Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-s74w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T17:37:20.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Respiratory systems as a key to a new superorder division of the class Blastoidea (Echinodermata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2026

Johnny Waters*
Affiliation:
Geological and Environmental Sciences, Appalachian State University , USA
D. Bradford Macurda Jr.
Affiliation:
Spring, Texas, USA
*
Corresponding author: Johnny Waters; Email: watersja@appstate.edu

Abstract

Blastoids have three primary systems providing entrances to blastoid hydrospires, the primary organ for respiration: (1) exposed hydrospire slits formed across the width of the radiodeltoid suture; (2) hydrospire pores formed at the aboral ends of the ambulacra; and (3) hydrospire tubules formed as invaginations along the radiodeltoid suture, becoming openings that pierce the radials and deltoids ontogenetically. Blastoid classification historically divided the blastoids into two groups—the Fissiculata and Spiraculata. The Fissiculata comprised those blastoids that have exposed hydrospire slits or spiracular slits. The Spiraculata had hydrospire pores and spiracles that connect internally to hydrospires. Spiraculate classification focused on the configuration of the spiracles and anispiracle in combination with thecal form. Spiracles are the adoral consequence of the ambulacra infilling the radial sinus and covering the hydrospires by the lancet and the side plates and are found in all spiraculate blastoids. In this revision of blastoid classification, we place primacy on the three mechanisms by which water is drawn into the hydrospires—hydrospire slits open to seawater, hydrospire pores, and hydrospire tubules. Hydrospire tubules are formed along the radiodeltoid suture, a very different ontogenetic position from hydrospire pores, which are formed at the aboral end of the ambulacrum, and a fundamental phylogenetic difference. We herein abandon the term Spiraculata and refer to the spiraculate grade as being the Stomatoblastida, new superorder for spiraculates with hydrospire pores and the Tubuloblastida, new superorder for spiraculates with hydrospire tubules. The Fissiculata is elevated to superordinal status.

Information

Type
Featured Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Blastoids with hydrospire slits, hydrospire pores, and hydrospire tubules: (1, 4) Heteroschisma alternatum (Lyon, 1857), USNM 54567, a fissiculate with exposed hydrospire slits; (2, 5) Pentremites robustus Lyon, 1860, USNM 380840, a spiraculate with hydrospire pores (arrow) and spiracles, now assigned to the Stomatoblastida; (3, 6) Ellipticoblastus ellipticus Sowerby, 1825, NHMUK E8073, a spiraculate with hydrospire tubules (arrow) and spiracles, now assigned to the Tubuloblastida; (7) Troosticrinus renwardii Shumard, 1866, UTK M107336, a Silurian blastoid with spiracular clefts and indications of coronal canals; (8) Conuloblastus malladae (Etheridge & Carpenter, 1883), RGM 353035, a Lower Devonian genus with morphologies intermediate between fissiculates and spiraculates; (9) Pentremoblastus conicus Fay and Koenig, 1963, UM 15180, a Lower Mississippian genus with morphologies intermediate between fissiculates and spiraculates. Scale bars = 2 mm (6, 9); 5 mm (2, 3, 7, 8).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Number of hydrospires in fissiculates, tubuloblastids, and stomatoblastids. (1) Plot of means and standard deviations. A one-way ANOVA (PAST5) indicates that the difference between the means is significant at p < 0.001. The Tukey HSD test (PAST5) indicates that the mean number of hydrospires for fissiculates is significantly different (p < 0.001) from the mean number of hydrospires in the stomatoblastids and tubuloblastids, The mean number of hydrospires in the stomatoblastids is not significantly different from the mean number of hydrospires in the tubuloblastids. (2) Box and whisker plot of hydrospire number. Mean is horizontal line; Box is one standard deviation; whisker is 95% of hydrospire number.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Diversity of blastoid genera. Tick marks indicate Epoch boundaries (in Ma) for the Silurian-Llandovery, Wenlock, Ludlow, Pridoli, stage boundaries for the Devonian-Lochkovian, Pragian, Emsian, Eifelian, Givetian, Frasnian, Famennian, substage boundaries for the Mississippian part of the Carboniferous-Hastarian, Ivorian, Chadian, Arundian, Holkerian, Asbian, Brigantian, stage boundaries for the Pennsylvanian part of the Carboniferous-Serpukhovian, Bashkirian, Moscovian, Kasimovian, Gzelian, and stage boundaries for the Permian-Asselian, Sakmarian, Artinskian, Kungarian, Roadian, Wordian, Capitanian, Wuchipingian, Changhsingian. (1) Fissiculata. (2) Stomatoblastida. (3) Tubuloblastida. (4) Total blastoid diversity. (5) Total diversity showing transition in diversity dominance between fissiculates and spiraculates (= Stomatoblastida + Tubuloblastida).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Median number of hydrospires in fissiculates, tubuloblastids, and stomatoblastids plotted through time. Permian tubuloblastids are represented by a single species, Orbitremites malanius Wanner, 1916, which has 10 hydrospires. Pennsylvanian tubuloblastid numbers are a range through extrapolation between Mississippian and Permian occurrences of Orbitremites. The number of hydrospires decreased through time in all three groups, probably in response to increasing atmospheric oxygen levels.