The knowledge that individuals acquire regarding what constitutes a healthy diet exerts an influence on their receptiveness to nutritional guidelines and the recognition of the health benefits of incorporating new eating behaviours or practices. Knowledge acquisition favours the development of attitudes or perceptions related to eating and these attitudes have the potential to be converted into eating practices(Reference Macías and Glasauer1).
Studies report that manifestations of dietary concerns and the good eating practices these concerns tend to generate are associated with better health profiles(Reference Campos, Doxey and Hammond2–Reference Oliveira, Coelho and Siqueira5). Thus, concerns regarding salt intake(Reference Patel, Cogswell and John6) and the use of pesticides on food products as well as behaviours such as not using highly processed seasoning(Reference Oliveira, Coelho and Siqueira5), reading nutritional information on food labels(Reference Campos, Doxey and Hammond2) and consuming organic foods(Reference Álvarez Castaño, Cadavid Castro and Quintero Vergara7) may reflect the interest of individuals in changing their eating practices based on nutritional guidelines.
However, one’s living conditions exert a dual influence on the process of knowledge becoming attitude and then practice. On the one hand, one’s socio-economic status may or may not ensure the acquisition of knowledge regarding better eating practices(Reference Macías and Glasauer1). On the other hand, even if such knowledge is acquired, one’s living conditions can serve either a barrier or facilitator in the process of converting knowledge into perceptions, behaviours and practices(Reference Macías and Glasauer1,Reference Darmon and Drewnowski8,Reference Mozaffarian9) . Schooling can determine one’s degree of understanding with regard to recommendations related to nutrition and health as well as perceptions regarding the need to incorporate these recommendations into one’s lifestyle, but income is one of the determinants of the effective possibility of assimilating healthy eating practices(Reference Darmon and Drewnowski8,Reference Claro and Monteiro10) .
The evaluation of eating practices and dietary concerns can contribute to the identification of issues that require greater dissemination, discussion and guidance. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to evaluate associations between selected dietary concerns and selected eating practices and to determine the association among these concerns and practices with sex, age, schooling and income in adults and seniors residing in a large city in southeastern Brazil.
Methods
The data analysed in the present study were obtained from two population-based cross-sectional studies: the Campinas Health Survey and the 2015/2016 Campinas Nutrition Survey. The surveys collected information from residents of private households in the city of Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Campinas is located 96 km from the state capital and had more than 1 200 000 residents in 2019. It is the fourteenth largest city in the country and the second largest in the state of São Paulo. Its Human Development Index was estimated at 0·805 in 2010, and the urbanisation rate is 98·3 %(11).
The sample sizes of the Campinas Health Survey were defined considering the estimate of a 0·50 proportion (corresponding to maximum variability), a 95 % confidence level (Z = 1·96), 4–5 % sampling error and a design effect of 2, resulting in 1000 adolescents (10–19 years of age), 1400 adults (20–59 years of age) and 1000 seniors (60 years of age or older).
The sample was determined employing a complex, two-stage sampling procedure. Seventy census sectors were selected in the first stage, and the second stage consisted of the systematic selection of households in the selected census sectors to obtain independent samples of adolescents, adults and seniors. For the present study, only data from adults and seniors were analysed. Assuming a non-response rate of 22 % for adults and 20 % for seniors (based on experience with past surveys), the number of households selected for each of these age groups was, respectively, 1029 and 3157.
The data were collected by trained, supervised interviewers who administered a questionnaire comprising predominantly closed-ended questions with the aid of an electronic device (tablet). The questionnaire was composed of twelve sections addressing morbidities and disabilities, accidents and violence, emotional health, well-being, health behaviours, the use of healthcare services, socio-economic status and household characteristics.
The 2015/2016 Campinas Nutrition Survey collected data on the dietary habits of the same sample. The questionnaire involved a 24 h recall, questions on the weekly consumption of foods, eating practices and concerns, information on the circumstances of eating, etc. The data were entered into a template developed using the EpiData 3·1 programme.
Study variables
The dependent variables of this study were concerns and eating practices. The concerns regarded knowledge of the importance of moderate salt intake and the need to avoid the consumption of foods grown with pesticides. The practices analysed were those that indicate the incorporation of eating behaviours, such as the non-use of highly processed seasoning, checking the salt content on food labels and consuming organic foods1. These variables were determined based on the following questions:
-
Concern with salt intake – ‘Are you concerned with the amount of salt you consume in foods?’ (yes or no);
-
Use highly processed seasoning – ‘In your home, are store-bought seasoning products used to prepare meals?’ (yes or no);
-
Checking the Na content on food labels – ‘When buying a food product, do you generally check the information on the label/package?’, for which the response options were ‘yes’, ‘sometimes’ and ‘no’. The respondent was also asked about what type of information was of interest, for which the response options were (a) fat, (b) energies, (c) gluten, (d) fibre, (e) Na, (f) expiration date and (g) other. For this category, individuals who checked the salt content were those who answered ‘yes’ to the first question and reported ‘Na’ in the second question. All other respondents were in the category ‘does not check Na content on food labels’.
-
Concern with the use of pesticides – ‘When acquiring/buying a food product, are you concerned whether pesticides were used in the production of this food’ (yes or no);
-
Consumption the organic foods with some frequency – ‘Do you consume organic foods or those grown without pesticides?’ (yes/sometimes/part of the foods or no).
The independent variables included the following demographic and socio-economic characteristics: sex (male or female), age group (adults: 20–59 years; seniors: ≥ 60 years), schooling (0–4 and ≥ 5 years of study) and per capita family income using the Brazilian monthly minimum wage (BMMW) as reference and categorised as < BMMW and ≥ BMMW. The BMMW in 2015 was R$ 788 (Brazilian currency), corresponding to approximately US$ 152.
The number of chronic diseases was used to adjust the data in the multivariate analysis and included hypertension (prevalence: 23·0 %), CVD (angina, acute myocardial infarction, arrythmia or other heart diseases with prevalence of 11·0 %), cancer (prevalence: 3·2 %) and other CVD. The number of chronic diseases was categorised as none, one or two, three and four or more.
The prevalence of concerns and eating practices was estimated, and associations were tested using Pearson’s χ 2 test with the Rao–Scott correction. A P-value < 0·05 was considered indicative of a statistically significant association. The prevalence of each concern and each eating practice was analysed according to the independent variables. The associations were also tested using Pearson’s χ 2 test. Multivariate Poisson regression analyses with robust variance(Reference Barros and Hirakata12) were performed for the estimation of prevalence ratios (PR) and 95 % CI for the associations between each dependent variable and the independent variables. In the final models, the PR also were obtained by multivariate Poisson regression analyses with robust variance to test the associations between food concerns and eating practices and between these with demographic and socio-economic variables adjusted for sex, age, schooling, income and number of chronic diseases. The non-response weights for households and interviews and the post-stratification weight were considered in the analyses using the survey (svy) model of Stata 14.0 (Stata Corp.).
Results
Among the households selected for interviews with adults and seniors, the non-response rate was 8·7 % due to refusals and other reasons. Among the individuals identified in the households, the non-response rate was 21 % due to refusals and 1·8 % for other reasons. In the nutrition survey, the non-response rate was 13·2 %, leading to a final sample of 1710 individuals.
The study population was composed predominantly of women (52·9 %) and adults between 20 and 59 years of age (80·9 %). A total of 19·9 % of the overall sample had less than 4 years of schooling and 35·7 % had a family income per capita less than the BMMW. A total of 41·8 % of the sample had two or more chronic diseases (Table 1).
Characteristics of study participants and prevalence (%) of concerns and eating practices. 2014/15 Campinas Health Survey and 2015/16 Campinas Nutrition Survey (n 1710)
* BMMW: Brazilian monthly minimum wage.
A total of 62·3 % of the population expressed concern with their salt intake; the prevalence of this concern was higher among women and seniors. A percentage of 34·7 % did not use highly processed seasoning in the preparation of meals; the prevalence of this practice was higher among women, seniors and the segment with a higher income. A percentage of 10·6 % reported reading the Na content on food labels; the prevalence of this practice was higher in strata with higher levels of schooling and income. Concerns with the use of pesticides and the consumption of organic foods were reported by 27·5 and 26·5 % of the study population, respectively. The concern with pesticides was higher among women, seniors and the group with a higher income, whereas the consumption of organic foods was greater among women and in strata with higher levels of schooling and income (Table 1).
Associations were found between the two concerns analysed and the respective practices (Table 2). The prevalence of the non-use of highly processed seasoning was 1·40-fold higher, and the prevalence of checking the Na content on food labels was 2·77-fold higher among the group that reported being concerned with salt intake compared with those who reported not being concerned. The prevalence of eating organic foods was 3·35-fold higher in the group who reported being concerned with the use of pesticides on food products compared with those who reported not being concerned.
Prevalence (%) of eating practices among adults and seniors according to concerns. 2014/15 Campinas Health Survey and 2015/16 Campinas Nutrition Survey (n 1710)
* Adjusted for sex and age.
† P-value obtained by Pearson’s χ 2 test with the Rao–Scott correction.
‡ Adjusted for sex, age, schooling, income and number of chronic diseases.
The prevalence of all practices and concerns investigated, with the exception of checking the Na content on food labels, was higher among women. The largest difference between sexes was found regarding the concern with the contamination of food by pesticides, which was 43 % higher among the women (Table 3). Higher frequencies of concerns with salt intake and the use of pesticides and the practice of not using store-bought spice blends were found among the seniors with greater magnitude of differences observed for the non-use of highly processed seasoning (PR = 1·44) (Table 3). The greatest differences between schooling strata regarded the checking the Na content on food labels (PR = 4·06). Moreover, the consumption of organic foods increased with the increase in schooling (Table 3). The frequency of all practices and concerns analysed, except the concern with salt intake, was higher in groups with a higher income. The major differences between income strata regarded checking the Na content on food labels (PR = 2·95) and concerns with the use of pesticides (PR = 1·57) (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table 1).
Prevalence ratio of eating practices and concerns among adults and seniors according to demographic and socio-economic indicators, adjusted by sex, age, schooling, income and number of chronic diseases. 2014/15 Campinas Health Survey and 2015/16 Campinas Nutrition Survey (n 1710)
* BMMW: Brazilian monthly minimum wage.
Discussion
In the present study, high concern with salt intake was observed to be associated with the non-use of highly processed seasoning and the frequent reading of the Na content on the food label. Approximately one-quarter of the participants reported being concerned about pesticide use and most of them reported consuming organic foods with some frequency. The differences observed according to gender, age, education and income varied in their magnitude with the best profiles observed among women, seniors and in the groups with higher education and income. The biggest differences were observed for reading of the Na content on the food label in the high education and high-income groups, for the concern about pesticides among women and for non-use of processed seasonings among seniors.
A large proportion of the population studied (62·3 %) reported being concerned with their salt intake. A study conducted in five countries of the Americas found that, on average, 60·7 % of the population reported wanting to reduce the amount of salt that they consume, and the prevalence ranged from 46·3 % in Ecuador to 70·8 % in Argentina(Reference Claro, Linders and Ricardo13). Despite the high prevalence of the concern with salt found in the present investigation, another study conducted with data from 2015/16 Campinas Nutrition Survey detected mean Na intake as high as 3·3 g/d(Reference Ruiz, Lima and Medina14). The fact that the concern with salt consumption does not necessarily converge into a lower intake of this mineral may result from several factors. Those factors include the lack of knowledge on the risk of high salt consumption, on the amount of salt present in different kinds of food, like ultra-processed foods, and personal preferences developed during life(15–Reference Kuwae, Carvalho and Prado17). The WHO recommends that the daily Na intake for adults not surpass 2 g, which is equivalent to 5 g of table salt(18), but in Brazil, the mean Na intake is 3·7 g/d(Reference Mill, Malta and Machado19).
A total of 34·7 % of the participants studied reported not using highly processed seasoning. Highly processed seasoning, such as store-bought bouillon cubes, has a high content of Na, fat and synthetic additives(15) and is generally used to enhance the flavour of foods. A study conducted in a large Brazilian city identified greater Na intake among individuals who frequently used ready-made seasoning(Reference Oliveira, Coelho and Siqueira5). However, no studies were found comparing the Na content in highly processed seasoning and home seasoning. The literature indicates that the practice of seasoning foods at home enables individuals greater control over the amount of salt added, favouring a reduction in dietary Na intake, which is preferable to the use of highly processed seasoning(Reference Nakadate, Ishihara and Iwasaki20). However, some processed seasoning products may have low-Na versions, such as low-Na soy sauce, and consumers could also decide to use only a fraction of the content in the package.
The low prevalence of checking the Na content on food labels (10·6 %) is similar to that reported in a study conducted with individuals surveyed at primary care units in the city of Niterói, Brazil (11·9 %)(Reference Lindemann, Silva and César16). The literature indicates a lower frequency of checking the Na content compared with sugar and fat contents(Reference Webster, Li and Dunford21) and has revealed that a large proportion of individuals (56–89 %) are not capable of interpreting information on salt through the publication of the Na content on the labels of products(Reference Bhana, Utter and Eyles22)
Approximately one-fourth of the participants reported being concerned with the use of pesticides on food products. The issue of pesticide use in Brazil has particularities. Since 2008, the country has been the largest consumer of pesticides in the world(Reference Jardim and Caldas23,Reference Carneiro24) , and Brazilian lawmakers have experienced strong pressure to facilitate and expand the use of pesticides despite the harmful effects of these products(Reference Moraes25). However, the perception of this problem was low in this studied population, which may at least partly be due to the predominant agricultural production in Brazil based on large properties of land, monocultures and the intensive use of pesticides(Reference Lima, Galiza and Valadares26).
The prevalence of the occasional consumption of organic foods was 26·5 %. Brazilian legislation has a wider definition compared with the legislation of other countries, considering the organic foods produced from different agroecological crops that in addition predict a production without the use of pesticides, considers principles of sustainability and social justice(27). Internationally, definitions for organic foods are usually restricted to foods produced without the use of industrial chemicals, such as fertilizers and pesticides(Reference Lima, Galiza and Valadares26). A study conducted with the Brazilian population detected that 15 % of the respondents reported having consumed some organic product in the previous month, ranging from 10 % in the southeastern region of the country to 34 % in the southern region(28).
The results of the present study revealed that the concern with salt intake was associated with the practice of not consuming highly processed seasoning and was even more strongly associated with the practice of checking the Na content on food labels. Likewise, a study conducted with adults in the United States in 2012 found that the prevalence of reading food labels and the choice of foods with a low salt content was higher among individuals who recognised that excessive salt intake was harmful to one’s health and those who had received advice from a healthcare provider to reduce the amount of salt in their diet(Reference Patel, Cogswell and John6).
A strong association was found between the concern with the use of pesticides and the practice of eating organic foods. The literature indicates a tendency for consumers to choose organic foods not only because they do not contain pesticides, what is good for their health, but also due to concerns regarding environmental impact(Reference van de Vijver and van Vliet29). Thus, a recent behaviour is detected of consumers choosing ‘clean’ foods(Reference Reeves, McGuire and Stokes30).
The prevalence of concern with salt intake was higher among women and seniors. A study conducted by Claro et al. also found that women and seniors reported being more concerned with the harm caused by excessive salt intake(Reference Claro, Linders and Ricardo13). Women are often in charge of family eating practices(Reference Fonseca31) and are generally more engaged, aware and better informed regarding health-related issues(Reference Ek32). Seniors generally have a greater number of chronic diseases and, consequently, they use more healthcare services, where they may receive counseling on health and eating practices(Reference Szwarcwald, Souza Júnior and Damacena33).
The prevalence on non-used highly processed seasoning was higher among women, seniors and the higher income group. The Dietary Guide for the Brazilian Population places considerable emphasis on cooking skills, which involve everything from the selection of ingredients to the presentation of the meal, as a way of promoting healthy eating. Such skills have historically been the domain of women, which may explain the lower frequency of the use of highly processed seasoning by women in the present study. Moreover, cooking skills are transmitted from generation to generation, which is a process that has been losing momentum in Brazil and other countries in the world, leading to a situation in which older people have this accumulated knowledge and younger people have increasingly less autonomy in the preparation of meals(15). Groups with a higher income may consume less highly processed seasoning by eating out more often, as indicated in a study conducted with the population of adults in Brazil(Reference Bezerra, Moreira and Cavalcante34), or by eating a larger number of fast foods, which do not require any preparation(Reference Medina, Barros and Sousa35).
About the differences found in the practice of checking the Na content on food labels, as in the present investigation, a Brazilian study found a greater frequency of this practice in the group with a higher level of schooling(Reference Lindemann, Silva and César16). Other studies have also consistently identified a higher frequency of label reading among individuals with higher levels of schooling and income(Reference Campos, Doxey and Hammond2,Reference Kang, Shim and Lee36) . The difficulty of consumers in interpreting information on salt through the Na content presented on the labels(Reference Bhana, Utter and Eyles22) may be one of the determinants of the low prevalence of checking this content in the studied population as well as the greater prevalence of this practice in the segment with more schooling. The income differences found in this practice may be the consequence of the greater consumption of industrialised foods in segments with a higher income in the adult population in Brazil(Reference Simões, Barreto and Molina37), as all such products have labels.
The prevalence of concern with the use of pesticides on food products was higher among women, seniors and the higher income group. The differences in sex and age detected in the present investigation may be due to the fact that women and seniors tend to recognise health risks more than men and younger individuals(Reference Kuwae, Carvalho and Prado17,Reference Grzymisławska, Puch and Zawada38) . However, the prevalence of the consumption of organic foods was higher among women as well as the groups with higher schooling and income. Women also consumed more organic foods than men in a study conducted in a large Brazilian city, and this difference is at least partially due to the fact that women tend to consume healthier foods than men and adhere more to health guidelines(15,Reference Grzymisławska, Puch and Zawada38) . The seniors, despite presenting a better profile for all practices, do not consume organic foods more frequently than younger. In general, the seniors tend to choose their food based on behaviours and preferences established in the past(Reference Kuwae, Carvalho and Prado17), and organic foods is a concept more recently valued.
As in other countries, the price of organic foods in Brazil is quite high mainly due to the high costs of monitoring and certification processes(Reference Lima, Galiza and Valadares26). Although there are Brazilian initiatives regarding participative certification (obtained from groups of rural producers rather than certificating firms)(Reference Lima, Galiza and Valadares26) and for the shortening of organic food trade and distribution chains through the implementation of farmer’s markets, community-supported agriculture and consumer groups, these items are economically unviable for a large proportion of the population(Reference Lima, Galiza and Valadares26). Among the participants in a survey conducted by Brazilian Council of Organic and Sustainable Production – Organis, 62 % reported that price was the main barrier to the consumption of organic foods(28). A Brazilian study conducted by Andrade et al. also found price to be the main impediment to the consumption of organic foods(Reference Andrade and Bertoldi39). Another factor is the high concentration of wealth in Brazil(40), which impedes certain segments of the population from having access to these foods. A study conducted by Claro & Monteiro revealed that expenditure on food accounts for a higher relative percentage of household expenses among poor Brazilian families compared with those with a higher income(Reference Claro and Monteiro10). This at least partly explains the income difference found regarding the consumption of organic foods in the present investigation.
The present study has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. Data obtained through interviews are subject to information bias, as respondents tend to give answers that they consider to be more acceptable. The questions addressing eating practices and concerns did not compose specific, validated instruments, but were similar to those used in previous studies investigating the frequency of such practices(Reference Claro, Linders and Ricardo13,Reference Andrade and Bertoldi39,Reference Nakasato41,Reference Soares, Zuchi and Lopes42) . The strength of this study regards the use of a representative sample of the population of a highly urbanised city with more than a million residents and the analysis of eating practices and dietary concerns rarely studied.
A strong association between dietary concerns and practices was detected, and considerable demographic and socio-economic differences were found regarding these concerns and practices. Better profiles were generally found among women, seniors and groups with higher schooling and income.
Our results reveal the need for greater dissemination of the knowledge on the health risks of high Na intake and on the correspondence between salt and Na. Also the need of government strategies to reduce the Na content in processed foods and seasonings and to encourage families to reduce their salt ingestion.
The findings about concern with pesticides indicate the need for more discussion and the dissemination of knowledge on this issue to pressure in the country for a reduction in the use of these chemicals. About the organic foods, to increase consumption, strategies are needed to popularise this practice and subsidise production, which would result in a reduction in prices that could broaden consumption by segments that currently have no access to these products.
Conclusions
The results also suggested that further studies need to be conducted in order to better understand the paths that lead subjects to convert concerns into eating practices.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements: None. Financial support: This research was supported by the Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP) for funding the research and the Brazilian Ministry of Health, through Health’s Secretary of Campinas. Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo and Brazilian Ministry of Health had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. M.L.P.B. is supported by FAPESP and B.M.B.A. by a Research Productivity Grant from CNPq. Conflict of interest: There are no conflicts of interest. Authorship: As the first author, I attest that all the authors have made substantial contribution to this study. I (L.P.B.M.) conceptualised the study and did the statistical analyses, the literature review and the writing; M.B.A.B. contributed in the conceptualisation of the study and in the literature review and writing; R.M.F., D.A. and A.A.B.F. contributed in the review of literature and the writing. All the authors revised the content of this paper and approved the final version. Ethics of human subject participation: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and it was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medical Science. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Supplementary material
For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020003638
