Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-6jg5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T05:00:02.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypersonic boundary-layer transition over a circular cone in a Mach 8 digital wind tunnel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2025

Mateus Schuabb
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Lian Duan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Katya M. Casper
Affiliation:
Experimental Aerosciences Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
Ross M. Wagnild
Affiliation:
Computational Aerosciences Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
Meelan M. Choudhari
Affiliation:
Computational AeroSciences Branch, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, USA
Pedro Paredes
Affiliation:
Computational AeroSciences Branch, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, USA
*
Corresponding author: Lian Duan, duan.322@osu.edu

Abstract

In conventional hypersonic wind tunnels, tunnel noise is dominated by acoustic radiation from turbulent nozzle-wall boundary layers, which can directly influence the boundary-layer transition (BLT) over the model in the test section. To offer new insights into BLT in conventional ground facilities, direct numerical simulations (DNS) were performed to simulate the receptivity and transition processes of a Mach 8 boundary layer over a nearly sharp $7^\circ$ half-angle cone, with transition triggered by tunnel-like broadband free-stream acoustic disturbances radiated from the nozzle wall of the Sandia hypersonic wind tunnel at Mach 8 (Sandia HWT-8). The DNS captured all the stages of the transition to turbulence caused by tunnel noise, including the passage of broadband free-stream noise through the shock wave, the receptivity process leading to the generation of Mack’s second-mode waves, their nonlinear growth to saturation, the laminar breakdown to turbulence and the post-transitional, fully turbulent flow. The transition location predicted by DNS compared well with that of Pate’s theory and was also consistent with the locations of peak pressure fluctuations as measured in the Sandia HWT-8 facility. The computed skin friction and Stanton number distributions in the initial breakdown region showed an overshoot compared with the turbulent predictions by the van Driest II theory. The wall-pressure spectra in both the transitional and turbulent regions of the cone compared well with those measured in the Sandia HWT-8. The second-mode breakdown amplitude $A_{max}$ predicted by the DNS was also consistent with sharp-cone measurements from multiple conventional wind tunnels.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
To the extent this is a work of the US Government, it is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the Author(s), 2025
Figure 0

Table 1. Preshock and postshock free-stream conditions for DNS of a Mach 8 cone.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Computational domain and simulation set-up for DNS of Mach 8 flow over a 7$^\circ$ half-angle circular cone with a nose radius of $R_n$ = 0.5 mm. The contour plots are generated by overlaying the numerical schlieren ($NS=\exp (-10|\nabla \rho |/|\nabla \rho |_{_{ref}})$) based on the density gradient (greyscale) and pressure (coloured). Note that the image at the top of figure 1(a) was for illustration purposes (to show the size of the cone model relative to the tunnel test section), while the cone model was not included in the precursor wind-tunnel simulation.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Comparison of the laminar baseflow solutions between DNS (dashed lines) and NASA’s VULCAN flow solver (solid lines). The wall-normal profiles were taken at $x_g=$ 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 m.

Figure 3

Table 2. Domain size and grid resolution for the DNS runs. Here $\Delta x$, $r \Delta \theta$ and $\Delta z$ represent the grid spacing in the local streamwise, azimuthal and wall-normal directions, respectively. The superscript ‘+’ denotes normalisation by the viscous length $z_\tau$ at a reference location of $x_g=0.396$ m for all the boxes, which is the same location where $u_{\tau }$ and $\delta$ were extracted. The total simulation length is $0.874$ ms, among which the last $0.2528$ ms is used for time-averaged statistics.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Spatial evolution of pressure fluctuations at $f=300$ kHz predicted by 2-D axisymmetric DNS of the Mach 8 cone with $R_n = 0.5$ mm. (a) Contours of $Re(p^{\prime})$ and (b) $|p^{\prime}|$ and $Re(p^{\prime})$ at the cone surface, along with the PSE prediction of $|p^{\prime}|$.

Figure 5

Figure 4. The N-factor curves of the wall pressure predicted by 2-D axisymmetric DNS of Mach 8 cones. (a) Comparison with the linear PSE at $R_n = 0.5$ mm; (b) comparison between $R_n = 0.05$ mm and $0.5$ mm. In each DNS, 10 slow planar acoustic waves are imposed in the free stream with frequency increments of 50 kHz from 50 kHz to 500 kHz.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Instantaneous wall pressure (coloured scale) and divergence of the velocity (greyscale) at $t=0.838$ ms. The plot line was extracted from a row of axial locations along $\phi = 0^\circ$ meridian.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Time trace of wall pressure at different streamwise locations. Starting from $x=0.15$, the vertical shift is 750 Pa relative to the previous location.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Instantaneous wall shear stress and wall heat flux at $t=0.8508$ ms. The line plots were extracted from the centre of the contour plots (i.e. along $y_g = 0$).

Figure 9

Figure 8. Numerical (synthetic) schlieren based on the density gradient at different times at $\phi = 0^\circ$ and $x_g=[0.20,0.40]$ m. Here, the frequency of the snapshots is $\approx$ 78.1 kHz, and the blue arrow denotes the position of a specific wavepacket at different times.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Instantaneous streamwise velocity at different wall-normal locations at $t=0.838$ ms.

Figure 11

Figure 10. The r.m.s. pressure fluctuations in the free stream (before and after the shock) and at the wall over the laminar portion of the cone.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Frequency power spectrum density of pressure fluctuations in the free stream (before and after the shock) and at the wall at $x_g=0.01$ m.

Figure 13

Figure 12. (a,b) Frequency PSD and (c,d) azimuthal wavenumber spectrum of the wall-pressure fluctuations as a function of streamwise locations $x_g$.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Comparison of wall-pressure fluctuations at multiple axial locations along the cone between DNS and those measured by surface-mounted PCB transducers in Sandia HWT-8 (Casper 2009; Casper et al.2016; Smith et al.2016).

Figure 15

Figure 14. Amplitudes of the second mode (measured by $p^{\prime}_{w,rms}/{p}_{\infty,2}$) in comparison with sharp-cone measurements in multiple conventional hypersonic wind tunnels as reported in Marineau et al. (2019).

Figure 16

Figure 15. Comparison of the transition location between DNS and the empirical correlation of Pate (1978).

Figure 17

Figure 16. Comparison of the domain and set-up between the current DNS with tunnel-noise-induced BLT (left) and that without BLT by Huang et al. (2024) with a nominal Mach number of 8 and $(Re_{unit})_{\infty,1} = 12.8 \times 10^{6}$ (right).

Figure 18

Figure 17. Streamwise evolution of (a) skin-friction coefficient and (b) Stanton number in comparison with those of the laminar baseflow, the van Driest II theory and the turbulent cone DNS with artificial inflow turbulence generation by Huang et al. (2024).

Figure 19

Figure 18. Comparison of (a) r.m.s. wall pressure, (b) r.m.s. skin friction and (c) r.m.s. wall heat flux against those of the turbulent cone DNS by Huang et al. (2024).

Figure 20

Figure 19. Comparison of the van Driest transformed mean streamwise velocity against those of the turbulent cone DNS by Huang et al. (2024) and other flat-plate experimental and DNS data. Symbols: $\vartriangle$, Priebe & Martin (2011); $\bigcirc$, Williams et al. (2018); $\lozenge$, Schlatter & Örlü (2010).

Figure 21

Figure 20. Comparison of density-weighted turbulence intensities with those from the turbulent cone DNS by Huang et al. (2024). $u_\tau ^*=(\overline {\rho }_w/\overline {\rho })^{1/2}u_\tau$ is the density-weighted velocity scale.

Figure 22

Figure 21. Comparison of (a) streamwise and (b) wall-normal components of the turbulent heat flux against those of the turbulent cone DNS by Huang et al. (2024).

Figure 23

Figure 22. Comparison of (a) temperature–velocity correlation coefficient $R_{u^{\prime\prime}T^{\prime\prime}}$ and (b) turbulent Prandtl number $Pr_t$ against those of the turbulent cone DNS by Huang et al. (2024) and the flat-plate DNS by Pirozzoli & Bernardini (2011) at $M=2$ and $Re_\tau =251$.

Figure 24

Figure 23. Comparison of (a) frequency PSD and (b) azimuthal wavenumber spectrum of the wall-pressure fluctuations against those of Huang et al. (2024). The DNS-predicted spectrum in (a) was spatially averaged over the surface grid points within a diameter of $0.98$ mm to match the sensing area of the PCB piezotronics.

Figure 25

Figure 24. Visualisation of the streamwise velocity fluctuations at $x_{\textit{ref}} \approx 0.53$ m for the current DNS with BLT (left column) against those of the DNS without BLT by Huang et al. (2024) (right column). A streamwise range of $\delta$ centred at the downstream turbulent portion of the computation domain was selected for each case, where $\delta$ is the local boundary-layer thickness at the reference location $x_{\textit{g,ref}} \approx 0.53$ m. The heights are selected at (a,b) $z^*\approx 15$, (c,d) $z^*\approx 200$ and (e,f) $z/\delta \approx 0.5$. Flood contour levels are shown for $-2\leqslant \sqrt {\rho }u^{\prime\prime}/\sqrt {\tau _w}\leqslant 2$ from dark to light shades. Inner scales are used in (a,b) and outer scales in (c,d,e,f).

Figure 26

Figure 25. Computational domain set-up for the precursor DNS of the full-scale axisymmetric nozzle of Sandia HWT-8 (Duan et al.2019b).

Figure 27

Figure 26. Numerical schlieren images (i.e. density gradient contours) of radiated acoustic waves within the nozzle of the Sandia HWT-8 (Duan et al.2019b). The vertical dashed line indicates the axial location of the selected cross-section visualised in the right panel.

Figure 28

Figure 27. Schematic of the rectangular domain for extracting free-stream acoustic disturbances from the precursor DNS of an empty wind tunnel. The vertical dashed line indicates the streamwise location of the selected cross-plane visualised on the top right.

Figure 29

Figure 28. The PSD of free-stream acoustic disturbances computed based on the calibrated acoustic model of (A1) with fast (+) or slow (-) acoustic wave assumptions in comparison with that of the precursor tunnel DNS at $x \approx 2.1$ m.

Figure 30

Figure 29. Wavenumber spectra of free-stream acoustic disturbances computed with the calibrated acoustic model of (A1) by using different spatial domain sizes in comparison with those of the precursor tunnel DNS. (a–c) Pressure and (d–f) streamwise velocity.

Figure 31

Figure 30. Temporal evolution of free-stream acoustic disturbances in a cross-plane ($y{-}z$ plane) at $x \simeq 2.1$ m, generated by the calibrated acoustic model of (A1) in comparison with those from the precursor tunnel DNS.

Figure 32

Figure 31. Comparison between the tunnel DNS and the acoustics model with a different spectral wavenumber cutoff at t = 0 s.