Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T13:59:49.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using modern ferruginous habitats to interpret Precambrian banded iron formation deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2015

Elif Koeksoy
Affiliation:
Department of Geomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Sigwartstrasse 10, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
Maximilian Halama
Affiliation:
Department of Geomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Sigwartstrasse 10, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
Kurt O. Konhauser
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada
Andreas Kappler*
Affiliation:
Department of Geomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Sigwartstrasse 10, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early Earth processes are typically identified through the study of mineralogical, elemental and isotopic features in the rock record, including Precambrian banded iron formations (BIF). However, post-depositional processes often obscure the primary geochemical signals, making the use of BIF as proxies for paleo-seawater and the paleo-biosphere potentially imprecise. Thus, alternative approaches are required to complement the information gained from the rock record in order to fully understand the distinctive biogeochemical processes on ancient Earth. Simulating these conditions in the laboratory is one approach, but this approach can never fully replicate the complexity of a natural environment. Therefore, finding modern environments with a unique set of geochemical and microbiological characteristics to use as analogues for BIF depositional environments can provide invaluable information. In this review, we provide an overview of the chemical, physical and biological parameters of modern, ferruginous lakes that have been used as analogue BIF environments.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of the chemical and physical composition of the Archean, Proterozoic and modern ocean including respective estimates on the atmospheric oxygen content given in % present atmospheric level (PAL)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Overview of the Fe–S biogeochemistry in the Archean and Proterozoic ocean. Archean: Fe(II) was introduced into the ocean hydrothermally and remained in its reduced state as oceans were dominantly anoxic. The occurrence of Fe(III) in the BIF record from that time can be explained by three different processes: (1) UV photolysis of Fe(II), (2) microbial oxidation of Fe(II) by photoautotrophic bacteria and (3) abiotic oxidation of Fe(II) by oxygen that started getting produced in minor amounts by cyanobacteria in the late Archean. Fe(III) was reduced to Fe(II) coupled to the oxidation of H2/organic C by Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. Sulphate mainly was introduced into the ocean by volcanic input in form of SO2 that further got oxidized to SO42− prior to its transfer to the ocean water. Sulphate-reducing bacteria already produced small amounts of H2S by oxidizing H2 and/or organic carbon. Proterozoic: The ocean surface was slightly oxic after the GOE as O2 also started accumulating in the atmosphere. Increased oxidative weathering increased sulphate concentrations in the ocean by continental input in addition to volcanic input. Sulphate-reducing bacteria produced high amounts of sulphide which started accumulating under the reducing conditions of the deep ocean. Microaerophilic bacteria started flourishing under microoxic conditions and oxidized Fe(II) and H2S to Fe(III) and sulphate, respectively. Fe(II) and H2S reacted and precipitated in form of FeS minerals which is preserved in the rock record. Phototrophic sulphide-oxidizing bacteria started being highly active in the photic zone of the water column and oxidized accumulating H2S to sulphate.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Different approaches to evaluate the mineralogy, geochemistry and geomicrobiology of Archean and Proterozoic environments.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Patterns of stratification and turnover in holomictic and meromictic lakes.

Figure 4

Table 2. Comparison of five holo- or meromictic lakes regarding their physical and chemical properties

Figure 5

Fig. 4. The Fe- and S-rich Arvadi Spring, located in the eastern Swiss Alps. Photograph was taken in February 2014. (a) Front view of the spring with the spring pond in the back and creek outflow. (b) View on the spring front from the top. The white S0 flocks are distributed all over the spring pond, overlaying reddish Fe(III) minerals in the spring sediment. (c) White biofilms of Thiothrix like bacteria sticking to stones at the creek outflow are a strong indication for the presence of sulphide-oxidizing bacteria in the spring. (d) Spring creek flows downwards into forest.