Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T10:14:48.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved resistance to Eimeria acervulina infection in chickens due to dietary supplementation with garlic metabolites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2012

Duk Kyung Kim
Affiliation:
Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Building 1040, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD20705, USA
Hyun S. Lillehoj*
Affiliation:
Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Building 1040, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD20705, USA
Sung Hyen Lee
Affiliation:
Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Building 1040, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD20705, USA
Erik P. Lillehoj
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD21201, USA
David Bravo
Affiliation:
Pancosma SA, Geneva, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author: Dr H. S. Lillehoj, fax +1 301 504 5103, email hyun.lillehoj@ars.usda.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of a compound including the secondary metabolites of garlic, propyl thiosulphinate (PTS) and propyl thiosulphinate oxide (PTSO), on the in vitro and in vivo parameters of chicken gut immunity during experimental Eimeria acervulina infection were evaluated. In in vitro assays, the compound comprised of PTSO (67 %) and PTS (33 %) dose-dependently killed invasive E. acervulina sporozoites and stimulated higher spleen cell proliferation. Broiler chickens continuously fed from hatch with PTSO/PTS compound-supplemented diet and orally challenged with live E. acervulina oocysts had increased body weight gain, decreased faecal oocyst excretion and greater E. acervulina profilin antibody responses, compared with chickens fed a non-supplemented diet. Differential gene expression by microarray hybridisation identified 1227 transcripts whose levels were significantly altered in the intestinal lymphocytes of PTSO/PTS-fed birds compared with non-supplemented controls (552 up-regulated, 675 down-regulated). Biological pathway analysis identified the altered transcripts as belonging to the categories ‘Disease and Disorder’ and ‘Physiological System Development and Function’. In the former category, the most significant function identified was ‘Inflammatory Response’, while the most significant function in the latter category was ‘Cardiovascular System Development and Function’. This new information documents the immunologic and genomic changes that occur in chickens following PTSO/PTS dietary supplementation, which are relevant to protective immunity during avian coccidiosis.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012
Figure 0

Table 1 Primers used for quantitative RT-PCR

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Effect of propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate (PTSO/PTS) in vitro. (A) Eimeria acervulina (EA) sporozoites (1·0 × 106/ml) were incubated with PBS (control), 10 μg/ml of PTSO/PTS or 5·0 μg/ml of chicken recombinant natural killer (NK) lysin, for 2 or 4 h at 4°C, and viability was measured by trypan blue exclusion by counting a minimum of 100 sporozoites. (B) Spleen cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of PTSO/PTS, concanavalin A (Con A; 5 μg/ml) or medium (control) for 48 h and viable cell numbers were measured using 2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulphophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars (n 3). Mean values were significantly different from those of PTSO/PTS-treated with control groups according to the Student's t test: * P < 0·05; *** P < 0·001. OD, optical density.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Effect of dietary propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate (PTSO/PTS) on body weight gain and faecal oocyst excretion following experimental Eimeria acervulina infection. Chickens were fed from hatch with non-supplemented or PTSO/PTS-supplemented diets and either uninfected or orally infected with 1·0 × 104 oocysts of E. acervulina at 10 d post-hatch. (A) Body weights (twenty birds/group) were measured in non-infected and infected chickens on the non-supplemented diet (control), and in infected chickens on the PTSO/PTS-supplemented diet at 0 and 10 d post-infection. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different according to Duncan's multiple-range test (P < 0·05). (B) Faecal samples (twenty birds/group) were collected from chickens on the non-supplemented (control) and PTSO/PTS-supplemented diets between 6 and 9 d post-infection and total oocyst numbers were determined using a McMaster chamber. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. ** Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·01; Students t test).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Effect of dietary propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate (PTSO/PTS) on profilin antibody (Ab) levels. Chickens were fed from hatch with non-supplemented (control) or PTSO/PTS-supplemented diets and orally infected with 1·0 × 104 oocysts of Eimeria acervulina at 10 d post-hatch. Peripheral blood (four birds/group) was collected at 10 d post-infection and sera were analysed for anti-profilin Ab levels by ELISA. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars (n 4). a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters are significantly different according to Duncan's multiple-range test (P < 0·05). OD, optical density.

Figure 4

Table 2 Genes corresponding to up-regulated intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte transcripts in chickens given a propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate-supplemented diet compared with a non-supplemented diet

Figure 5

Table 3 Genes corresponding to down-regulated intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte transcripts in chickens given a propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate-supplemented diet compared with a non-supplemented diet

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Comparison between microarray (■) analysis and quantitative RT-PCR (□) for the levels of mRNA corresponding to selected genes. Each bar represents fold changes of mRNA levels in propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate-fed chickens compared with non-supplemented controls. ADIPOR2, adiponectin receptor 2; ASPH, aspartate β-hydroxylase; TNFSF13B, TNF (ligand) superfamily, member 13b.

Figure 7

Table 4 Significant functions in the category ‘Disease and Disorders’ in chickens given a propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate-supplemented diet compared with a non-supplemented diet

Figure 8

Table 5 Significant functions in the category ‘Physiological System Development and Function’ in chickens given a propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate-supplemented diet compared with a non-supplemented diet

Figure 9

Table 6 Significant canonical pathways in chickens given a propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate-supplemented diet compared with a non-supplemented diet

Figure 10

Table 7 Significant networks in chickens given a propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate-supplemented diet compared with a non-supplemented diet

Figure 11

Fig. 5 The most significant network with the indicated genes corresponding to mRNA exhibiting >2·0-fold up- and down-regulated levels following dietary supplementation of propyl thiosulphinate oxide/propyl thiosulphinate compared with non-supplemented controls. Genes corresponding to increased and decreased mRNA are indicated by red and green colours, respectively, with the colour intensity indicating the relative expression levels. Overlaid numbers are the fold changes associated with each gene. , Complex; , cytokine/growth factor; , enzyme; , group/complex/other; , transcription regulator; , transmembrane receptor; , transporter; , unknown; , direct relationship; , indirect relationship.