Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8v9h9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T13:00:41.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated monitoring of mountain glaciers as key indicators of global climate change: the European Alps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Wilfried Haeberli
Affiliation:
Glaciology and Geomorphodynamics Group, Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland E-mail: haeberli@geo.unizh.ch
Martin Hoelzle
Affiliation:
Glaciology and Geomorphodynamics Group, Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland E-mail: haeberli@geo.unizh.ch
Frank Paul
Affiliation:
Glaciology and Geomorphodynamics Group, Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland E-mail: haeberli@geo.unizh.ch
Michael Zemp
Affiliation:
Glaciology and Geomorphodynamics Group, Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland E-mail: haeberli@geo.unizh.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The internationally recommended multi-level strategy for monitoring mountain glaciers is illustrated using the example of the European Alps, where especially dense information has been available through historical times. This strategy combines in situ measurements (mass balance, length change) with remote sensing (inventories) and numerical modelling. It helps to bridge the gap between detailed local process-oriented studies and global coverage. Since the 1980s, mass balances have become increasingly negative, with values close to –1mw.e. a–1 during the first 5 years of the 21st century. The hot, dry summer of 2003 alone caused a record mean loss of 2.45 mw.e., roughly 50% above the previous record loss in 1998, more than three times the average between 1980 and 2000 and an order of magnitude more than characteristic long-term averages since the end of the Little Ice Age and other extended periods of glacier shrinkage during the past 2000 years. It can be estimated that glaciers in the European Alps lost about half their total volume (roughly 0.5% a–1) between 1850 and around 1975, another 25% (or 1%a–1) of the remaining amount between 1975 and 2000, and an additional 10–15% (or 2–3% a–1) in the first 5 years of this century.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2017
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Cumulative length changes since 1900 of three characteristic glacier types in the Swiss Alps. Small cirque glaciers such as Pizolgletscher have low basal shear stresses and directly respond to annual mass-balance and snowline variability through deposition/melting of snow/firn at the glacier margin. Medium-sized mountain glaciers such as Glacier de Trient flow under high basal shear stresses and dynamically react to decadal mass-balance variations in a delayed and strongly smoothed manner. Large valley glaciers such as Aletschgletscher may be too long to dynamically react to decadal mass-balance variations, but exhibit strong signals of secular developments. Considering the whole spectrum of glacier response characteristics gives the best information on secular, decadal and annual developments. Data from WGMS.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Annual (a) and cumulative (b) mass balance of nine glaciers with uninterrupted mass-balance determination (for the entire glacier) in the European Alps (Saint-Sorlin and Sarennes, France; Gries and Silvretta, Switzerland; Careser, Italy; Hintereis, Kesselwand, Vernagt and Sonnblick, Austria). Data from WGMS. The light dashed lines show an average mass loss of nearly 18 m, or 716 mma–1, (b) and an average increase in mass loss of 34 mma–2 (a) since 1980. The Silvretta values may be systematically too positive and should be corrected in the near future.

Figure 2

Table 1. Geodetically/photogrammetrically determined secular mass balances of alpine glaciers

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Measured and reconstructed mass balances in the European Alps for (a) the past 2000 years and (b) the past 500 years. Data from WGMS (measured thickness change 1890–2000 and mass balance 1967–2004), Steiner and others (2005) (neural networks; last 500 years) and Haeberli and Holzhauser (2003) (continuity model; past two millennia); cf. also Tables 3 and 4 in the Appendix. The essential information on rates of mass change is reflected in the slopes of the curves; the vertical position of the curves is somewhat arbitrary.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Roseggletscher in the eastern Swiss Alps, with a collapse hole on its thin tongue. Photo by C. Rothenbühler, summer 2003.

Figure 5

Table 2. Estimated ice volumes in 1850, 1975, 2000 and 2005, and changes in the European Alps. The increase in volume-change rates indicates continued or even enhanced climate forcing, but might also be influenced by the different lengths of the periods considered. Data from Zemp and others (2006)

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Changes in glacier elevation in the region of Zermatt, Swiss Alps, with Gomergletscher at the lower right, from differencing the SRTM3 DEM (resampled to 25 m) from the year 2000 and the swisstopo DEM25 L1 from about 1985. Irregular black areas indicate data voids in the SRTM DEM, which are usually located outside the glacier perimeter. The grey values denote elevation changes from –80m (darkest grey value) to +10m (brightest grey value) and are plotted in classes of half standard deviations. North is at top and image width is 38 km.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Glacier extent for the Aletsch region in 1973 (black outlines) and modelled extent for six shifts of the steady-state ELA using an AAR of 0.6. The legend gives the greyscale that will disappear due to the corresponding shift in ELA. For an ELA rise of 600 m, only the darkest regions will remain. The background is a Landsat satellite image acquired at 31 August 1998. Landsat data © Eurimage/Swiss National Point of Contact for Satellite Images (NPOC).

Figure 8

Table 3. Thickness changes from selected Alpine glaciers 1889–2000. Compilation and calculation from data of WGMS (http://www.wgms.ch) and Finsterwalder and Rentsch (1981)

Figure 9

Table 3.

Figure 10

Table 3.

Figure 11

Table 4. Decadal mean annual thickness change of selected Alpine glaciers (calculated from Table 3), 1890–1999. In addition, decadal standard deviations and number of included glaciers are given