Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-23T08:18:30.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Permian ammonoids from the Guadalupian (Wordian–Capitanian) of Las Delicias, Coahuila state, Mexico: new biostratigraphical and paleobiogeographical insights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2025

Alberto Alanis-Pavón*
Affiliation:
Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City, 04510 Mexico
Miguel A. Torres-Martínez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Paleontología, Instituto de Geología, Circuito de la Investigación Científica, Avenida Universidad 3000, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, Mexico City, 04510 Mexico
Josep Anton Moreno-Bedmar
Affiliation:
Departamento de Paleontología, Instituto de Geología, Circuito de la Investigación Científica, Avenida Universidad 3000, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, Mexico City, 04510 Mexico
Jessica Utrup
Affiliation:
Yale Peabody Museum, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology, 170 Whitney Avenue, P.O. Box 208118, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
*
Corresponding author: Alberto Alanis Pavón; Email: albertoap@ciencias.unam.mx

Abstract

This work describes and discusses Permian ammonoid faunas collected in two stratigraphic sections from the Las Delicias Formation of Coahuila state, northern Mexico. The taxa identified comprise 18 species, including Demarezites quirozii new species, as well as Mexicoceras smithi (Miller and Furnish, 1940), a variety of Mexicoceras guadalupense (Girty, 1908) here upgraded to specific status. The systematic analysis of the species found allowed us to recognize two middle Permian faunal zones, represented in ascending order by the Waagenoceras dieneri-Adrianites elegans Biozone from the Wordian and the Timorites schucherti-Cibolites uddeni Biozone from the Capitanian. Thus, the relative age of the Las Difuntas-18 section is established as Wordian (middle Guadalupian), whereas the Las Manuelas I section is Wordian–Capitanian (middle–upper Guadalupian). Both ammonoid zones are correlated with those recorded in Guadalupian outcrops from the southern USA, northeastern Japan, and southern China. This faunal resemblance between Mexican ammonoids and those taxa reported in these regions (USA, Japan, and China) supports the proposal that during the middle Guadalupian there was a marine corridor through the Panthalassa Ocean, which could have connected the Paleotethys and North American regions. It should be noted that ammonoids of both studied sections from the Las Delicias Formation were correlated better with West Texas (USA) and British Columbia (Canada) faunas, which are included in the North American Realm.

UUID: https://zoobank.org/60c6c43c-6536-4fbf-a372-c610bec86626

Information

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geographic location of the Las Manuelas I (LMI) and Las Difuntas-18 (LD18) sections of Las Delicias Formation. Chaotic lithosomes: 1, Cañon Rosillo; 3, Cerro Prieto; 4, San Pedro. Bedded lithosomes: 2, La Cria (modified from McKee et al., 1999).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The morphological terminology and standard measurements applied in this study for describing the ammonoid conch. Dm = shell diameter; uw = umbilical width; wh = whorl height; ww = whorl width.

Figure 2

Table 1. Dimensions (mm) and conch proportions of the most complete specimens. Dm, shell diameter; uw, umbilical width; uw/Dm, umbilical width index; wh, whorl height; ww, whorl width; ww/Dm, shell width index; ww/wh, whorl width index.

Figure 3

Table 2. Dimensions (mm) and conch proportions of the most complete specimens of Demarezites spp. Abbreviations as for Table 1. Data taken from Glenister and Furnish (1987), together with own measurements of D. quirozii n. sp.

Figure 4

Table 3. Dimensions (mm) and conch proportions of the most complete specimens of Mexicoceras guadalupense (Girty, 1908) and Mexicoceras smithi (Miller and Furnish, 1940). Abbreviations as for Table 1.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Eumedlicottia burckhardti (Böse, 1919): (1–3) IGM 14096, lateral (1), ventral (2), and apertural (3) views; (4–6) IGM 14111, lateral (4), ventral (5), and apertural (6) views; (7–9) YPM IP 16699, lateral (7, 8) and ventral (9) views (this specimen was assigned to Medlicottia sp. indet. by Miller, 1944). Figures 3.8 and 3.9 from King et al. (1944, pl. 23, figs. 1, 2), shown without scale. Dashed lines emphasize two rows of aligned nodes in the ventral zone. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 6

Figure 4. (1) Eumedlicottia burckhardti (Böse, 1919), IGM 14197, lateral view. (2–4) Neogeoceras girtyi (Miller and Furnish, 1940): (2) IGM 14136, lateral view; (3, 4) IGM 14194, lateral (3) and ventral (4) views. (5, 6) Altudoceras cf. A. altudense (Böse, 1919): (5) IGM 14188, ventrolateral view; (6) IGM 14189, lateral view. (7) Strigogoniatites cf. S. kingi Miller, 1944, IGM 14316, lateral view. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 7

Figure 5. External sutures: (1) Eumedlicottia burckhardti (Böse, 1919) from Las Difuntas-18 section, level LD1, Las Delicias Formation; based on sample IGM 14197. (2) Neogeoceras girtyi (Miller and Furnish, 1940) from Las Difuntas-18 section, level LD1, Las Delicias Formation; based on sample IGM 14136. (3) Roadoceras roadense (Böse, 1919) from Las Manuelas I section, level LM1, Las Delicias Formation; based on sample IGM 14256. (4) Neocrimites plummeri (Miller, 1944) from Las Manuelas I section, level LM1, Las Delicias Formation; based on sample IGM 14198. (5) Pseudagathiceras difuntense Miller, 1944 and (6) Pseudagathiceras spinosum Miller, 1944 from Las Difuntas-18 section, level LD1, Las Delicias Formation; based on samples IGM 14129 and 14126, respectively. (7) Stacheoceras gemmellaroi Miller, 1944 from Las Manuelas I section, level LM1, Las Delicias Formation; based on sample IGM 14193. (8) Paraceltites elegans Girty, 1908 and (9) Cibolites cf. C. uddeni Plummer and Scott, 1937 from level LM2, from Las Manuelas I section, Las Delicias Formation; based on samples IGM 14324 and 14326, respectively. Arrows indicate the shell aperture. Scale bars = 5 mm.

Figure 8

Figure 6. (1–4) Roadoceras roadense (Böse, 1919): IGM 14256, lateral (1), ventral (2), and apertural (3) views; (4) IGM 14119, ventral view. (5–10) Neocrimites plummeri (Miller, 1944) (= Metacrimites plummeri): (5–7) IGM 14198, lateral (5), ventral (6), and apertural (7) views; (8–10) IGM 14187, lateral (8), ventral (9), and apertural (10) views. (11–18) Pseudagathiceras difuntense Miller, 1944: (11–13) IGM 14101, lateral (11), ventral (12), and apertural (13) views; (14–16) IGM 14129, lateral (14), ventral (15), and apertural (16) views; (17, 18) YPM IP 16306, lateral (17) and ventral (18) views. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Pseudagathiceras spinosum Miller, 1944: (1–3) IGM 14126, lateral (1) and ventral (2, 3) views; (4–7) YPM IP 16310, lateral (4, 6) and ventral (5, 7) views. Dashed lines emphasizing two lines of tubercles at the beginning of the body chamber. Figures 7.6 and 7.7 from King et al. (1944, pl. 29, figs. 1, 2), shown without scale. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 10

Figure 8. (1–7) Stacheoceras gemmellaroi Miller, 1944: (1–3) IGM 14153, lateral (1), ventral (2), and apertural (3) views; (4) IGM 14157, ventral view; (5–7) IGM 14193, lateral (5), ventral (6), and apertural (7) views. (8–13) Demarezites quirozii n. sp.: (8) IGM 14097, lateral view; (9, 10) IGM 14100, lateral (9) and ventral (10) views; (11–13) IGM 14093, lateral (11), ventral (12), and apertural (13) views. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 11

Figure 9. (1–3) Demarezites quirozii n. sp., holotype IGM 14104, lateral (1), ventral (2), and apertural (3) views. (4–7) Mexicoceras guadalupense (Girty, 1908): (4, 5) IGM 14225, lateral (4) and apertural (5) views; (6) IGM 14235, lateral view; (7) IGM 14224, ventral view. (8–12) Mexicoceras smithi (Miller and Furnish, 1940): (8) IGM 14164, ventral view; (9, 10) IGM 14284, lateral (9) and ventral (10) views; (11, 12) IGM 14226, lateral (11) and ventral (12) views. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 12

Figure 10. External sutures: (1, 2) Demarezites quirozii n. sp. from Las Difuntas-18 section, level LD1, Las Delicias Formation; based on samples IGM 14097 and 14104, respectively; (3) Demarezites oyensi (Gerth, 1950), UA E229; (4) Demarezites lidacensis (de Roever, 1940), UA B2154. Figures 10.3 and 10.4 modified from Glenister and Furnish (1987, fig. 5), shown without scale. Arrows indicate the shell aperture. Scale bar = 5 mm (1, 2).

Figure 13

Figure 11. Bivariate diagrams of the conch parameters wh, ww, and uw in function of Dm and ww in function of wh for the 10 specimens of Demarezites used for this study. The blue triangle indicates the holotype specimen of D. quirozii n. sp.

Figure 14

Figure 12. Dispersion of the plots along the first two axes (axis 1 and 2) of the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) for the 10 specimens of the genus Demarezites used in this study. The ratios ww/Dm and ww/wh are the most diagnostic parameters for taxonomic differentiation.

Figure 15

Figure 13. External sutures: (1) Mexicoceras guadalupense (Girty, 1908) and (2, 3) Mexicoceras smithi (Miller and Furnish, 1940) from Las Manuelas I section, level LM1, Las Delicias Formation; based on samples IGM 14224, 14218, and 14221, respectively. (4) Waagenoceras dieneri Böse, 1919, (5) Waagenoceras girtyi Miller and Furnish, 1940, level LM1, and (6) Waagenoceras karpinskyi Miller, 1944, level LM2, from Las Manuelas I section, Las Delicias Formation; based on samples IGM 14303, 14251, and 14320, respectively. Arrows indicate the shell aperture. Scale bars = 5 mm.

Figure 16

Figure 14. Mexicoceras smithi (Miller and Furnish, 1940): (1, 2) IGM 14228, lateral (1) and ventral (2) views; (3, 4) IGM 14258, lateral (3) and ventral (4) views; (5) IGM 14221, ventral view; (6) IGM 14259, ventral view; (7, 8) IGM 14218, lateral (7) and ventral (8) views; (9–11) IGM 14115, lateral (9), ventral (10), and apertural (11) views. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 17

Figure 15. (1) Dispersion of the plots for the two first Principal Components (PC1 and PC2) of the Principal Components Analysis (PCA). The ratios ww/Dm and ww/wh are the most significant for taxonomic differentiation. (2) Dispersion of the plots along the first axes of the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) for the specimens of the Mexicoceras guadalupense (Girty, 1908) and M. smithi (Miller and Furnish, 1940) used in this study.

Figure 18

Figure 16. Waagenoceras dieneri Böse, 1919: (1, 2) IGM 14277, lateral (1) and ventral (2) views; (3, 4) IGM 14167, lateral (3) and ventral (4) views; (5) IGM 14215, lateral view; (6) IGM 14168, ventral view; (7, 8) IGM 14303, lateral (7) and ventral (8) views. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 19

Figure 17. (1, 2) Waagenoceras dieneri Böse, 1919, YPM IP 16666, lateral (1) and ventral (2) views. (3, 4) Waagenoceras girtyi Miller and Furnish, 1940, YPM IP 16672, lateral (3) and ventral (4) views. (5) Waagenoceras karpinskyi Miller, 1944, YPM IP 16676, lateral view, with partial enlargement (x2.5, red square). Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 20

Figure 18. (1–4) Waagenoceras girtyi Miller and Furnish, 1940: (1–3) IGM 14298, lateral (1), ventral (2), and apertural (3) views; (4) IGM 14251, lateral view. (5–8) Waagenoceras karpinskyi Miller, 1944: (5) IGM 14320, lateral view; (6–8) IGM 14319, lateral (6), ventral (7), and apertural (8) views. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 21

Figure 19. (1–3) Timorites schucherti Miller and Furnish, 1940: (1) IGM 14328, lateral view; (2, 3) IGM 14327, lateral (2) and ventral (3) views. (4–6) Paraceltites elegans Girty, 1908, IGM 14324, lateral (4), ventral (5), and apertural (6) views. (7–9) Cibolites cf. C. uddeni Plummer and Scott, 1937, IGM 14326, lateral (7), ventral (8), and apertural (9) views. Scale bars = 1 cm.

Figure 22

Figure 20. Stratigraphy and lithology of the sections studied, displaying the location of the taxa and the corresponding ammonoid biozonation.

Figure 23

Figure 21. (1) Paleogeographical map of the middle Permian, showing the kingdoms of ammonoid previously proposed (I, Paleotethyan; II, Uralian; III, American; IV, Arctic; and V, Australian), as well as their respective distribution (modified from Leonova, 2018). (2) Detail of North American basin during the Guadalupian (middle Permian). Ac, Acatlan Complex; CA, Colombian Andes; ChM, Chiapas Massif; Cho, Chortis block; F, Florida; LD, Las Delicias; M, Maya; NM, New Mexico; Oax, Oaxaquia; OL, Olinalá; Tx, Texas; WT, West Texas; Y, Yucatan (modified from Weber et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2015; Guerrero-Moreno et al., 2023).