Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T00:04:01.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mitochondrial energetics in liver and skeletal muscle after energy restriction in young rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2011

Raffaella Crescenzo
Affiliation:
Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Naples, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Edificio 7, Via Cinthia-I-80126, Napoli, Italy
Francesca Bianco
Affiliation:
Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Naples, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Edificio 7, Via Cinthia-I-80126, Napoli, Italy
Italia Falcone
Affiliation:
Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Naples, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Edificio 7, Via Cinthia-I-80126, Napoli, Italy
Paola Coppola
Affiliation:
Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Naples, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Edificio 7, Via Cinthia-I-80126, Napoli, Italy
Abdul G. Dulloo
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Physiology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
Giovanna Liverini
Affiliation:
Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Naples, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Edificio 7, Via Cinthia-I-80126, Napoli, Italy
Susanna Iossa*
Affiliation:
Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Naples, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, Edificio 7, Via Cinthia-I-80126, Napoli, Italy
*
*Corresponding author: Professor S. Iossa, fax +39 081 679233, email susiossa@unina.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of 2 weeks of energy restriction on whole body, liver and skeletal muscle energy handling. We measured whole-body oxygen consumption, as well as mitochondrial protein mass, respiratory capacity and energetic coupling in liver and skeletal muscle from food-restricted (FR) rats, age- and weight-matched controls. We also assessed markers of oxidative damage and antioxidant defences. The present results show that, in response to energy restriction, an adaptive decrease in whole-body energy expenditure is coupled with structural and functional changes in mitochondrial compartment, both in liver and skeletal muscle. In fact, liver mitochondrial mass per g of liver significantly increased, whereas total hepatic mitochondrial oxidative capacity was lower in FR than in control rats, because of a significant decrease in liver contribution to total body weight. In skeletal muscle, sub-sarcolemmal (SS) mitochondrial respiratory capacity, as well as SS and inter-myofibrillar (IMF) mitochondrial protein mass per g of tissue, was significantly lower in FR rats, compared to controls. Finally, a decrease in oxidative damage was found in liver but not in skeletal muscle mitochondria from FR rats, whereas an increase in antioxidant defence was found in both tissues. From the present results, it appears that skeletal muscle is involved in the decrease in energy expenditure induced by energy restriction. Energy sparing is achieved through changes in the activity (SS), mass (SS and IMF) and efficiency (IMF) of mitochondrial compartment.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011
Figure 0

Table 1 Body composition in food restricted (FR) and control rats(Mean values with their standard errors of six rats per group)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 (A) The 24 h monitoring of oxygen consumption, VO2, and (B) carbon dioxide production, VCO2, as well as (C) mean 24 h VO2 and VCO2, (D) mean 24-h respiratory quotient (RQ) and non-protein RQ (NPRQ), (E) light- or dark-phase RQ and (F) light- or dark-phase general physical activity values in food-restricted and control rats. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars of six rats per group. a,b Bars with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-test). WM, weight-matched control rats ((A, B) ; (C–F) ); AM, age-matched control rats ((A, B) ; (C–F) ); FR, food-restricted rats ((A, B) ; (C–F) □).

Figure 2

Fig. 2 State 3 respiratory capacities in (A) liver homogenates, (B) isolated mitochondria and (C) per g liver per 100 g body weight, with NAD, FAD and lipid substrate in food-restricted and control rats. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars of six rats per group. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-test). WM, weight-matched control rats (□); AM, age-matched control rats (); FR, food-restricted rats ().

Figure 3

Fig. 3 State 3 respiratory capacities in (A) skeletal muscle homogenates and (B) isolated sub-sarcolemmal and (C) inter-myofibrillar mitochondria, with NAD, FAD and lipid substrate in food-restricted and control rats. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars of six rats per group. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-test). WM, weight-matched control rats (□); AM, age-matched control rats (); FR, food-restricted rats ().

Figure 4

Table 2 Thermodynamic coupling (q) and optimal thermodynamic efficiency (η) of oxidative phosphorylation in hepatic and skeletal muscle mitochondria from food restricted (FR) and control rats(Mean values with their standard errors of six rats per group)

Figure 5

Table 3 Cytochrome c content and cytochrome oxidase activity in homogenates and isolated mitochondria from liver and skeletal muscle in food restricted (FR) and control rats(Mean values with their standard errors of six rats per group)

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Aconitase- and superoxide dismutase (SOD)-specific activity in (A) liver and (B) sub-sarcolemmal and (C) inter-myofibrillar skeletal muscle mitochondria in food-restricted and control rats. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars of six rats per group. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-test). WM, weight-matched control rats (□); AM, age-matched control rats (); FR, food-restricted rats ().