Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T07:36:37.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Jetlag is Independently Associated with Chronotype and Poor Memory for Extinguished Fear

Subject: Psychology and Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2020

Ryan Bottary*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
Tony J. Cunningham
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Rebecca M.C. Spencer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
Edward F. Pace-Schott
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email: ryan.bottary@bc.edu

Abstract

Social jetlag (SJ) occurs when sleep-timing irregularities from social or occupational demands conflict with endogenous sleep–wake rhythms. SJ is associated with evening chronotype and poor mental health, but mechanisms supporting this link remain unknown. Impaired ability to retrieve extinction memory is an emotion regulatory deficit observed in some psychiatric illnesses. Thus, SJ-dependent extinction memory deficits may provide a mechanism for poor mental health. To test this, healthy male college students completed 7–9 nights of actigraphy, sleep questionnaires, and a fear conditioning and extinction protocol. As expected, greater SJ, but not total sleep time discrepancy, was associated with poorer extinction memory. Unexpectedly, greater SJ was associated with a tendency toward morning rather than evening chronotype. These findings suggest that deficient extinction memory represents a potential mechanism linking SJ to psychopathology and that SJ is particularly problematic for college students with a greater tendency toward a morning chronotype.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Association between social jetlag (determined by subtracting weekday from weekend mean actigraphy-measured sleep midpoint expressed as minutes past midnight) and extinction memory determined by (a) Extinction Retention Index (ERI) and (b) differential ERI (dERI; corrects for general increases in reactivity) (see Supplementary Materials for ERI/dERI calculations). Note better memory for extinction is expressed as greater ERI or dERI.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Sleep timing on weekdays and weekends for evening types (ET) and intermediate-morning/morning types (IMT). Social jetlag (i.e. later sleep midpoint on weekends compared to weekdays) was greater in those with greater tendency toward morningness based on Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ; Horne and Ostberg, 1976) scores. Here, ET reflects averages across true evening types while IMT reflects averages across the upper half (higher MEQ scores, based on a median split) of intermediate types (Pace-Schott et al., 2015). This split included 2 moderate morning types and 1 definite morning type based on Horne and Ostberg (1976) scoring criteria. Note. MWD = average sleep midpoint on weekday nights; MWE = average sleep midpoint on weekend nights; TST = total sleep time.

Supplementary material: File

Bottary et al. supplementary material

Bottary et al. supplementary material

Download Bottary et al. supplementary material(File)
File 28.2 KB
Reviewing editor:  Jessica Payne University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States, 46556
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and met required revisions.

Review 1: Social Jetlag is Independently Associated with Chronotype and Poor Memory for Extinguished Fear

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to the Author: In this manuscript, the authors examined whether social jet lag was associated with poorer extinction memory and/or evening chronotype in a sample of healthy male college students. This is a novel and interesting question, with relevance to understanding oft-noted associations between eveningness and worse psychological health. Although college students are arguably not the ideal sample for examining social jet lag as traditionally defined (see below), the manuscript could still provide a worthwhile contribution to the literature. I suggest considering the following comments/concerns:

  1. 1) More detail about weekday and weekend actigraphy data would be useful, including providing the # of weekend days available (with 9 days of data, some individuals may have 2 sets of weekend data), what weekend data was included in the means if more than one weekend was available, and the separate mean sleep timing data for both weekdays and weekends.

  2. 2) Relatedly, college students are less bound to the traditional weekday/weekend schedules (e.g., Thursday is often treated as a weekend night in terms of social activities and sleep schedule), and also have less systematically imposed early start times on weekdays (due to relatively greater control over their class schedules), raising questions about the meaningfulness of the traditional “social jet lag” definition. This may be relevant to the unexpected finding that morning chronotypes exhibited greater social jet lag in this sample (although the authors’ speculation that college schedules may be more difficult for morning-types is worth consideration as well).

  3. 3) Notably, the authors’ seemingly ignore that social jet lag in the opposite direction (advancing on the weekend) is seemingly associated with improved extinction memory. Other social jet lag papers have also ignored this issue, but it deserves discussion. Why would relative delay on weekdays be less problematic than relative delay on the weekend? In the more typical cases where eveningness and social jet lag are associated, one could argue that a delayed state is more adaptive, and thus spending relatively less time in the advanced state on weekends is a good thing. But that explanation would not seem to fit the current circumstances, when morningness was associated with greater social jet lag.

  4. 4) The authors could do more to address the lack of association between chronotype (as measured by MEQ) and extinction memory, especially given that social jet lag (which did correlate with extinction memory) was associated with morningness, which should be associated with better extinction memory based on consistent findings that eveningness is often accompanied by psychological/physical dysfunction. I wondered if it would be worth looking at whether the chronotype-extinction memory association is moderated by social jet lag—that is, in the morning-types with the most social jet lag, is there also worse extinction memory?

  5. 5) Finally, the authors could better distinguish between the standard SCR and differential SCR measures—they have the room in the Supplemental section, and it’s currently unclear how the literature views these two different approaches (whether one is more valid in certain circumstances, etc.).

Presentation

Overall score 3.9 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
3 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
4 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3.4 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
3 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
4 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5

Review 2: Social Jetlag is Independently Associated with Chronotype and Poor Memory for Extinguished Fear

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: The authors present data showing that social jetlag in college students is positivelty associated with greater morningness and is negatively associated with fear extinction memory. The paper is well written with appropriate analyses. The results highlight the negative consequences of social jetlag on a specific domain of cognitive functioning. The authors should clarify whether the result reported on lines 90-91 (“SJ was positively associated with Recall CS+E reactivity (i.e. lower ERI/dERI)…”) is referring back to the result reported in the Figure, or is a separate analysis. If it is a separate analysis, results of the statistical test should be reported.

Presentation

Overall score 5 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
5 out of 5

Context

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
5 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
5 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5