Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T21:23:31.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical alteration and preservation of sedimentary/organic nitrogen isotope signatures in a 2.7 Ga seafloor volcanic sequence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

L. D. Anderson
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA
G. E. Bebout*
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA Institute for Planetary Materials, Okayama University, 827 Yamada, Misasa, Tottori 682-0193, Japan
M. R. M. Izawa
Affiliation:
Institute for Planetary Materials, Okayama University, 827 Yamada, Misasa, Tottori 682-0193, Japan The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
N. J. Bridge
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
N. R. Banerjee
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: G. E. Bebout, E-mail: geb0@lehigh.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Massive to lobate volcanic flows and brecciated hyaloclastite units in the Abitibi greenstone belt allow investigation of Late Archæan seafloor alteration and associated incorporation into these rocks of nitrogen (N) biogeochemical signatures. In this suite (the Blake River Group), hyaloclastite units containing putative microbial ichnofossils are particularly enriched in large-ion lithophile elements (K, Rb, Ba, Cs), B, and Li, consistent with their having experienced the greatest fluid–rock interaction during subseafloor hydrothermal alteration. Similarly, silicate-δ18O and δ15N values for samples from the hyaloclastites show the greatest shifts from plausible magmatic values. The chemical and isotopic patterns in these tholeiitic igneous rocks greatly resemble those in modern altered seafloor basalts, consistent with the preservation of an Archæan seafloor alteration signature. The N enrichments and shifts in δ15N appear to reflect stabilization of illite and interaction with fluids carrying sedimentary/organic signatures. Enrichments of N (and the δ15N of this N) in altered glass volcanic rocks on Earth's modern and ancient seafloor point to the potential utility of N for tracing past and present biogeochemical processes in similar rocks at/near the Mars surface.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. General geology of the Abitibi greenstone belt, the location of the Hurd Property outcrop in the Southern Volcanic Zone is marked by the red star. Inset map shows the position of the Abitibi Subprovince on the Canadian Shield. Modified from Mueller & Daigneault (2006).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Detailed map of the Hurd Property outcrop with the locations of the three transects mapped in 2008 (E, East; C, Central; W, West). Samples were collected at 2 m (or smaller) intervals within each transect, but not all were analysed for this study. The transect maps and flow thickness measurement calculations were combined into an idealized stratigraphic section (right). Diamonds and squares indicate the unit sources on samples on all following geochemical scatter plots. Map modified from Bridge et al. (2010).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Photomicrographs of the various extents of shard deformation and palagonitization exhibited in the Hurd Property hyaloclastite samples. (a) 07RN-33 and (b) 38-KH08 represent autobrecciated clasts with subangular to angular and cuspate shards rimmed with palagonite (brown). Fibrous growth texture is evident in the palagonite (b). (c) 02-KH08 and (d) 05-KH08 represent rounded and mildly fractured clasts that have non-distinct palagonite rims. (e) 03-KH08 and (f) 06-KH08 represent the most extensively fractured and palagonitized shards.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Representative stratigraphic section of the volcanic units at the Hurd Property. (a) Description of volcanic facies and sample locations relative to the section. (b) Mineral occurrence diagram showing the presence of amphibole (Amp), magnetite (Mag), calcite (Cc), titanite (Ttn), illite (Illt), pyrite (Py) and epidote (Ep). Albite, chlorite and quartz have been omitted from the diagram because of their occurrence in every sample. (c–g) The major oxide element concentrations plotted as a function of their position in the section. Note that there are additional data in these plots, which are sourced from Bridge et al. (2010). (h–k) Large-ion lithophile and fluid-mobile element concentrations as a function of depth. (l) Oxygen isotope composition and SiO2 concentrations. (m) Nitrogen isotope compositions and N concentrations. Horizontal shaded bars represent the ichnofossil-bearing horizons (yellow) and illite-bearing horizons (grey).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Abundances of fluid-mobile elements, normalized to CI chondrites (values of McDonough and Sun 1995). (a) Uppermost stratigraphic unit, uppermost hyaloclastite unit (0–7 m); (b) thick hyaloclastite unit (7–21 m); (c) massive holocrystalline unit (21–34 m) and (d) oldest hyaloclastite (34–37 m).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Rare earth element (REE) patterns for Hurd volcanics, normalized to CI chondrites (values of McDonough and Sun 1995). (a) Uppermost stratigraphic unit, uppermost hyaloclastite unit (0–7 m); (b) thick hyaloclastite unit (7–21 m); (c) massive holocrystalline unit (21–34 m) and (d) oldest hyaloclastite (34–37 m).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Silicate-hosted N concentrations and δ15N values of the Hurd Property samples. (a) N content versus isotope concentration showing no obvious correlation within the sample suite. Within each unit, however, a few trends emerge, including the Hurd unit 2b and 2c (see unit designations in Fig. 2) samples that contain ichnofossils having greater N contents than the other samples in their unit and mostly higher δ15N as well. (b) Nitrogen content versus K content, showing weak correlation of N and K related to the substitution of NH4+ for K+.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Conceptual model of the eruption, alteration and microbial colonization cycles at the Hurd outcrop with a summary of events during each point in time, t1, t2 and t3; (a) and (b) indicate the specific eruption cycle units. Note that flow thicknesses and effects of subsidence are not indicated because the diagram is not spatially scaled.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Geochemical discrimination diagrams with data for the Hurd Property samples. (a) Total alkali versus silica (TAS) diagram showing the broadly tholeiitic affinity of the Hurd Property rocks. (b) Alternative discrimination diagram using Zr/Ti instead of total alkalis (which are presumably more strongly affected by postmagmatic processes), showing the same tholeiitic affinity. Volcanic classification diagrams employing high-field strength elements. (c) Zr/TiO2 ratio versus Nb/Y ratio demonstrating the intermediate basaltic andesite to andesite nature of the Hurd Property samples. (d) TiO2 versus Zr concentrations demonstrating the intermediate nature of the Hurd Property samples whose Ti and Zr contents resemble within-plate lavas more than they resemble volcanic arc lavas (indicating a lack of crustal contamination).

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Ratios of elements with similar compatibility versus concentration show uniform ratios with enrichment, consistent with by progressive magmatic differentiation via fractional crystallization. (a) Nb versus Nb/U; (b) U versus U/Th and (c) Ce versus Ce/Zr.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Nitrogen isotope composition plotted versus stratigraphic depth for the Hurd section. Shaded fields indicate the range of most Archean kerogen, modern air and modern MORB. Horizontal bars represent estimates of the range of δ15N values for two possible N input sources (chemolithoautotrophic biomass and Late Archean biomass) that could have influenced the δ15N of the NH4+ preserved in the volcanic rocks. The Hurd samples, even those containing microbial ichnofossils, appear to largely reflect the sedimentary kerogen values, indicating that fluids likely introduced NH4+ derived from overlying organic-rich sedimentary units.

Supplementary material: File

Anderson et al supplementary material

Anderson et al supplementary material 1

Download Anderson et al supplementary material(File)
File 26.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Anderson et al supplementary material

Anderson et al supplementary material 2

Download Anderson et al supplementary material(File)
File 43.5 KB