Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-jhrpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T14:41:43.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Intracranial Neuroendoscopic Procedures in Children versus Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Fady Girgis ,
Roberto Diaz ,
Walter Hader  and
Mark Hamilton
Fady Girgis
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Roberto Diaz
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Walter Hader
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mark Hamilton*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
*
Correspondence to: Mark Hamilton, Professor of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, 12th Floor, 1403, 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N-2T9, Canada. Email: mghamilton.hydro@gmail.com.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The emphasis regarding intracranial neuroendoscopy has been traditionally advocated and focused on the role in pediatric patients, although a significant usage has developed in adult patients. In this study, we examine and contrast the role of predominantly intracranial neuroendoscopy in both a pediatric and adult population with a minimum postprocedure follow-up of 5 years. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for patients in the two hospitals that manage neurosurgical care for Southern Alberta, Canada, undergoing neuroendoscopic surgery between 1994 and 2008. The pediatric group was defined as age ≤17 years and the adult group as age ≥18 years. Results: A total of 273 patients who underwent a total of 330 procedures with a mean postprocedure follow-up of 12.9 years were identified. There were 161 adult and 112 pediatric patients, and both groups underwent surgery by the same surgeons. The most common procedure was endoscopic third ventriculostomy, accounting for 55% of procedures. One postoperative death occurred in an adult patient. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy success 1-year postprocedure was 81%, with only three late-term failures. Postoperative infection was the most common serious complication (two pediatric/four adult patients). Adult and pediatric patients had similar major complication rates (4.2% vs 5.7%, p=0.547). Conclusions: Neuroendoscopy overall had a similar role in both pediatric and adult neurosurgical populations, with the most commonly associated complication being infection. Neuroendoscopy is an important therapeutic modality in the management of appropriate adult patients.

Résumé

Comparaison des interventions neuroendoscopiques intracrâniennes chez les enfants et chez les adultes.Contexte: Traditionnellement, l’emphase a été mise sur la neuroendoscopie intracrânienne chez les enfants et sur son rôle dans cette population de patients. Cependant, de telles interventions sont de plus en plus pratiquées chez des adultes. Nous examinons le rôle de la neuroendoscopie tant chez les enfants que chez les adultes et nous comparons son rôle dans ces deux populations de patients. Méthode: Nous avons procédé à une revue rétrospective des dossiers de patients ayant subi une chirurgie par neuroendoscopie entre 1994 et 2008 dans deux hôpitaux qui offrent des soins neurochirurgicaux dans la partie sud de l’Alberta, au Canada. Les patients du groupe pédiatrique étaient âgés de 17 ans ou moins et ceux du groupe adulte de 18 ans ou plus. Le suivi le plus court après l’intervention était de 5 ans. Résultats: Nous avons identifié 273 patients, dont 161 adultes et 112 enfants, qui ont subi au total 330 interventions, et chez qui un suivi moyen de 12,9 ans était disponible. Les deux groupes de patients ont été opérés par les mêmes chirurgiens. L’intervention la plus fréquemment effectuée était la ventriculostomie au niveau du 3e ventricule, ce qui représentait 5% des interventions. Un patient adulte est décédé en période post-opératoire. La ventriculostomie du 3e ventricule par voie endoscopique s’est avéré un succès au moment du suivi 1 an après l’intervention chez 81% des patients. Trois échecs tardifs ont été rapportés. L’infection postopératoire était la complication sérieuse la plus fréquente, rapportée chez 2 enfants et 4 adultes respectivement. Les patients des deux groupes avaient les mêmes taux de complications majeures, soit 4,2% chez les adultes et 5,7% chez les enfants (p = 0,547). Conclusions: En général, la neuroendoscopie jouait un rôle similaire dans le traitement neurochirurgical des populations pédiatriques et adultes et l’infection était la complication la plus fréquente chez ces patients. La neuroendoscopie constitue donc également un moyen thérapeutique important dans le traitement de patients adultes.

Keywords

adultcomplicationsneuroendoscopypediatric

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 42 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 427 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc. 2015 

Neuroendoscopy is an important minimally invasive technique in neurosurgeryReference Grunert, Gaab and Hellwig 1 and has evolved to include a role in both the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of disorders.Reference Cappabianca, Cinalli and Gangemi 2 In a historical context, the first therapeutic neuroendoscopic case was reported in Chicago in 1910, when L'Espinasse used a cystoscope to fulgurate the choroid plexus of two infants with hydrocephalus.Reference Abbott 3 Choroid plexus cauterization for the treatment of hydrocephalus gained popularity in the 1930s,Reference Harris 4 followed by endoscopic third ventriculoscopy (ETV) in the 1960s.Reference Enchev and Oi 5 However, it was not until the 1990s that endoscopy began to establish itself as a routine neurosurgical procedure.Reference Di Rocco, Cinalli, Massimi, Spennato, Cianciulli and Tamburrini 6 It grew from purely intraventricular applications to include surgery within other fluid-filled cavities such as the cisterna magna and the spinal canal, and eventually outside the cranial space to include skull base surgery,Reference Chrastina, Novak and Riha 7 tumor biopsy and resection, exploration of the cerebellopontine angle, and treatment of craniosynostoses.Reference Van Rompaey, Bush, McKinnon and Solares 8 , Reference Jenkins, Smith and McNeely 9 Neuroendoscopy may be done via existing anatomical pathways (e.g. transnasal) or using transcortical single- or multiport systems, in addition to robotic applications.Reference Vogel, Manjila and Cohen 10 , Reference Zada and Liu 11

As experience grows and techniques are refined, complication rates are decreasing and more and more neurosurgeons are enticed by the less-invasive appeal of the neuroendoscope. However, despite these advances and novel initiatives to train growing numbers of surgeons in the proper use of this technique,Reference Agrawal, Kato, Sano and Kanno 12 , Reference Filho, Coelho, Cavalheiro, Lyra and Zymberg 13 intracranial neuroendoscopy is still seen as a pediatric neurosurgery procedure, even though there are numerous indications in adult patients. We report a large series of neuroendoscopic cases in which the same surgeons performed both adult and pediatric procedures to illustrate the similarities and differences between pediatric and adult patient populations.

Methods

Following institutional board approval (E-22666), a retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent neuroendoscopic surgery at the Foothills Medical Centre and the Alberta Children’s Hospital between 1994 and 2008, as identified from a patient-specific database. These two hospitals are tertiary care centers providing care to all neurosurgical patients in Southern Alberta and parts of South-Eastern British Columbia (population approximately 1.5 million). We excluded transnasal pituitary and skull base procedures.

Information was collected from operative reports, clinic notes, progress notes in hospital, and discharge summaries. Recorded data included patient demographics, presenting symptoms, procedures performed, complications, and follow-up times. Pediatric patients were defined as age ≤17 years; adult patients were defined as age ≥18 years. Major complications included death, permanent neurological deficit or endocrine abnormality, meningitis, and a subdural collection requiring shunting. Minor complications included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, seizure, wound infection, and transient neurological deficit or endocrine abnormality.

Statistical analysis was performed using the R programming environment (Vienna, Austria). A p value of less than 0.05 was predefined to indicate a statistically significant result.

Results

A total of 330 procedures were performed in 273 consecutive patients between 1994 and 2008; these comprised 141 procedures in 112 pediatric patients and 189 procedures in 161 adult patients. Both adult and pediatric cases were performed by the same surgeons. ETV was the most common procedure performed in both groups. As expected from disease presentations and characteristics, more colloid cysts were resected in adults and more arachnoid cysts were fenestrated in children. Mean follow-up duration after the neuroendoscopic procedure was 12.9 years (range 5.7-19.7 years excluding one early death) and median follow-up 12.8 years.

A breakdown of the adult procedures and their complications is shown in Table 1. As seen in the table, ETV was the most common procedure performed in adult patients, followed by colloid cyst resection, tumor biopsy, and cyst fenestration. Major complications occurred in eight of 189 procedures, giving a major complication rate of 4.23%. These included four cases of meningitis and three cases of permanent neurological deficit, which included one postoperative case of hemiparesis, one cranial nerve palsy, and one patient who developed chronic seizures. In addition, one death occurred following septostomy in a 55-year-old man with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. His shunt failed because of ventriculitis and a cerebellar abscess, and following the urgent removal of the shunt, a septostomy, and placement of an extraventricular drain, he developed a large intracerebral hemorrhage around the drain. Given his overall poor state, care was withdrawn.

Table 1

Adult endoscopic procedures and their major complications

* Cranial nerve palsy.

† Chronic seizures.

‡ Hemiparesis.

A breakdown of the pediatric procedures and their complications is shown in Table 2. As seen in the table, ETV was the most common procedure performed in pediatric patients, followed by cyst fenestration. Major complications occurred in eight of 141 procedures, giving a major complication rate of 5.67%. These included two cases of meningitis, two patients who developed permanent and severe weight gain, one patient with panhypopituitarism, one patient with severe memory impairment, and two patients who developed subdural collections that required shunting.

Table 2

Pediatric endoscopic procedures and their major complications

* Obesity.

† Memory deficit.

‡ Panhypopituitarism.

A breakdown of all minor complications in both pediatric and adult patients is shown in Table 3. Minor complications occurred in 27 of 330 total procedures, giving an overall minor complication rate of 8.18%. The most common of these were CSF leak and transient seizures, followed by wound infection, transient weight gain or electrolyte abnormality, and transient cranial nerve III palsy.

Table 3

Minor complications of all procedures

* Cranial nerve III palsy.

† Hemiparesis.

‡ Includes four spine detetherings and six fenestrations of loculation.

We have previously reported the success of ETV to treat hydrocephalus as defined by remaining shunt-free at 1 year postprocedureReference Hader, Walker, Myles and Hamilton 14 with rates of 82.5% for primary ETV and 82% for ETV done in the setting of shunt failure and subsequent shunt removal. The success rate for this expanded population is essentially unchanged (81%), and only three delayed failures of ETV have occurred with long-term follow-up. All three delayed failures occurred in patients who underwent their ETV when younger than age 18. Two occurred within 2 years and one 10 years post-ETV as an adult. All underwent successful repeat ETV procedures and remain shunt-free.

To determine if there was a difference in the incidence of complications between adult and pediatric patients undergoing specific neuroendoscopic procedures, two-tailed chi-square tests were applied to major complication rates for each type of procedure, but none reached statistical significance (Table 4), nor did the overall complication rate between adult and pediatric patients (4.2% vs 5.7%, p=0.547).

Table 4

Differences in major complication rates by procedure

Incidence of major complication rates (number of major complications per total number of procedures) in endoscopic procedures for adult versus pediatric patients. The p values calculated using two-tailed chi-square test (alpha=0.05).

Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to attempt to identify any specific procedures that may potentially be associated with major complications, and to determine if there was a relation between patient age and complication rates, but neither reached statistical significance (odds ratios, 0.62-1.43; p values, 0.22-0.79).

Discussion

As minimally invasive approaches grow in popularity, endoscopy is becoming a powerful tool in the neurosurgeon’s armamentarium.Reference Hardavella and Ianovici 15 However, despite the appeal of a smaller incision, and the now well-described anatomy of intraventricular spaces,Reference Longatti, Fiorindi, Feletti, D'Avella and Martinuzzi 16 , Reference Longatti, Fiorindi, Perin and Martinuzzi 17 serious perioperative complications may occur. This is largely due to the proximity of the endoscope to critical neural structures, as is the case in several endoscopic procedures.Reference Cinalli, Spennato and Ruggiero 18 , Reference Ganjoo, Sethi, Tandon, Singh and Pandey 19 However, the incidence of complications is low, as reported in our population-based study, and varies with operative indication as well as patient age. Despite our finding that there is no statistically significant difference in complication rates between adult and pediatric patients, neuroendoscopy maintains the reputation of being a largely pediatric technique.

This large study is the first, to our knowledge, to report on endoscopic cases wherein the same surgeons performed both the pediatric and adult procedures, allowing for a direct and meaningful comparison of complication rates between the two patient groups. It is also the first to provide significant long-term follow-up.

Here we discuss the complications and outcomes of neuroendoscopy through its currently established indications.

Hydrocephalus

Hydrocephalus is a heterogeneous group of disorders that spans a wide range of ages and symptom profiles.Reference Bergsneider, Miller, Vespa and Hu 20 As such, each patient requires an individualized diagnostic and treatment approach. Traditionally, the treatment of hydrocephalus involved ventricular shunting, but because of the tendency of those systems to fail over time, whether from shunt malfunction or infection,Reference Jallo, Kothbauer and Abbott 21 endoscopic techniques are emerging as possible alternatives. These include ETV and septostomy, options that are most suitable for treating those patients with obstructive hydrocephalus.Reference Bergsneider, Miller, Vespa and Hu 20 - Reference Vogel, Bahuleyan, Robinson and Cohen 30 ETV consists of creating a hole through the tuber cinereum in the floor of the third ventricle to allow CSF to flow into the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns, thereby bypassing obstructions in the aqueductal area,Reference Jallo, Kothbauer and Abbott 21 , Reference Hellwig, Grotenhuis and Tirakotai 31 - Reference Brockmeyer 40 whereas septostomy involves placing the hole in the septum pellucidum. Another postulated mechanism involves the restoration of the pulsatility of ventricular walls as a result of the stoma, an effect that may help restore CSF dynamics by driving CSF flow from the ventricular system into the subarachnoid space.Reference Gangemi, Maiuri, Colella, Magro, Seneca and de Divitiis 22 On occasion, both ETV and septostomy may be required for the same patient to treat hydrocephalus.

The overall success rate of ETV has been reported as high as 89%,Reference Kadrian, van Gelder and Florida 23 and possibly even higher in the subset of patients with aqueductal stenosis,Reference Costa Val, Scaldaferri and Furtado 41 with most failures presenting in the first few weeks after surgery.Reference Santamarta, Diaz Alvarez and Goncalves 24 The long-term success for ETV in this pediatric and adult patient population was 81%. Various classification systems are emerging not only to help predict outcome after endoscopic procedures for hydrocephalus, but also to aid in the selection of appropriate patients to maximize positive outcomes.Reference Kulkarni, Drake and Mallucci 25 , Reference Kulkarni, Drake and Kestle 42 - Reference Ros, Romero and Ibanez 45

The most common indication for ETV is aqueductal stenosis, either from congenital narrowing of the aqueduct or obstructive tumors such as tectal gliomasReference Javadpour and Mallucci 46 and obstructive cysts.Reference Farin, Aryan, Ozgur, Parsa and Levy 47 , 48 Other indications include the fenestration of loculated compartments, 49 , Reference Oi and Abbott 50 ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction,Reference Bilginer, Oguz and Akalan 26 , Reference O’Brien, Javadpour, Collins, Spennato and Mallucci 27 and preresectional ETV for posterior fossa tumors.Reference Bhatia, Tahir and Chandler 51 Yet another potential role for ETV is in the realm of communicating hydrocephalusReference Hailong, Guangfu and Haibin 52 —specifically normal pressure hydrocephalusReference Gangemi, Maiuri, Buonamassa and Colella 53 , Reference Paidakakos, Borgarello and Naddeo 54 —although these remain controversial indications. A recent randomized, open-label trial of 42 patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus found that those treated with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt had significantly better neurological outcomes at 12 months compared with those who underwent ETV (77% vs 50%),Reference Pinto, Saad and MFd 55 whereas a large population-based study using institutional data found that ETV is associated with greater perioperative mortality and complication rates in these patients compared with shunting.Reference Chan, McGovern and Zacharia 56 Although more needs to be learned about this patient population, and the benefits of ETV seem inferior to shunting in hydrocephalic people with normal or low pressures, it may still play a role in appropriately selected patients.Reference Hamilton and Price 57

Appropriate candidates for ETV include both adults and children, although infants younger than 1 year old tend to have worse outcomes,Reference Kadrian, van Gelder and Florida 23 , Reference Tisell, Almstrom, Stephensen, Tullberg and Wikkelso 58 - Reference Drake, Kulkarni and Kestle 62 especially if they are born preterm or with a low birth weight.Reference Elgamal, El-Dawlatly, Murshid, El-Watidy and Jamjoom 63 Our series only had 34 children younger than 1 year of age undergoing a neuroendoscopic procedure, and only 14 underwent ETV. Complication rates in our pediatric population differed slightly from the literature in that, whereas overall trends showed complication rates increased with decreasing age, the highest rates of complication occurred in the 5- to 10-year-old age range.

In our series, 182 third ventriculostomies and 15 septostomies were performed; of these 197 procedures, 80 were performed on pediatric patients and 117 on adult patients. The overall major complication rate was 5.6%, which is similar to that of other studies. A recent systematic review by Bouras and Sgouros examined 2985 ETV procedures and reported an overall complication rate of 8.5%, a permanent morbidity rate of 2.4%, and a mortality rate of 0.21%.Reference Bouras and Sgouros 64 Jenkinson reported a 5.8% complication rate in 190 adult ETV proceduresReference Jenkinson, Hayhurst, Al-Jumaily, Kandasamy, Clark and Mallucci 65 and Kadiran described a 4.9% infection rate, 7.2% transient major complication rate, and a 1.1% permanent complication rate in 203 ETV patients.Reference Kadrian, van Gelder and Florida 23 In general, it has been reported that complication and mortality rates decrease with increased surgeon experience and are lower compared with open procedures in experienced hands.Reference Farin, Aryan, Ozgur, Parsa and Levy 47 , Reference Egger, Balmer, Altermatt and Meuli 66 , Reference Brockmeyer, Abtin, Carey and Walker 67 A qualitative analysis of our study did show that complication rates marginally decreased as surgeon experience increased, but it is important to note that equipment quality also improved over the course of the series. There were also more adult cases done later in the series, which may have contributed to the lower, albeit nonsignificant, complication rate in adult versus pediatric patients (4.2% vs 5.7%).

In addition, complications have been reported to occur more frequently in previously shunted patients than in patients treated for newly diagnosed hydrocephalusReference Hader, Walker, Myles and Hamilton 14 as well as patients undergoing repeat procedures.Reference Hader, Walker, Myles and Hamilton 14 , Reference Ersahin and Arslan 68 However, many of these complications are classified as minor, are transient, and may not affect long-term outcome. Therefore, when assessing the risks versus benefits of performing ETV in previously shunted patients, it is important to take into consideration the natural history of these patients when using a shunt, and subsequently their cumulative risk of shunt revision and infection over the lifespan of the shunt.

Overall, the complication rate for ETV is low and is similar to the expected infection rate associated with shunts.Reference Hader, Walker, Myles and Hamilton 14 Although the potential exposure to significant neurological complications with ETV may be higher than the risk of a single shunt operation, the possibility of achieving long-term shunt independence with ETV should be considered preferable in good-risk patients when compared with the cumulative morbidity of multiple shunt procedures.Reference Brockmeyer, Abtin, Carey and Walker 67 Absolute contraindications to ETV include small ventricular size preventing safe intraventricular manipulation of the scope and a tumor obstructing the surgeon's access to the floor of the third ventricle.Reference Rekate 69 These scenarios aside, the difficulties inherent to pediatric endoscopy and the risks associated with more complex cases may be alleviated with the use of neuronavigation, a technique that has been shown to a safe and beneficial adjunct to endoscopy.Reference McMillen, Vonau and Wood 70 - Reference Rohde, Behm, Ludwig and Wachter 72 Several systems, such as AxiEM (Medtronic, USA) currently used at our center, allow frameless navigation of the endoscope in patients that are unable to safely undergo rigid cranial fixation in pins because of young age or thin skull vaults, and in the subset of patients who have complicated or distorted ventricular anatomy.Reference McMillen, Vonau and Wood 70 , Reference Choi, Seo, Kim, Kim, Kim and Lee 73

Tumors

Endoscopic tumor management is a safe and effective alternative to conventional means and allows the option of ETV or septostomy for treatment of associated hydrocephalus.Reference Najjar, Azzam, Baghdadi, Turkmani and Skaf 74 - Reference Wong, Chen, Liang, Yen and Chang 90 The results in most series are based on data from both adult and pediatric populations. Neuroendoscopy in the field of neurooncology offers the advantages of improved visualization of intraventricular pathology, better management of tumor-related hydrocephalus, less morbid biopsies, and the allowance of minimally invasive removal of intraventricular tumors.Reference Badie, Brooks and Souweidane 77 , Reference Oppido, Fiorindi and Benvenuti 91 Certain characteristics make a tumor ideally suited for endoscopic biopsy or resection.Reference Teo and Nakaji 78 These include moderate to low vascularity, soft-consistency, tumors smaller than 2 cm in diameter, those associated with secondary hydrocephalus, those that are histologically low grade, and lesions situated in the lateral ventricle and pineal region.Reference Hanada, Oyoshi, Hirano and Arita 76 , Reference Tirakotai, Riegel and Stiegel 92 In addition, tumors that will be treated primarily nonsurgically, such as gliomas of the tectal region, are ideally suited for primary treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus and, if appropriate, neuroendoscopic biopsy.Reference Badie, Brooks and Souweidane 77

In our series, 27 intraventricular tumors were biopsied, four of which were also resected. Of the 27 patients, there were 20 adults and seven pediatric patients. The overall major complication rate was 3.7%, which is consistent with that of other series. Constantini et al reported a large series of 293 patients who underwent endoscopic tumor biopsy with an infection rate of 3% and a mortality rate of 0.3%.Reference Constantini, Mohanty and Zymberg 93 Another report by Luther et al of 86 intraventricular tumors that were biopsied or resected had a hemorrhagic sequelae rate of 3.5%.Reference Luther, Cohen and Souweidane 79 They defined clinically significant hemorrhage as that resulting in abandonment of the procedure, postoperative hydrocephalus requiring shunting, neurological change, or hemorrhage that required a second procedure to treat the bleed. In addition, Tirakotai et al described 46 patients (mean age 43.8 years) with peri- and intraventricular tumors who underwent neuroendoscopic procedures with three transient morbidities and one permanent deficit, but no operative mortality.Reference Tirakotai, Hellwig, Bertalanffy and Riegel 81

Arachnoid Cysts

Primary arachnoid cysts are developmental lesions containing a fluid similar to CSF and are often incidentally found in patients as a focal area of fluid accumulation with bulging and thinning of the adjacent skull.Reference Awaji, Okamoto and Nishiyama 94 Overall, arachnoid cysts account for approximately 1% of all intracranial mass lesions, with potentially up to 60-90% of these becoming symptomatic in childhood.Reference Pradilla and Jallo 95 Patients presenting with symptoms or signs of increased intracranial pressure or seizures and with growing arachnoid cysts are typically considered for surgical treatment. Endoscopic surgery has become the treatment of choice when feasible because of its minimal invasiveness and good outcomes.Reference Pradilla and Jallo 95 - Reference Karabagli and Etus 105 Assessment of the anatomical relationship between the arachnoid cyst wall and adjacent anatomical structures such as blood vessels, cranial nerves, and brain parenchyma is necessary during preoperative planning to avoid injury to these structures. Complications may include intraoperative bleeding obscuring the surgeon's visual field, postoperative subdural hematomas or hygromas, meningitis, or the injuring of adjacent structures during fenestration.Reference Abbott 106

In our combined series, 53 cyst fenestrations were performed, 16 in adults and 37 in pediatric patients. The overall major complication rate was 7.5%, which is similar to that of other series. For example, Nowoslawska et al reviewed 106 children with arachnoid cysts, 44 of whom underwent a neuroendoscopic procedure and 62 of whom underwent other operations.Reference Nowoslawska, Polis and Kaniewska 101 Eleven of the 44 experienced complications, including five CSF leaks, two third nerve palsies, two subdural hematomas, one case of meningitis, and one case of severe intraoperative bleeding. In the nonendoscopic group, there were ten with complications. In a smaller series reported by Huang et al of 15 patients who underwent neuroendoscopic arachnoid cyst fenestration, there was only one complication of chronic subdural hematoma that was treated with burr hole drainage.Reference Huang, Wang, Guo, Zhou, Wang and Li 100 The authors concluded that, compared with traditional treatments, neuroendoscopic cystic fenestration is more effective and minimally invasive with less mortality and morbidity. Similarly, two additional patient series, one reported by Schroeder et al of 21 endoscopically fenestrated arachnoid cysts revealed no deaths or permanent complicationsReference Schroeder, Oertel and Gaab 102 ; another study by Pradilla et al of 11 endoscopically treated arachnoid cysts (mean age 10.9 years) found one patient left with persistent spasticity and one patient suffering mild hemiparesis.Reference Pradilla and Jallo 95 These authors concluded that cyst fenestration is favored over shunting as the method of choice for initial cyst decompression.

Colloid Cysts

Colloid cysts are benign space-occupying lesions that typically arise in the region of the anterior third ventricleReference Charalampaki, Filippi, Welschehold and Perneczky 107 and represent about 0.5-2% of intracranial tumors.Reference Grondin, Hader, MacRae and Hamilton 108 Although uncommon, they are an important clinical entity because of their ability to cause CSF obstruction at the foramina of Munro with resultant hydrocephalus, which in the acute state can lead to sudden death.Reference Grondin, Hader, MacRae and Hamilton 108 If the obstruction of the foramina of Monro is asymmetrical, one lateral ventricle can grow larger than the other, resulting in bowing of the septum pellucidum to the nonaffected side.Reference Charalampaki, Filippi, Welschehold and Conrad 109 Although microsurgery has been the classic treatment option,Reference Longatti, Godano and Gangemi 110 the composition and location of these cysts make them ideally suited for endoscopic excision.Reference Mishra, Chandra, Suri, Rajender, Sharma and Mahapatra 111 - Reference Margetis and Souweidane 115 Expectedly, the success of endoscopic colloid cyst removal is heavily dependent upon the surgeon’s experience.Reference Badie, Brooks and Souweidane 77

In our series, 32 colloid cysts were endoscopically resected, 31 of which were in adult patients. The overall major complication rate was 3.1%, and the cyst recurred in one case. We have previously presented our data in comparison to microsurgical resections, showing that endoscopic resection of colloid cysts can be performed with a significantly lower risk of complications than microsurgical resection (4% vs 33%), and with equivalent surgical success.Reference Grondin, Hader, MacRae and Hamilton 108 In addition, operative time and length of hospital stay are both significantly reduced with endoscopic resection. Similar results were found in a series of 30 patients reported by Lewis et al,Reference Lewis, Crone, Taha, van Loveren, Yeh and Tew 116 where half underwent open resection and the other half endoscopic resection of a colloid cyst. They found the endoscopic group had shorter hospital stay and operative time, as well as a shorter interval before returning to work. Similarly, Longatti et al reported on 61 patients (mean age 41 years) undergoing endoscopic colloid cyst resection who had a complication rate of 3.2%, with seven asymptomatic recurrences,Reference Longatti, Godano and Gangemi 110 and Greenlee et al reported 35 patients (mean age 32.4 years) experiencing a complication rate of 8.6%.Reference Greenlee, Teo, Ghahreman and Kwok 117

Summary and Conclusions

Intracranial, intraventricular neuroendoscopy was performed in 161 adult and 112 pediatric patients. A higher percentage of pediatric patients underwent cyst fenestration, whereas a higher percentage of adults underwent ETV, colloid cyst removal, and tumor biopsy. The most common complication associated with neuroendoscopy was infection, and adult and pediatric patients had similar complication rates. These findings highlight the important potential role for neuroendoscopy during management of appropriate adult patients. Therefore, neuroendoscopy should be an available therapeutic modality in all neurosurgical centers and should be considered as a potential therapeutic modality in the management of suitable adult as well as pediatric patients.

Disclosures

All authors have seen and approved this manuscript and have no disclosures to report. No portion of this work has been previously published or presented. FG, RD, WH, and MH declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Grunert, P, Gaab, MR, Hellwig, D. Oertel JMK. German neuroendoscopy above the skull base. Neurosurgical Focus. 2009 Sep;27(3):E7.Google Scholar
2. Cappabianca, P, Cinalli, G, Gangemi, M, et al. Application of neuroendoscopy to intraventricular lesions. Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62 Suppl 2:575-97; discussion 97-8.Google Scholar
3. Abbott, R. History of neuroendoscopy. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2004 Jan;15(1):1-7.Google Scholar
4. Harris, LW. Endoscopic techniques in neurosurgery. Microsurgery. 1994;15(8):541-546.Google Scholar
5. Enchev, Y, Oi, S. Historical trends of neuroendoscopic surgical techniques in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurgical Review. 2008 Jul;31(3):249-262.Google Scholar
6. Di Rocco, C, Cinalli, G, Massimi, L, Spennato, P, Cianciulli, E, Tamburrini, G. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients. Advances & Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. 2006;31:119-219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Chrastina, J, Novak, Z, Riha, I. Neuroendoscopy. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy. 2008;109(5):198-201.Google Scholar
8. Van Rompaey, J, Bush, C, McKinnon, B, Solares, A. EMinimally invasive access to the posterior cranial fossa: an anatomical study comparing a retrosigmoidal endoscopic approach to a microscopic approach. Journal of Neurological Surgery. 2013 Jan;74(1):1-6.Google Scholar
9. Jenkins, G, Smith, N, McNeely, P. Pancraniosynostosis following endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and helmet orthosis for sagittal suture craniosynostosis in a nonsyndromic patient. Journal of Neurosurgery, Pediatrics. 2013 Jul;12(1):77-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Vogel, TW, Manjila, S, Cohen, AR. Cranial neuroendoscopy: novel applications and next frontiers. Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences. 2011 Sep;55(3):243-257.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Zada, G, Liu, C. Apuzzo MLJ. “Through the looking glass”: optical physics, issues, and the evolution of neuroendoscopy. World Neurosurgery. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S3-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Agrawal, A, Kato, Y, Sano, H, Kanno, T. The incorporation of neuroendoscopy in neurosurgical training programs. World Neurosurgery. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S15.e1-3.Google Scholar
13. Filho, FVG, Coelho, G, Cavalheiro, S, Lyra, M, Zymberg, ST. Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training. Neurosurgical Focus. 2011 Apr;30(4):E17.Google Scholar
14. Hader, WJ, Walker, RL, Myles, ST, Hamilton, M. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in previously shunted patients. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1 Suppl 1):ONS168-74; discussion ONS74-5.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Hardavella, G, Ianovici, N. Current trends in minimally invasive neurosurgery: neuro-endoscopy. Revista Medico-Chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici Si Naturalisti Din Iasi. 2005 Jul-Sep; 109(3):528-531.Google Scholar
16. Longatti, P, Fiorindi, A, Feletti, A, D'Avella, D, Martinuzzi, A. Endoscopic anatomy of the fourth ventricle. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2008 Sep;109(3):530-5.Google Scholar
17. Longatti, P, Fiorindi, A, Perin, A, Martinuzzi, A. Endoscopic anatomy of the cerebral aqueduct. Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3 Suppl):1-5; discussion 6.Google Scholar
18. Cinalli, G, Spennato, P, Ruggiero, C, et al. Complications following endoscopic intracranial procedures in children. Childs Nervous System. 2007 Jun;23(6):633-644.Google Scholar
19. Ganjoo, P, Sethi, S, Tandon, MS, Singh, D, Pandey, BC. Perioperative complications of intraventricular neuroendoscopy: a 7-year experience. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2010 Jan; 20(1):33-38.Google Scholar
20. Bergsneider, M, Miller, C, Vespa, PM, Hu, X. Surgical management of adult hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62(Suppl 2):643-659; discussion 59-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Jallo, GI, Kothbauer, KF, Abbott, IR. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgical Focus. 2005 Dec 15;19(6):E11.Google Scholar
22. Gangemi, M, Maiuri, F, Colella, G, Magro, F, Seneca, V, de Divitiis, E. Is endoscopic third ventriculostomy an internal shunt alone? Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;50(1):47-50.Google Scholar
23. Kadrian, D, van Gelder, J, Florida, D, et al. Long-term reliability of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. [Reprint in Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62 Suppl 2:614-21; PMID: 18596443]. Neurosurgery. 2005 Jun;56(6):1271-1278; discussion 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Santamarta, D, Diaz Alvarez, A, Goncalves, GM, et al. Outcome of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Results from an unselected series with noncommunicating hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2005 Apr;147(4):377-382; discussion 82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Kulkarni, AV, Drake, JM, Mallucci, CL, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. Journal of Pediatrics. 2009 Aug;155(2):254-259. e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Bilginer, B, Oguz, KK, Akalan, N. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for malfunction in previously shunted infants. Childs Nervous System. 2009 Jun;25(6):683-688.Google Scholar
27. O’Brien, DF, Javadpour, M, Collins, DR, Spennato, P, Mallucci, CL. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis of primary cases and procedures performed after ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2005 Nov;103(5 Suppl):393-400.Google ScholarPubMed
28. Bouramas, D, Paidakakos, N, Sotiriou, F, Kouzounias, K, Sklavounou, M, Gekas, N. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in obstructive hydrocephalus: surgical technique and pitfalls. Acta Neurochirurgica - Supplement. 2012;113:135-139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Teo, C, Kadrian, D, Hayhurst, C. Endoscopic management of complex hydrocephalus. World Neurosurgery. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S21.e1-7.Google Scholar
30. Vogel, TW, Bahuleyan, B, Robinson, S, Cohen, AR. The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics. 2013 Jul;12(1):54-61.Google Scholar
31. Hellwig, D, Grotenhuis, JA, Tirakotai, W, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurosurgical Review. 2005 Jan;28(1):1-34; discussion 5-8.Google Scholar
32. Naftel, RP, Tubbs, RS, Reed, GT, Wellons, JC 3rd. Small ventricular access prior to rigid neuroendoscopy. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2010 Oct;Pediatrics, 6(4):325-328.Google Scholar
33. Ebner, FH, Marquardt, JS, Hirt, B, Feigl, GC, Tatagiba, M, Schuhmann, MU. Broadening horizons of neuroendoscopy with a variable-view rigid endoscope: an anatomical study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2010 Feb;36(2):195-200.Google Scholar
34. van Beijnum, J, Hanlo, PW, Fischer, K, et al. Laser-assisted endoscopic third ventriculostomy: long-term results in a series of 202 patients. Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62(2):437-43; discussion 43-4.Google Scholar
35. Costa Val, JA. Minicraniotomy for endoscopic third ventriculostomy in babies: technical note with a 7-year-segment analysis. Childs Nervous System. 2009 Mar;25(3):357-359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Knaus, H, Abbushi, A, Hoffmann, KT, Schwarz, K, Haberl, H, Thomale, UW. Measurements of burr-hole localization for endoscopic procedures in the third ventricle in children. Childs Nervous System. 2009 Mar;25(3):293-299.Google Scholar
37. Sandberg, DI. Endoscopic management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients: a review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. Journal of Child Neurology. 2008 May;23(5):550-560.Google Scholar
38. Nishiyama, K, Mori, H, Yoshimura, J, Fujii, Y. Endoscopic fenestration of the third ventricle in the reverse direction. Childs Nervous System. 2008 Apr;24(4):507-508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Harris, AE, Hadjipanayis, CG, Lunsford, LD, Lunsford, AK, Kassam, AB. Microsurgical removal of intraventricular lesions using endoscopic visualization and stereotactic guidance. [Reprint in Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62 Suppl 2:622-9; PMID: 18596442]. Neurosurgery. 2005 Jan;56(1 Suppl):125-132; discussion -32.Google Scholar
40. Brockmeyer, D. Techniques of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2004 Jan;15(1):51-59.Google Scholar
41. Costa Val, JA, Scaldaferri, PM, Furtado, LM. de Souza Baptista G. Third ventriculostomy in infants younger than 1 year old. Childs Nervous System. 2012 Aug;28(8):1233-1235.Google Scholar
42. Kulkarni, AV, Drake, JM, Kestle, JRW, et al. Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV Success Score. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2010 Oct; Pediatrics, 6(4):310-315.Google Scholar
43. Garcia, LG, Lopez, BR, Botella, GI, et al. Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score (ETVSS) predicting success in a series of 50 pediatric patients. Are the outcomes of our patients predictable? Childs Nervous System. 2012 Aug;28(8):1157-1162.Google Scholar
44. Kulkarni, AV, Riva-Cambrin, J, Browd, SR. Use of the ETV Success Score to explain the variation in reported endoscopic third ventriculostomy success rates among published case series of childhood hydrocephalus. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;7(2):143-146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Ros, B, Romero, L, Ibanez, G, et al. Success criteria in pediatric neuroendoscopic procedures. Proposal for classification of results after 67 operations. Childs Nervous System. 2012 May;28(5):691-697.Google Scholar
46. Javadpour, M, Mallucci, C. The role of neuroendoscopy in the management of tectal gliomas. Childs Nervous System. 2004 Nov;20(11-12):852-857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Farin, A, Aryan, HE, Ozgur, BM, Parsa, AT, Levy, ML. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2006 Aug;13(7):763-70.Google Scholar
48. El-Ghandour NMF. Endoscopic cyst fenestration in the treatment of uniloculated hydrocephalus in children. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;11(4):402-409.Google Scholar
49. El-Ghandour NMF. Endoscopic cyst fenestration in the treatment of multiloculated hydrocephalus in children. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2008 Mar;Pediatrics, 1(3):217-22.Google Scholar
50. Oi, S, Abbott, R. Loculated ventricles and isolated compartments in hydrocephalus: their pathophysiology and the efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2004 Jan;15(1):77-87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Bhatia, R, Tahir, M, Chandler, CL. The management of hydrocephalus in children with posterior fossa tumours: the role of pre-resectional endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2009;45(3):186-191.Google Scholar
52. Hailong, F, Guangfu, H, Haibin, T, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of communicating hydrocephalus: a preliminary study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2008 Nov;109(5):923-930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. Gangemi, M, Maiuri, F, Buonamassa, S, Colella, G. de Divitiis E. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2004 Jul;55(1):129-134; discussion 34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Paidakakos, N, Borgarello, S, Naddeo, M. Indications for endoscopic third ventriculostomy in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochirurgica - Supplement. 2012;113:123-127.Google Scholar
55. Pinto, FCG, Saad, F, MFd, Oliveira, et al. Role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2013 May;72(5):845-853; discussion 53-4.Google Scholar
56. Chan, AK, McGovern, RA, Zacharia, BE, et al. Inferior Short-Term Safety Profile of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy as Compared to Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Population-Based Study. Neurosurgery. 2013 Aug; 5.Google Scholar
57. Hamilton, MG, Price, AV. Syndrome of inappropriately low-pressure acute hydrocephalus (SILPAH). Acta Neurochirurgica - Supplement. 2012;113:155-159.Google Scholar
58. Tisell, M, Almstrom, O, Stephensen, H, Tullberg, M, Wikkelso, C. How effective is endoscopic third ventriculostomy in treating adult hydrocephalus caused by primary aqueductal stenosis? Neurosurgery. 2000 Jan;46(1):104-10; discussion 10-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Ogiwara, H, Dipatri, AJ Jr., Alden, TD, Bowman, RM, Tomita, T. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus in children younger than 6 months of age. Childs Nervous System. 2010 Mar;26(3):343-347.Google Scholar
60. Lipina, R, Reguli, S, Dolezilov, , et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus in children younger than 6 months of age: is it a first-choice method? Childs Nervous System. 2008 Sep;24(9):1021-1027.Google Scholar
61. Baldauf, J, Oertel, J, Gaab, MR, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 2 years of age. Childs Nervous System. 2007 Jun;23(6):623-6.Google Scholar
62. Drake, JM, Kulkarni, AV, Kestle, J. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric patients: a decision analysis. Childs Nervous System. 2009 Apr;25(4):467-472.Google Scholar
63. Elgamal, EA, El-Dawlatly, A-A, Murshid, WR, El-Watidy, SMF, Jamjoom, ZA-AB. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus in children younger than 1 year of age. Childs Nervous System. 2011 Jan;27(1):111-116.Google Scholar
64. Bouras, T, Sgouros, S. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics. 2011 Jun;7(6):643-649.Google Scholar
65. Jenkinson, MD, Hayhurst, C, Al-Jumaily, M, Kandasamy, J, Clark, S, Mallucci, CL. The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in adult patients with hydrocephalus. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009 May;110(5):861-866.Google Scholar
66. Egger, D, Balmer, B, Altermatt, S, Meuli, M. Third ventriculostomy in a single pediatric surgical unit. Childs Nervous System. 2010 Jan;26(1):93-9.Google Scholar
67. Brockmeyer, D, Abtin, K, Carey, L, Walker, ML. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 1998 May;28(5):236-240.Google Scholar
68. Ersahin, Y, Arslan, D. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nervous System. 2008 Aug;24(8):943-948.Google Scholar
69. Rekate, HL. Selecting patients for endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2004 Jan;15(1):39-49.Google Scholar
70. McMillen, JL, Vonau, M, Wood, MJ. Pinless frameless electromagnetic image-guided neuroendoscopy in children. Childs Nervous System. 2010 Jul;26(7):871-8.Google Scholar
71. Sangra, M, Clark, S, Hayhurst, C, Mallucci, C. Electromagnetic-guided neuroendoscopy in the pediatric population. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009 Apr;Pediatrics, 3(4):325-30.Google Scholar
72. Rohde, V, Behm, T, Ludwig, H, Wachter, D. The role of neuronavigation in intracranial endoscopic procedures. Neurosurgical Review. 2012 Jul;35(3):351-358.Google Scholar
73. Choi, KY, Seo, BR, Kim, JH, Kim, SH, Kim, TS, Lee, JK. The usefulness of electromagnetic neuronavigation in the pediatric neuroendoscopic surgery. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2013 Mar;53(3):161-166.Google Scholar
74. Najjar, MW, Azzam, NI, Baghdadi, TS, Turkmani, AH, Skaf, G. Endoscopy in the management of intra-ventricular lesions: preliminary experience in the Middle East. Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery. 2010, Jan; 112(1):17-22.Google Scholar
75. Ahmad, F, Sandberg, DI. Endoscopic management of intraventricular brain tumors in pediatric patients: a review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. Journal of Child Neurology. 2010 Mar;25(3):359-367.Google Scholar
76. Hanada, T, Oyoshi, T, Hirano, H, Arita, K. Metastatic pineal tumors treated by neuroendoscopic surgery--two case reports. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica. 2010;50(3):232-236.Google Scholar
77. Badie, B, Brooks, N, Souweidane, MM. Endoscopic and minimally invasive microsurgical approaches for treating brain tumor patients. J Neurooncol. 2004 Aug-Sep;69(1-3):209-219.Google Scholar
78. Teo, C, Nakaji, P. Neuro-oncologic applications of endoscopy. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2004 Jan;15(1):89-103.Google Scholar
79. Luther, N, Cohen, A, Souweidane, MM. Hemorrhagic sequelae from intracranial neuroendoscopic procedures for intraventricular tumors. Neurosurgical Focus. 2005 Jul; 15;19(1):E9.Google Scholar
80. Souweidane, MM. Endoscopic surgery for intraventricular brain tumors in patients without hydrocephalus. [Reprint in Neurosurgery. 2008 Jun;62(6 Suppl 3):1042-8; PMID: 18695524]. Neurosurgery. 2005 Oct;57(4 Suppl):312-318; discussion -8.Google Scholar
81. Tirakotai, W, Hellwig, D, Bertalanffy, H, Riegel, T. The role of neuroendoscopy in the management of solid or solid-cystic intra- and periventricular tumours. Childs Nervous System. 2007 Jun;23(6):653-658.Google Scholar
82. Al-Tamimi, YZ, Bhargava, D, Surash, S, et al. Endoscopic biopsy during third ventriculostomy in paediatric pineal region tumours. Childs Nervous System. 2008 Nov;24(11):1323-1326.Google Scholar
83. Klimo, P Jr., Goumnerova, LC. Endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy for brainstem tumors. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006 Oct;105(4 Suppl):271-274.Google Scholar
84. O’Brien, DF, Hayhurst, C, Pizer, B, Mallucci, CL. Outcomes in patients undergoing single-trajectory endoscopic third ventriculostomy and endoscopic biopsy for midline tumors presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006 Sep;105(3 Suppl):219-26.Google Scholar
85. Cipri, S, Gangemi, A, Cafarelli, F, et al. Neuroendoscopic management of hydrocephalus secondary to midline and pineal lesions. Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences. 2005 Sep;49(3):97-106.Google Scholar
86. Yurtseven, T, Ersahin, Y, Demirtas, E, et al. Neuroendoscopic biopsy for intraventricular tumors. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2003 Oct;46(5):293-299.Google Scholar
87. Di Rocco, F, Juca, CE, Zerah, M, Sainte-Rose, C. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and posterior fossa tumors. World Neurosurgery. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S18.e5-9.Google Scholar
88. Morgenstern, PF, Souweidane, MM. Pineal region tumors: simultaneous endoscopic third ventriculostomy and tumor biopsy. World Neurosurgery. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S18.e9-3.Google Scholar
89. Shahinian, HK, Ra, Y. 527 fully endoscopic resections of vestibular schwannomas. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;54(2):61-67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90. Wong, T-T, Chen, H-H, Liang, M-L, Yen, Y-S, Chang, F-C. Neuroendoscopy in the management of pineal tumors. Childs Nervous System. 2011 Jun;27(6):949-959.Google Scholar
91. Oppido, PA, Fiorindi, A, Benvenuti, L, et al. Neuroendoscopic biopsy of ventricular tumors: a multicentric experience. Neurosurgical Focus. 2011 Apr;30(4):E2.Google Scholar
92. Tirakotai, W, Riegel, T, Stiegel, A, et al. Peri-operative quality of life assessment in endoscopically treated patients with pineal region tumours. Childs Nervous System. 2007 Jun;23(6):659-63.Google Scholar
93. Constantini, S, Mohanty, A, Zymberg, S, et al. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of neuroendoscopic biopsies: an international multicenter study. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;11(6):704-709.Google Scholar
94. Awaji, M, Okamoto, K, Nishiyama, K. Magnetic resonance cisternography for preoperative evaluation of arachnoid cysts. Neuroradiology. 2007 Sep;49(9):721-726.Google Scholar
95. Pradilla, G, Jallo, G. Arachnoid cysts: case series and review of the literature. Neurosurgical Focus. 2007;22(2):E7.Google Scholar
96. Oertel, JM, Baldauf, J, Schroeder, HW, et al. Endoscopic cystoventriculostomy for treatment of paraxial arachnoid cysts. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009 Apr;110(4):792-799.Google Scholar
97. Ersahin, Y, Kesikci, H. Endoscopic management of quadrigeminal arachnoid cysts. Childs Nervous System. 2009 May;25(5):569-576.Google Scholar
98. Ersahin, Y, Kesikci, H, Aksen, M, Aydin, C, Mutluer, S. Endoscopic treatment of suprasellar arachnoid cysts. Childs Nervous System. 2008 Sep;24(9):1013-1020.Google Scholar
99. Di Rocco, F, R James, S, Roujeau, T, Puget, S, Sainte-Rose, C, Zerah, M. Limits of endoscopic treatment of sylvian arachnoid cysts in children. Childs Nervous System. 2010 Feb;26(2):155-162.Google Scholar
100. Huang, Q, Wang, D, Guo, Y, Zhou, X, Wang, X, Li, X. The diagnosis and neuroendoscopic treatment of noncommunicating intracranial arachnoid cysts. Surgical Neurology. 2007 Aug;68(2):149-154; discussion 54.Google Scholar
101. Nowoslawska, E, Polis, L, Kaniewska, D, et al. Neuroendoscopic techniques in the treatment of arachnoid cysts in children and comparison with other operative methods. Childs Nervous System. 2006 Jun;22(6):599-604.Google Scholar
102. Schroeder, HWS, Oertel, J, Gaab, MR. Endoscopic treatment of cerebrospinal fluid pathway obstructions. Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS44-51; discussion ONS-2.Google Scholar
103. Spacca, B, Kandasamy, J, Mallucci, CL, Genitori, L. Endoscopic treatment of middle fossa arachnoid cysts: a series of 40 patients treated endoscopically in two centres. Childs Nervous System. 2010 Feb;26(2):163-172.Google Scholar
104. Cinalli, G, Peretta, P, Spennato, P, et al. Neuroendoscopic management of interhemispheric cysts in children. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006 Sep;105(3 Suppl):194-202.Google Scholar
105. Karabagli, H, Etus, V. Success of pure neuroendoscopic technique in the treatment of Sylvian arachnoid cysts in children. Childs Nervous System. 2012 Mar;28(3):445-452.Google Scholar
106. Abbott, R. The endoscopic management of arachnoidal cysts. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2004 Jan;15(1):9-17.Google Scholar
107. Charalampaki, P, Filippi, R, Welschehold, S, Perneczky, A. Endoscope-assisted removal of colloid cysts of the third ventricle. Neurosurgical Review. 2006 Jan;29(1):72-79.Google Scholar
108. Grondin, RT, Hader, W, MacRae, ME, Hamilton, MG. Endoscopic versus microsurgical resection of third ventricle colloid cysts. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 2007 May;34(2):197-207.Google Scholar
109. Charalampaki, P, Filippi, R, Welschehold, S, Conrad, J. Endoscopic and endoscope-assisted neurosurgical treatment of suprasellar arachnoidal cysts (Mickey Mouse cysts). Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2005 Oct;48(5):283-288.Google Scholar
110. Longatti, P, Godano, U, Gangemi, M, et al. Cooperative study by the Italian neuroendoscopy group on the treatment of 61 colloid cysts.[Erratum appears in Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Oct;22(10):1375]. Childs Nervous System. 2006 Oct;22(10):1263-1267.Google Scholar
111. Mishra, S, Chandra, PS, Suri, A, Rajender, K, Sharma, BS, Mahapatra, AK. Endoscopic management of third ventricular colloid cysts: eight years’ institutional experience and description of a new technique. Neurology India. 2010 May-Jun;58(3):412-417.Google Scholar
112. Zohdi, A, El Kheshin, S. Endoscopic approach to colloid cysts. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2006 Oct;49(5):263-268.Google Scholar
113. Tamburrini, G, D’Angelo, L, Paternoster, G, Massimi, L, Caldarelli, M, Di Rocco, C. Endoscopic management of intra and paraventricular CSF cysts. Childs Nervous System. 2007 Jun;23(6):645-651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
114. Tirakotai, W, Schulte, DM, Bauer, BL, Bertalanffy, H, Hellwig, D. Neuroendoscopic surgery of intracranial cysts in adults. Childs Nervous System. 2004 Nov;20(11-12):842-851.Google Scholar
115. Margetis, K, Souweidane, MM. Endoscopic treatment of intraventricular cystic tumors. World Neurosurgery. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S19.e1-1.Google Scholar
116. Lewis, AI, Crone, KR, Taha, J, van Loveren, HR, Yeh, HS, Tew, JM Jr. Surgical resection of third ventricle colloid cysts. Preliminary results comparing transcallosal microsurgery with endoscopy. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1994 Aug;81(2):174-178.Google Scholar
117. Greenlee, JDW, Teo, C, Ghahreman, A, Kwok, B. Purely endoscopic resection of colloid cysts. Neurosurgery. 2008 Mar;62 (3 Suppl 1):51-5; discussion 5-6.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Adult endoscopic procedures and their major complications

Figure 1

Table 2 Pediatric endoscopic procedures and their major complications

Figure 2

Table 3 Minor complications of all procedures

Figure 3

Table 4 Differences in major complication rates by procedure