Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T22:57:18.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of a meteorological forecast for snow accumulation on transmission lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tatsuhito Ito
Affiliation:
Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc., Sapporo, Japan
Masaru Yamaoka
Affiliation:
Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc., Sapporo, Japan
Hisayuki Ohura
Affiliation:
Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc., Sapporo, Japan
Takashi Taniguchi
Affiliation:
Hokkaido Head Office of Japan Weather Association, Sapporo, Japan
Gorow Wakahama
Affiliation:
Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Hokkaido we have often experienced hazardous accidents, such as tower collapses and conductor breakage, caused by wet-snow accretion on transmission lines, and over many years have developed countermeasures for wet-snow accretion. Recently we have been developing a system to forecast areas where snow accretion may occur. We used the southern part of Hokkaido, divided into 5 km × 5 km meshes, as a forecast area; our predictions were hourly, 3–24 hours in advance. A method of predicting meteorological data which forms an important part of the system predicts three elements which influence wet-snow accretion: air temperature, precipitation, and wind direction and speed. We used an interpolation for predicting temperature and precipitation and a one-level, mesoscale model for diagnosing surface winds for wind direction and speed. By applying the method to many examples of wet-snow accretion, we checked the prediction of weather elements.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1993
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Configuration of snow accretion forecasting.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Flow chart for predicting temperature.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Interpolating at an AMeDAS point (Hakodate), o, predicted value; - - -, measured value.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Temperature lapse rate of elevation.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Radar—AMeDAS Composite Chart.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. MRR (mean rainfall rate) for 3 April 1990: 0–1 mm; 1, l–3 mm; 2, 3–5 mm; 3, 5–7 mm; and 4, 7–9 mm of precipitation.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Flow chart showing short-range forecast of precipitation.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Calculation method of predicting substantial precipitation.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Measured values for 1100 h on 28 December 1991 and predicted values for 0900 h on the same day. a, temperature; b, precipitation (measured from Radar-AMeDAS composite chart); c, wind; d, substantial precipitation.