Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T14:32:47.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coeval brittle and ductile deformation beneath the late Wisconsinan Puget Lobe, Washington State, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2019

Jasper Knight*
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Archaeology & Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
*
Author for correspondence: Jasper Knight, E-mail: jasper.knight@wits.ac.za
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Late Wisconsinan glacial sediments, exposed on Whidbey Island and Camano Island, Puget Sound (Washington State, USA), were deposited in a proglacial shallow marine/outwash environment during northward retreat of the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran ice sheet. Sediments mainly comprise massive and cross-bedded sand and gravels, and rhythmically-bedded clay and silt/fine sand couplets, interbedded with diamictons that were deposited by a range of mass flows of different viscosities. Although sediment stratigraphy and ice advance–retreat patterns are well established for the Puget Lobe, brittle and ductile deformation structures within, and separating, these sediment units are less well understood. These structures record the nature of ice–bed interactions taking place in subglacial and proglacial environments. This study examines evidence for these processes and environments. Key deformation structures identified include open to overturned folds, normal and reverse faults, clastic dikes and hydrofractures and passive-loading structures. Evidence for coeval development of ductile and brittle deformation structures shows the close relationship between porewater changes, sediment rheology and sediment system responses to changes in strain caused by ice–bed interactions.

Information

Type
Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2019
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Location of the study area showing the maximal position of the late Wisconsinan ice margin of the Puget Lobe, with LGM ice flow direction marked (blue arrows; after Fulton, 1991) and (b) locations of Whidbey Island (W.I.) and Camano Island (C.I.) within Puget Sound, and the positions of sites named in the text.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Composite regional stratigraphy of Puget Lobe advance–retreat (after Easterbrook, 1969; Domack, 1984) and stratigraphic positions of typical deformation structures identified at sites discussed in the text. Note that detailed facies logs from individual sites are presented in Figure 3.

Figure 2

Table 1. Locations of sites examined in this study and their major sediment properties

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Schematic logs of sediments examined across Whidbey Island and Camano Island, Puget Sound. (a) West Beach, (b) Blowers Bluff, (c) Point Partridge, (d) Barnum Point, (e) Ebey Lodge, (f) Cavalero Beach and (g) Double Bluff. Circled 1, 2 are sediment units discussed in the text.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Sediments and deformation structures at West Beach. (a, b) Flat-lying rhythmites of sand and silt/clay separated (at base) by an intraformational debris flow bed above an undulating erosional surface; (c) deformed tree debris incorporated into basal sediments by ice readvance across a vegetated forefield; (d) diffuse sand and diamictic gravel beds exhibiting an undulating morphology; (e) brittle-fractured silt beds overlying fine sand and diamictic gravel beds and (f) ball and pillow structures developed in adjacent silt and gravel beds along with minor brittle fracture and rafting of silt slabs in the lowermost unit (below the trowel). Trowel is 19 cm long.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Sediments and deformation structures at Blowers Bluff. (a) Metre-scale sand and silt packages (indicated by the arrows) within cut and fill channels; (b) ripple and trough cross-bedded sands with silt drapes, and mud clasts as lags at the base of channel fills; (c) detail of mud clasts and superimposed multistorey channel fills with normally graded cm-scale infills or laterally persistent sand laminae and (d) rectilinear cross-bedded surfaces within dm-scale channelised sand packages marked by erosionally unconformable boundaries. Trowel is 19 cm long.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Sediments and deformation structures at Point Partridge. (a–d) Evidence for brittle fracture of thick and massive silt bed overlain by gravels and sands: (a) flexural fracture of the silt bed and infilling of gravels from above; (b) U-shaped erosional channel infilled with poorly sorted gravels and angular silt soft-sediment clasts. Note the arc-like erosional surface across the top of the U-shaped channel; (c) fractured and laterally transported silt raft, incorporated into the gravel debris flow; (d) dm-scale silt raft transported by rafting at the top of the underlying gravel flow, supported by high-dispersive pressure; (e–j) evidence for ductile deformation within the silt bed: (e) ball and pillow structure developed in cm-scale silt and sand beds; (f) pods of sand rolled into surrounding silts as the core of a sheath fold; (g) massive gravels deforming into a pre-existing fold developed in the massive silt bed; (h) rounded silt soft-sediment clasts incorporated into a folded silt and sand structure; (i) a silt mega-raft (right) incorporated within a gravel bed. The raft is (d) is located in the top left; (j) complex disharmonic folding in vertically-rotated cm-scale silt beds (left of the trowel), with silt brecciation and sand gravel sags. Trowel is 19 cm long.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Sketches of folds developed in diamictic gravel beds at Point Partridge. (a) Open and chevron folds with consistent axial plane strikes and (b) interactions between adjacent gravelly diamicton and silt beds when folded. Minor normal faulting of silt beds may reflect bed extension across the top of the fold.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Sediments and deformation structures within unit 2 at Barnum Point. (a) Reverse-faulted margin showing a m-scale downthrown block (relative movement direction indicated); (b) imbricated and stacked diamicton beds (sheared boundaries indicated); (c) upward going m-scale intersecting shears and clastic dikes, at the position of the trowel, with density-drive sags in diamicton beds seen in the top right; (d) thin and linear sandy parting along a listric shear, at the position of the trowel; (e) relationships between shearing and folding structures, outlined in yellow, with direction of relative movement shown by the arrows. The trowel is located in the core of an overturned fold developed in a diamicton bed; (f) density-driven sags developed in diamicton beds that may have been glacitectonically transported. Trowel is 17 cm long, pencil is 15 cm long.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Lower hemisphere stereoplot of various depositional and deformational structures within unit 2 at Barnum Point.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Sediments and deformation structures at Ebey Lodge. (a) Sketch of inclined faults and deformed mud beds (black shading), showing the dip direction and dip angle; (b) inversely bedded gravel lenses separating diamicton beds and (c) deformed mud beds at the base of inclined diamictic debris flows. Trowel is 19 cm long.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Sketch of different deformation structures present within unit 1 at Cavalero Beach.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Upward-directed movement of fine sediments leading to bed deformation and parasitic clastic dikes at Double Bluff.

Figure 13

Table 2. Evidence for different deformation styles at the sites discussed in this study

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Schematic continuum of deformation structures found in association with particular depositional settings, based on evidence from this study (note, other studies may suggest different depositional contexts).