Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T14:09:32.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ice–ocean dynamics and mechanics: a summary of the papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kolumban Hutter*
Affiliation:
Institut für Mechanik, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Hochschulstrasse 1, D-6100 Darmstadt, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A subjective review and summary of the key ideas presented at the conference is given, with occasional indications as to which scientific steps might resolve specific queries that arose from the work. The intention is to encourage closer reading of the papers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1991
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Various yield surfaces characterizing sea-ice yield under compaction: (a) elliptical (1), cavitation fluid (2), square (3) and Mohr-Coulomb (4) yield surfaces used in a seasonal sea-ice model; (b) typical yield surface as obtained from compacting an assemblage of discs. The strain rates at yield are only nearly orthogonal to the yield surface, and the dashed position of the yield surface is uncertain. However, the model does not predict intersection of the yield surface with the principal stress axes. The inset shows the strain rates to which the boundaries of the assembly were subjected.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Definition of hr, and hl for ridge and level ice. (b) Regular arrangement of ridges whose intersection angle can be related to ϕ. (c) Mohr-Coulomb yield surface with constant internal angle of friction ϕ. (d) Ridge formation from, a thin sheet of lead ice. (e) Ice floes riding on a wavy surface.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Reflection (R) and transmission, (T) of incoming (I) ocean waves at the edge of an elastic ice plate, (b) Interaction of ocean waves with an ice tongue on which time series of strains with 40–50 s periods were observed, (c) Indentation experiment of a floating ice plate from below with constant velocity. Stress versus time curves as measured (solid) and as obtained from a Winkler foundation hypothesis (dashed) (schematic).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Explaining Mc.Phee's quasi-analytic under-ice boundary-layer model. (a) Vertical momentum flux is treated by a steady Ekman balance in the ocean boundary layer (OBL) and the lower ocean below the pycnocline, with eddy viscosity distribution as sketched and drag due to internal waves being accounted for. (b) Heat and salt transport, which is affected by a laminar sub-layer and the ocean turbulent boundary layer, takes melting processes into account.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Thin cuts under polarized light are photographed, the photos digitized and analyzed in a PC for two textural parameters, “constant gradient” and “cord-size distribution” of grains.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Compressive fracture under confinement, (a) Stress state on cube with 150 mm side-length, (b) Fracture stress, , as a function of confinement ratio, R, and sketches of fracture modes in the two regimes for R where behaviour is different.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (a) Fracture toughness, KQ, plotted against crack tip radius, ρ, for fresh-water and saline ice as inferred from DeFranco and others, (b) Kinetic friction coefficient, μ, of laboratory-grown saline ice against itself as a function of the sliding velocity and various temperatures (schematic).