Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T15:42:38.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brachiaria and Panicum maximum in an integrated crop–livestock system and a second-crop maize system in succession with soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2020

Mariana Borges de Castro Dias
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Agricultural Sciences/Agronomy, Goias Federal Institute (Instituto Federal Goiano – IF Goiano, Campus Rio Verde), Rio Verde, Goias, Brazil
Kátia Aparecida de Pinho Costa*
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Agricultural Sciences/Agronomy, Goias Federal Institute (Instituto Federal Goiano – IF Goiano, Campus Rio Verde), Rio Verde, Goias, Brazil
Eduardo da Costa Severiano
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Agricultural Sciences/Agronomy, Goias Federal Institute (Instituto Federal Goiano – IF Goiano, Campus Rio Verde), Rio Verde, Goias, Brazil
Ubirajara Oliveira Bilego
Affiliation:
Institute of Science and Technology Comigo (Instituto de Ciência and Tecnologia Comigo – ITC), Rio Verde, Goiás, Brazil
Antonio Eduardo Furtini Neto
Affiliation:
Institute of Science and Technology Comigo (Instituto de Ciência and Tecnologia Comigo – ITC), Rio Verde, Goiás, Brazil
Dieimisson Paulo Almeida
Affiliation:
Institute of Science and Technology Comigo (Instituto de Ciência and Tecnologia Comigo – ITC), Rio Verde, Goiás, Brazil
Simone Cristiane Brand
Affiliation:
PlantCare Agricultural Research (PlantCare Pesquisa Agrícola), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Lourival Vilela
Affiliation:
Embrapa Cerrados, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Kátia Aparecida de Pinho Costa, E-mail: katia.costa@ifgoiano.edu.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Owing to its contribution to the maintenance of carbon stocks, soil nitrogen and nutrient cycling for subsequent crops, the integrated systems become increasingly important for agricultural conservation. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production of and total nutrient in Brachiaria spp. and Panicum maximum forage grasses used as mulch and soybean yields in an integrated crop–livestock system and second-crop maize succession system. The treatments consisted of the following cropping systems: Xaraes palisadegrass intercropped with soybean, Congo grass intercropped with soybean, Mombaça guinea grass intercropped with soybean, Tamani guinea grass intercropped with soybean and a soybean/maize succession system. The forage grasses were established during the soybean R6–R7 stage. Compared with Congo grass, Xaraes palisadegrass, Mombaça guinea grass and Tamani guinea grass produced more biomass and equivalent amounts of fertilizer returned to the soil and resulted in greater nutrient cycling, indicating the benefits of these grasses for use as mulch in integrated production systems. Maize had a greater C/N ratio, but the forage grasses also exhibited high potential by protecting the soil until the end of the soybean development cycle. The use of an integrated crop–livestock system combined with a forage cropping system provided greater soil nutrient cycling than the maize cropping system did, which resulted in increased soybean yields, thus contributing to the sustainability of agricultural systems.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Monthly rainfall and mean daily temperatures recorded from October 2016 to February 2018 in Rio Verde-GO, Brazil.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (Colour online) Diagram of the cropping systems comprising Brachiaria spp. and Panicum forage species in an integrated crop–livestock system and a system with maize in succession to soybean, covering all evaluation stages.

Figure 2

Table 1. Dry matter production (kg/ha) of forage in different grazing cycles

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Remaining mulch biomass (a) and C/N ratio (b) of forages for the Brachiaria and Panicum genera and maize during soybean cultivation (0–120 days).

Figure 4

Table 2. Biomass production and total nutrients in biomass of different cropping systems

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Nitrogen (a), phosphorus (b), potassium (c), calcium (d), magnesium (e) and sulphur (f) content in the biomass of forages in the Brachiaria and Panicum genera and maize during soybean cultivation (0–120 days).

Figure 6

Table 3. N, P2O5 and K2O equivalent contents in the biomass of different cropping systems

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Soybean sowing uniformity at the time of stand establishment in the different cropping systems plant distribution (a) and plant population (b) on a typical Dystrophic Red Latosol. The dashed lines indicate the mean, and the vertical bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 8

Table 4. Plant and insertion of the first pod height, number of pods per plant and number of grains per pods, 1000-grain weight and soybean yield on the biomass of different cropping systems