Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-d2fvj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T04:53:42.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Physicists, the Chemists, and the Pragmatics of Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Robin Findlay Hendry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I investigate two views of theoretical explanation in quantum chemistry, advocated by John Clarke Slater and Charles Coulson. Slater argued for quantum-mechanical rigor, and the primacy of fundamental principles in models of chemical bonding. Coulson emphasized systematic explanatory power within chemistry, and continuity with existing chemical explanations. I relate these views to the epistemic contexts of their disciplines.

Information

Type
Causation and Explanation in Chemistry
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers , December 2004 , pp. 1048 - 1059
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

Research towards this paper, and my attendance at the PSA meeting were supported financially by the Leverhulme Trust and the British Academy.

References

Altmann, S. L., and Bowen, E. J. (1974), “Charles Alfred Coulson”, Charles Alfred Coulson 20:75–134.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen (1999), “The Dynamics of Theory Change in Chemistry: Part 1, The Benzene Problem 1865–1945; Part 2. Benzene and Molecular Orbitals, 1945–1980”, The Dynamics of Theory Change in Chemistry: Part 1, The Benzene Problem 1865–1945; Part 2. Benzene and Molecular Orbitals, 1945–1980 30:21–79, 263–302.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1987), “Philosophical Problems of Quantum Theory: The Response of American Physicists”, in Krüger, Lorenz, Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Morgan, Mary (eds.), The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 417–435.Google Scholar
Coulson, Charles A. (1960), “Present State of Molecular Structure Calculations”, Present State of Molecular Structure Calculations 32:170–177.Google Scholar
Coulson, Charles A. (1961), Valence, 2d. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1929), “The Quantum Mechanics of Many-Electron Systems”, The Quantum Mechanics of Many-Electron Systems A123:714–733.Google Scholar
Gavroglu, Kostas, and Simoes, Ana (2000), “One Face or Many? The Role of Textbooks in Building the New Discipline of Quantum Chemistry”, in Lundgren, Anders and Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette (eds.), Communicating Chemistry: Textbooks and Their Audiences, 1789–1939. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 415–450.Google Scholar
Hendry, Robin Findlay (1998), “Models and Approximations in Quantum Chemistry”, in Shanks, Niall (ed.), Idealization in Contemporary Physics: Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 63, Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 23–42.Google Scholar
Hendry, Robin Findlay (forthcoming), “Is There Downward Causation in Chemistry?” in D. Baird, L. McIntyre, and E. Scerri (eds.), Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Hoddeson, Lillian (1990), “John Clarke Slater”, in Holmes, Frederic L. (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 18, suppl. 2. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 832–836.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian (1992), “The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism” in Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects for Non-Reductive Physicalism. Berlin: de Gruyter, 49–93Google Scholar
Nye, Mary Jo (1993), From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Park, Buhm Soon (2000), “The Contexts of Simultaneous Discovery: Slater, Pauling and the Origins of Hybridisation”, The Contexts of Simultaneous Discovery: Slater, Pauling and the Origins of Hybridisation 31B:451–474.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Jeffry (2000), “Of Parameters and Principles: Producing Theory in Twentieth-Century Physics and Chemistry”, Of Parameters and Principles: Producing Theory in Twentieth-Century Physics and Chemistry 31B:549–567.Google Scholar
Schweber, Silvan S. (1990), “The Young John Clarke Slater and the Development of Quantum Chemistry”, The Young John Clarke Slater and the Development of Quantum Chemistry 20:339–406.Google Scholar
Simoes, Ana, and Gavroglu, Kostas (1999), “Quantum Chemistry qua Applied Mathematics: The Contributions of Charles Alfred Coulson”, Quantum Chemistry qua Applied Mathematics: The Contributions of Charles Alfred Coulson 29:363–406.Google Scholar
Slater, John Clarke (1939), Introduction to Chemical Physics. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Michael (2004), “Qualitative Theory and Chemical Explanation”, Qualitative Theory and Chemical Explanation 71:1071–1081.Google Scholar
Woody, Andrea I. (2000), “Putting Quantum Mechanics to Work in Chemistry: The Power of Diagrammatic Representation”, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) S612–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar