Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T01:18:15.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3.5 THz quantum-cascade laser emission from dual diagonal feedhorns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2019

B. N. Ellison*
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Space Department, STFC, Didcot, UK
A. Valavanis
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
O. Auriacombe
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Space Department, STFC, Didcot, UK
D. Gerber
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Space Department, STFC, Didcot, UK
T. Rawlings
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Space Department, STFC, Didcot, UK
N. Brewster
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Space Department, STFC, Didcot, UK
M. L. Oldfield
Affiliation:
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Space Department, STFC, Didcot, UK
Y. Han
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
L. H. Li
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
E. Zafar
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
E. H. Linfield
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
A. G. Davies
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
G. Savini
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, UK
M. Emes
Affiliation:
University College London, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Dorking, UK
B. Winter
Affiliation:
University College London, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Dorking, UK
D. Walker
Affiliation:
School of Computing and Engineering, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
E. Saenz
Affiliation:
Radio Frequency Payloads & Technology Division, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
*
Author for correspondence: B. N. Ellison, E-mail: brian.ellison@stfc.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antenna-pattern measurements obtained from a double-metal supra-terahertz-frequency (supra-THz) quantum cascade laser (QCL) are presented. The QCL is mounted within a mechanically micro-machined waveguide cavity containing dual diagonal feedhorns. Operating in continuous-wave mode at 3.5 THz, and at an ambient temperature of ~60 K, QCL emission has been directed via the feedhorns to a supra-THz detector mounted on a multi-axis linear scanner. Comparison of simulated and measured far-field antenna patterns shows an excellent degree of correlation between beamwidth (full-width-half-maximum) and sidelobe content and a very substantial improvement when compared with unmounted devices. Additionally, a single output has been used to successfully illuminate and demonstrate an optical breadboard arrangement associated with a future supra-THz Earth observation space-borne payload. Our novel device has therefore provided a valuable demonstration of the effectiveness of supra-THz diagonal feedhorns and QCL devices for future space-borne ultra-high-frequency Earth-observing heterodyne radiometers.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic of the supra-THz radiometer.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) QCL, waveguide cavity, and dual feedhorn structure; (b) QCL, feedhorn block, and mirrors mounted on the cold finger. Window is not shown.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. System used to measure far-field 3.5 THz dual diagonal feedhorn antenna patterns.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a) Simulated single 3.5 THz feedhorn pattern. (b) Measurement of the dual feedhorn QCL device at 3.5 THz. The scan extent in each case is 70 × 70 mm2 and the Golay detector aperture was 3 mm diameter. The power scale applies to both images.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Top most image: 3.5 THz QCL dual beam profile sampled with a 2 mm diameter Golay detector aperture. Corresponding normalized horizontal and vertical antenna beam profiles measured across each diagonal feedhorn output (left and right beam) are shown in the bottom images (separate points) and with a Gaussian fit profile superimposed (continuous line). In most cases the beam FWHM is in close agreement with the simulated value of 5°.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. CAD drawings of the LOCUS breadboard system in plan (left image) and elevation (right image) views showing the location of the primary and secondary mirrors, and the cryogenic system that cools the QCL source. The QCL is replaced by a mixer and QCL LO when the system is configured as a supra-THz receiver.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Views of the LOCUS breadboard arrangement. The left image shows the location of the QCL on the cryogenic system cold finger. The signal path from the QCL to a Golay cell detector is also shown – note that the direction of this path is reversed when the QCL is replaced by a mixer and the system configured as a heterodyne receiver. The right image shows a view of the breadboard approximately from the direction of the Golay detector, which is shown mounted on the scanning system.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Scan of the signal emerging from one output of the dual feedhorn 3.5 THz QCL with the secondary breadboard mirror removed. The intensity scale is linear and relative to the maximum observed signal.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. First scan at 3.5 THz across the optical breadboard with the secondary mirror relocated. An intensity distribution across the primary mirror is evident, as is signal spillover and showing around part of the secondary. The small (dashed) and large (solid) circles show the approximate positions of the secondary and primary mirrors, respectively. The intensity scale is linear and relative to the maximum observed intensity. Note that the maximum in this case is nearly one order of magnitude lower than that of Fig. 8.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Scan at 3.5 THz across the primary mirror (circle) after adjustment of the secondary. The resultant intensity distribution is more clearly apparent with the secondary position adjusted and the spillover signal attenuated. The intensity scale is linear and relative to the maximum observed intensity.