Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-dqfph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T14:54:11.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Jonathan Barnes’ Proof, Knowledge and Scepticism: Essays in Ancient Philosophy III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2015

Tamar Nawar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Information
Philosophy , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 363
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2015 

There are two errors in this review. On page 4, the quotation from Barnes should be corrected to read:

‘A Deduction is an ordered pair, <{α1, α2, …, αn}, σ > such that (1) σ follows necessarily from {α1, α2, …, αn}, and (2) σ holds (if it holds) because of each αi.’

The second error is in the third footnote, on page 5, wherein there is an extra word. The pertinent sentence, once revised, should read:

‘They offer us knowledge which we already had under a different mode of presentation but do not straightforwardly lead us to know new things.’

References

Nawar, Tamar. Proof, Knowledge and Scepticism: Essays in Ancient Philosophy III. Philosophy. Published by Cambridge University Press, 21 April 2015. doi:10.1017/S0031819115000042.Google Scholar