Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T16:11:27.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent Deposition of 210Pb on the Greenland Ice Sheet: Variations in Space and Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jack E. Dibb*
Affiliation:
Glacier Research Group, University of New Hampshire Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space, Science and Engineering Research Building, Durham, NH 03824, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Detailed 210Pb profiles were determined for four “Chernobyl dated” snowpits sampled during a wide-ranging survey of the Greenland ice sheet during the 1988 season. The profiles from widely separated pits show little or no coherence; even for two pits only 40 km apart the profiles differ in detail. There does not appear to have been any seasonality in the deposition of 210Pb onto the ice sheet in the two years since the Chernobyl accident. The total deposition of 210Pb during this period (10-20 bq m-2) was about 20 times less than has been observed at mid-latitude sites in the eastern United States. The three pits west of the ice-sheet divide recorded very similar depositional fluxes, while the one eastern pit had only two-thirds the average of the others, suggesting a west-to-east gradient in the deposition of 210Pb, and perhaps other continentally-derived submicron aerosols, onto the Greenland ice sheet.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1990
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of pits where large-volume samples were collected for radionuclide analyses. The Summit (S) pit was sampled in the 1987 season and the rest were sampled during the 1988 season.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Detailed profiles of 210Pb activity versus depth in the firn for pits 1, 6 and 7. Pits were sampled at continuous 0.06 m intervals. The horizontal bars represent one sigma counting uncertainty. The depth of the winter layers was derived from δ18O profiles (not shown). The Chernobyl layer is from Dibb (1989).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Detailed profiles of 210Pb activity versus depth in the firn for pits 1 and 2. Pits were sampled at continuous 0.06 m intervals. The horizontal bars represent one sigma counting uncertainty. The depth of the winter layers was derived from δ18O profiles (not shown). The Chernobyl layer is from Dibb (1989).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. 210 Pb deposition at the four sites during the two-year interval between the Chernobyl accident in late April, 1986, and sampling in May, 1988. The range in estimated deposition reflects the uncertainty in the density of the firn over the depth sampled. The low estimate for each pit assumes an average density of 300 kg m×3 and the high estimate assumes 400 kg m×3.