Introduction
Depression is the most common mental disorder in later life, affecting people's quality of daily life and functioning. It can be experienced as a result of stress initiating cognitive and biological processes; with major life adversities, traumatic events or lifecourse adversities (terms often used interchangeably) being found to be amongst the best predictors of future onset of depression (Kraaij et al., Reference Kraaij, Arensman and Spinhoven2002). Despite the fact that there are now more people in the United Kingdom (UK) aged 60 or over than aged under 18 (Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2017), and that by mid-2039 more than one in 12 of the population is projected to be aged 80 or over (ONS, 2015), relatively few studies have examined the impact of major lifecourse adversities amongst the older population. Even fewer have taken a longitudinal approach, investigating the association between earlier life adversity with the onset or recurrence of depression in later life (e.g. Fiske et al., Reference Fiske, Gatz and Pedersen2003), and there are none to our knowledge in the UK. This paper therefore adds to the literature in three important ways. Firstly, by taking a more holistic perspective of entire lifecourse adversities experience, it provides new evidence on the relationship between accumulated major life adversities and depressive symptoms amongst community-dwelling older people aged 50 and over in England at a single point in time (2006). Secondly, it provides new insights into the persistent effect of major life adversities as a risk factor for the onset of depression during later life, following older individuals who are clear of depression at the baseline over an eight-year period (2006–2014). Finally, it evidences the differences of such relationships by gender.
Depression in old age and gendered patterns
The level of depression in old age varies due to differences in diagnostic criteria and the population sampled between studies. Based on the estimation of the World Health Organization (2017), globally, the depression prevalence rate was 4.4 per cent in 2015 and varied by age, peaking among those aged 55–74 years (above 7.5% among females, and above 5.5% among males). Blazer (Reference Blazer2003) reviewed the existing evidence of depression in late life and reported that major depressive disorder occurs among up to 4 per cent of community-dwelling older adults aged 65 and above, and minor depression among 8–16 per cent. In the UK, the 2014 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey using the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised reported that among people aged 16, the prevalence of depression was 3.3 per cent, and that depression was more common in people aged 16–64 than in those aged 65 and above (McManus et al., Reference McManus, Bebbington, Jenkins and Brugha2016). Existing research shows that biological, psychological and social factors, such as medical illness, genetic susceptibility to mood disorders, endocrine changes, adverse life events and impaired social support, are all associated with later-life depression (Blazer, Reference Blazer2003).
Women are about twice as likely as men to develop depression during their lifetime, with a higher recorded prevalence in older women than in older men. Certain unique biological and social factors likely contribute to women's higher prevalence of depression (Nolen-Hoeksema, Reference Nolen-Hoeksema2001). Women have historically had less socio-economic power and status than men due to patterns of financial dependence or economic standing, and are also more likely to experience chronic strains, such as poverty and constrained choices (Stone et al., Reference Stone, Evandrou and Falkingham2013). Moreover, women experience certain traumatic events, particularly sexual abuse, more often than men. A recent epidemiology survey of traumatic-event exposure worldwide (Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Aguilar-Gaxiola, Alonso, Benjet, Bromet, Cardoso, Degenhardt, Girolamo, Dinolova, Ferry, Florescu, Gureje, Haro, Huang, Karam, Kawakami, Lee, Lepine, Levinson, Navarro-Mateu, Pennell, Piazza, Posada-Villa, Scott, Stein, Have, Torres, Viana, Petukhova, Sampson, Zaslavsky and Koenen2017) shows that most people (over 70%) are exposed to traumas at some time in their life and nearly one-third were exposed to four or more traumas. In addition, men and women differ in the types of events they tend to experience, with men being more likely to report injuries, accidents and physical assault, and women more likely to report sexual assault. Even when women and men experience the same stressors, women may be more likely than men to develop depression (Breslau et al., Reference Breslau, Davis, Andreski, Peterson and Schultz1997). Studies have found that gender roles and psychological factors are more important than biological factors in explaining gender differences in stress responses (Nazroo et al., Reference Nazroo, Edwards and Brown1997; Lundberg, Reference Lundberg2005).
The impact of early life adversities and health
Early life adversity has been associated with a life-long increased risk for ill health. O'Rand and Hamil-Luker (Reference O'Rand and Hamil-Luker2005) found that early disadvantage and childhood illness have severe enduring effects and increase the risk for heart attack across the lifecourse. Friedman et al. (Reference Friedman, Karlamangla, Gruenewald, Koretz and Seeman2015) reported an association between early life adversity, such as childhood abuse and allostatic load, which is a marker of biological risk induced from inflammation, cardiovascular function, lipid metabolism and other indicators. A further recent study found that childhood abuse is linked to earlier all-cause mortality among women but not among men (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Turiano, Mroczek and Miller2016). Other studies have examined the effect of mediating factors such as personality traits and personal control, between early life events and later-life health outcomes. For instance, Pitzer and Fingerman (Reference Pitzer and Fingerman2010) found that higher levels of personal control were associated with better physical and psychological functioning among adults who experienced abuse in childhood. However, such studies have focused solely on the effects of early childhood adversities, without exploring the full range of lifecourse adversities.
The association between major life adversities and depressive symptoms is now relatively well established. A number of studies among psychiatric patients and the general population have explored the long-term effects of traumatic stress on current adult depression, showing consistently that adults with depression report early traumatic adversities, such as experience of war (Landau and Litwin, Reference Landau and Litwin2000), natural disasters (Briere and Elliot, Reference Briere and Elliot2000), sexual assault (Zoellner et al., Reference Zoellner, Goodwin and Foa2000), bereavement (Utz et al., Reference Utz, Caserta and Lund2012) and childhood traumas (Nurius et al., Reference Nurius, Green, Logan-Greene and Borja2015). Several mechanisms have been proposed; for instance, it is argued that stressful events may cause negative affective states such as feelings of anxiety, which in turn exert direct effects on biological processes or behavioural patterns influencing disease risk (McEwen, Reference McEwen1998). Over time, dysregulations across major biological regulatory systems (cumulative interacting adverse effects) may influence physiological and neuro-immunological pathways linking mental and physical health (Slavich and Irwin, Reference Slavich and Irwin2014).
Theoretical background and empirical studies of early life adversities and later-life depression
The mechanisms between major adversities earlier in the lifecourse and health in later life are, however, less clear cut. Evidence of a causal link between two phenomena distant in time is more difficult to uncover due to the presence of multiple confounding factors in the intervening period, although the reciprocal effects of social, biological and psychological systems on each other are known to play an important role. Two inter-related theoretical approaches help to frame conceptually the experience of traumatic/stressful lifetime events and their relationship with depressive symptoms in later life – the theory of ‘stress proliferation’ (Pearlin et al., Reference Pearlin, Schieman, Fazio and Meersman2005) and the ‘cumulative inequality’ theory (Ferraro and Shippee, Reference Ferraro and Shippee2009).
Pearlin et al. (Reference Pearlin, Schieman, Fazio and Meersman2005) put forward a conceptual framework regarding ‘stress, health and the lifecourse’, arguing that inequality rooted in social structure accumulates across an individual's lifespan, and that disadvantaged individuals have the greatest chance of exposure to health-related stressors. This is consistent with much of the literature on health inequalities, recognising that some groups have better opportunities for good health and longevity than others (Wilkinson and Pickett, Reference Wilkinson and Pickett2009). Importantly, for the purpose of this paper, and in addition to highlighting the potential health effects of single long-term stressors, such as poverty or discrimination, Pearlin et al. (Reference Pearlin, Schieman, Fazio and Meersman2005) also put forward the notion of stress proliferation as a mechanism to explain how earlier life circumstances can affect later health and wellbeing. They suggest that early traumas and off-time or out-of-sequence transitions (i.e. major life adversities), tend to give rise to additional, or secondary, stressors. Thus, those individuals who were exposed to a (early) serious adversity are at risk of experiencing a later exposure to additional adversities, which in turn cause cumulative, long-term harm to health (Horwitz et al., Reference Horwitz, Widom, McLaughlin and White2001).
The cumulative inequality theory adds a further dimension, contending that cumulative inequality interacts with one's ability to mobilise social, economic and psychological resources, shaping the individual's health and wellbeing in old age (Ferraro and Shippee, Reference Ferraro and Shippee2009). Individuals with early life traumas are thus more likely to encounter and generate further stressful events throughout the later lifestages, but with fewer personal and psycho-social resources to cope with them. Moreover, such individuals are more likely to amplify their biological and emotional response to any later-emerged stressor and are predisposed to self-medicating behaviours like smoking, drug use and consumption of high-fat diets (Nusslock and Miller, Reference Nusslock and Miller2016). Together, these contributions to the literature provide a useful base to develop a conceptual framework which links the experience of stressful events at one stage of the lifecourse with adverse outcomes at a subsequent stage (Figure 1).
Conceptual framework linking the experience of stressful events at one stage of the lifecourse with adverse outcomes at a subsequent stage.
Some researchers argue that the consequences of prior adversities are better captured by considering one's exposure to multiple events rather than to one focal event only (Green et al., Reference Green, Goodman, Krupnick, Corcoran, Petty, Stockton and Stern2000), a position which is consistent with the concept of stress proliferation and lifetime cumulative adversity. A study analysing data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe found that respondents with more lifetime cumulative adversities were at greater risk of a high level of depressive symptoms and low quality of life (Shrira, Reference Shrira2012). The association between cumulative adversities and mental health has also been explored taking into account differences in the type of adversity and gender. For instance, studies found that self-oriented adversities (i.e. those reflecting trauma where the individual themselves was the target, e.g. being at risk of death due to accident or being a victim of assault or abuse) had a positive association with depressive symptoms, whereas other-oriented adversities (i.e. those where the trauma came from being exposed to actions targeting others, e.g. witnessing people killed by violence) had either no association or an inverse association with depressive symptoms (Shmotkin and Litwin, Reference Shmotkin and Litwin2009). However, Palgi et al. (Reference Palgi, Shrira, Ben-Ezra, Shiovitz-Ezra and Ayalon2012) showed that both self-oriented and other-oriented lifetime traumatic events were associated with perceived loneliness and depressive symptoms in the second half of individuals’ life.
Research hypotheses
Few studies have explored holistically the dimensions of entire lifecourse adversities experience (Pietrzak and Cook, Reference Pietrzak and Cook2013), and whether such adversities continue to be associated with a later risk of depressive symptoms, either as a first onset or as an episode recurrence. This paper aims to (a) create and describe a taxonomy of the clustered lifecourse adversities among older men and women in England, and (b) investigate the association between these lifecourse adversities and mental health in later life. The first two hypotheses of this study are formulated as follows:
• Hypothesis 1: The risk of suffering depressive symptoms in later life is higher amongst those who have suffered accumulated lifecourse adversities than those who have not (retrospective combined with cross-sectional analysis).
• Hypothesis 2: This effect persists into later life (longitudinal analysis).
Moreover, our understanding of the association between major adversities during the lifecourse and their adverse impact on individuals’ mental health in later life cannot be isolated from gender differences permeating individuals’ social and financial resources across the lifecourse (Pearlin et al., Reference Pearlin, Schieman, Fazio and Meersman2005). Women in particular in many societies experience a relative lack of social power, making them more vulnerable than men to specific traumas, which in turn may contribute to depression directly or indirectly by increasing women's reactivity to stress (Nolen-Hoeksema, Reference Nolen-Hoeksema2001). For instance, Pirkola et al. (Reference Pirkola, Isometsä, Aro, Kestilä, Hämäläinen, Veijola, Kiviruusu and Lönnqvist2005) found that among a population sample aged 30–64 in Finland, there were marked sex differences in the associations between reported childhood experiences and environmental circumstances, on the one hand, and adulthood mental disorders, on the other. We therefore further hypothesise the sex differences in the associations as follows:
• Hypothesis 3: Women's mental health in later life is more sensitive to earlier life adversities than men's.
Method
Data
This study analysed data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), which started in 2002 and collects information on physical and mental health, as well as demographic and socio-economic circumstances, from a representative sample of the English population aged 50 years and over (Marmot et al., Reference Marmot, Oldfield, Clemens, Blake, Phelps, Nazroo, Steptoe, Rogers, Banks and Oskala2016). The sample has been followed up with an interview and medical examination every two and four years, respectively (Steptoe et al., Reference Steptoe, Breeze, Banks and Nazroo2012). At Wave 3 in 2006, an additional module collecting retrospective life-history data was fielded (Ward et al., Reference Ward, Medina, Mo and Cox2009). Given this paper focuses on measures of lifetime adversities, the analyses were based on Wave 3 (2006) which was taken as the study baseline, with follow-up at Wave 4 (2008), Wave 5 (2010), Wave 6 (2012) and Wave 7 (2014).
Study sample
A total of 7,855 participants completed the ELSA Wave 3 (2006) life-history interviews. Of these, 7,048 were core study members and were aged 50 and above. From this sample, a total of 1,821 respondents were excluded from the analysis because of missing values (not mutually exclusive) on adversity events (N = 1,807), childhood health (N = 7), housing wealth (N = 7), physical activity (N = 8) and depressive symptoms (N = 29). Missing values for alcohol intake and social isolation were categorised as a missing group. The final analytical sample was 5,198 (men = 2,330, women = 2,868), which was classified into four age groups: 50–59 (29.6%), 60–69 (33.5%), 70–79 (25.8%) and 80 and above (11.1%). The majority of respondents (84.8%) had intermediate or high education. More information about the sample (N = 5,198) is provided in Table 1. This sample was used for the cross-sectional analysis. The analysis of the excluded participants shows that they were more likely to experience significant depressive symptoms (18.2% versus 13.0%, p = 0.001) and were older than the analytical sample (mean age 67.2 versus 66.3, p = 0.001), but there were no gender differences (see Table S1 in the online supplementary material).
Bivariate associations between selected covariates and depressive symptoms
Notes: N = 5,198. ADL: activity of daily living. NS-SEC: National Statistics Socio-economic Classification.
Source: Authors’ analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, Wave 3 (2006).
Significance levels: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Cross-sectional analysis can only analyse multiple variables at a given time, however, depressive symptoms might have occurred prior to some of the adversities. In order to avoid a possible reverse time-order between the lifecourse adversity and depression, participants with current depressive symptoms at the baseline were excluded and 4,520 respondents who were clear of depressive symptoms in 2006 were selected to follow up in the longitudinal analysis. Among them, 479 participants who had missing information on the measurement of depressive symptoms in all of the follow-up surveys from Wave 4 (2008) to Wave 7 (2014) were excluded. Thus, the total analytical sample for the longitudinal analysis was 4,041.
Measurement
Current depressive symptoms
The Eight-Item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to measure depressive symptoms. The CES-D has been widely used in studies of later-life depression, and has good psychometric properties for use in the UK population (Karim et al., Reference Karim, Weisz, Bibi and Rehman2015). A cut-off point of 4 has been found to produce comparable results to other depression scales (Steffick, Reference Steffick2000). In the survey, in order to determine the presence of depressive symptoms, each respondent was asked the following questions, with the response options of ‘yes’ or ‘no’: (1) Much of the time during the past week I felt depressed; (2) I felt everything I did was an effort; (3) My sleep was restless; (4) I was happy; (5) I felt lonely; (6) I enjoyed life; (7) I felt sad; and (8) I could not ‘get going’. For each respondent, the total number of yes responses to questions 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and the ‘no’ responses to questions 4 and 6 were summed to create a total depressive symptom score ranging from 0 to 8. If an individual was missing any of the eight items, they were excluded from the analyses. In this study, the report of current depressive symptoms equals 1 if the respondents’ total depressive symptom score is greater than, or equal to, four at the baseline in 2006; and it equals 0 if not. This measurement was treated as the dependent variable for the cross-sectional logistic regression models.
Time until having a new case of depressive symptoms
This time-to-event measurement was used as the dependent variable for the longitudinal Cox regression models. A group of participants (N = 4,041) who were clear of depression at the baseline in 2006 were asked the CES-D questions in each of the follow-up interviews between 2006 and 2014. The time until having a new case of depressive symptoms was measured as the period from the baseline survey in 2006 when respondents were clear of depression to the year when the respondents’ depressive symptoms occurred (total depressive symptom score greater than, or equal to, four). The score equals 1 if the respondents had significant depressive symptoms at Wave 4 (2008). The corresponding time equals 2, 3 or 4 if the new case of depressive symptoms happened at Wave 5 (2010) or Wave 6 (2012) or Wave 7 (2014), respectively.
Accumulated lifecourse adversity
Sixteen lifecourse adversities listed in the ELSA life-history questionnaire were used for the latent class analysis (LCA) method to generate the latent variable, reflecting the accumulation of major lifecourse adversities. Table S2 (in the online supplementary material) presents a list of the questions and the prevalence of each adversity by gender. Significant gender differences were observed for the majority of single adversities. Four out of 16 questions including the indication ‘aged <16’ helped to understand the timing of when such adversities were first experienced in childhood: ‘Whether when aged <16 was physically abused by your parents; Whether when aged <16 parents argue or fight very often; Whether when aged <16 either parent was unemployed for over six months when wanted to work; Whether when aged <16 parents drunk/took drugs/had mental health problems’. Other adversities such as ‘Ever fired a weapon in combat or been fired upon; Ever had a husband/wife/partner/child who has been addicted to drugs or alcohol’ are likely to have been experienced during the respondents’ adulthood. LCA was applied to identify latent classes (accumulated lifecourse adversity) for the next step of the statistical analysis.
Control variables
The multivariate analyses were performed after controlling for the effects of selected demographic, socio-economic status, risk behaviour and social resources variables, the selection of which was based on previous studies (Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Nelson, McGonagle, Liu, Swartz and Blazer1996; Blazer, Reference Blazer2003; Fiske et al., Reference Fiske, Gatz and Pedersen2003). These controls included age, gender, current marital status, childhood self-rated health, activities of daily living (ADLs), education, National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC), housing wealth, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, working status, physical activity and social isolation.
Analytical plan
LCA was applied to identify unobserved sub-groups characterised by common lifecourse patterns of adversities experience. LCA is a model-based clustering method which produces the latent classes or latent clusters (terms used interchangeably) using a probabilistic model describing the distribution of data (Goodman, Reference Goodman, Hagenaars and McCutcheon2002). In contrast to other clustering approaches finding sequence clusters with a chosen distance measure (e.g. Stone et al., Reference Stone, Evandrou, Falkingham and Vlachantoni2015), LCA helps to compare models with differing numbers of latent classes in order to determine the best-fitting model. The categorical indicators used for the LCA were 16 reported single lifecourse adversities (see Table S2 in the online supplementary material). We began with a two-class model and proceeded to test models with successively larger numbers of classes. The choice of the optimal number of classes was based on the comparison of various models using Akaike information criterion (AIC), Schwarz's Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the sample-size-adjusted BIC (A-BIC), where a smaller AIC, BIC or A-BIC value indicates a better-fitted model. Further, we assessed the entropy of each model as an indicator for class separation, with higher entropy values being preferable, and performed the Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test (LMR), Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test (vLMR) and bootstrap likelihood ratio test (bLRT) to test the significance of the difference in likelihoods of two models, where a non-significant p value indicates that the model with one or fewer classes is preferable. The authors’ judgement of model interpretability were considered in the final decision.
Once the optimal number of classes was determined, a three-step procedure was applied for modelling LCA with distal outcomes (Asparouhov and Muthén, Reference Asparouhov and Muthén2014). Using a conventional regression model, treating the latent class membership as a directly observable variable may lead to biased results because it ignores the classification uncertainty that is attached to the process of extracting the latent class membership given the probabilistic nature of this method. A three-step procedure was therefore adopted to avoid any potential bias. The first step fitted a LCA model with the 16 categorical indicators of single lifecourse adversity only and assigned respondents to their mostly likely latent class N. The second step determined the measurement error for N. The third step estimated the logistic or Cox regression models, where the latent class variable was measured by the most likely class variable N, and the measurement error was fixed and prespecified to the values obtained from step 2. Mplus 8 was used for the statistical analysis (Muthén and Muthén, Reference Muthén and Muthén2017).
In our analysis, there were two types of distal outcomes. The first was a binary variable – the current depressive symptoms at the baseline in 2006; the second was a ‘time to event’ variable – time to have new depressive symptoms during the follow-up, 2006–2014. LCA models with distal outcomes were run first for females and males together, and then for females and males separately. For the binary distal outcome logistic regression was used, which uncovers relationships between lifecourse adversity and the prevalence of depression. Given the cross-sectional nature of all variables measured at a single point in time, it is possible that depressed older people are more likely to report lifecourse adversities. In order to address the possible reverse time sequence between depressive symptoms and lifecourse adversities, we then conducted Cox regression analysis to examine the time to have a new case of depressive symptoms during the follow-up period from 2006 to 2014, taking the latent classes of the accumulated major lifecourse adversities into consideration. For this longitudinal analysis, older people with depression in the previous logistic regression were excluded and only those who were clear of depression at baseline in 2006 were included. Participants were right-censored at the end of observation in 2014 if they did not experience a new case of depressive symptoms. Those with missing measurements of depressive symptoms were also right-censored at the time of dropout.
The ELSA has a relatively high sample attrition rate (Banks et al., Reference Banks, Muriel and Smith2011). In the longitudinal analysis for this paper, 1,689 out of the total 4,520 respondents who were clear of depression at the baseline (Wave 3, 2006) only completed one, two or three rounds of the survey in the subsequent phases of data collection, and dropped out of the survey before 2014. As a result of such attrition, there may be possible selectivity affecting the validity of the results. There are two ways in which attrition can bias a sample (Ahern and Brocque, Reference Ahern and Brocque2005). Firstly, attrition may alter the characteristics of the sample, making it no longer representative of the original sample. Secondly, selective attrition can bias the longitudinal data by altering the covariance of variables. This occurs when the under-representation of some groups in the longitudinal sample leads to correlations between variables that are different from the true correlations in the original data. In order to explore the latter, survival analysis was run to investigate whether any of our study variables had been affected by attrition, which in turn could change the true correlations in the study sample. Unlike logistic regression, survival analysis estimates the time until respondents drop out of the survey, capturing the features of both earlier and later drop-offs. This method has been used in previous studies to reveal significant predictors of longitudinal sample attrition (Zethof et al., Reference Zethof, Nagelhout, Rooij, Driezen, Fong, Putte, Hummel, Vries, Thompson and Willemsen2016). The results show that all selected variables were not statistically different between the study cases and the cases either lost to follow-up or with missing values, indicating that attrition was at random and did not require statistical adjustment in the analyses (see Table S3 in the online supplementary material).
Results
LCA
A series of latent class models were explored, ranging from two to six latent classes. The AIC, BIC, A-BIC and p values for the LMR likelihood ratio test and vLMR likelihood ratio test indicated that the five-class model was statistically the most feasible model (see Table S4 in the online supplementary material), though a four-class solution might work better if p values of the LMR likelihood ratio test and vLMR likelihood ratio test were set at 0.01. More importantly, the five-class model provided the most meaningful classifications of lifecourse accumulated adversities and thus was chosen for further analysis.Footnote 1
The model-based (five-class model) predicted probabilities for each of the 16 adversities by latent clusters are presented in Table S1 and illustrated in Figure S1 (both in the online supplementary material). The results show very low probabilities of all adversities in Cluster 1; high probabilities of losing a very close friend/relative at risk of death/died due to illness/serious accident and providing long-term care in Cluster 2; high probabilities of childhood physical abuse, physical violence, sexual violence, natural disaster, life-threatening illness and financial difficulties in Cluster 3; high probabilities of childhood parental unemployment, drink/drug use and frequent fighting in Cluster 4; and high probabilities of having ever witnessed the serious injury/death of someone in war or military action, ever fired a weapon in combat or been fired upon, and ever lost a very close friend/relative in war or military service in Cluster 5.
Thus, the created latent clusters were named as follows:
(1) No/few lifecourse adversities (58.6%).
(2) Relationship lost (27.0%).
(3) Chained lifecourse adversities (2.4%).
(4) Childhood adversities (6.3%).
(5) War-related adversities (5.7%).
Classification and characteristics of latent clusters
Table 2 comprises a summary of the descriptive characteristics of the five clusters of the latent variable of accumulated lifecourse adversities. Cluster 1 (no/few lifecourse adversities) represented the largest group of older people (59%) who had no or few lifecourse adversities. Cluster 2 (relationship lost), as described above, characterised older people who had suffered bereavement and provided long-term informal care. Compared with the other clusters, this group (27%) shows a significantly higher educational status and social class. Cluster 3 (chained lifecourse adversities) embodied a small group of people (2%) who experienced multiple chained adversities through life. Compared to the other clusters, this group was relatively younger, female, more likely to be in a lower social class, currently smoking and had a low level of physical activity. Cluster 4 (childhood adversities) shows a group in which a substantial proportion were female and from a relatively lower social class. Cluster 5 (war-related adversities) included significant proportions of individuals who are of older age, male, with a lower education, former smokers and reporting low physical activity.
Cluster characteristics
Notes: N = 5,198. NS-SEC: National Statistics Socio-economic Classification.
Source: Authors’ analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, Wave 3 (2006).
The association of cumulative major life adversities and depressive symptoms
Table 1 shows the bivariate association between current depressive symptoms and a range of covariates, including the latent variable of accumulated lifecourse adversities. Overall, 13.0 per cent of the respondents reported depressive symptoms. Lifecourse adversities were associated with depressive symptoms, with the highest prevalence of depressive symptoms being observed among older people in Cluster 3 (chained adversities), followed by Cluster 4 (childhood adversities) and Cluster 2 (relationship lost). Older people in Cluster 1 (no/few adversities) and Cluster 5 (war-related adversities) exhibited relatively lower prevalence of depression. In addition, being female, reporting poor childhood health, being divorced or widowed, having lower education, lower occupational class, lower household wealth, experience of smoking, frequently drinking, reporting less physical activity and higher levels of social isolation were all found to be associated with depressive symptoms. A higher prevalence of current depressive symptoms was found amongst the younger old (50–59) and oldest old (80 and above) age groups.
Current depressive symptoms
The multivariate logistic regression results (Table 3) show that older people who experienced lifecourse adversities had higher odds of depressive symptoms, even after controlling for selected socio-demographic, health-risk behaviour and social support variables. Specifically, compared with older people who had no/few lifecourse adversities, those who experienced chained adversities had the highest chance of also experiencing depression, followed by those who experienced childhood adversities and those who suffered a lost relationship. Other factors which significantly predict depression included poor childhood self-rated health, lower housing wealth, smoking experience, lower physical activity and a higher level of social isolation. Gender is also significant, as is age, with being young and female both associated with higher odds of experiencing depressive symptoms. The separate models by gender show similar patterns, although interestingly among older men, only one group – those with childhood adversities – had significantly higher odds of experiencing depression; while among older women, having experienced childhood adversities, a lost relationship, war-related adversities and chained adversities all led to higher odds of experiencing depressive symptoms.
Odds ratios (OR) of depressive symptoms
Notes: N = 5,198. ADL: activity of daily living. NS-SEC: National Statistics Socio-economic Classification.
Source: Authors’ analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, Wave 3 (2006).
Significance levels: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
New case of depressive symptoms
Over the follow-up period of eight years (2006–2014), there were 743 new cases of significant depressive symptoms out of 4,041 participants; an incident rate of 18.4 per cent. Figure 2 presents the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the length of survival time after baseline (2006) until the occurrence of the significant depressive symptoms for men and women separately. The y-axis denotes the percentage of the sample who remain with no significant depressive symptoms, while the x-axis denotes observed time. Three points stood out. Firstly, among all older respondents who did not have any significant depressive symptoms at baseline, those with no or few major life adversities were more likely to continue in that situation (i.e. having a higher survival rate) than those who experienced chained adversities, childhood adversities, war-related adversities and relationship loss. Secondly, compared to male elders, most female elders faced a higher risk of the onset of depression, with lower survival curves than men. Finally, men who experienced chained adversities faced the highest risk of the onset of depression, while women who experienced war-related adversities had the highest risk.
Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for the length of survival time after baseline (2006) until the occurrence of significant depressive symptoms for men and women.
Table 4 shows that participants who experienced childhood adversities, a lost relationship and war-related adversities over the lifecourse had a higher hazard ratio (HR) of developing depressive symptoms, even after controlling for socio-demographic, health behaviour and social support variables. Older women were more likely (HR = 1.67) to develop depressive symptoms during the eight-year follow-up period than their male counterparts. Other factors which significantly influence the likelihood of experiencing a new case of depressive symptoms included lower educational status and low levels of physical activity.
Hazard ratios (HR) of depressive symptoms
Notes: N in Wave 3 = 4,041 (1,861 males and 2,180 females). Ref.: reference category. ADL: activity of daily living. NS-SEC: National Statistics Socio-economic Classification.
Source: Authors’ analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, Waves 3 (2006), 4 (2008), 5 (2010), 6 (2012) and 7 (2014).
Significance levels: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
The separate Cox regression models show somewhat different results. For men, only those who experienced childhood adversities had a significantly higher HR for the onset of significant depressive symptoms; while among women, in addition, those who suffered a lost relationship, chained adversities and war-related adversities also had a higher risk of experiencing depressive symptoms. Moreover, higher education was a protective factor for depression among women and relatively better housing wealth was a protective factor for depression among men, while daily drinking and poor childhood health were risk factors for men.Footnote 2
Discussion
This study characterised a typology of accumulated lifecourse adversities based on LCA and investigated the associations between types of adversities and mental health in later life. The findings address important aspects of lifecourse research by adopting a comprehensive approach which described one's entire lifecourse adversity experience (Pietrzak and Cook, Reference Pietrzak and Cook2013), and considered conditions at earlier stages of the lifecourse in order to explain mental health in later life (Pearlin et al., Reference Pearlin, Schieman, Fazio and Meersman2005; Ferraro and Shippee, Reference Ferraro and Shippee2009).
The results of this study suggest that five clustered major adversities experiences emerged over the lifecourse among older people and the corresponding socio-demographic correlates were not distributed randomly for these clusters. Older people with chained adversities and those with childhood adversities were more likely to be women and in relative disadvantage in terms of social conditions; while groups with war-related adversities were dominated more by men and relatively older persons. The social differences of adversity exposure were consistent with a previous study (Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Aguilar-Gaxiola, Alonso, Benjet, Bromet, Cardoso, Degenhardt, Girolamo, Dinolova, Ferry, Florescu, Gureje, Haro, Huang, Karam, Kawakami, Lee, Lepine, Levinson, Navarro-Mateu, Pennell, Piazza, Posada-Villa, Scott, Stein, Have, Torres, Viana, Petukhova, Sampson, Zaslavsky and Koenen2017). Compared to the conventional measurement of major adversities, i.e. simple counts of the total number of adversities or in one particular life period, e.g. childhood adversity, the LCA provided a more holistic and detailed compositional dimension of exposure to adversity over one's entire lifecourse.
The findings further suggest that cumulative major life adversities were associated with both the prevalence and incidence of depressive symptoms among older-age people in England. Broadly consistent with existing research (Shrira, Reference Shrira2012, Reference Shrira2014), those who had experienced childhood adversities (odds ratio (OR) = 2.08, HR = 2.35) and a lost relationship (OR = 1.98, HR = 1.89) faced a higher risk of having poor mental health outcomes in later life, even after controlling for socio-demographic characteristics, health-risk behaviours and social support. These findings support our hypotheses that the risk of suffering depressive symptoms in later life was higher amongst those who have suffered accumulated lifecourse adversities than those who have not. In addition, this effect persists into later life. Interestingly, chained adversity was only associated with the prevalence of depression (OR = 4.86), while war-related adversity was only significantly associated with the incidence of depression (HR = 1.75). The possible explanation might be that respondents who have experienced chained adversity had a very high chance of earlier onset of depression (OR = 4.86), and among this sub-group, those clear of depression for the longitudinal analysis may have much better resilience than other sub-groups. Future studies in this area would require more information about the respondents’ stress coping resources and strategies in response to lifecourse adversities. In addition, war-related adversities might be linked with an advanced age at the onset of depression. Indeed, a previous study found that most veterans aged 60 and above were psychologically resilient (Pietrzak and Cook, Reference Pietrzak and Cook2013), while another study indicated mental health vulnerability among very old (aged 75 and above) Holocaust survivors (Landau and Litwin, Reference Landau and Litwin2000).
Older women experienced higher odds of depressive symptoms and a higher hazard of reporting new symptoms over an eight-year follow-up period. Cumulative major life adversities were positively associated with depressive symptoms among both older men and women. However, more identified latent clusters of accumulated lifecourse adversities among women were significantly associated with both the prevalence and incidence of depression in later life. These findings were in line with the assumption that women's mental health in later life was more sensitive to earlier life adversities than men's. A number of factors can be put forward to explain these gender differences, including differences in the experience of adverse events themselves, as well as in biological responses to stress, mediated through the gendered nature of social roles (Nazroo et al., Reference Nazroo, Edwards and Brown1997; Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Klein, Lewis, Gruenewald, Gurung and Updegraff2000; Lundberg, Reference Lundberg2005). Notwithstanding the increase in women undertaking paid work roles alongside their caring obligations, nevertheless women's relative lack of social power may mean that women are more likely to encounter certain stressors, such as sexual assault, more often than men; this same lack of social power may then make them more vulnerable to developing depression in response to stress (Nolen-Hoeksema, Reference Nolen-Hoeksema2001; see also Table S2 in the online supplementary material). These results are in line with previous research findings that women were more vulnerable than men to developing depression and anxiety disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, even when they were threatened with similar stressors (Breslau et al., Reference Breslau, Davis, Andreski, Peterson and Schultz1997).
Taken together, the findings in this study emphasise the long-term consequences of lifecourse adversities on mental health in later life, as well as the gender differences permeating such relationships. The study identifies a five-categorical taxonomy of lifecourse adversities, namely the experience of a lost relationship, chained adversities, childhood adversities, war-related adversities and no/few adversities. Several types of early life exposures in childhood and early adulthood still operated as risk factors of late-onset depression, and there existed gender differences within such relationships. Lifecourse adversity exposures may create a vulnerable stress regulation system which continues into old age, and the nature of such vulnerability is likely to be specific to certain patterns of exposure. Our study has several strengths, including a large study sample, detailed life-history data and the use of LCA with distal outcomes. However, our findings should be assessed in the light of the study limitations. The measurement of lifetime adversity was based on retrospective data, raising the prospect that the relationship between adversity and depression may be over- or under-estimated due to selective recall of these events as a function of current depression (Hardt and Rutter, Reference Hardt and Rutter2004). Such recall bias was partially mitigated here, in that the reports of lifetime adversity at baseline (2006) were made at a different time-point to the reports of depressive symptoms during the follow-up period (2008–2014). Additionally, it was unclear from the data whether the current episode of depressive symptoms reflects the first onset or reoccurrence of these symptoms, and in both the logistic regression and Cox regression analysis we could only establish the association between the lifecourse adversities and the first onset or recurrence of depression. However, a previous study found that a gender difference (with women at an increased risk) was revealed for the first onset of depression only (Wainwright and Surtees, Reference Wainwright and Surtees2002), providing some support to the gender differentials found here being indicative of a first onset. Thirdly, it is important to recognise that other recent, unobserved, life events might also influence the outcome, although previous research has found that the effect of recent life events on depressive symptoms may be weaker and time limited (Kraaij et al., Reference Kraaij, Arensman and Spinhoven2002). Finally, the very small class of ‘chained adversities’ (2.4%) might be associated with considerable uncertainty and classification error, pointing to the need for further research to explore the existence of this sub-group in other settings.
Notwithstanding these limitations, this study contributes to the literature on the link between clustered cumulative life adversities, and current and new depressive symptoms. Understanding this association is important not only in its own right, but also because poor mental health has been associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in later life in various contexts, with depression being a particularly strong predictor of mortality in relation to cardiac failure and stroke (House et al., Reference House, Knapp, Bamford and Vali2001; Pennix et al., Reference Pennix, Geerlings, Deeg, van Eijk, van Tilling and Beekman2001). An elevated risk of depressive symptoms in later life is often associated with normative events as part of the process of ageing, such as retirement, widowhood and reduced ability to perform ADLs. Acknowledging that the current picture may be further complicated by the longer term and cumulative impact of early life adversities can help inform the design of future preventive interventions and treatments, and improve both current and future mental health among individuals.
Policy and practice implications
The paper's findings have important implications for the general population and the practice of health and social care professionals. The significant associations between early life adversities and the onset and prevalence of depression in old age indicate a need to create broader public awareness and understanding about the effects of harmful stress from different types of adverse lifecourse experiences on mental health across a wider population. Depression affects about 22 and 28 per cent of men and women over 65, respectively (Health Survey for England, 2007), however previous research shows that fewer than one in six older people with depression discuss their symptoms with their general practitioner, and among those, only half receive adequate treatment (Chew Graham et al., Reference Graham C, Campion, Kaiser and Edwards2011). In addition, NHS England's National Director for Older People's Mental Health has highlighted that older people are a fifth as likely as younger age groups to have access to talking therapies but six times as likely to be on medication (Burns, Reference Burns2015). Developing mechanisms to encourage older people to share their lifecourse experiences and symptoms of depression can effectively contribute to treating depression and promoting better mental health among the older population. The findings in this paper also relate to the UK government's recent efforts to raise awareness about social isolation and its link to, among a range of other factors, depression across the lifecourse and in later life (HM Government, 2018). Acknowledging the significant impact of lifecourse adversities on older men's and women's risk of developing depression, and by extension their risk of living in social isolation, is an important step in preventing and treating the negative effects associated with adverse mental health for individuals across socio-economic strata and with diverse demographic characteristics.
Future research
For future research, it would be interesting to add the precise timing dimension of these events within one's lifecourse into the LCA. Lifecourse adversity may have a different impact depending on when and how adversities occur. Also, it would be ideal to lag the timing of depressive symptom onset in the multivariate analyses in order to allow for the control of prior conditions, especially the first onset of depression. Lastly, it could be important to repeat the analyses in other contexts including other European countries, the United States of America and China, where the similarly designed and structured survey data (the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, the Health and Retirement Study, and China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study) are available.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19000461.
Author ORCIDs
Jane Falkingham, 0000-0002-7135-5875; Athina Vlachantoni, 0000-0003-1539-3057.
Financial support
This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Population Change (grant number ES/K007394/1 at the University of Southampton).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical standards
Ethics approval was not required for this project as the data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were anonymised at the sources by the survey team.
Open access
