Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-qmkzp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-02T09:49:50.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium co-fermented feed alters antioxidant capacity, muscle fibre characteristics and lipid profiles of finishing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2023

Shiqi Liu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Eastern of China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Man Du
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Eastern of China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Jiabao Sun
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Yuang Tu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Eastern of China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Xin Gu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Eastern of China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Peiran Cai
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Eastern of China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Zeqing Lu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Eastern of China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Yizhen Wang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Eastern of China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
Tizhong Shan*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Eastern of China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Tizhong Shan, email tzshan@zju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to assess how Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium co-fermented feed (FF) affects the antioxidant capacity, muscle fibre types and muscle lipid profiles of finishing pigs. In this study, a total of 144 Duroc × Berkshire × Jiaxing Black finishing pigs were randomly assigned into three groups with four replicates (twelve pigs per replication). The three treatments were a basal diet (0 % FF), basal diet + 5 % FF and basal diet + 10 % FF, respectively. The experiment lasted 38 d after 4 d of acclimation. The study revealed that 10 % FF significantly increased the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) compared with 0 % FF group, with mRNA levels of up-regulated antioxidant-related genes (GPX1, SOD1, SOD2 and CAT) in 10 % FF group. 10 % FF also significantly up-regulated the percentage of slow-twitch fibre and the mRNA expression of MyHC I, MyHC IIa and MyHC IIx, and slow MyHC protein expression while reducing MyHC IIb mRNA expression. Lipidomics analysis showed that 5 % FF and 10 % FF altered lipid profiles in longissimus thoracis. 10 % FF particularly led to an increase in the percentage of TAG. The Pearson correlation analysis indicated that certain molecular markers such as phosphatidic acid (PA) (49:4), Hex2Cer (d50:6), cardiolipin (CL) (72:8) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) (33:0e) could be used to indicate the characteristics of muscle fibres and were closely related to meat quality. Together, our findings suggest that 10 % FF improved antioxidant capacity, enhanced slow-twitch fibre percentage and altered muscle lipid profiles in finishing pigs.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Primer sequences used in this study

Figure 1

Table 2. Contents of anti-nutritional factors in mixed feed and co-fermented feed (%, air-dry basis)

Figure 2

Table 3. Effects of FF on longissimus thoracis biochemical indicators (Standard error of the means)

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Effects of FF on muscle fibre histology and characteristics. (a) The morphology of myofibres by H&E staining. (b) The section average area of muscle fibres. (c) The immunofluorescence staining of slow-MyHC and fast-MyHC in muscle section. (d) Statistics on the percentage of slow-twitch fibres in each field of view. (e) The mRNA expression levels of genes associated with muscle fibre type. (f) The expression levels of protein expression associated with muscle fibre type. (g) The gene relative expression levels of AMPK-PGC1α signalling pathway. (h) The expression levels of genes associated with antioxidant capacity. Data are expressed as the mean values with their standard errors (n 6). Values with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0·05). FF, fermented feed; H&E, haematoxylin–eosin.

Figure 4

Table 4. Effects of FF on antioxidant enzyme activities and MDA content in serum and muscle (Standard error of the means)

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Effects of FF on the overall lipid composition and distribution in muscle. (a) Distribution of lipid classes that were considered for subsequent analysis in all of the samples. (b) The composition of total lipids in the longissimus thoracis. (c)–(e) Proportion of different lipid species among the three groups. (f) TAG acyl chain percentages at different saturation levels. (g)–(i) TAG with different numbers of carbon atoms. (j) TAG with different numbers of double bond contents. Significant differences are indicated by ‘*’ and ‘**’ (*P < 0·05 and **P < 0·01) (n 6). FF, fermented feed.

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Correlation analysis between differential lipids and meat quality indicators. (a) Score plots of lipid composition of the three groups were obtained by partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). (b) The number of common and special lipids among groups is shown by Venn diagram. (c) The most significantly different twenty lipids were shown in the heatmap. (d) Pearson correlation analysis between significantly different lipids and expression levels of genes associated with muscle fibre type. Blue and red represent negative and positive correlations, respectively. (e) Pearson correlation analysis between antioxidant activity and expression levels of genes associated with muscle fibre type. (f) Pearson correlation analysis between significantly different lipids and antioxidant activity. (g) Pearson correlation analysis between significantly different lipids and meat quality indicators. Meat quality data cited from our previous research(15). Significant correlations are indicated by ‘*’ and ‘**’ (*P < 0·05 and **P < 0·01) (n 6).

Figure 7

Fig. 4. A working model of the effects of FF on the muscle fibre characteristics, antioxidant capacity and lipid composition of pork. FF increases the slow-twitch fibre percentage and tenderness through AMPK/PGC-1α signalling pathway and improves antioxidant capacity and the portion of TAG in pork. FF, fermented mixed feed.