No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Plasticity in the brooding cidaroid Ctenocidaris nutrix: a morphological, trophic, and molecular investigation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2025
Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity refers to the capacity of an organism’s phenotype to vary in response to changes in environmental conditions, without any change in the individual genotype. Sea urchins (Echinoidea) are well-known for their morphological and behavioural plasticity in response to changing habitats or trophic environments. Phenotypic plasticity has been little studied in directly developing species, in which low levels of phenotypic plasticity are usually expected as a consequence of high levels of genetic differentiation among populations and local genetic adaptation. In the present work, we report a significant plasticity in the direct-developing and brooding sub-Antarctic species Ctenocidaris (Eurocidaris) nutrix (Echinoidea, Cidaridae) through morphological and trophic analyses of gut contents and δ13C and δ15N isotopic compositions. Molecular data (COI mtDNA) confirm that the different phenotypes of C. nutrix, the short-spined C. nutrix nutrix and the long-spined C. nutrix longispina, are a single species restricted to sub-Antarctic waters. As formerly demonstrated in broadcasting echinoid species, morphological plasticity appears to be mainly linked to depth and swell exposure, specimens from exposed and shallow sites showing shorter spines and larger apical systems compared to specimens from sheltered or deep sites. Significant differences in the diet and trophic niche of the different phenotypes suggest that prey type and food diversity may also be a factor promoting distinct phenotypic responses, both in the feeding behaviour and morphology of echinoids.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.
References
Boecklen, WJ, Yarnes, CT, Cook, BA and James, AC (2011) On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42, 411–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advance in Genetics 13, 115–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, HL (1940) Notes on Echinoderms form the W. Coast of central America. Zoologica 25, 348.Google Scholar
Clement, M, Snell, Q, Walker, P, Posada, D and Crandall, K (2002) TCS: estimating gene genealogies. In Proceedings 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, p. 184. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2002.101658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coplen, TB (2011) Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable-isotope-ratio and gas-ratio measurement results. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 25, 2538–2560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, H (1953) The geochemistry of the stable carbon isotopes. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta 3, 53–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, B, Choné, T, Mooi, R and De Ridder, C (2005) Antarctic Echinoidea. Synopses of the Antarctic benthos. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.Google Scholar
De Ridder, C, David, B and Larrain, A (1992) Antarctic and Subantarctic echinoids from ‘Marion Dufresne’ expeditions MD03, MD04, MD08, and from the ‘Polarstern’ expedition EposIII. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris 4, 405–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNiro, MJ and Epstein, S (1981) Influence of diet on the distribution of nitrogen isotopes in animals. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta 45, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, TJ and Langerhans, RB (2004) Integrated solutions to environmental heterogeneity. In DeWitt, TJ and Scheiner, SM (eds), Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, TJ and Scheiner, SM (2004) Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, TJ, Sih, A and Wilson, DS (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doncaster, C and Davey, AJH (2007) Analysis of Variance and Covariance: How to Choose and Construct Models for the Life Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhamel, G (2011) Poker 2, Deuxième Campagne D’évaluation de la Biomasse de Poissons À Kerguelen. Paris: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle.Google Scholar
Ebert, TA (1980) Relative growth of sea urchin jaws: an example of plastic resource allocation. Bulletin of Marine Science 30, 467–474.Google Scholar
Ebert, TA (1996) Adaptive aspects of phenotypic plasticity in echinoderms. Oceanologica Acta 19, 347–355.Google Scholar
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, PB and Ebert, TA (1991) Plastic responses to limited food availability and spine damage in the sea-urchin Stronglycentrotus purpuratus (Stimpson). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 145, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabri-Ruiz, S, Saucède, T, Danis, B and David, B (2017) Southern Ocean Echinoid database. Zookeys 697, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, FJ (1976) The Cidaroida (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) of Antarctica and the Southern oceans. PhD thesis. USA: University of Maine.Google Scholar
Fenaux, L, Strathmann, MF and Strathmann, RA (1994) Five tests of food-limited growth of larvae in coastal waters by comparisons of rates of development and form of echinoplutei. Limnology and Oceanography 39, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féral, J-P, Poulin, E, González-Wevar, CA, Améziane, N, Guillaumot, C, Develay, E and Saucède, T (2019) Long-term monitoring of coastal benthic habitats in the Kerguelen Islands: a legacy of decades of marine biology research. In Welsford, D, Dell, J and Duhamel, G (eds), The Kerguelen Plateau: Marine Ecosystem and Fisheries. Proceedings of the Second Symposium. Kingston, Tasmania, Australia: Australian Antarctic Division, 383–402.Google Scholar
Flaherty, EA and Ben-David, M (2010) Overlap and partitioning of the ecological and isotopic niches. Oikos 119, 1409–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, JA (2006) The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2377–2383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geller, J, Meyer, C, Parker, M and Hawk, H (2013) Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Molecular Ecology Resources 13, 851–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillou, M, Lumingas, LJL and Michel, C (2000) The effect of feeding or starvation on resource allocation to body components during the reproductive cycle of the sea urchin Sphaerechinus granularis (Lamarck). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 245, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, MW and Strathmann, RR (1994) Functional consequences of phenotypic plasticity in echinoid larvae. Biology Bulletin 186, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, AD, Brunner, L, Cook, EJ, Kelly, MS and Wilson, B (2012) Echinoderms display morphological and behavioural phenotypic plasticity in response to their trophic environment. PLoS One 7(8), e41243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, AL, Inger, R, Parnell, AC and Bearhop, S (2011) Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER – Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. Journal of Animal Ecology 80, 595–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, U, Terpstra, S and Brey, T (2003) High-Antarctic regular sea urchins – The role of depth and feeding in niche separation. Polar Biology 26, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, MS (2000) The reproductive cycle of the sea urchin Psammechinus miliaris (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in a Scottish sea loch. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 909–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroh, A and Mooi, R (2025) World Echinoidea Database. Lytechinus pictus (Verrill, 1867). accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=513378on2025-10-07.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Stecher, G and Tamura, K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7), 1870–1874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layman, CA and Allgeier, JE (2012) Characterizing trophic ecology of generalist consumers: A case study of the invasive lionfish in The Bahamas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 448, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, CA, Araújo, MS, Boucek, R, Hammerschlag‐Peyer, CM, Harrison, E, Jud, ZR, Matich, P, Rosenblatt, AE, Vaudo, J, Yeager, LA, Post, DM and Bearhop, S (2012) Applying stable isotopes to examine food‐web structure: An overview of analytical tools. Biological Reviews 87, 545–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layton, KK, Corstorphine, EA and Hebert, PD (2016) Exploring Canadian echinoderm diversity through DNA barcodes. PLoS One 11, e0166118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bourg, B, Saucède, T, Charpentier, A, Lepoint, G and Michel, L (2022) What is the menu today in a subantarctic kelp food web from the Kerguelen Islands? Phytodetritus, phytoplankton and phytobenthos; not living kelp. Marine Biology 169(9), 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, SJ, O’Loughlin, PM and Tutera, P (1994) Brood-protection and diversity in echinoids from Prydz Bay, Antarctica. In David, B, Guille, A, Féral, JP and Roux, M (eds), Echinoderms Through Time (Echinoderms Dijon). Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 749–756.Google Scholar
Mariotti, A (1983) Atmospheric nitrogen is a reliable standard for natural 15N abundance measurements. Nature 303, 685–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, LN, David, B, Dubois, P, Lepoint, G and De Ridder, C (2016) Trophic plasticity of Antarctic echinoids under contrasted environmental conditions. Polar Biology 39, 913–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mincks, SL, Smith, CR, Jeffreys, RM and Sumida, PYG (2008) Trophic structure on the West Antarctic Peninsula shelf: Detritivory and benthic inertia revealed by d13C and d15N analysis. Deep-Sea Research II 55, 2502–2514.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T (1928) A Monograph of the Echinoidea. Vol.1 Cidaroidea. Copenhagen: Reitzel CA.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T (1943) A Monograph of the Echinoidea. Vol.3.2 Camarodonta 1. Copenhagen: Reitzel CA.Google Scholar
Moureaux, C, Pérez-Huerta, A, Compère, P, Zhu, W, Leloup, T, Cusack, M and Dubois, P (2010) Structure, composition and mechanical relations to function in sea urchin spine. Journal of Structural Biology 170, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mykles, DL, Ghalambor, CK, Stillman, JH and Tomanek, L (2010) Grand challenges in comparative physiology: Integration across disciplines and across levels of biological organization. Integrative and Comparative Biology 50, 6–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newsome, SD, Del Rio, CM, Bearhop, S and Phillips, DL (2007) A niche for isotopic ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5, 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, DK and Savedo, MM (2013) A systematic review of phenotypic plasticity in marine invertebrate and plant systems. Advances in Marine Biology 65, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, KE (1998) The Role of dispersal ability in the phenotypic differentiation and plasticity of two marine gastropods: II. Growth. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 221, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnasingham, S, Wei, C, Chan, D, Agda, Agda J, Ballesteros-Mejia, L, Ait Boutou, H, El Bastami, Z M, Ma, Ma E, Rea, D, Ho, C, Telfer, A, McKeowan, J, Rahulan, M, Steinke, C, Dorsheimer, J, Milton, M, Hebert, PDN (2024) BOLD v4: A Centralized Bioinformatics Platform for DNA-Based Biodiversity Data. In DNA Barcoding: Methods and Protocols, Chapter 26, pp. 403–441. New York, NY: Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitzel, A and Heyland, A (2007) Reduction in morphological plasticity in echinoid larvae: Relationship of plasticity with maternal investment and food availability. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9, 109–121.Google Scholar
Russell, MP (1998) Resource allocation plasticity in sea urchins: Rapid, diet induced, phenotypic changes in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (Muller). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 220, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saucède, T, Guillaumot, C, Michel, L, Fabri-Ruiz, S, Bazin, A, Cabessut, M, García-Berro, A, Mateos, A, Mathieu, O, De Ridder, C, Dubois, P, Danis, B, David, B, Díaz, A, Lepoint, G, Motreuil, S, Poulin, E and Féral, J-P (2019) Modelling species response to climate change in sub-Antarctic islands: Echinoids as a case study for the Kerguelen plateau. In Welsford, D, Dell, J and Duhamel, G (eds), The Kerguelen Plateau: Marine Ecosystem and Fisheries. Proceedings of the Second Symposium. Kingston, Tasmania, Australia: Australian Antarctic Division, pp. 95–116.Google Scholar
Saucède, T, Jossart, Q, Vandermeeren, J, Delleuze, M, Danis, B and Moreau, C (2024) The enigmatic echinoid Aporocidaris incerta (Koehler, 1902): new data suggest an unknown species and highlight new phylogenetic insights within Ctenocidaridae (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 65, 411–418.Google Scholar
Saucède, T, Pierrat, B, Danis, B and David, B (2014) Chapter 10.8. Biogeographic processes in the Southern Ocean. In De Broyer, C, Koubbi, P, Griffiths, HJ, Raymond, B and Udekem d’Acoz, C (eds), Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, pp. 456–463.Google Scholar
Schlichting, CD and Pigliucci, M (1998) Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Schwenk, K, Padilla, DK, Bakken, GS and Full, RJ (2009) Grand challenges in organismal biology. Integrative and Comparative Biology 49, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selden, R, Johnson, AS and Ellers, O (2009) Waterborne cues from crabs induce thicker skeletons, smaller gonads and size-specific changes in growth rate in sea urchins. Marine Biology 156, 1057–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soars, N, Prowse, T and Byrne, M (2009) Overview of phenotypic plasticity in echinoid larvae, ‘Echinopluteus transversus’ type vs. typical echinoplutei. Marine Ecology Progress Series 383, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathmann, RR, Fenaux, L and Strathmann, MF (1992) Heterochronic developmental plasticity in larval sea-urchins and its implications for evolution of nonfeeding larvae. Evolution 46, 972–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, CW (1876) Notice of some peculiarities in the mode of propagation of certain echinoderms of the Southern Seas. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 13, 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kleunen, M and Fischer, M (2005) Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytologist 166, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitman, DW and Agrawal, AA (2009) What is phenotypic plasticity and why is it important? In Whitman, DW and Ananthakrishna, TN (eds), Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 1–63.Google Scholar