Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-24T13:58:07.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacterial communities of cryoconite holes of a temperate alpine glacier show both seasonal trends and year-to-year variability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2018

Francesca Pittino
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DISAT), University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy. E-mail: roberto.ambrosini@unimib.it
Maurizio Maglio
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DISAT), University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy. E-mail: roberto.ambrosini@unimib.it
Isabella Gandolfi
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DISAT), University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy. E-mail: roberto.ambrosini@unimib.it
Roberto Sergio Azzoni
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
Guglielmina Diolaiuti
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
Roberto Ambrosini
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DISAT), University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy. E-mail: roberto.ambrosini@unimib.it Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
Andrea Franzetti
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DISAT), University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy. E-mail: roberto.ambrosini@unimib.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cryoconite holes are small depressions of the glacier surface filled with melting water and with a wind-blown debris on the bottom. These environments are considered hot spots of biodiversity and biological activities on glaciers and host communities dominated by bacteria. Most of the studies on cryoconite holes assume that their communities are stable. However, evidence of seasonal variation in cryoconite hole ecological communities exists. We investigated the variation of the bacterial communities of cryoconite holes of Forni Glacier (Central Italian Alps) during the melting seasons (July–September) 2013 and 2016, for which samples at three and five time-points, respectively were available. Bacterial communities were characterized by high-throughput Illumina sequencing of the hypervariable V5−V6 regions of 16S rRNA gene, while meteorological data were obtained by an automatic weather station. We found consistent trends in bacterial communities, which shifted from cyanobacteria-dominated communities in July to communities dominated by heterotrophic orders in late August and September. Temperature seems also to affect seasonal dynamics of communities. We also compared bacterial communities at the beginning of the melting season across 4 years (2012, 2013, 2015 and 2016) and found significant year-to-year variability. Cryoconite hole communities on temperate glaciers are therefore not temporally stable.

Information

Type
Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of the sampling area on the ablation tongue of Forni Glacier (Stelvio Park, Central Italian Alps). The sampling area is reported with a red-dashed line, the AWS is represented by a red star. The base map is produced from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle flight in 2014.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Relative abundance of bacterial taxa, mostly at the order level, expressed as the percentage of sequences classified with confidence >90%. Orders whose abundance was <1% were grouped in ‘Others’.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. PCA plot on Hellinger-transformed abundances of each OTU of all the samples. Line colours and styles denote the month when the samples were collected (green solid line = July, violet dashed line = August, blue dotted line = September), while symbols the year (dots = 2012, triangles = 2013, diamonds = 2015, squares = 2016).

Figure 3

Table 1. RDA of variation of Hellinger-transformed bacterial OTU abundance of July samples of 2012, 2013, 2015 and 2016 according to year

Figure 4

Fig. 4. (a) Biplot from RDA on Hellinger-transformed bacterial OTU abundance on year and month. Each point represents one sample. The analysis includes data collected in 2013 (dots) and 2016 (squares) only. Samples collected in different months are indicated by different colours and included in polygons with different line styles (green solid line = July, violet dashed line = August, blue dotted line = September). The percentage of variance explained by each axis and its significance (***: P < 0.001) is reported. rM is the Mantel correlation coefficient between the Hellinger distance between samples and the Euclidean distance between the corresponding symbols in the graph. Values close to one indicate that the graph correctly represents the distance between samples. (b) Results from the variation partitioning showing the amount of variance explained by the independent effects of the predictors entered in the RDA. There was no combined effect of the two variables.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a) Biplot from RDA of Hellinger-transformed bacterial OTU abundance on the year, day of melting season and temperature index (TI). Each point represents one sample. The analysis includes data collected in 2013 (dots) and 2016 (squares) only. Samples collected in different months are indicated by different colours (green = July, violet = August, blue = September). Arrows represent noncategorical constraining variables (black arrow = day of melting season, blue arrow = TI). The percentage of variance explained by each axis and its significance (***: P < 0.001) are reported. rM is the Mantel correlation coefficient between the Hellinger distance between samples and the Euclidean distance between the corresponding symbols in the graph. Values close to one indicate that the graph correctly represents the distance between samples. (b) Results from the variation partitioning showing the amount of variance explained by the independent and combined effects of the predictors entered in the RDA. The amount of variance explained by the shared contribution of TI and day of melting season was null as well as that explained by the shared contribution of year and day of melting season and by all the three variables simultaneously.

Figure 6

Table 2. RDA of Hellinger-transformed bacterial OTU abundance on year, day of melting season and an index of temperatures based on samples collected in 2013 and 2016

Supplementary material: File

Pittino et al. supplementary material

Pittino et al. supplementary material 1

Download Pittino et al. supplementary material(File)
File 794.3 KB