Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T23:11:10.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kam (Rongjiang Variety)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2025

Jie Yang
Affiliation:
School of Liberal Arts, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China
Xiyu Wu
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Language Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China, Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Peking University, Beijing, China
Jiangping Kong*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Language Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China, Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Peking University, Beijing, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jpkong@pku.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Rongjiang variety of Kam described in the present study is a southern Dong dialect (ISO 639-3: [kmc]), which belongs to the Tai-Kadai Languages (Edmondson & Luo 2008; Pittayaporn 2021).

Information

Type
Illustration of the IPA
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/), which permits re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Phonetic Association
Figure 0

Figure 1. Distribution of Kam. The areas of the northern dialect are shaded light red and the areas of the southern dialect are shaded blue. The map is drawn from C1–12 of Language Atlas of China (中国语言地图集).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Waveforms and spectrograms for the minimal pairs of /ka3⁵⁵/ ‘to pull’ vs. /kʰa2⁵/ ‘ear’ in Kam.

Figure 2

Figure 3. VOT of plosives in Kam, the unaspirated and aspirated are indicated by distinct colors. The mean and standard deviation were calculated using 10 tokens of each plosive from the single speaker.

Figure 3

Figure 4. FFT spectrum (blue line) and spectral envelope (cepstrally smoothed spectrum, red line) (made with a 23 ms window centred on the peak of noise intensity) of the frication in /sa3⁵⁵/ ‘ford’, /ça3⁵⁵/ ‘to cover’ and /ha22/ ‘only if’.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Waveforms and spectrograms for the minimal pairs /pa3⁵⁵/ ‘fish’ vs. /pja3⁵⁵/ ‘stone’. The red dotted lines represent the formants.

Figure 5

Figure 6. The mean F2 onset after plain vs. palatalized consonants in Kam. The mean and standard deviation were calculated using 10 tokens of each consonant from the single speaker.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Waveforms and spectrograms for the minimal pairs /ka3⁵⁵/ ‘to pull’ vs. /kwa3⁵⁵/ ‘to register’. The red dotted lines represent the formants.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Acoustic plots for the vowels of Kam, F1and F2 of each vowel were based on mean formant values of 10 open syllables. The ellipses show the F1 and F2 values to 2 standard deviations.

Figure 8

Table 1. Duration of /aː/ and /a/

Figure 9

Figure 9. Waveforms and spectrograms for the minimal pairs /taːm3⁵⁵/ ‘handle’ vs. /tam3⁵⁵/ ‘pond’.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Two allophones [ə] and [ɤ] of /ə/ in F1 vs. F2 vowel space.

Figure 11

Table 2. Mean F1 and F2 of the diphthongs measured at 20 percent and 80 percent of the vowels

Figure 12

Figure 11. f0 contours of Kam tones for the one speaker; (a) unchecked tones; (b) checked tones.

Figure 13

Table 3. Onset consonants and tones

Figure 14

Table 4. Checked tone distribution of vowels with stop codas

Figure 15

Table 5. Syllable structure and examples of Kam