Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T00:52:23.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Stereotype Threat Hypothesis: An Assessment from the Philosopher's Armchair, for the Philosopher's Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Gina Schouten
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to Stereotype Threat Hypothesis (STH), fear of confirming gendered stereotypes causes women to experience anxiety in circumstances wherein their performance might potentially confirm those stereotypes, such as high‐stakes testing scenarios in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) courses. This anxiety causes women to underperform, which in turn causes them to withdraw from math‐intensive disciplines. STH is thought by many to account for the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields, and a growing body of evidence substantiates this hypothesis. In considering the plausibility of STH as an explanation for women's disproportionate attrition from undergraduate philosophy programs, one is struck by dissimilarities between STEM and philosophy that appear to undermine the applicability of STH to the latter. In this paper, I argue that these dissimilarities are either merely apparent or merely apparently relevant to the plausibility of STH as an explanation for gender disparities in philosophy. I argue further that, if research from STEM uncovers promising strategies for confronting stereotype threat, we should think about how to apply those strategies in our introductory philosophy classrooms.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Spring 2015 , pp. 450 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., and Pittinsky, T. L. 2001. Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science 12 (5): 385–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aronson, J., Quinn, D. M., and Spencer, S. J. 1998. Stereotype threat and academic underperformance of minorities and women. In Prejudice: The target's perspective, ed. Swim, J. K. and Stangor, C. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aronson, J., Fried, C., and Good, C. 2002. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (2): 113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., and Inzlicht, M. 2004. The ups and downs of attributional ambiguity: Stereotype vulnerability and the academic self‐knowledge of African American college students. Psychological Science 15 (12): 829–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aronson, J., and Steele, C. M. 2005. Stereotypes and the fragility of human competence, motivation, and self‐concept. In Handbook of competence and motivation, ed. Dweck, C. and Elliot, E. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Benbow, C. P., and Stanley, J. C. 1980. Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science 210 (4475): 1262–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benbow, C. P., and Stanley, J. C. 1983. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science 222 (4627): 1029–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Lombardo, M., and Frigerio, S. 2006. Stereotype threat: The moderating role of locus of control beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology 36 (2): 183–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2009. The undergraduate pipeline problem. Hypatia 24 (2): 216–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., and Master, A. 2006. Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social‐psychological intervention. Science 313 (5791): 1307–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. L., and Garcia, J. 2008. Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17 (6): 365–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croizet, J. C., Despres, G., Gauzins, M. E., Huguet, P., Leyens, J. P., and Meot, A. 2004. Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (6): 721–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eccles, J. S. 1987. Gender roles and women's achievement–related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly 11 (2): 135–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S., and Jacobs, J. E. 1986. Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11 (2): 367–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles‐Parsons, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., and Midgley, C. 1983. Expectations, values, and academic behaviors. In Achievement and achievement motivation, ed. Spence, J. T. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Elizaga, R., and Markman, K. 2008. Peers and performance: How in‐group and out‐group comparisons moderate stereotype threat effects. Current Psychology 27 (4): 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, C., Aronson, J., and Inzlicht, M. 2003. Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24 (6): 645–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, C., Aronson, J., and Harder, J. A. 2008. Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high‐level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29 (1): 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 210–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Kieran. 2011. Percentage of Ph.Ds awarded in the U.S. to women in 2009. http://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2011/02/04/gender-divides-in-philosophy-and-other-disciplines/ (accessed September 22, 2014).Google Scholar
Huguet, Pascal, and Regner, Isabelle. 2007. Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi‐ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (3): 545–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inzlicht, M., and Ben‐Zeev, T. 2000. A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem‐solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science 11 (5): 365–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., and Aronson, J. 2006. Stigma as ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self‐control. Psychological Science 17 (3): 262–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., and Engle, R. W. 2004. The generality of working memory capacity: A latent‐variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (2): 189–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, J. 2002. Blatant stereotype threat and women's math performance: Self‐handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles 47 (3‐4): 193–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J., and Dauenheimer, D. 2003. Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (3): 371–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, P. 2006. Someone like me can be successful: Do college students need same‐gender role models? Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (1): 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombrozo, Tania. 2013. Name five women in philosophy. Bet you can't. http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2013/06/17/192523112/name-ten-women-in-philosophy-bet-you-can-t National Public Radio blog (accessed on July 31, 2013).Google Scholar
Maass, A., and Cadinu, M. 2003. Stereotype threat: When minority members underperform. European Review of Social Psychology 14 (1): 243–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, A., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., and Schimel, J. 2006. Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self‐affirmation on women's intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2): 236–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, D. M., and Roman, J. S. 2002. Female role models: Protecting female students' math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (9): 1185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, D. M., Stapel, D. A., and Muller, D. 2005. We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (3): 432–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Akira, Kost‐Smith, Lauren E., Finkelstein, Noah D., Pollock, Steven J., Cohen, Geoffrey L., and Ito, Tiffany A. 2010. Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science 330 (6008): 1234–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, Molly, Figdor, Carrie, and Tiberius, Valerie. 2012. Quantifying the gender gap: An empirical study of the underrepresentation of women in philosophy. Hypatia 27 (4): 949–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, D. M., and Spencer, S. J. 2001. The interference of stereotype threat with women's generation of mathematical problem‐solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues 57 (1): 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. 2012. Women in philosophy. The Philosophers' Magazine. http://philosophypress.co.uk/?p=1079 (accessed on July 31, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiebinger, L. L. 2001. Has feminism changed science? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmader, T., and Johns, M. 2003. Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (3): 440–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmader, T., Johns, M., and Barquissau, M. 2004. The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women's experience in the math domain. Sex Roles 50 (11‐12): 835–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmader, T., Johns, M., and Forbes, C. 2008. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review 115 (2): 336–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekaquaptewa, D., and Thompson, M. 2003. Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women's performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 (1): 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T., and Ambady, N. 1999. Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science 10 (1): 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., and Quinn, D. 1999. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C. M. 1997. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 52 (6): 613–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, C. M., and Aronson, J. 1999. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (5): 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S., and Aronson, J. 2002. Contending with images of one's group: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In Advances in experimental social psychology 34, ed. Zanna, M. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stout, Jane G., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Hunsinger, Matthew, and McManus, Melissa A. 2010. STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self‐concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (2): 255–70.Google Scholar