Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T04:15:18.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-sectional associations between fruit and vegetable intake and successful ageing across six countries: findings from the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2024

Catherine M Milte*
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
Karen E Lamb
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
Sarah A McNaughton
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia Health and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Catherine M Milte; Email catherine.milte@deakin.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This study develops successful ageing profiles across six low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and examines associations with fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake.

Design:

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in mid-aged and older adults from the WHO Study of Global Ageing. Participants without chronic disease, cognitive impairment, depression or disability and with good physical, cardiovascular and respiratory function were considered to have successfully aged. Associations between F&V intake (serves/d) and successful ageing were examined using log-binomial regression adjusting for key confounders.

Setting:

China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa.

Participants:

A total of 28 785 men and women aged 50 years and over.

Results:

Successful ageing ranged from 4 % in Mexico to 15 % in China. After adjustment, only Ghana showed an association between fruit intake and successful ageing, with an inverse association identified (prevalence ratio (PR) = 0·87, 95 % CI 0·78, 0·98). An inverse association between vegetable intake and successful ageing was found in China (0·97, 0·95, 0·98) but no other country. An inverse association was shown for both China (0·98, 0·96, 0·99) and Ghana (0·92, 0·84, 1·00) when considering fruit and vegetables combined.

Conclusions:

Associations between F&V intake and successful ageing are inconsistent. Further studies on LMIC countries are needed to meet the challenges of the ageing population.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Descriptive characteristics for eligible study participants by country

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Prevalence ratio (PR) of successful ageing by fruit intake. *Note: 0: not successfully ageing; 1 = successfully ageing. Adjusted model 1 includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status, ethnicity (apart from Mexico where ethnicity was not reported by most participants) and urban/rural location which were identified as the minimal sufficient adjustment set to account for confounders. Adjusted model 2 includes model 1 + smoking status, alcohol intake, BMI, total physical activity and sedentary time. (b) PR of successful ageing by vegetable intake. * Note: 0: not successfully ageing; 1 = successfully ageing. Adjusted model 1 includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status, ethnicity (apart from Mexico where ethnicity was not reported by most participants) and urban/rural location which were identified as the minimal sufficient adjustment set to account for confounders. Adjusted model 2 includes model 1 + smoking status, alcohol intake, BMI, total physical activity and sedentary time. (c) PR of successful ageing by fruit and vegetable intake. * Note: 0: not successfully ageing; 1 = successfully ageing. Adjusted model 1 includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status, ethnicity (apart from Mexico where ethnicity was not reported by most participants) and urban/rural location which were identified as the minimal sufficient adjustment set to account for confounders. Adjusted model 2 includes model 1 + smoking status, alcohol intake, BMI, total physical activity and sedentary time.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Incidence rate ratio (IRR) of successful ageing score by fruit intake. * Note: Higher score indicates poorer outcomes. Adjusted model 1 includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status, ethnicity (apart from Mexico where ethnicity was not reported by most participants) and urban/rural location which were identified as the minimal sufficient adjustment set to account for confounders. Adjusted model 2 includes model 1 + smoking status, alcohol intake, BMI, total physical activity and sedentary time. (b) IRR of successful ageing score by vegetable intake* Note: Higher score indicates poorer outcomes. Adjusted model 1 includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status, ethnicity (apart from Mexico where ethnicity was not reported by most participants) and urban/rural location which were identified as the minimal sufficient adjustment set to account for confounders. Adjusted model 2 includes model 1 + smoking status, alcohol intake, BMI, total physical activity and sedentary time. (c) IRR of successful ageing score by fruit and vegetable intake. * Note: Higher score indicates poorer outcomes. Adjusted model 1 includes age, sex, marital status, education, employment status, ethnicity (apart from Mexico where ethnicity was not reported by most participants) and urban/rural location which were identified as the minimal sufficient adjustment set to account for confounders. Adjusted model 2 includes model 1 + smoking status, alcohol intake, BMI, total physical activity and sedentary time.

Supplementary material: File

Milte et al. supplementary material 1

Milte et al. supplementary material
Download Milte et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 391.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Milte et al. supplementary material 2

Milte et al. supplementary material
Download Milte et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 23.3 KB