Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-l8wb7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-27T03:11:48.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Convolutional autoencoder for on-demand parametric inverse design of local resonator geometry in wind turbine metastructure targeting vibration control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2025

Mohammadreza Sahaf Naeini
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
Marcela Machado*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Brasilia , Brasìlia, Brazil
Maciej Dutkiewicz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Corresponding author: Marcela Machado; Email: marcelam@unb.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vibration control in structures is essential to mitigate undesired dynamic responses, thereby enhancing stability, safety, and performance under varying loading conditions. Mechanical metamaterials have emerged as effective solutions, enabling tailored dynamic properties for vibration attenuation. This study introduces a convolutional autoencoder framework for the inverse design of local resonators embedded in mechanical metamaterials. The model learns from the dynamic behaviour of primary structures coupled with ideal absorbers to predict the geometric parameters of resonators that achieve desired vibration control performance. Unlike conventional approaches requiring full numerical models, the proposed method operates as a data-driven tool, where the target frequency to be mitigated is provided as input, and the model directly outputs the resonator geometry. A large dataset, generated through physics-informed simulations of ideal absorber dynamics, supports training while incorporating both spectral and geometric variability. Within the architecture, the encoder maps input receptance spectra to resonator geometries, while the decoder reconstructs the target receptance response, ensuring dynamic consistency. Once trained, the framework predicts resonator configurations that satisfy predefined frequency targets with high accuracy, enabling efficient design of passive controllers of the syntonized mass type. This study specifically demonstrates the application of the methodology to resonators embedded in wind turbine metastructures, a critical context for mitigating structural vibrations and improving operational efficiency. Results confirm strong agreement between predicted and target responses, underscoring the potential of deep learning techniques to support on-demand inverse design of mechanical metamaterials for smart vibration control in wind energy and related engineering applications.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the metamaterial 5 MW NREL offshore wind turbine (a), zoom details of ideal dynamic resonators used in the forward design (b), and physical resonators obtained by the inverse design (c).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Four levels designing chain of metastructures associated with methods, challenges, and objectives (adapted from Jiao and Alavi, 2022]).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Workflow of the proposed inverse design model.

Figure 3

Table 1. Dimensions chosen for the dataset preparation for predicting geometrical parameters of the metamaterial’s cantilever resonator

Figure 4

Figure 4. Schematic representation of inverse design architecture.

Figure 5

Table 2. CNN-autoencoder inverse design model description. Output 1 predicts geometrical parameters, and Output 2 exhibits the receptance reconstruction

Figure 6

Figure 5. Resonator representation, receptance response, temporal, and phase diagram responses for (a–d) undamped resonator and (e–g) resonator with hysteretic damping of 0.01 of the damping factor.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Comparison of probability density functions for the geometric parameters: (a) length, (b) height, and (c) width, under LHS versus the Monte Carlo technique.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Receptance response of the resonator, assuming as random variables the beam (a) length, (b) width, (c) height, and (d) the three variables.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Probability density function calculated with the resonant frequency and respective amplitude values estimated for each sample. (a) PDF of the resonant frequency assuming random variable length (blue), width (green), and height (red). (b) PDF of the resonant amplitude assuming random variable length (blue), width (green), and height (red). (c) PDF of the resonant frequency and (d) PDF of the resonant amplitude, assuming the three random variables simultaneously.

Figure 10

Table 3. Actual and predicted geometric parameters, RMS values, resonance frequencies, and errors for four randomly selected samples

Figure 11

Figure 9. Resonator’s receptance response of the randomly selected samples, calculated with Eq. (5) using the estimated parameter given by the encoder. The four samples’ parametric features are given in Table 3.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Comparison of (a) resonance frequency and (b) RMS values for the test samples.

Figure 13

Table 4. Resonator properties before and after fine-tuning for three cases

Figure 14

Figure 11. Dynamic response of the resonator (a,d,g), uncontrolled and controlled metamaterial wind turbine(b,e,h), and temporal responses of the metamaterial wind turbine(c,f,i) of the cases described in Table 4. (a,b,c) illustrate Case I, (d,e,f) illustrate Case II, and (g,h,i) illustrate Case III.