Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-72crv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T17:11:54.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypnotherapy and therapeutic suggestion: bridging the gap between evidence and utility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2022

Henry Orewa
Affiliation:
Postgraduate student on the Masters in Public Health programme at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Itoro Udo
Affiliation:
Consultant psychiatrist at City Clinic & Wellness Center, London, Ontario, and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. He is an accredited practitioner with the British Society of Clinical and Academic Hypnosis (BSCAH) and holds an Advanced Diploma in Clinical Hypnosis with distinction from Staffordshire University, UK. He uses clinical hypnosis in his daily work, especially in the management of complaints of bodily distress and medically unexplained symptoms.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The use of hypnotherapy in psychiatry has been controversial. However, evidence presented by Chan and colleagues shows that it is beneficial to the promotion of good mental health and well-being, specifically being applicable in the management of mental disorders. But what does this mean for practice? This commentary looks at what we agree and disagree with, what we opine is missing from the article and what now needs to happen. Patients should be able to access hypnotherapy or hypnosis routinely on the National Health Service. Since it works, who may it work for and how may we make this available to those who could benefit from it?

Information

Type
Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.