Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-mgxrv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-19T06:01:53.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Un-Accountable?: A Response to Devika Hovell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rosa Freedman*
Affiliation:
Birmingham Law School
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Devika Hovell has provided an excellent call to arms for academics to move beyond the question of whether the United Nations has due process deficiencies: By now we all know that it does. She invites us to focus instead on making “the normative case for adopting due process safeguards in UN decision making,” insisting that until now scholars have failed to ask the important theoretical questions underpinning their policy research. Hovell uses two case studies to demonstrate why resort to judicial mechanisms ought not to be the answer when seeking to find ways to ensure due process. She first focuses on targeted sanctions and then turns attention to cholera in Haiti.

Information

Type
Symposium on Devika Hovell, “Due Process in the United Nations”
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016