Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T05:45:06.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sub-terahertz propagation characteristics up to 150 GHz for 6G mobile communication systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2022

Minoru Inomata*
Affiliation:
NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories, NTT Corporation, 1-1 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Wataru Yamada
Affiliation:
NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories, NTT Corporation, 1-1 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Nobuaki Kuno
Affiliation:
NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories, NTT Corporation, 1-1 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Motoharu Sasaki
Affiliation:
NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories, NTT Corporation, 1-1 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Koshiro Kitao
Affiliation:
6G-IOWN Promotion Department, NTT DOCOMO, INC., 3-6 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Mitsuki Nakamura
Affiliation:
6G-IOWN Promotion Department, NTT DOCOMO, INC., 3-6 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Takahiro Tomie
Affiliation:
6G-IOWN Promotion Department, NTT DOCOMO, INC., 3-6 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Yasuhiro Oda
Affiliation:
6G-IOWN Promotion Department, NTT DOCOMO, INC., 3-6 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Minoru Inomata, E-mail: minoru.inomata.va@hco.ntt.co.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Extreme-high-speed communication exceeding 100 Gbps is one requirement for 6G. To satisfy extreme-high-speed-communication, one solution is to utilize terahertz bands above 100 GHz. To determine the new radio-interface technologies and service frequency bands for 6G, terahertz propagation characteristics above 100 GHz need to be understood. In this paper, we introduce our new radio-network topology for 6G and then show the frequency dependency of key propagation phenomena such as the characteristics of path loss in an urban environment, human blockage, and scattering from a rough building surface up to 150 GHz. Human blockage loss increases and the scattering is more diffused as the frequency increases. In the path-loss characteristics, it was found that path-loss frequency dependency is stronger than that given by conventional path-loss model because of scattering effects from a rough building surface.

Information

Type
EuCAP 2021 Special Issue
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Evolution of radio-network topology for 6G.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Key propagation phenomena for sub-THz bands.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Measurement setup and results. (a) Photo of anechoic chamber. (b) Top view of measurement setup. (c) Measurement of human blockage loss. (d) Comparison between measurement and calculation results using M.2412 human blockage model.

Figure 3

Table 1. Measurement parameters

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Relationship between reflection and scattering. (a) Measurement building wall. (b) Measurement setup.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Measurement environment and setup. (a) 97.5 GHz, (b) 66.5 GHz, (c) 26.4 GHz, (d) 2.2 GHz.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Frequency dependency of scattering from rough building surface.

Figure 7

Table 2. Measurement parameters

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Measurement setup. (a) Configuration of Tx antenna. (b) Measurement routes.

Figure 9

Table 3. Parameters used in measurement path loss and power angular profiles

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Measurement results. (a) Path-loss characteristics in LOS environment. (b) Path-loss characteristics in NLOS environment. (c) Measured power angular profiles.

Figure 11

Table 4. Comparison results