferometer chords at $250^{\circ }$ and the other six at $255^{\circ }$; and the deep-insertion probe at $300^{\circ }$. Magnetic flux surfaces are computed with the MSTFit toroidal equilibrium reconstruction code (Anderson et al. 2004), and the solid black line indicates the inner surface of the vacuum shell.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Major radial profiles of the interferometer data at three points in time corresponding to phases in the snake rotation where the helical core is located farthest inboard, farthest outboard and near the axis. Shown are (a) the individual chord measurements and interpolated curves, and (b) the density perturbation obtained by subtracting the time-averaged signal as described in the text. Here, q(a) = 2.3.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Example of results from the numerical algorithm for snake identification and characterization, for the same event shown in figure 1. (a) Relative error of the fit parameters $A$ or $f$. The shaded regions in panels (a)–(c) indicate when the relative error is below a threshold of 10 % for all of these parameters, indicating a probable snake event. Also shown are (b) the fitted amplitude, and (c) the fitted frequency versus time. (d) The 85 % relative density contour and fitted curves are plotted over a contour map of the interferometer data. Here, q(a) = 2.35.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Histograms of snake parameters gathered using the algorithm described in § 2 for two different groupings of edge safety factor values. Shown are (a) the radial amplitude of the oscillation; (b) the rotation frequency; and (c) the width of the density perturbation at the 85 % relative density contour. As the edge safety factor increases, the amplitude and width decrease on average, while the frequency increases. In panels (a) and (b), inboard and outboard measurements are averaged together.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Poloidal field perturbations taken at multiple depths using an insertable probe, and (b) data from two interferometer chords roughly equidistant from the magnetic axis. Oscillations in panel (a) are correlated with those in panel (b) as described in the text, indicating a magnetic fluctuation consistent with the snake rotation. Here, q(a) = 2.27.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Data from the edge toroidal coil array show (a) magnetic mode amplitudes and (b) phases with $n=1-3$, which are correlated with the snake density perturbation measured by two interferometer chords shown in panel (c), for the same event shown in figure 1. The rotating $n=1$ mode is dominant before the snake appears in the interferometer diagnostic, until its termination around $t = 18$ ms. The mode rotates at the same frequency as the density oscillation. Panel (c) shows the off-axis chords nearest to the axis to compare the density snake oscillations with those seen in the magnetics. Here, q(a) = 2.35.

Figure 8

Figure 8. (a) Boron-IV impurity emissions (282 nm) and (b) data from two interferometer chords during a snake event. The fiber 1 line of sight is through the edge of the snake region, whereas fiber 2 is through the magnetic axis. The fiber 1 emission intensity signal was cross-correlated with the density signal to get a phase shift of $32^{\circ }$, indicating that the intensity oscillations are in phase with the density. Here, q(a) = 2.4.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Electron density distributions for models of (a) an ideal kink, (b) a resistive kink and (c) a quasi-interchange mode, with phase $\phi =0$ (see text for details). Profiles of the distributions along $(R,Z=0)$ are given in panel (d) along with the corresponding symmetric profile.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Experimental data of chord-averaged electron density from the 11-chord interferometer are shown in (a) for approximately two periods of the density snake event shown in figure 1. They are compared with synthetic data generated from simple models of (b) an ideal kink, (c) a resistive kink and (d) a crescent kink, where (c) appears to be the best fit.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Perturbation of a density snake due to sawtooth crashes. (a) Interferometer data showing the snake structure, (b) deep-insertion probe signals and (c) the normalized amplitude of the $n=1$ poloidal field perturbation measured by the edge magnetic array. The crash times are identified as burst of activity in the magnetic signals, and are indicated as vertical purple lines. Each crash significantly perturbs the snake rotation frequency, radial size and density perturbation, until it gradually disappears. Here, q(a) = 2.27.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Density profiles calculated from toroidal equilibrium reconstructions using the MSTFit code. Shown are two profiles from the same discharge, before and after a density snake occurs. The profile change indicates a radial transport of density after the density snake dissipates. Here, q(a) = 2.07.