Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-05T09:07:41.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reciprocal swimming in viscoelastic granular hydrogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2026

Hongyi Xiao*
Affiliation:
Institute for Multiscale Simulation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg , Erlangen, Germany Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, USA
Jing Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
Achim Sack
Affiliation:
Institute for Multiscale Simulation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg , Erlangen, Germany
Ralf Stannarius
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany Department of Engineering, Brandenburg University of Applied Sciences, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
Thorsten Pöschel*
Affiliation:
Institute for Multiscale Simulation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg , Erlangen, Germany
*
Corresponding authors: Hongyi Xiao, hongyix@umich.edu; Thorsten Pöschel, thorsten.poeschel@fau.de
Corresponding authors: Hongyi Xiao, hongyix@umich.edu; Thorsten Pöschel, thorsten.poeschel@fau.de

Abstract

We experimentally study a scallop-like swimmer with reciprocally flapping wings in a nearly frictionless, cohesive granular medium consisting of hydrogel spheres. Significant locomotion is found when the swimmer’s flapping frequency matches the inverse relaxation time of the material. Remarkably, the swimmer moves in the opposite direction compared with its motion in a cohesion-free granular material of hard plastic spheres. At higher or lower frequencies, we observe no motion of the swimmer, apart from a short initial transient phase. X-ray radiograms reveal that the wing motions create low-density zones, which in turn give rise to a hysteresis in drag and propulsion forces. This time-dependent effect, combined with the swimmer’s inertia, accounts for locomotion at intermediate frequencies.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Experimental set-up for swimming in granular media. The apparatus consists of a pair of wings ($15\,\text{mm}\times \text{15}\,\text{mm}\times 1\,\text{mm}$) operating in a reservoir ($70\,\text{mm} \times 70\,\text{mm} \times 85\,\text{mm}$) filled with granular particles. The inset shows a photograph of the hydrogel particles.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Swimmer displacement as a function of time (dashed curves) for several flapping periods: $T=2.0\,\text{s}$ (blue), $T=1.0\,\text{s}$ (purple), $T=0.4\,\text{s}$ (red). For comparison, the black curve shows data for polystyrene granulate at $T=2.0\,\text{s}$. For each case, symbols, connected by solid lines, indicate the displacement at the end of each cycle, averaged over two repetitions, and the corresponding displacement in each repetition is shown as a solid curve with lighter colour.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Net swimmer displacement per cycle as a function of the flapping frequency in hydrogel particles. Error bars indicate the differences between two experimental repetitions. The inset shows the data for a swimmer moving in polystyrene particles; here, the error bars are very small.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Phase-resolved swimmer velocity (black dashed line, right axis) and driving force (red solid line, left axis) at a flapping frequency of $1/T=1\,\text{Hz}$ in hydrogel particles. The vertical dotted line separates the opening and closing half-cycles, sketched in the insets.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Averaged relative displacement of the swimmer as a function of the phase, $t/T$, for various flapping frequencies in hydrogel particles. For each case, the average was taken over at least five individual cycles beyond the initial transients. The vertical dotted line separates the opening and closing half-cycles. The figure also defines the (positive) peak location, $\tau$, and the peak-to-peak amplitude, $\Delta y$, that depend on the flapping frequency, see figure 6.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Phase shift $\tau$ and peak-to-peak amplitude $\Delta y$ (inset) as functions of the flapping frequency in hydrogel particles. The vertical dashed lines mark the frequency of maximal locomotion (see figure 2). Error bars indicate the differences between two experimental repetitions, which are very small for $\Delta y$. The standard errors (not shown) in the cycle-averaged $2\pi \tau$ and $\Delta y$ are also negligible. Lines guide the eye.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Relaxation of the swimming force following a rapid stroke in hydrogel particles. For opening (a), the data are fitted to (4.1) (dashed curve) with $\alpha =0.085\,\text{N}$, $\tau _1=0.31\,\text{s}$, $\tau _2=5.02\,\text{s}$ and $F_\infty =0.281\,\text{N}$. For closing (b), we obtain $\alpha =0.039\,\text{N}$, $\tau _1=0.26\,\text{s}$, $\tau _2=4.72\,\text{s}$ and $F_\infty =0.154\,\text{N}$.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Time-averaged X-ray radiographs of the swimmer flapping with frequency $1/T=0.05\,\text{Hz}$ (a) and $1/T=1\,\text{Hz}$ (b) in hydrogel particles. In each case, the average was taken over entire swimming cycles for at least five cycles. Yellow boxes mark the regions swept by the wings, and red boxes indicate the position of the mounting rod. A higher intensity $\varGamma$ corresponds to a lower density in the hydrogel medium.