Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T06:02:17.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exercise enhancement of hepatic insulin-sensitising substance-mediated glucose uptake in diet-induced prediabetic rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2012

Kawshik K. Chowdhury
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, A210-753 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, CanadaMB R3E 0T6
Dallas J. Legare
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, A210-753 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, CanadaMB R3E 0T6
W. Wayne Lautt*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, A210-753 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, CanadaMB R3E 0T6
*
*Corresponding author: Dr. W. W. Lautt, fax +1 204 975-7784, E-mail: wlautt@cc.umanitoba.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sensitisation of insulin action in response to a meal (i.e. meal-induced insulin sensitisation, MIS) represents one of the major means of increased glucose disposal in peripheral tissues during the postprandial state. MIS occurs when the release of hepatic insulin-sensitising substance (HISS) stimulates skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Our previous study had demonstrated that the HISS pathway is impaired in age-associated insulin resistance, and in the rats which were part of that study, voluntary exercise improved the response to insulin by restoring HISS action. The present study tests the hypothesis that voluntary exercise would reverse insulin resistance in diet-induced models of insulin resistance, and that the benefits are attributed through the improvement in HISS action. In this study, two experimental diets, a high-fat diet (for 4 weeks) and 35 % sucrose solution (for 9 and 16 weeks), were used to induce insulin resistance in rats. These rats were assigned to the exercise/no-exercise intervention. The effect of 7 d voluntary running-wheel exercise was determined by measuring insulin- and HISS action in the exercised rats and comparing them with the non-exercised controls. Voluntary exercise reversed insulin resistance, caused by dietary manipulation, through restoration of the HISS action. The direct insulin action was not changed by either diet or exercise. The metabolic improvements and reduced adiposity correlated with the extent of reversal of HISS action induced by exercise. Exercise improves insulin sensitivity in diet-induced insulin resistance primarily by restoration of HISS-mediated glucose uptake.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Flow-chart of the study protocol illustrating the insulin-resistant rat models and intervention types. High-fat diet (Hf-4) or 35 % sucrose supplement (Sc-9/Sc-16) was used in specific age groups to induce insulin resistance. Following the period of dietary insult, the rats were maintained on a normal diet and drinking-water for 1 week while they received exercise/no-exercise intervention. Hf-4, high-fat diet for 4 weeks; Sc-9, 35 % sucrose solution for 9 weeks; Sc-16, 35 % sucrose solution for 16 weeks.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 The average distance run in the three intervention models of absence of meal-induced insulin sensitisation (7 d average exercise). Ex, exercised rats; Hf-4, high-fat diet for 4 weeks; Sc-9, 35 % sucrose solution for 9 weeks; Sc-16, 35 % sucrose solution for 16 weeks.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 (a) Total glucose uptake in insulin-resistant (IR) rats was compared with that in exercised (Ex) rats and age-matched healthy controls (C). The rapid insulin sensitivity test was used to determine (b) hepatic insulin-sensitising substance (HISS)-independent and (c) HISS-dependent glucose uptake. Postprandial insulin sensitivity was decreased significantly by dietary insult and reversed by exercise. The development of insulin resistance was caused primarily due to the blockade of HISS action; conversely, exercise reversed insulin resistance by restoring the HISS pathway. HISS-independent glucose uptake (or direct insulin action) was not affected by the diet or exercise. Hf-4, high-fat diet for 4 weeks; Sc-9, 35 % sucrose solution for 9 weeks; Sc-16, 35 % sucrose solution for 16 weeks. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Mean value was significantly different from that of the control rats: * P< 0·05, ** P< 0·01, *** P< 0·001, **** P< 0·0001.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Positive correlation between exercise and hepatic insulin-sensitising substance (HISS) action signifies a performance-dependent enhancement in insulin response in exercised rats of groups: (a) Hf-4-fed rats (r2 0·60; slope 22·0 (se 9·0); NS), (b) Sc-9-fed rats (r2 0·61; slope 13·5 (se 4·9); P< 0·05), (c) Sc-16-fed rats (r2 0·66; slope 70·00 (se 22·4); P< 0·05) and (d) all exercised insulin-resistant rats (r2 0·62; slope 19·5 (se 3·6); P< 0·0001). Note that the exercise axis is on a different scale for the oldest rats, which exercised the least. Hf-4, high-fat diet for 4 weeks; Sc-9, 35 % sucrose solution for 9 weeks; Sc-16, 35 % sucrose solution for 16 weeks.

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Impairment in the hepatic insulin-sensitising substance (HISS) pathway causes progressive development of multiple metabolic abnormalities including hyperglycaemia, resultant hyperinsulinaemia, increased oxidative stress and accumulation of body fat. The inverse relationship between (a) HISS action and fat pad mass (r2 0·17; slope − 0·37 (se 0·13); P< 0·01) or (b) HISS action and postprandial serum insulin concentration (r2 0·34; slope − 7·71 (se 1·64); P< 0·0001), and the positive correlation between (c) serum insulin level and fat pad mass (r2 0·44; slope 9·70 (se 1·66); P< 0·0001) are consistent with the pathologies being secondary to the impaired HISS action. In the exercised groups (●), the HISS action was recovered and a higher HISS action was correlated with lower adiposity and serum insulin level. In the non-exercised groups (▲), the HISS pathway was almost blocked, leading to progressive adiposity and hyperinsulinaemia over the range of a very low HISS action.

Figure 5

Fig. 6 (a) Body weight, (b) fat-free mass, (c) visceral fat pad mass and (d) whole body adiposity. The 7 d voluntary exercise (Ex) reduced (a) body weight, (c) visceral fat mass and (d) adiposity (percentage fat mass) in all groups. (b) Lean body weight or fat-free mass was not changed significantly by exercise, signifying that the increase in muscle mass is not the primary mechanism by which the 7 d voluntary training causes insulin sensitisation in diet-induced insulin-resistant (IR) rats. Hf-4, high-fat diet for 4 weeks; Sc-9, 35 % sucrose solution for 9 weeks; Sc-16, 35 % sucrose solution for 16 weeks. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Mean value was significantly different from that of the IR rats: * P< 0·05, *** P< 0·001. Mean value was marginally significantly different from that of the IR rats: † P= 0·08, †† P= 0·059.

Figure 6

Table 1 Metabolic profiles in the three intervention rat models with or without exercise∥ (Mean values with their standard errors)