Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-pksg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-26T11:02:50.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The predictive factors of hypozincemia in patients with chronic liver disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2025

Shoji Ando*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Management, NHO Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Nagasaki, Japan Department of Nutritional Management, NHO Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Saga, Japan
Atsumasa Komori
Affiliation:
Department of Treatment for Intractable Disease, Clinical Research Center, NHO Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Nagasaki, Japan
Hiroshi Yatsuhashi
Affiliation:
Clinical Research Center, NHO Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Nagasaki, Japan
Seigo Abiru
Affiliation:
Clinical Research Center, NHO Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Nagasaki, Japan The Department of Internal Medicine, NHO Saga Hospital, Hinode, Saga, Japan
Yuri Yotsumoto
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Management, NHO Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Nagasaki, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Shoji Ando; Email: ando.shouji.fq@mail.hosp.go.jp

Abstract

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) often experience hypozincemia. The clinical factors associated with hypozincemia have not been established. We investigated clinical factors that may be useful to predict hypozincemia in patients with CLD. The serum zinc levels CLD patients were measured; Study 1 investigated the predictive factors of hypozincemia, and Study 2 was performed to validate the factors identified in Study 1. Study 1 included 197 participants, of whom 28 and 106 had serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and <80 µg/dL, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL or <80 µg/dL were associated with the albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score and serum albumin level. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the ALBI score ≥ −1.83 and the serum albumin level ≤3.3 g/dL were the cut-off values for a serum zinc level <60 µg/dL, whereas the ALBI score ≥ −2.44 and the serum albumin level ≤3.6 g/dL were the cut-off values for a serum zinc level <80 µg/dL. In Study 2 (n = 177), the diagnostic accuracy rates for serum zinc <60 µg/dL were 81.9% for the ALBI score and 75.1% for the serum albumin level, and those for serum zinc <80 µg/dL were 70.1% for both parameters. Together these findings indicate that the ALBI score may serve as a predictive factor of hypozincemia in CLD patients.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

Zinc deficiency is associated with symptoms such as oral ulcers, increased susceptibility to infections, decreased appetite, dysgeusia, and anaemia.(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1) In patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), zinc deficiency is also correlated with disease progression, including liver fibrosis (FIB)(Reference Kim, Lee and Kim2) and hyperammonemia(Reference Riggio, Merli and Capocaccia3) and is associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).(Reference Shigefuku, Iwasa and Katayama4) Clinically, serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL are defined as zinc deficiency, and levels 60–80 µg/dL are defined as marginal zinc deficiency.(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1) Patients with CLD often experience zinc deficiency,(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1) with a reported prevalence at 28.1%–59.9%(Reference Ozeki, Arakawa and Suji5,Reference Soichi, Yusuke and Nozomu6) and even 41.0%–82.8% when restricted to CLD patients with liver cirrhosis.(Reference Ozeki, Arakawa and Suji5,Reference Miwa, Hanai and Maeda7,Reference Sengupta, Wroblewski and Aronsohn8)

The factors that contribute to zinc deficiency in persons with CLD are as follows: (a) a decrease in albumin-bound zinc due to impaired albumin synthesis in the liver, leading to an increased urinary excretion of amino acid-bound zinc;(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1) (b) reduced zinc intake due to decreased appetite;(Reference Davidson, Richardson and Sutherland9) (c) impaired absorption of zinc from the intestine, possibly due to portal hypertension;(Reference Karayalcin, Arcasoy and Uzunalimoglu10,Reference Katayama11) and (d) increased zinc excretion caused by diuretics used for the treatment of ascites and oedema.(Reference Chiba, Katayama and Takeda12)

The literature concerning the need to determine CLD patients’ serum zinc levels (not limited to those with liver cirrhosis) is limited. Even the guidance issued by the America Association of Study of Liver Disease recommends an annual assessment of the serum zinc level in patients with cirrhosis,(Reference Lai, Tandon and Bernal13) whereas the European and Japanese guidelines do not clearly state the necessity of evaluating serum zinc.(14,Reference Yoshiji, Nagoshi and Akahane15) Consequently, serum zinc levels are not likely measured routinely in all CLD patients. As such an inadequate assessment can delay the detection and treatment of zinc deficiency in CLD patients, it is important to identify the clinical factors that may be used to predict hypozincemia in order to enable its early detection and timely treatment in at-risk patients, ultimately improving the overall prognosis of individuals with CLD.

Some predictive factors for hypozincemia in patients with CLD have been reported; for example, a serum albumin level ≤3.3 g/dL and a daily furosemide dosage ≥5.0 mg were observed to be associated with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL.(Reference Uchida, Uemura and Tsuji16) Another study also suggested that the serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, haemoglobin level, and presence of alcoholic liver disease might be potentially useful for predicting hypozincemia in patients with CLD.(Reference Soichi, Yusuke and Nozomu6) Although serum zinc levels have been reported to be negatively correlated with the albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score (which is an indicator of liver function) and the FIB-4 index (a marker of liver FIB)(Reference Kim, Lee and Kim2,Reference Soichi, Yusuke and Nozomu6,Reference Nishikawa, Enomoto and Yoh17) , few studies have evaluated whether these indicators could be used to predict serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL or <80 µg/dL in patients with CLD.

Here we sought to identify predictive factors for serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and <80 µg/dL in individuals with CLD, with an evaluation of previously described candidate factors, including the ALBI score and FIB-4 index.

Patients and methods

Study design

This study consisted of Study 1 and Study 2, both of which were retrospective cross-sectional cohort investigations. Study 1 was a training cohort in which we analysed the predictive values of the ALBI score and FIB-4 index for serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and <80 µg/dL. The subsequent Study 2 was performed to validate the predictive factors of hypozincemia identified in Study 1, along with previously reported predictors, i.e., the serum albumin level and the daily furosemide dosage.(Reference Uchida, Uemura and Tsuji16) Figure 1 depicts the study designs.

Figure 1. The designs of Study 1 and Study 2, the data items, and the study timeframes.

a Data collected on the same day or within 7 days of the initial serum zinc level measurement.

b BMI collected on the day of serum zinc measurement or, if not available, the most recent value within the prior year.

BMI: body mass index.

Patients

The patients whose cases were eligible for analysis in this study were those with CLD whose morning serum zinc level had been measured and whose ALBI score and FIB-4 index were calculated at the Hepatology Department of National Hospital Organization (NHO) Nagasaki Medical Center. Study 1 included the clinical data of the consecutive inpatients who were examined during the period from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022 and the outpatients examined during the period from October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Study 2 was comprised of the inpatients examined during a different period (i.e., April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2020) and the outpatients examined during another period (April 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021).

In order to limit confounders for the patients’ serum zinc levels, we excluded the cases of the patients with any of the following: (a) oral zinc preparation use, (b) chronic pancreatitis,(Reference Vujasinovic, Hedström and Maisonneuve18) (c) a past history of surgery for pancreatic cancer,(Reference Yu, Yang and Shan19) (d) current participation in haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis,(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1) or (e) a past history of gastric, duodenal, or jejunal resection.(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1,Reference Namikawa, Shimizu and Yokota20) We did not include insufficient zinc intake depending on the patients’ dietary habits as an exclusion criterion, because of both the difficulty of assessment and the retrospective nature of the present analyses. However, our Medical Center applied no dietary restrictions for CLD patients regarding the intake of foods high in zinc, including meat, shellfish, and legumes.

We used all of the above-described exclusion criteria in order to (i) minimise the potential influence of factors that could independently affect the serum zinc levels of individuals with CLD, and (ii) ensure that all of the variables that are required to test our study hypothesis were available.

Data collection

The following data were collected during the patients’ hospital admission or at outpatient visits: age, sex, BMI, aetiology of liver disease, comorbidities, Child-Pugh class and score, and the type of medication used. The outpatients’ laboratory data were collected on the same day as the measurement of serum zinc levels, and those of the inpatients were collected within 7 days of the serum zinc level measurements. The outpatients’ BMI was obtained on the same day as the serum zinc measurement, and if it was not available on that day, the most recent BMI within 12 months prior to the serum zinc measurement was used.

The ALBI score was calculated for each patient and classified into three grades: grade 1 (≤ −2.60), grade 2 (> −2.60 and ≤ −1.39), and grade 3 (> −1.39), with a higher score or grade indicating poorer liver function.(Reference Johnson, Berhane and Kagebayashi21) The FIB-4 index was calculated for each patient and classified into three categories: low (<1.30), intermediate (1.30–2.67), and high (>2.67), with higher values indicating greater liver FIB.(Reference Shah, Lydecker and Murray22)

Statistical analyses

The results of the analyses are presented as numbers (%), mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median (interquartile range). Student’s t-test, the Mann–Whitney U-test, the χ2-test, and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the patients with serum zinc levels below and above each of two cut-off values (60 µg/dL and 80 µg/dL). We conducted a binary logistic regression analysis using the backward elimination method with stepwise variable selection to investigate factors that may be associated with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL or <80 µg/dL. The explanatory variables consisted of (a) predefined variables that are likely to have a strong influence on the serum zinc level, including the ALBI score, the FIB-4 index, the serum albumin level,(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1) the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level,(Reference Ono, Kawate and Suzuki23) the patient’s daily furosemide dosage,(Reference Uchida, Uemura and Tsuji16) alcohol-related aetiology,(Reference Soichi, Yusuke and Nozomu6) and the presence of diabetes,(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1) and (b) other variables that differed significantly between the patients with serum zinc levels below versus above each of the two cut-offs in the univariate analysis.

We performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to calculate the cut-off values for the prediction of serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL or <80 µg/dL. The diagnostic accuracy rate was calculated for the validation of the predictive factors for serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL or <80 µg/dL as follows: (true positive patients + true negative patients)/total patients. Probability (p)-values <0.05 were accepted as significant. EZR ver. 1.53 software was used for the statistical analyses.

Ethical considerations

This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center (no. 2022081). Consent for participation in the study was obtained through an opt-out approach, with the study details available on the website of NHO Nagasaki Medical Center.

Results

Study 1

Among the 382 initial study candidates of the study, Study 1 analysed the cases of 197 patients, of whom 28 (14.2%) had serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and 106 (53.8%) had serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL (Figure 2A). Table 1 summarises the patients’ clinical characteristics. A univariate analysis was performed first to identify factors associated with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL. Briefly (as shown by the data in Table 2), those with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL had significantly higher ALBI scores (p < 0.001), FIB-4 index values (p < 0.001), and serum total bilirubin levels (p < 0.001), a significantly higher prevalence of diuretic usage (p < 0.001), a significantly higher daily dosage of furosemide (p < 0.001), and a significantly higher prevalence of liver cirrhosis (p < 0.001), as well as significantly lower serum albumin levels (p < 0.001).

Figure 2. Flowchart of participant selection.

ALBI: albumin–bilirubin

Table 1. Clinical demography of the Study 1 patients (n = 197)

a Only the patients with liver cirrhosis.

b Daily dosage of furosemide (mg/day): 0, n = 173; 10, n = 6; 20, n = 14; 40, n = 3; 60, n = 1.

Data are number (%), mean ± SD, or median (interquartile range).

Missing data: BMI, n = 29; BUN, n = 1; creatinine, n = 1; CRP, n = 129; ammonia, n = 114; prothrombin activation, n = 17.

Reference range for laboratory tests; zinc, 65–118 µg/dL; albumin, 4.1–5.1 g/dL; total bilirubin, 0.4–1.5 mg/dL; AST, 13–30 U/L; ALT, 10–42 U/L; BUN, 8.0–20.0 mg/dL; creatinine, 0.46–0.79 mg/dL; CRP, ≤0.14 mg/dL; ammonia, 12–66 µg/dL; prothrombin activation, 70%–130%; white blood cells, 3,300–8,600/µL; haemoglobin, 11.6–14.8 g/dL; platelets, 15.8–34.8 × 104/µL.

AIH: autoimmune hepatitis, ALBI: albumin–bilirubin, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, BMI: body mass index, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, CRP: C-reactive protein, FIB-4: fibrosis-4, HBV: hepatitis B virus, HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma, HCV: hepatitis C virus, NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, PBC: primary biliary cholangitis, WBC: white blood cells.

Table 2. Factors associated with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL

a Only the patients with liver cirrhosis.

b Daily dosage of furosemide, serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL; 20 mg/day, n = 7; 40 mg/day, n = 2; 60 mg/day, n = 1, serum zinc levels above 60 µg/dL; 10 mg/day, n = 6; 20 mg/day, n = 7; 40 mg/day, n = 1.

○1 Student’s t-test; ○2 Mann–Whitney U-test; ○3 χ Reference Kim, Lee and Kim2 -test; ○4 Fisher’s exact test.

Univariate analysis: data are number (%), mean ± SD, or median (interquartile range). Multivariate analysis: values are odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

Multivariate analysis: Of 67 subjects who did not have any missing data for the explanatory variables, 17 had serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL. Binary logistic regression was performed using a stepwise backward elimination method. Excluded explanatory variables were indicated by‘–’. Explanatory variables: The models were divided into Model 1 and Model 2 due to multicollinearity between the ALBI score and the serum albumin levels. The Child-Pugh class and score were excluded as they were only evaluated in patients with liver cirrhosis. The serum total bilirubin levels and prothrombin activity were excluded due to multicollinearity with other variables. The daily dose of furosemide was chosen, due to multicollinearity among the daily dose of furosemide, diuretics, and types of diuretics.

ALBI: albumin–bilirubin, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, BMI: body mass index, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, CRP: C-reactive protein, FIB-4: fibrosis-4, HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma, WBC: white blood cells.

In the multivariate analysis, the explanatory variables were analysed separately in Model 1 for the ALBI score and in Model 2 for the serum albumin level, due to these factors’ multicollinearity. We excluded the serum total bilirubin level due to its multicollinearity with the ALBI score.

Consequently, we observed that the ALBI score (odds ratio [OR] 19.3, p < 0.001) and FIB-4 index (OR 1.2, p = 0.012) were associated with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL in Model 1. In Model 2, the serum albumin level (OR 0.08, p < 0.001) and FIB-4 index (OR 1.3, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL (Table 2).

We performed another univariate analysis to identify factors associated with serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL (Table 3). In the multivariate analysis that was conducted with variables that were similar to those in Table 3, explanatory variables were analysed separately in Model 3 for the ALBI score and in Model 4 for both the serum albumin level and the serum total bilirubin level, due to their multicollinearity. In this analysis, the ALBI score (OR 5.2, p = 0.002) in Model 3 and the serum albumin level (OR 0.2, p = 0.003) in Model 4 were significantly associated with serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL (Table 3).

Table 3. Factors associated with serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL

a Only the patients with liver cirrhosis.

b Daily dosage of furosemide, serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL; 10 mg/day, n = 3; 20 mg/day, n = 12; 40 mg/day, n = 3; 60 mg/day, n = 1, serum zinc levels above 80 µg/dL; 10 mg/day, n = 3; 20 mg/day, n = 2.

○1 Student’s t-test; ○2 Mann–Whitney U-test; ○3 χ2 test; ○4 Fisher’s exact test. Univariate analysis: data are number (%), mean ± standard deviation, or median (interquartile range). Multivariate analysis: values are odds ratio (95% confidence interval). Multivariate analysis: Of the 67 patients who did not have any missing data for the explanatory variables, 48 had serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL. Binary logistic regression was performed using a stepwise backward elimination method. Excluded explanatory variables are indicated by the ‘–’ symbol. Explanatory variables: The models were divided into Model 3 and Model 4 due to multicollinearity between the ALBI score and serum albumin levels and serum total bilirubin levels. Child-Pugh class and score were excluded as they were evaluated only in the patients with liver cirrhosis. The daily dose of furosemide was chosen due to multicollinearity among the daily dose of furosemide, diuretics, and types of diuretics.

ALBI: albumin–bilirubin, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, BMI: body mass index, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, CRP: C-reactive protein, FIB-4: fibrosis-4, HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma, WBC: white blood cells.

Because the ALBI score and the serum albumin level were commonly associated with serum zinc levels <60 and <80 µg/dL, we determined these variables’ cut-off values for each threshold by performing an ROC curve analysis. The results of this analysis demonstrated that an ALBI score ≥ −1.83 and a serum albumin level ≤3.3 g/dL were predictive factors of serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL, and the latter cut-off value for serum albumin (≤3.3 g/dL) was consistent with the finding of an earlier study.(Reference Uchida, Uemura and Tsuji16) An ALBI score ≥ −2.44 and serum albumin level ≤3.6 g/dL were predictive factors of serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL (Figure 3).

Figure 3. The cut-off values of the ALBI score and serum albumin level for predicting a serum zinc level <60 µg/dL or <80 µg/dL in the ROC curve analysis. The cut-off values were determined as the values at which the sum of sensitivity and specificity is maximised.

Study 2

Among the 299 initial candidates for Study 2, the cases of 177 patients were analysed, of whom 33 (18.6%) and 92 (52.0%) had serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and <80 µg/dL, respectively (Figure 2B). Table 4 summarises these patients’ characteristics and shows that the patients’ ALBI scores, serum albumin levels, and daily dosage of furosemide were comparable to those of the Study 1 patients.

Table 4. Clinical demography of the Study 2 patients (n = 177)

a Only the patients with liver cirrhosis.

b Daily dosage of furosemide 0 mg/day, n = 151; 10 mg/day, n = 2; 20 mg/day, n = 16; 30 mg/day, n = 1; 40 mg/day, n = 4; 60 mg/day, n = 2; 80 mg/day, n = 1.

Data are number (%), mean ± SD, or median (interquartile range). Missing data; BMI, n = 18; CRP, n = 109; ammonia, n = 95; prothrombin activation, n = 14. Reference range for laboratory tests; zinc, 65–118 µg/dL; albumin, 4.1–5.1 g/dL; total bilirubin, 0.4–1.5 mg/dL; AST, 13–30 U/L; ALT, 10–42 U/L; BUN, 8.0–20.0 mg/dL; creatinine, 0.46–0.79 mg/dL; CRP, ≤0.14 mg/dL; ammonia, 12–66 µg/dL; prothrombin activation, 70%–130%; white blood cells, 3,300–8,600/µL; haemoglobin, 11.6–14.8 g/dL; platelets, 15.8–34.8 × 104/µL. AIH: autoimmune hepatitis, ALBI: albumin–bilirubin, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, BMI: body mass index, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, CRP: C-reactive protein, FIB-4: fibrosis-4, HBV: hepatitis B virus, HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma, HCV: hepatitis C virus, NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, PBC: primary biliary cholangitis, WBC: white blood cells.

We evaluated the diagnostic accuracies of the ALBI score and serum albumin level that had been revealed in Study 1 as well as the previously reported daily dosage of furosemide for the prediction of serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and <80 µg/dL.(Reference Uchida, Uemura and Tsuji16) The evaluation revealed the following accuracy rates for predicting serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL: ALBI score ≥ −1.83, 81.9%; serum albumin level ≤3.3 g/dL, 75.1%; and daily dosage of furosemide ≥5.0 mg/dL, 79.1%. The accuracy rates of ALBI scores ≥ −2.44 and serum albumin levels ≤3.6 g/dL to predict serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL were both 70.1% (Table 5). Consequently, the ALBI score showed the highest diagnostic accuracy rate for the prediction of serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL or <80 µg/dL.

Table 5. Validation for predictive factors of serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and <80 µg/dL (n = 177)

Values are percentages.

ALBI: albumin–bilirubin, PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value.

Discussion

We investigated and validated factors that can be used to predict hypozincemia in patients with CLD. The main result of our analyses is that the ALBI score could be used to predict hypozincemia among these patients. Other research groups have described a strong correlation between serum zinc levels and the ALBI score (r = −0.60 to 0.62, p < 0.001), which indicates that the prevalence of hypozincemia increases as the ALBI grade rises.(Reference Soichi, Yusuke and Nozomu6,Reference Nishikawa, Enomoto and Yoh17) Our present findings thus validate and complement previous studies demonstrating the relationship between serum zinc levels and the ALBI score.

The ALBI score was originally developed as an indicator of liver function in patients with HCC, and it has since become increasingly preferred as a measure of liver function in various areas of hepatology. Incorporation of all five components of the gold-standard indicator of the hepatic reserve, i.e., the Child–Pugh score, into a multivariable model revealed that the ALBI score, which examines albumin and bilirubin levels alone in an appropriately derived formula, can be substituted for the Child–Pugh score.(Reference Johnson, Berhane and Kagebayashi21) Compared to the Child–Pugh score, which is calculated with subjective parameters (presence of ascites and encephalopathy), the ALBI score is able to detect subtle changes in liver function in patients with compensated cirrhosis that cannot be captured by the Child–Pugh score.(Reference Toyoda and Johnson24,Reference Kumada, Toyoda and Tada25) Consequently, the ALBI score has been reported as (a) prognostic for mortality in patients with CLD,(Reference Hsieh, Lee and Wang26,Reference Oikonomou, Goulis and Doumtsis27) (b) predictive of the development of HCC,(Reference Fujita, Nomura and Morishita28Reference Tanaka, Ogawa and Huang30) (c) prognostic for the development of HCC after treatment,(Reference Demirtas, D’Alessio and Rimassa31) and (d) predictive of the complications and outcomes following liver transplantation.(Reference Zhang, Liu and Tan32,Reference Ma, Li and Wang33) Beyond liver diseases, the ALBI score has also been suggested to have prognostic utility in patients with heart failure, acute pancreatitis, and various malignancies other than HCC.(Reference Toyoda and Johnson24,Reference Luo, Li and Liu34,Reference Shi, Zhang and Zhang35)

Regarding the albumin used to calculate the ALBI score, it is important to note that approx. 60%–80% of the zinc in human blood is bound to serum albumin, and hypoalbuminemia leads to an increase in the urinary excretion of amino acid-bound zinc due to a decrease in protein-bound zinc.(Reference Kodama, Itakura and Ohmori1) Hypoalbuminemia may also contribute to intestinal oedema, potentially reducing the absorption of zinc.(Reference Uchida, Uemura and Tsuji16) Apart from its recently emphasised role as an indicator of inflammation,(Reference Evans, Corkins and Malone36) the serum albumin level remains an important factor in guiding and evaluating nutritional therapy, especially in patients with CLD.(Reference Yoshiji, Nagoshi and Akahane15) The presence of hypoalbuminemia may suggest insufficient nutritional intake and consequently may reflect inadequate zinc intake.

Regarding the other component of the ALBI score, i.e., bilirubin, the details of the mechanisms underlying the association between bilirubin and hypozincemia are unclear. A negative correlation between the serum levels of bilirubin and zinc has been reported.(Reference Katayama, Kawaguchi and Shiraishi37,Reference Pramoolsinsap, Promvanit and Komindr38) Excessive zinc intake may suppress the enterohepatic circulation,(Reference Méndez-Sánchez, Martínez and González39) whereas zinc deficiency may activate it, potentially compensating for an increased serum bilirubin level.(Reference Katayama, Kawaguchi and Shiraishi37) The serum bilirubin level also reflects portal hypertension and hepatic metabolic capacity. As impaired liver function collectively affects zinc intake, absorption, and excretion,(Reference Davidson, Richardson and Sutherland9Reference Chiba, Katayama and Takeda12) we suggest that the ALBI score, which includes the serum bilirubin level and can detect subtle changes in liver function, is a more useful predictive factor for hypozincemia than the serum albumin level alone.

In our present investigation, the ALBI score cut-off values for predicting serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and <80 µg/dL were ≥ −1.83 and ≥ −2.44, respectively, both of which corresponded to ALBI grade 2. The reported prevalence of serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL was 6.7%, 44.6%, and 83.9% in patients with ALBI grades 1, 2, and 3, and the corresponding prevalence of serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL was 74.6%, 92.3%, and 96.8%, respectively.(Reference Nishikawa, Enomoto and Yoh17) Moreover, another study reported that the prevalence of patients with serum zinc levels <70 µg/dL according to the modified ALBI score — which is considered to provide a more accurate assessment of liver function — was 49.6%, 86.7%, 97.1%, and 100.0% in ALBI grades 1, 2a (> −2.60 and < −2.27), 2b (≥ −2.27 and ≤ −1.39), and 3, respectively.(Reference Soichi, Yusuke and Nozomu6) These findings collectively suggest that the prevalence of hypozincemia increases substantially from ALBI grade 2, supporting the validity of the predictive cut-off values identified in our present study.

One possible explanation for the discrepancies between our present findings and the previous reports of a relatively high prevalence of hypozincemia even in ALBI grade 1 is that those studies did not control for the timing of blood sampling, despite the diurnal variation in serum zinc levels (higher in the morning and lower in the afternoon)(¹). Our patient population included only patients who had been assessed in the morning, in order to improve the reliability of the results. Though the ALBI score was used as a predictive factor for liver-related mortality, with its cut-off values being relatively high. Our present analyses identified intermediate cut-off values of the ALBI score for the early detection of hypozincemia. The clinical use of these cut-off values may lead to the timely intervention of zinc supplementation, possibly preventing severe hepatic outcomes.

To evaluate the predictive factors for hypozincemia identified in this study, we calculated the diagnostic accuracy rate, which provides a comprehensive assessment of diagnostic performance. We also calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) to support the interpretation of diagnostic performance. The calculations revealed that the ALBI score provided the highest diagnostic accuracy (81.9%) for predicting serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL, with a favourable balance of sensitivity (78.8%) and specificity (82.6%). Notably, the NPV was as high as 94.4%, suggesting that hypozincemia can be reliably ruled out using the ALBI score. The ALBI score also showed potentially moderate usefulness for predicting serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL, as its predictive performance was inferior compared to that for serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL, warranting further investigation. Taken together, our findings indicate that the ALBI score is a clinically useful factor for predicting hypozincemia, serving as practical guidance for zinc measurement and supplementation.

In the treatment of zinc deficiency, dietary therapy alone is often insufficient, and pharmacological supplementation with 50–150 mg zinc per day in adults is recommended(¹). Numerous investigations demonstrated that such supplementation improved patients’ clinical manifestations of zinc deficiency, including oral ulcers, increased susceptibility to infections, dysgeusia, and anaemia.(Reference Orbak, Cicek and Tezel40Reference Fukushima, Horike and Fujiki43) Several research groups have reported clinically beneficial effects of zinc supplementation in patients with CLD. Diglio et al. conducted a meta-analysis of two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of 167 patients with CLD to evaluate the efficacy of zinc supplementation for hepatic encephalopathy. Their analysis showed that zinc supplementation significantly improved hepatic encephalopathy (relative risk, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.46, 0.95).(Reference Diglio, Fernandes and Stein44) Fathi et al. investigated 56 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity, randomised to calorie restriction groups with or without 12-week zinc supplementation. They reported that compared to caloric restriction alone, the added zinc supplementation significantly decreased the patients’ serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) levels, along with their waist circumference values.(Reference Fathi, Alavinejad and Haidari45) In another study conducted by Fathi et al. using a similar design, zinc supplementation significantly decreased the patients’ values of serum insulin, the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and oxidative stress markers including serum superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and malondialdehyde (MDA).(Reference Fathi, Alavinejad and Haidari46) Hosui et al. reported that zinc supplementation improved the liver function of patients with liver cirrhosis and was associated with a reduced risk of HCC development.(Reference Hosui, Kimura and Abe47)

We also observed that the FIB-4 index was associated with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL. Hypozincemia has been described as an independent risk factor for liver FIB in patients with MASLD, suggesting a potential link with the FIB-4 index.(Reference Kim, Lee and Kim2) However, the FIB-4 index is considered a marker of FIB, not liver function,(Reference Zhang, Luo and Li48) and its calculation does not require knowledge of the patient’s serum albumin level. Because our results did not identify the FIB-4 index as a factor associated with serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL, we consider the FIB-4 index inferior to the ALBI score as a predictive factor of hypozincemia. However, combining the ALBI score with the FIB-4 index has been reported to provide better predictive value for mortality, liver failure, and postoperative recurrence in patients with HCC after hepatic resection.(Reference Zhang, Luo and Li48,Reference Tian, Niu and Xu49) It is thus possible that a predictive model incorporating both the ALBI score and the FIB-4 index, such as a regression-based approach, could more efficiently detect hypozincemia. However, predicting hypozincemia by using a regression formula after calculating the ALBI score and FIB-4 index may involve a complicated procedure, and further research is necessary to assess the practicality and generalizability of a predictive model incorporating both the ALBI score and the FIB-4 index.

Our analysis of factors that were previously reported to be associated with hypozincemia (i.e., the daily furosemide dose, serum AST level, haemoglobin level, and alcoholic liver disease), indicated that none of the factors were statistically significant. Furosemide forms a chelate with zinc and also inhibits the reabsorption of zinc in the renal tubules, thereby increasing the urinary excretion of zinc.(Reference Chiba, Katayama and Takeda12,Reference Uchida, Uemura and Tsuji16) Serum AST levels are thought to be influenced by zinc. In patients with CLD, zinc deficiency may enhance hepatic lipid peroxidation, promote hepatocellular damage, and increase the oxidative stress induced by intracellular iron, leading to elevated serum AST levels.(Reference Cabré, Camps and Paternáin50,Reference Bray and Bettger51) In addition, haemoglobin levels are influenced by transcription factors containing zinc fingers, which utilise zinc as a cofactor and play a crucial role in haemoglobin production.(Reference Zheng, Kitajima and Sakai52) Patients with alcoholic liver disease often exhibit zinc deficiency, which is one of the most consistent nutritional/biochemical observations,(Reference Zhou53) likely caused by impaired zinc absorption and inadequate intake.(Reference McClain, Van Thiel and Parker54,Reference Sullivan and Heaney55) Although these factors are suspected to be associated with zinc, they likely represent either a consequence of impaired liver function or part of its determinant.; Therefore, in our multivariable analysis, after the adjustment for the effects of the ALBI score and serum albumin levels, these factors were not observed to be significantly associated with hypozincemia.

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, a nutritional prognosis indicator calculated from the serum albumin level, total lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol level, has been proposed as another potential predictor of hypozincemia in patients with CLD. We did not conduct a CONUT analysis in the present study, due to the limited number of patients whose total cholesterol level was evaluated.(Reference Soichi, Yusuke and Nozomu6) Patients with zinc deficiency have also been reported to present with clinical symptoms such as lymphopenia, a decreased ratio of T helper (Th) cells to cytotoxic T cells, decreased natural killer (NK) cell activity, and increased monocyte cytotoxicity.(Reference Wessels, Maywald and Rink56) In addition, zinc deficiency was demonstrated to affect insulin secretion and insulin resistance, potentially leading to an increased total cholesterol level.(Reference Ranasinghe, Wathurapatha and Ishara57) It is thus possible that serum zinc levels and the CONUT score are inter-related. However, the correlation between serum zinc levels and the ALBI score has been reported to be stronger than the correlation between serum zinc levels and the CONUT score (r = −0.46, p < 0.001), suggesting that the ALBI score may be a more sensitive predictor of hypozincemia than the CONUT score.(Reference Soichi, Yusuke and Nozomu6)

Some study limitations should be addressed. Since the study’s design was retrospective and since the study was conducted at a single institution among patients whose serum zinc levels might have been measured for prophylaxis, selection bias might have occurred. Moreover, 60%–70% of Japanese adults do not meet the recommended dietary intake of zinc,(Reference Kodama, Tanaka and Naito58) indicating a background of chronic insufficient intake. We did not assess the patients’ zinc intake and thus this variable could not be adjusted for as a potential confounder, which may have influenced the observed associations with serum zinc levels. It thus remains necessary to prospectively analyse consecutive CLD patients in a multicentre study, including the assessment of dietary zinc intake, to avoid such bias and to validate our results.

Second, we analysed the ALBI score as a candidate predictive factor of hypozincemia only among patients with CLD. It remains necessary to evaluate the external validity of our results in populations without CLD but with other diseases. Would the ALBI score be universally predictive of hypozincemia? This is surely an outstanding question in the management of hypozincemia.

Conclusion

With the use of the ALBI score as a factor for predicting hypozincemia, a patient’s serum zinc level can be measured at appropriate time points as needed, thereby supporting the treatment of zinc deficiency in patients with CLD.

Data availability statement

Data cannot be shared for ethical/privacy reasons.

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the study participants and acknowledge the support of our colleagues and the institution involved.

Author contributions

Conceptualisation: S. Ando. Methodology: S. Ando. Data collection: S. Ando. Data analysis: S. Ando, A. Komori. Writing — original draft: S. Ando. Writing — review & editing: A. Komori, H. Yatsuhashi, S. Abiru, Y. Yotsumoto. Supervision: H. Yatsuhashi

Funding statement

The study received no external funding.

Competing interests

The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of NHO Nagasaki Medical Center (no. 2022081).

Patient consent statement

Consent for participation in the study was obtained through an opt-out approach, with the study details openly available on the website of NHO Nagasaki Medical Center.

Permission to reproduce material from other sources

Not applicable to this study.

Clinical trial registration

Not applicable.

References

Kodama, H, Itakura, H, Ohmori, H et al. Practice guideline for zinc deficiency. J Jpn Soc Clin Nutr. 2018; 40:120167 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Kim, MC, Lee, JI, Kim, JH et al. Serum zinc level and hepatic fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. PLOS ONE. 2020; 15:e0240195.10.1371/journal.pone.0240195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riggio, O, Merli, M, Capocaccia, L et al. Zinc supplementation reduces blood ammonia and increases liver ornithine transcarbamylase activity in experimental cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1992; 16:785789.10.1002/hep.1840160326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shigefuku, R, Iwasa, M, Katayama, K et al. Hypozincemia is associated with human hepatocarcinogenesis in hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis. Hepatology Res. 2019; 49:11271135.10.1111/hepr.13388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozeki, I, Arakawa, T, Suji, H et al. Zinc deficiency in patients with chronic liver disease in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2020; 50:396401.10.1111/hepr.13465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soichi, I, Yusuke, K, Nozomu, M et al. The useful predictors of zinc deficiency for the management of chronic liver disease. J Gastroenterol. 2022; 57:322332.Google Scholar
Miwa, T, Hanai, T, Maeda, T et al. Zinc deficiency predicts overt hepatic encephalopathy and mortality in liver cirrhosis patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology Res. 2021; 51:662673.10.1111/hepr.13601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sengupta, S, Wroblewski, K, Aronsohn, A et al. Screening for zinc deficiency in patients with cirrhosis: when should we start? Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60:31303135.10.1007/s10620-015-3613-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, HI, Richardson, R, Sutherland, D et al. Macronutrient preference, dietary intake, and substrate oxidation among stable cirrhotic patients. Hepatology. 1999; 29:13801386.10.1002/hep.510290531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karayalcin, S, Arcasoy, A, Uzunalimoglu, O. Zinc plasma levels after oral zinc tolerance test in nonalcoholic cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1988; 33:10961102.10.1007/BF01535784CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katayama, K. Zinc and protein metabolism in chronic liver diseases. Nutr Res. 2020; 74:19.10.1016/j.nutres.2019.11.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiba, M, Katayama, K, Takeda, R et al. Diuretics aggravate zinc deficiency in patients with liver cirrhosis by increasing zinc excretion in urine. Hepatol Res. 2013; 43:365373.10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.01093.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, JC, Tandon, P, Bernal, W et al. Malnutrition, Frailty, and Sarcopenia in Patients With Cirrhosis: 2021 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2021; 74:16111644 10.1002/hep.32049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2019; 70:172193.10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshiji, H, Nagoshi, S, Akahane, T et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for Liver Cirrhosis 2020. J Gastroenterol. 2021; 56:593596.10.1007/s00535-021-01788-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uchida, Y, Uemura, H, Tsuji, S et al. Significance of furosemide in patients with cirrhosis treated with or without zinc acetate hydrate supplementation. Hepatol Res. 2022; 52:449461.10.1111/hepr.13751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishikawa, H, Enomoto, H, Yoh, K et al. Serum zinc level classification system: usefulness in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Clin Med. 2019; 8:2057.10.3390/jcm8122057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vujasinovic, M, Hedström, A, Maisonneuve, P et al. Zinc deficiency in patients with chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25:600607.10.3748/wjg.v25.i5.600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, HH, Yang, TM, Shan, YS et al. Zinc deficiency in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors is associated with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. World J Surg. 2011; 35:21002117.10.1007/s00268-011-1170-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Namikawa, T, Shimizu, S, Yokota, K et al. Serum zinc deficiency in patients after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021; 26:18641870.10.1007/s10147-021-01978-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, PJ, Berhane, S, Kagebayashi, C et al. Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach – The ALBI grade. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33:550558.10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, AG, Lydecker, A, Murray, K et al. Comparison of noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7:11041112.10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ono, S, Kawate, K, Suzuki, S et al. A study on effects of replenished zinc on patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Jpn Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 36:899907.Google Scholar
Toyoda, H, Johnson, PJ. The ALBI score: from liver function in patients with HCC to a general measure of liver function. JHEP Rep. 2022; 4:100557.10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100557CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumada, T, Toyoda, H, Tada, T et al. Changes in background liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma over 30 years: comparison of Child-Pugh classification and albumin bilirubin grade. Liver Cancer. 2020; 9:518528.10.1159/000507933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, YC, Lee, KC, Wang, YW et al. Correlation and prognostic accuracy between noninvasive liver fibrosis markers and portal pressure in cirrhosis: role of ALBI score. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13:e0208903.10.1371/journal.pone.0208903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oikonomou, T, Goulis, L, Doumtsis, P et al. ALBI and PALBI grades are associated with the outcome of patients with stable decompensated cirrhosis. Ann Hepatol. 2019; 18:126136.10.5604/01.3001.0012.7904CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujita, K, Nomura, T, Morishita, A et al. Albumin-bilirubin score differentiates liver fibrosis stage and hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019; 101:220225.10.4269/ajtmh.19-0129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujita, K, Oura, K, Yoneyama, H et al. Albumin-bilirubin score indicates liver fibrosis staging and prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol Res. 2019; 49:731742.10.1111/hepr.13333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, Y, Ogawa, E, Huang, CF et al. HCC risk post-SVR with DAAs in east Asians: findings from the REAL-C cohort. Hepatol Int. 2020; 14:10231033.10.1007/s12072-020-10105-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demirtas, CO, D’Alessio, A, Rimassa, L et al. ALBI grade: evidence for an improved model for liver functional estimation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep. 2021; 3:100347.10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, Liu, C, Tan, Y et al. Albumin-bilirubin score for predicting post-transplant complications following adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Ann Transpl. 2018; 23:639646.10.12659/AOT.910824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, T, Li, QS, Wang, Y et al. Value of pretransplant albumin-bilirubin score in predicting outcomes after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25:18791889.10.3748/wjg.v25.i15.1879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, Y, Li, Z, Liu, J et al. Prognostic value of the albumin-bilirubin score in critically ill patients with heart failure. Ann Palliat. 2021; 10:1272712741.10.21037/apm-21-3424CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, L, Zhang, D, Zhang, J. Albumin-bilirubin score is associated with in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 32:963970.10.1097/MEG.0000000000001753CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, DC, Corkins, MR, Malone, A et al. The use of visceral proteins as nutrition markers: an ASPEN Position Paper. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021; 36:2228.10.1002/ncp.10588CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katayama, K, Kawaguchi, T, Shiraishi, K et al. The prevalence and implication of zinc deficiency in patients with chronic liver disease. J Clin Med Res. 2018; 10:437444.10.14740/jocmr3374wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pramoolsinsap, C, Promvanit, N, Komindr, S et al. Serum trace metals in chronic viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand. J Gastroenterol. 1994; 29:610615.10.1007/BF02365444CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Méndez-Sánchez, N, Martínez, M, González, V et al. Zinc sulfate inhibits the enterohepatic cycling of unconjugated bilirubin in subjects with Gilbert’s syndrome. Ann Hepatol. 2002; 1:4043.10.1016/S1665-2681(19)32191-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orbak, R, Cicek, Y, Tezel, A et al. Effects of zinc treatment in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Dent Mater J. 2003; 22:2129.10.4012/dmj.22.21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, AS, Beck, FWJ, Bao, B et al. Zinc supplementation decreases incidence of infections in the elderly: effect of zinc on generation of cytokines and oxidative stress. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85; 837844.10.1093/ajcn/85.3.837CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shintani, T, Ohta, K, Ando, T et al. Retrospective study on the therapeutic efficacy of zinc acetate hydrate administration to patients with hypozincemia-induced dysgeusia. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23:159.10.1186/s12903-023-02866-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukushima, T, Horike, H, Fujiki, S et al. Zinc deficiency anemia and effects of zinc therapy in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Ther Apher Dial. 2009; 13:213219.10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00656.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diglio, DC, Fernandes, SA, Stein, J et al. Role of zinc supplementation in the management of chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol. 2019; 19:190196.10.1016/j.aohep.2019.08.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fathi, M, Alavinejad, P, Haidari, Z et al. The effect of zinc supplementation on steatosis severity and liver function enzymes in overweight/obese patients with mild to moderate non-alcoholic fatty liver following calorie-restricted diet: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020; 197:394404.10.1007/s12011-019-02015-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fathi, M, Alavinejad, P, Haidari, Z et al. The effects of zinc supplementation on metabolic profile and oxidative stress in overweight/obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2020; 62:126635.10.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126635CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosui, A, Kimura, E, Abe, S et al. Long-term zinc supplementation improves liver function and decreases the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Nutrients. 2018; 10:1955.10.3390/nu10121955CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J, Luo, Y, Li, C et al. The combination of the preoperative albumin-bilirubin grade and the fibrosis-4 index predicts the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection. BioScience Trends. 2019; 13:351357.10.5582/bst.2019.01212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, YB, Niu, H, Xu, F et al. ALBI score combined with FIB-4 index to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2024; 14:8034.10.1038/s41598-024-58205-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabré, M, Camps, J, Paternáin, JL et al. Time-course of changes in hepatic lipid peroxidation and glutathione metabolism in rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2000; 27:694699.10.1046/j.1440-1681.2000.03322.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, TM, Bettger, WJ. The physiological role of zinc as an antioxidant. Free Radic Biol Med. 1990; 8:281291.10.1016/0891-5849(90)90076-UCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, J, Kitajima, K, Sakai, E et al. Differential effects of GATA-1 on proliferation and differentiation of erythroid lineage cells. Blood. 2006; 107:520527.10.1182/blood-2005-04-1385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Z. Zinc and alcoholic liver disease. Dig Dis. 2011; 28:745750.10.1159/000324282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClain, CJ, Van Thiel, DH, Parker, S et al. Alterations in zinc, vitamin A, and retinol-binding protein in chronic alcoholics: a possible mechanism for night blindness and hypogonadism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1979; 3:135141.10.1111/j.1530-0277.1979.tb05287.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, JF, Heaney, RP. Zinc metabolism in alcoholic liver disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1970; 23:170177.10.1093/ajcn/23.2.170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wessels, I, Maywald, M, Rink, L. Zinc as a gatekeeper of immune function. Nutrients. 2017; 9:1286.10.3390/nu9121286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranasinghe, P, Wathurapatha, WS, Ishara, MH et al. Effects of zinc supplementation on serum lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2015; 12:26.10.1186/s12986-015-0023-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kodama, H, Tanaka, M, Naito, Y et al. Japan’s practical guidelines for zinc deficiency with a particular focus on taste disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, and liver cirrhosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21:2941.10.3390/ijms21082941CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. The designs of Study 1 and Study 2, the data items, and the study timeframes.a Data collected on the same day or within 7 days of the initial serum zinc level measurement.b BMI collected on the day of serum zinc measurement or, if not available, the most recent value within the prior year.BMI: body mass index.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Flowchart of participant selection.ALBI: albumin–bilirubin

Figure 2

Table 1. Clinical demography of the Study 1 patients (n = 197)

Figure 3

Table 2. Factors associated with serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL

Figure 4

Table 3. Factors associated with serum zinc levels <80 µg/dL

Figure 5

Figure 3. The cut-off values of the ALBI score and serum albumin level for predicting a serum zinc level <60 µg/dL or <80 µg/dL in the ROC curve analysis. The cut-off values were determined as the values at which the sum of sensitivity and specificity is maximised.

Figure 6

Table 4. Clinical demography of the Study 2 patients (n = 177)

Figure 7

Table 5. Validation for predictive factors of serum zinc levels <60 µg/dL and <80 µg/dL (n = 177)