Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T08:41:18.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Tank-Mix Combinations of Non-Selective Foliar and Selective Soil-Applied Herbicides on Three Weed Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David E. Hydrick  and
David R. Shaw
David E. Hydrick
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were established to investigate the effects of tank-mixing glyphosate, paraquat, or glufosinate with metribuzin plus chlorimuron, imazaquin, or metribuzin on entireleaf morningglory, sicklepod, and johnsongrass control. Antagonism was the most frequent interaction, and usually occurred when the lower rates of non-selective foliar-active herbicides were used in tank mixtures with selective soil-active herbicides. Antagonism occurred on all species when 180 g ai/ha paraquat was tank-mixed with 90 g ai/ha metribuzin plus 15 g ai/ha chlorimuron. When the rates of non-selective herbicide were increased, antagonism was usually overcome. Antagonism also occurred on entireleaf morningglory control when 210 g ai/ha glyphosate was tank-mixed with 90 g/ha metribuzin plus 15 g/ha chlorimuron or 36 g ai/ha imazaquin. When lower rates of paraquat or glufosinate were tank-mixed with 210 g/ha metribuzin, antagonism also occurred. Less antagonism was noted with glufosinate.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]-amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid)glufosinate, 2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl)butanoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineimazaquin, 2[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneparaquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ionentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula L. # IPOHGjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHAsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBAntagonismsynergismchlorimuronglufosinateglyphosateimazaquinmetribuzinparaquatCassia obtusifoliaIpomoea hederacea var. integriusculaSorghum halepenseCASOBIPOHGSORHA

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 129 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P. and Somabhi, M. 1978. Antagonistic effect of atrazine and simazine on glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 26:135–139.Google Scholar
2. Brown, S. M., Chandler, J. M., and Morrison, J. E. Jr. 1987. Weed control in a conservation tillage rotation in the Texas Blacklands. Weed Sci. 35:695–699.Google Scholar
3. Bruff, S. A. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Tank-mix combinations for weed control in stale seedbed soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:45–51.Google Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D. and Werling, V. L. 1989. Weed control from imazaquin and metolachlor in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:392–399.Google Scholar
5. Carey, J. B. and DeFelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:232–237.Google Scholar
6. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
7. Gerwick, B. C., Thompson, P., and Noveroske, R. 1988. Potential mechanisms in antagonism with aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28:284.Google Scholar
8. McWhorter, C. G. and Azlin, W. R. 1978. Effects of environment on the toxicity of glyphosate to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 26:605–608.Google Scholar
9. Minton, B. W., Shaw, D. R., and Kurtz, M. E. 1989. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:329–334.Google Scholar
10. O'Donovan, J. T. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1982. Amine salts of growth regulator herbicides antagonize paraquat. Weed Sci. 30:605–608.Google Scholar
11. Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) control with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 3:95–98.Google Scholar
12. Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436–441.Google Scholar
13. Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass. Weed Sci. 32:595–597.Google Scholar
14. Selleck, G. W. and Baird, D. D. 1981. Antagonism with glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 29:185–190.Google Scholar
15. Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293–298.Google Scholar
16. Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33:531–536.Google Scholar
17. Wilson, J. S. and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of non-selective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:648–652.Google Scholar
18. Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1975. Glyphosate toxicity to common milkweed and hemp dogbane as influenced by surfactants. Weed Sci. 25:275–287.Google Scholar