Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:15:09.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parental Self-Efficacy Among Israeli Older Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2023

Miri Kestler–Peleg Open the ORCID record for Miri Kestler–Peleg [Opens in a new window] ,
Lee Greenblatt-Kimron ,
Ahuva Even-Zohar  and
Osnat Lavenda
Miri Kestler–Peleg*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
Lee Greenblatt-Kimron
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
Ahuva Even-Zohar
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
Osnat Lavenda
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
*
Corresponding author: La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Miri Kestler-Peleg, School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, 40700, Israel (mirikp@ariel.ac.il).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parental self-efficacy (PSE) is a central aspect of parenting research. Although parenting continues in older ages, few studies have focused on PSE among older adults. In line with the parenting determinant model, the study examined the associations between psychological distress, social support, loneliness, and PSE in older age.

The study used a quantitative cross-sectional survey, including 362 Israeli parents age 65 years and above. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires of psychological distress, social support, loneliness, PSE, and background information.

Results revealed that higher PSE was associated with lower psychological distress, higher social support, and a lower sense of loneliness in older adults. The research model explained 36.9 per cent of the variance in PSE among older adults.

Mental state and social conditions are important for PSE of older adults; therefore, professionals should ensure the availability of diverse solutions to enable, maintain, and promote well-being through social and familial engagement in this population.

Résumé

Résumé

L’auto-efficacité parentale est un aspect central de la recherche sur la parentalité. Bien que la parentalité continue de s’exercer jusque tard dans la vie, peu d’études se sont penchées sur le sentiment d’auto-efficacité parentale chez les personnes âgées. En se basant sur le modèle des déterminants de la parentalité, cette étude examine les liens entre la détresse psychologique, le soutien social, la solitude et le sentiment d’auto-efficacité parentale à un âge avancé.

L’étude se fonde sur les résultats d’un sondage quantitatif transversal mené auprès de 362 parents israéliens âgés de 65 ans et plus. Les participants ont été invités à fournir des renseignements de base et à remplir des questionnaires mesurant la détresse psychologique, le soutien social, la solitude et l’auto-efficacité parentale.

Les résultats du sondage ont révélé qu’un sentiment élevé d’auto-efficacité parentale était associé à un plus faible degré de détresse psychologique, à un soutien social supérieur et à un plus faible sentiment de solitude chez les aînés. Le modèle de la recherche explique 36,9 % de la variance de l’auto-efficacité parentale chez les personnes âgées.

L’état mental et les conditions sociales sont des facteurs importants du sentiment d’auto-efficacité parentale chez les aînés, par conséquent, les professionnels devraient assurer l’accès à diverses solutions visant à favoriser, entretenir et promouvoir le bien-être par l’engagement social et familial au sein de cette population.

Keywords

Agingpsychological distresssocial supportlonelinessparentingVieillissementdétresse psychologiquesoutien socialsolitudeparentalité
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 631 - 641
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© Canadian Association on Gerontology 2023

Introduction

Parenting Among Older Adults

Social connections with one’s grown children are among the most essential relationships in an adult’s life (Fingerman, Sechrist, & Birditt, Reference Fingerman, Sechrist and Birditt2013; Levitzki, Reference Levitzki2009). For older people, relationships with adult children are significant. In later life, older parents face losses of meaningful relationships (illness or death of their spouse and friends), and their need for social interactions intensifies (Fingerman et al., Reference Fingerman, Sechrist and Birditt2013; Umberson, Crosnoe, & Reczek, Reference Umberson, Crosnoe and Reczek2010). Indeed, relationships with their adult children have been related to older parents’ physical and mental health (Lowenstein, Katz, & Gur-Yaish, Reference Lowenstein, Katz and Gur-Yaish2007). Furthermore, daily pleasant or stressful experiences with adult children have been found to affect parental well-being (Fingerman, Kim, Birditt, & Zarit, Reference Fingerman, Kim, Birditt and Zarit2016). In recent decades, research has focused on examining various aspects of the relationship between older parents and their adult children, such as frequent contact or support exchange (Fingerman, Cheng, Birditt, & Zarit, Reference Fingerman, Cheng, Birditt and Zarit2012; Lowenstein et al., Reference Lowenstein, Katz and Gur-Yaish2007; Treas & Gubernskaya, Reference Treas, Gubernskaya, Van Hook, McHale and King2018). The increased interest in parenting in older age may be attributed to the extended periods that children live with their parents due to the increasing cost of living, and, accordingly, the growing dependence of adult children on their parents (Connidis & Barnett, Reference Connidis and Barnett2019; Fingerman, Huo, & Birditt, Reference Fingerman, Huo and Birditt2020; Kahn, Goldscheider, & García-Manglano, Reference Kahn, Goldscheider and García-Manglano2013). Additionally, the intensity and frequency of relations between parents and their adult offspring have increased over the past years, mostly because of mobile phones, e-mails, and other technologies that produce convenient and low-cost communications (Fingerman et al., Reference Fingerman, Huo and Birditt2020; Taipale, Petrovcic, & Dolnicar, Reference Taipale, Petrovcic, Dolnicar, Taipale, Wilska and Gilleard2018; Treas & Gubernskaya, Reference Treas, Gubernskaya, Van Hook, McHale and King2018). Nevertheless, while the importance of relationships with adult children and their beneficial influence on older people has recently been acknowledged, there are recurring questions in the literature on family and aging regarding the nature of the specific role of parenting at an older age and its importance for parents in later life (Bar-Tur, Ifrah, Moore, Kamin, & Lang, Reference Bar-Tur, Ifrah, Moore, Kamin and Lang2018; Connidis & Barnett, Reference Connidis and Barnett2019).

Parenting is one of the most important roles experienced by adults (Levitzki, Reference Levitzki2009). Several studies have emphasized the continuity of the parental role and its endless significance for older parents’ identity, well-being, and psychological experience (e.g., Bar-Tur et al., Reference Bar-Tur, Ifrah, Moore, Kamin and Lang2018; Levitzki, Reference Levitzki2009; Lowenstein et al., Reference Lowenstein, Katz and Gur-Yaish2007). While the role of parenting is clear at young ages and includes various specific tasks such as financial provider, protector, caregiver, authoritarian figure, teacher, socialization facilitator, and entertainment provider (Nye, Reference Nye1976), this role at older ages becomes more obscure in terms of its definition. Parents’ responsibilities at an older age tend to be vague due to the need to gradually reduce control over the offspring and to “step back” (Levitzki, Reference Levitzki2009; Mendonça & Fontaine, Reference Mendonça and Fontaine2014). An exceptional case is parenting adult children with disabilities or mental illness. In these cases, the parenting role of older adults remains eternal, to some extent; the parent is highly involved, and the parenting tasks are very clear and practical (Namkung, Greenberg, Mailick, & Floyd, Reference Namkung, Greenberg, Mailick and Floyd2018). Nevertheless, the ambiguity of the boundaries of older adults’ parental role makes the perception of success in later life more challenging to define and more subjected to contextual and subjective interpretations. Although the practical side of parenting is less prominent in later years as grown adults are less likely to depend on their parents for basic needs such as food, clothes, and shelter, resilience is still possible due to the steady increase in the cost of living and the psychological aspects of parenting, which are still crucial for shaping the adult child’s identity and self-esteem (Benedek, Reference Benedek, Anthony and Benedek1970; Smith & Pardasani, Reference Smith and Pardasani2014). Therefore, given the uniqueness of the parenting role in the older person’s life (Hank, Cavrini, Di Gessa, & Tomassini, Reference Hank, Cavrini, Di Gessa and Tomassini2018), this study seeks to focus on an unexplored aspect of parenting in older age, which may underlie parenting practices (Glatz & Buchanan, Reference Glatz and Buchanan2021): the concept of the older adult’s parental self-efficacy (PSE).

Parental Self-Efficacy

Although an absolute definition of successful parental functioning is lacking, a central aspect is self-efficacy, which refers to individuals’ subjective confidence in their ability to perform specific demands (Bandura, Reference Bandura1977; Cervone, Artistico, & Berry, Reference Cervone, Artistico, Berry and Hoare2006). Thus, PSE is the individuals’ confidence in their ability to successfully fulfil their role as parents and its associated tasks (Coleman & Karraker-Hildebrandt, Reference Coleman and Karraker-Hildebrandt2000; Johnston & Mash, Reference Johnston and Mash1989). However, self-efficacy is not considered a permanent personality trait and rather an evolving dynamic component that is altered by changing circumstances and tasks, as well as by changing individual characteristics (Bandura, Reference Bandura1977; Sevigny & Loutzenhiser, Reference Sevigny and Loutzenhiser2010). The aging process necessitates changes in various areas of life, including parental functioning of adult children (Cervone et al., Reference Cervone, Artistico, Berry and Hoare2006). Therefore, it is assumed that PSE and its characteristics will also vary in older age. In addition, older people must adapt to new roles in their lives that affect parental functioning, such as retirement, widowhood, and grandparenthood (Cervone et al., Reference Cervone, Artistico, Berry and Hoare2006; Mendonça & Fontaine, Reference Mendonça and Fontaine2014). More specifically, retirement may render more time for parenting and joint activities with the offspring (St George & Fletcher, Reference StGeorge and Fletcher2014). In contrast, widowhood may bring a sense of loneliness to the parenting role previously fulfilled by a partner (Lopata, Reference Lopata2017). On the other hand, grandparenthood burdens parenting with many other tasks that revolve around child and grandchild rearing that may impact the relationship between the older parent and the adult child (Kirby & Hoang, Reference Kirby, Hoang, Sanders and Morawska2018). These changes require new depiction of the parental role, which might affect parents’ confidence in their ability to function and succeed in the parenting role. As far as we know, this confidence in parental ability, namely PSE, has only been examined among older adults in one previous study (see Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, Even-Zohar, & Lavenda, Reference Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, Even-Zohar and Lavenda2021a). Nevertheless, in light of the evidence in recent decades of the significance of parenting in older age for promoting higher quality of life, greater physical and mental health, and well-being (Levitzki, Reference Levitzki2009; Lowenstein, Reference Lowenstein2007; Mendonça & Fontaine, Reference Mendonça and Fontaine2014), further examination of PSE among older adults is required (Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, et al., Reference Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, Even-Zohar and Lavenda2021a). Since information on PSE among older adults is scarce, the study is based on existing knowledge regarding PSE during earlier life-cycle stages.

One of the most prominent theories that deals with aspects of parenting in recent decades, including PSE (Jones & Prinz, Reference Jones and Prinz2005), is Belsky’s parenting determinant model (Reference Belsky1984), which serves as the theoretical framework in the present study. The model originated in Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory (Reference Bronfenbrener1979) and acknowledged the multi-level psychosocial factors influencing parenting. In particular, the parenting determinant model does not specify a certain reference of timeline and may be used in varied age ranges to examine human development across the lifespan. The model refers to three characteristics that influence parenting in the following order of significance: parental, contextual, and offspring characteristics (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984; Sevigny & Loutzenhiser, Reference Sevigny and Loutzenhiser2010). These three determinants are known to positively influence or, alternatively, undermine PSE (Glatz & Buchanan, Reference Glatz and Buchanan2015; Jones & Prinz, Reference Jones and Prinz2005). The first two domains of Belsky (Reference Belsky1984) are the focus of the current study: (a) individual characteristics that are represented by psychological distress and loneliness, and (b) contextual characteristics that are represented by social support. This comprehensive perspective enables reference to the specific socio-demographic context of parenting in the present study – older Israeli parents of adult children. To explore the factors that hinder or promote PSE among older Israeli adults, variables known to be central to both older adults and PSE were selected, that is, psychological distress, social support, and loneliness (Fang, Boelens, Windhorst, Raat, & van Grieken, Reference Fang, Boelens, Windhorst, Raat and van Grieken2021; Losada-Baltar et al., Reference Losada-Baltar, Jiménez-Gonzalo, Gallego-Alberto, Pedroso-Chaparro, Fernandes-Pires and Márquez-González2021).

Psychological Distress

According to the parenting determinant model, psychological distress is one of the individual characteristics affecting parenting (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984). Psychological distress is an umbrella term that describes various kinds of mental difficulties (Facey, Tallentire, Selzer, & Rotstein, Reference Facey, Tallentire, Selzer and Rotstein2015). It is an emotional experience of discomfort that results in temporary or permanent harm to the individual (Facey et al., Reference Facey, Tallentire, Selzer and Rotstein2015). Thus, psychological distress has been used as a measure of various mental states, such as anxiety, depression, or stress (Dyrbye, Thomas, & Shanafelt, Reference Dyrbye, Thomas and Shanafelt2006). In older age, psychological distress is associated with varied critical aspects of life, such as physical health conditions (Davison et al., Reference Davison, Lung, Lin, Tong, Kobayashi and Fuller-Thomson2020), physical frailty (Fu, Zhou, & Meng, Reference Fu, Zhou and Meng2020; Jing et al., Reference Jing, Li, Wang, Ding, Tang and Feng2020), sleep quality (Fu et al., Reference Fu, Zhou and Meng2020), cognitive function (Geiger, Reed, Combs, Boggero, & Segerstrom, Reference Geiger, Reed, Combs, Boggero and Segerstrom2019), and family functioning (Fingerman et al., Reference Fingerman, Huo and Birditt2020; Kelley, Whitley, & Campos, Reference Kelley, Whitley and Campos2013). When mental health is impacted, it might impair the person’s perception of the ability to succeed in the parenting role. Indeed, psychological distress has been negatively associated with PSE, and this association was found to be reciprocal (Crnic & Ross, Reference Crnic, Ross, Deater-Deckard and Panneton2017). These links have been evident at different periods in the family life cycle (e.g., Glatz & Buchanan, Reference Glatz and Buchanan2015; Razurel, Kaiser, Antonietti, Epiney, & Sellenet, Reference Razurel, Kaiser, Antonietti, Epiney and Sellenet2017) and, nevertheless, have not been examined to date among older adults.

Social Support

According to the parenting determinant model (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984), social support is one of parenting’s most significant contextual psychological characteristics, and of PSE in particular. Social support reflects the variety of sources that arise from relationships with significant others (Folkman, Schaefer, & Lazarus, Reference Folkman, Schaefer, Lazarus, Hamilton and Warburton1979). These sources include emotions (such as empathy or closeness), instrumental help (such as financial or accessibility services), knowledge (about the surroundings), and evaluation for self-esteem appreciation. Social support facilitates feedback for the parent on its parental practices and attitude, as well as contributes to shaping parental identity (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984; House, Reference House1981). It also enables learning from others and sharing, consulting, and observing others, thus increasing confidence in parental functioning (Lavenda & Kestler-Peleg, Reference Lavenda and Kestler-Peleg2018).

Social support includes forms of formal support (e.g., organizations) and informal support (e.g., spouse, family, and friends). The present study focused on informal support. Throughout life, informal social support is strongly associated with physical and mental health (Bar-Tur et al., Reference Bar-Tur, Ifrah, Moore, Kamin and Lang2018) and becomes central in older age due to the many losses associated with the aging process, including the loss of significant others, physical and mental decline, and retirement (Fernández–Ballesteros, Reference Fernández–Ballesteros2002; Temple & Dow, Reference Temple and Dow2018). Social support in later life has been positively associated with a better quality of life (Fernández–Ballesteros, Reference Fernández–Ballesteros2002), increased physical activity (Smith, Banting, Eime, O’Sullivan, & Van Uffelen, Reference Smith, Banting, Eime, O’Sullivan and Van Uffelen2017), better sleep outcomes (Kent de Grey, Uchino, Trettevik, Cronan, & Hogan, Reference Kent de Grey, Uchino, Trettevik, Cronan and Hogan2018), higher cognitive functioning (Rutter et al., Reference Rutter, Tyas, Maxwell, Law, O’Connell and Konnert2020), and, specifically, higher self-efficacy (Wu & Sheng, Reference Wu and Sheng2019), while negatively linked with depressive symptoms (Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Qian, Li, Jia, Wang and Xu2020). However, a qualitative study exploring the perception and desire for social support among adults over the age of 65 demonstrated that their need for social support might be experienced as shameful, embarrassing and result in feelings of being a burden to others (Yoo, Reference Yoo2013).

Studies conducted at earlier stages of life indicated that more informal social support predicted higher levels of PSE (e.g., Jones & Prinz, Reference Jones and Prinz2005; Leahy-Warren & McCarthy, Reference Leahy-Warren and McCarthy2011). The ability to consult, receive information, share parenting debates, obtain instrumental help, and gain strength and affirmations for one’s abilities seems to heighten one’s self-perception as successful in performing the parenting role. This association was found consistent across the different stages of family life (e.g., Lavenda & Kestler-Peleg, Reference Lavenda and Kestler-Peleg2018), however, as yet to be examined among older adults.

Loneliness

According to the parenting determinant model (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984) and contrasting social support, a contextual characteristic that reflects how people perceive themselves as assisted by the social systems, loneliness is an individual characteristic embedded in people themselves. Loneliness produces distress resulting from an unsatisfied, subjective desire for emotional and intimate social relationships. Thus, it reflects a gap between desirable and existing relationships (Heinrich & Gullone, Reference Heinrich and Gullone2006). Loneliness is experienced as particularly difficult among older adults (Ermer, Segel Karpas, & Benson, Reference Ermer, Segel Karpas and Benson2020; Yang, Reference Yang2018). For example, in a study conducted in Spain, older people described their loneliness as: I have lost close people and loved ones (42.3%); I have no one (28.5%); I have no family (26.8%); I feel that no one needs me (17.3%); I have no friends (4.7%) (IMSERSO, 2000, in: Fernández–Ballesteros, Reference Fernández–Ballesteros2002). Moreover, loneliness has been found as a risk factor for cognitive decline, mental and physical health, and even for mortality in older age (Cornwell & Waite, Reference Cornwell and Waite2009). In addition, loneliness may also impair individuals’ self-perception of their ability to successfully fulfil their tasks, in general, such as self-efficacy (Cohen-Mansfield, Hazan, Lerman, & Shalom, Reference Cohen-Mansfield, Hazan, Lerman and Shalom2016) and their role as parents, in particular—that is, impaired PSE (Tuominen, Junttila, Ahonen, & Rautava, Reference Tuominen, Junttila, Ahonen and Rautava2016). A negative association was found between PSE and loneliness in a single study to date that examined this link among older adults (Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, et al., Reference Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, Even-Zohar and Lavenda2021a).

In light of the above, and based on Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory (Bronfenbrenner, Reference Bronfenbrener1979), the infrastructure for the parenting determinants model (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984), individual, and contextual characteristics are all embedded in the macrosystem, which is the context of culture and society. From this perspective and based on the notion that culture shapes parents’ perceptions of their parenting role (Smith & Pardasani, Reference Smith and Pardasani2014), it is essential to consider the specific context of Israel, the context of the present study.

The Israeli Context

Israeli society is a mosaic of different national, religious, and ethnic groups that are reflected in different beliefs, philosophies, origins, languages, and values. According to a statistical review that was conducted on the older Israeli population (Shnoor & Cohen, Reference Shnoor and Cohen2020), the average life expectancy in Israel is one of the highest in the world (83 years old). Moreover, older adults over the age of 65 constitute 12 per cent of the population; their percentage is constantly increasing (twice the general Israeli population) yet it is lower than most Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. OECD is a forum of countries describing themselves as committed to democracy and regarded as developed countries (OECD, 2023). More than half of Israeli older adults reported being satisfied with their lives, similar to satisfaction levels at other ages. Nonetheless, a lower per cent reported having friends (84%) than the general Israeli population (91%). Moreover, a higher per cent of Israeli older adults reported loneliness (30%) compared with the general population (22%).

Parents are exposed to challenges, attitudes, expectations, and ideals that are derived from their cultural and societal contexts (Silverstein, Gans, Lowenstein, Giarrusso, & Bengtson, Reference Silverstein, Gans, Lowenstein, Giarrusso and Bengtson2010), which can produce different beliefs about their parenting role (Glatz & Buchanan, Reference Glatz and Buchanan2021). Diverse studies indicate that parenting in older age is characterized differently in different countries, including more or less financial, social and emotional support, intergenerational traditions, frontal encounters, and intensity of contacts (Bar-Tur et al., Reference Bar-Tur, Ifrah, Moore, Kamin and Lang2018; Katz, Lowenstein, Halperin, & Tur-Sinai, Reference Katz, Lowenstein, Halperin and Tur-Sinai2015; Lowenstein et al., Reference Lowenstein, Katz and Gur-Yaish2007). Israel is a very family-run society that combines traditional family values and norms with modern characteristics (Lavee & Katz, Reference Lavee and Katz2003). According to the OECD, Israel has one of the highest rates of marriage in the developed world, standing at 6.3 marriages per 1,000 residents compared with the OECD average of 5.0 (OECD, 2015). The centrality of childbirth in Israel is reflected in the country’s birth rate, which is the highest in the developed world (3.0 children per woman, relative to the OECD average of 1.7 [OECD, 2015]).

The Israeli high familism is demonstrated by the close and deep ties between the generations and their mutual involvement (Lavee & Katz, Reference Lavee and Katz2003). Compared with North America, intergenerational relationships in Israel appear to be more intense and common (Lowenstein, Reference Lowenstein2007; Silverstein et al., Reference Silverstein, Gans, Lowenstein, Giarrusso and Bengtson2010). The intensity of these ties is attributed to several unique characteristics of the country. The historical background of the Holocaust in the establishment of the State of Israel enhanced fertility as retribution to the Nazi regime by ensuring the continuation of the Jewish people with further generations (Burg, Reference Burg2016). A unique intergenerational transmission of the Holocaust trauma has been demonstrated in both the second and third generations of Holocaust families living in Israel, consisting of both personal and societal components (Greenblatt-Kimron, Shrira, Rubinstein, & Palgi, Reference Greenblatt-Kimron, Shrira, Rubinstein and Palgi2021b). In particular, studies have indicated that the family atmosphere in Holocaust survivor families is frequently characterized by higher involvement compared with non-survivor families (Brom, Kfir, & Dasberg, Reference Brom, Kfir and Dasberg2001; Kellermann, Reference Kellermann2001; Palgi, Shrira, & Ben-Ezra, Reference Palgi, Shrira and Ben-Ezra2015; Scharf & Mayseless, Reference Scharf and Mayseless2011). The centrality of tradition and religion in the Israeli culture emphasizes family values demonstrated by family gatherings on Shabbat (the rest day in Judaism) and Jewish holidays. The geographical proximity of family members in the small country allows for multiple spontaneous encounters. Finally, the tension and dangers involved in mandatory military service and threatening terror activities have enhanced the bond with older children (Lowenstein, Reference Lowenstein2007; Levitzki, Reference Levitzki2009).

According to narratives that emerged from in-depth interviews with parents of adult children in Israel, it appears that intergenerational relationships are characterized as strong emotional relationships, with a continuing sense of caring, and that Israeli parents provide various types of support for their adult children (Levitzki, Reference Levitzki2009). It was also found that Israeli adults of ages 21–40 reported higher emotional closeness to their parents compared with individuals of the same ages from Germany (Bar-Tur et al., Reference Bar-Tur, Ifrah, Moore, Kamin and Lang2018). In addition, most students in Israel continue to live at home with their parents, and 65 per cent of parents in Israel continue to financially support their adult children after they leave home (Roll & Litwin, Reference Roll and Litwin2010). Given the high familism and the significant active relationships between parents and their adult children, Israel provides a unique and fruitful arena for exploring various aspects of parenting in older age, including PSE.

The Current Study

The study aimed to broaden the understanding of PSE among older adults. Despite the uniqueness of the parental role in older age, to the best of our knowledge, PSE among older adults has been examined in only one study to date (Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, et al., Reference Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, Even-Zohar and Lavenda2021a). Based on Belsky’s (Reference Belsky1984) parenting determinant model, which emphasizes the importance of parental characteristics and the context in which parenting occurs, as well as studies examining parents at earlier stages of the life cycle, we hypothesized that psychological distress, social support, and loneliness will predict PSE in older age, while controlling for background variables (age, gender, marital status, education, income, number of children, living arrangements, and offspring genders and ages). Thus, lower psychological distress, higher perceived social support, and less loneliness will be linked with higher PSE.

Method

Design, Participants, and Procedures

To test the hypotheses, a quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted. Data were based on a convenience sample of 362 Israeli parents above the age of 65 (Min. = 65, Max. = 91, M = 72.1, SD = 5.9), who were recruited through means of social media (Facebook, WhatsApp groups, and Internet forums). A detailed description of the sample can be found in the Results section.

After receiving the approval of the ethics committee of non-clinical research in humans at the authors’ university (No. AU-SOC-OL-20161214), a link with an electronic form was sent through social media groups, where participants were asked to sign an informed consent. Participants received no reward for participating.

Measures

Participants were asked to report information regarding their age, gender, marital status, perception of their economic status (on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 [“not good at all”] to 5 [“very good”]), level of education (i.e., number of years of education), number of children, and their living arrangements (1 = “living on my own”; 2 = “living with my partner”; 3 = “living with extended family”; and 4 = “living in an assisted living facility”). Offspring ages and genders were also reported. To avoid bias of the findings due to individual differences stemming from different age groups of offspring, participants were asked to refer to their child whose age was the closest to 40. This age symbolizes the beginning of Erikson’s generativity versus stagnation stage (Erikson, Reference Erikson1993), a stage that focuses on care for the next generation. Therefore, at this age, most adults already have children of their own (OECD, 2023).

Psychological distress was assessed using the K6 questionnaire (Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Barker, Colpe, Epstein, Gfroerer and Hiripi2003). The K6 is a six-item scale relating to symptoms of distress. Participants were asked to report the prevalence of each symptom in the previous week, on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“not at all”) to 5 (“all of the time”). In the current study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88.

Social support was assessed using a nine-item scale based on a scale developed by House (Reference House1981) and adjusted by Westman et al. (Westman, Etzion, & Horovitz, Reference Westman, Etzion and Horovitz2004) to fit three social sources: spouse, extended family, and friends. For each social source, participants were asked to report the extent to which they have (a) shared their recent experiences with that social source, (b) received support and understanding from that social source, and (c) received advice or instrumental support from that social source. Responses were given on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“not at all”) to 5 (“very much”). A higher mean score reflected a higher level of perceived support. Cronbach’s alpha in the current study was 0.82 for all nine items and ranged between 0.82 and 0.89 for the three social sources’ subscales.

Loneliness was assessed using the short version of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russell, Peplau, & Cutrona, Reference Russell, Peplau and Cutrona1980) developed by Hughes, Waite, Hawkley, and Cacioppo (Reference Hughes, Waite, Hawkley and Cacioppo2004). This is a three-item scale that deals with the perceived sense of loneliness reflected by the feeling of isolation, lack of companionship, and feeling left out. Responses were given on a 3-point Likert scale: 1 (“hardly ever”), 2 (“some of the time”), and 3 (“often”). A higher mean score reflected a higher level of loneliness. Cronbach’s alpha in the present study was 0.83.

PSE was assessed using an 18-item scale, referring to the parents’ sense of success in fulfilling their parental role. The scale is based on the widely used Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) developed by Johnston and Mash (Reference Johnston and Mash1989) (e.g., Kestler-Peleg et al., Reference Kestler-Peleg, Lavenda, Stenger, Bendett, Alhalel-Lederman and Maayan-Metzger2020). The questionnaire was adjusted to parenting in older age for the Hebrew language by replacing the phrase “my child” with “my son/daughter”. Participants were asked to indicate the degree to which they agree with the statements on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“not at all”) to 4 (“very much”). A higher mean score pointed to a higher sense of self-efficacy. Cronbach’s alpha in the present study was 0.79.

Data Analysis

Following the examination of the correlations between the study’s variables, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted. To prevent bias of results due to demographic variables that were associated with the dependent and independent variables (i.e., age, gender, marital status, economic status, living arrangements, years of education, number of children and age), the analysis was conducted while controlling for these variables. Therefore, demographic variables were entered first into the regression equation, followed by psychological distress, social support, and loneliness, in order to examine their contribution for the prediction of PSE in older age, above and beyond the demographic variables.

Post Hoc Statistical Power Analysis

A post hoc power analysis was conducted using the software package, GPower (Faul & Erdfelder, Reference Faul and Erdfelder1992). The sample size of 362 was used for the statistical power analysis with an alpha level of p < .05. The recommended effect sizes used for this assessment were small (f 2 = .02), medium (f 2 = .15), and large (f 2 = .35) (Cohen, Reference Cohen1977). The post hoc analysis revealed the statistical power for this study was .60 for detecting a small effect, whereas the power exceeded .99 for the detection of a medium to large effect size. Thus, there was more than adequate power (i.e., power * .80) at the medium to large effect size level but less than adequate statistical power at the small effect size level.

Results

Analyses were conducted on a sample of 362 participants. Table 1 summarizes the descriptive statistics of the sample. As indicated in the table, about two-thirds of the sample (63.7%) were female and most of the sample were married or living with a partner (74.5%). The rest of the sample were almost equally divided between being divorced (12.7%) and widowed (12.2%). In terms of living arrangements, about two-thirds of the sample reported living with their partner (66.1%), only a few reported living with extended family (3.6%) or in an assisted living facility (5.0%), and a fifth reported living on their own (25.3%). Most of the sample reported a high economic status (62.7% reported their economic status as “good” or “very good”). Participants reported having on average 3.5 children per family (SD = 1.50) of ages between 28 and 70 (M = 41.71, SD = 5.21).

Table 1. Descriptive statistic

The correlations between the study’s variables are presented in Table 2. The correlations indicate that PSE among older adults was negatively associated with psychological distress (r = -0.504, p < 0.001) and loneliness (r = -0.463, p < 0.001), and positively associated with social support (r = 0.390, p < 0.001). Demographic variables that were associated with at least one of the study’s variables were held constant during the conduction of the regression analysis to prevent the possible bias of results interpretation.

Table 2. Correlation coefficients between the study’s variables

Notes. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

The results of the hierarchical regression analysis are summarized in Table 3. As indicated in the table, the independent variables explain a total of 37.0 per cent of the variance in PSE in older age. The demographic variables contribute 11.2 per cent to the explained variance F(8,316) = 5.00, p < 0.001, psychological distress, and social support, and sense of loneliness contributed an additional 25.8 per cent to the explained variance of parental self-efficacy among older adults F(3,313) = 42.70, p < 0.001, above and beyond demographics.

Table 3. Hierarchical regression coefficients for predicting parental self-efficacy at an older age by demographic and psychological variables

Notes. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Among the demographic variables, economic status and living arrangements were found to be the strongest predictors of PSE among older adults (β = 0.068, p = 0.010; β = -0.069, p = 0.031, in accordance). Among the psychological variables, psychological distress was found to be the strongest predictor of PSE among older adults (β = -0.200, p < 0.001), followed by loneliness (β = -0.180, p < 0.001), and then by social support (β = 0.110, p < 0.001).

Discussion

PSE has become a significant component in the study of parenting and is one of the leading indicators of appropriate parental functioning (Shim & Lim, Reference Shim and Lim2019) and well-being (Albanese, Russo, & Geller, Reference Albanese, Russo and Geller2019). Despite the extended examination of PSE at younger ages (e.g., Razurel et al., Reference Razurel, Kaiser, Antonietti, Epiney and Sellenet2017), to the best of our knowledge, only one other study has investigated PSE among older adults (Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, et al., Reference Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, Even-Zohar and Lavenda2021a). The research hypotheses were confirmed. Older Israeli adults reported negative correlations between PSE and psychological distress and loneliness, and a positive correlation between PSE and informal social support. These correlations were found while the background variables (i.e., age, gender, marital status, economic status, living arrangements, years of education, number of offspring, and offspring ages and genders) were controlled for. All these together predicted 37.0 per cent of the explained variance in PSE. The strongest predictor of PSE among Israeli older adults was psychological distress, followed by loneliness, with perceived informal social support as the lowest predictor.

Based on the parenting determinant model (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984; Bronfenbrenner, Reference Bronfenbrener1979), the present study examined factors that shape PSE in older age in the context of the Israeli culture. The significance of the unique socio-cultural context of PSE has already been noted (Glatz & Buchanan, Reference Glatz and Buchanan2021). Nevertheless, a lacuna exists in studies that examined cultural differences and PSE (David & Khatib, Reference David and Khatib2021). A recent study showed that the parental role constitutes central identity in adult life in Israel and is intensified due to familism and pronatalism that characterize the Israeli society (Kestler-Peleg & Lavande, Reference Kestler-Peleg and Lavande2018). The findings of the current study strengthen this conception, demonstrated by the sensitivity of PSE among older adults in Israel to the significance of the parental role in this culture.

The present findings indicate that PSE among Israeli older adults is significantly and positively associated with the background characteristic of parental age and economic status. Regarding the parent characteristic of age, the current findings show that there are benefits for aging among older adults as they tend to be more confident in their abilities to succeed as parents. Perhaps this positive correlation between age and PSE is rooted in a more realistic perspective that is enabled due to older age based on cumulative life experience and a more proportionate perception (Jeste & Oswald, Reference Jeste and Oswald2014). Additionally, higher economic status was found to be a contextual predictor of a higher level of PSE among older adults. Parenting is affected by a lower economic situation as it often involves fears, troubles, and worries (Bianchi & Milkie, Reference Bianchi and Milkie2010). Economic difficulties can undermine the foundation of a positive self-concept of a parent, given the limited financial resources and challenging living conditions (Jones & Prinz, Reference Jones and Prinz2005). At younger ages, it was found that maternal higher income levels predicted higher PSE (Coleman & Karraker-Hildebrandt, Reference Coleman and Karraker-Hildebrandt2000). Thus, the positive association between economic status and PSE among Israeli older adults is consistent with both the parenting determinant model (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984) and data collected among younger parents.

Psychological Distress

In accordance with the parenting determinant model (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984) and in line with previous findings among younger parents (Glatz & Buchanan, Reference Glatz and Buchanan2015; Razurel et al., Reference Razurel, Kaiser, Antonietti, Epiney and Sellenet2017), psychological distress, reflecting a mental state, emerged in this study as the strongest predictor of PSE among Israeli older adults. Findings suggest that older adults with lower psychological distress perceive themselves in a more positive way and appreciate themselves as generally more successful, and particularly in their parenting role. Perhaps the benefits of aging are the mechanisms that link these two variables. The documented decline in psychological distress among older adults in most Western countries, despite the decline in levels of functioning, is attributed to the positive impact of life experience, such as the diminished gap between expectations and reality, skills acquired for emotional regulation, and problem-solving (Carstensen, Mikels, & Mather, Reference Carstensen, Mikels, Mather, Birren and Schaie2006). As older adults experience less psychological distress, they may experience their lives as more fulfilling, be less frustrated, and perceive themselves as more capable of successfully fulfilling their role as parents. Resultingly, older adults who experience lower levels of psychological distress may perceive themselves in a more positive way, enhancing their PSE.

Social Support

Perceived informal social support was also found to be a contextual predictor of PSE among Israeli older adults. The construct of social support depicts two aspects of the support that are included in the measure that was used in the present study: actual social networks and the individuals’ perceptions of these networks as a source of support. These two aspects become more complex later in life (Lang, Wagner, Wrzus, & Neyer, Reference Lang, Wagner, Wrzus and Neyer2013). Although in older age informal social sources dwell and the need of others may be experienced as embarrassing (Yoo, Reference Yoo2013), older adults still want to be treated with respect and independence, rather than as a dependent and helpless. Thus, informal social support becomes more difficult to attain in older age (Cloutier-Fisher, Kobayashi, & Smith, Reference Cloutier-Fisher, Kobayashi and Smith2011; Machielse & Duyndam, Reference Machielse and Duyndam2020), particularly as Israeli older adults have fewer friends compared with younger cohorts (Shnoor & Cohen, Reference Shnoor and Cohen2020). In the current study, it was found that older adults who had social networks (spouse, family, and friends) and who perceived them as sources of support felt more confident in their ability to succeed as parents. This finding is in line with the parenting determinant model (Belsky, Reference Belsky1984), which underpins this research and supports the social capital theory (Putnam, Reference Putnam2000). The social capital theory refers to abundant and meaningful social networks as the parent’s social capital, which has also found to be associated with high self-efficacy (Han, Chu, Song, & Li, Reference Han, Chu, Song and Li2015). Social capital enables rich feedback from others and thus builds a sense of individual ability. Moreover, people with greater social capital tend to turn to social networks for assistance in times of trouble, which also increases their self-efficacy (Han et al., Reference Han, Chu, Song and Li2015). In the current study and in accordance with findings among younger populations (Jones & Prinz, Reference Jones and Prinz2005; Leahy-Warren & McCarthy, Reference Leahy-Warren and McCarthy2011), older adults with greater social capital appear to have more confidence in their abilities to succeed as parents.

Loneliness

As a characteristic of the individual, loneliness was also found to be a predictor of PSE among Israeli older adults. It has been noted that aging involves an increase in loneliness in Israel, as well as in the Western world (Dykstra, van Tilburg, & de Gierveld, Reference Dykstra, van Tilburg and de Gierveld2005) but in Israel in particular (Shnoor & Cohen, Reference Shnoor and Cohen2020). Reduced social networks in older age increase the gap between desired and actual relationships. This perceived gap is known to consistently predict a range of negative outcomes at an older age, including decreased physical activity, mental and physical health, and even mortality (e.g., Gerino, Rollè, Sechi, & Brustia, Reference Gerino, Rollè, Sechi and Brustia2017).

Impaired general self-efficacy is also known to be one of the negative consequences of loneliness in older age (Fry & Debats, Reference Fry and Debats2002). In a qualitative study, older adults described their experience of loneliness as: hard to make new friends, circumstances making it hard to be social, feel very lonely despite leading a rich social life, loss of loved ones, and do not want to do things alone (Larsson, Wallroth, & Schröder, Reference Larsson, Wallroth and Schröder2019). Thus, loneliness is not only a reference to a lack of social connections but also a subjective feeling, even if the individual seems to be taking part in a social activity. The interpretation that a person attributes to the gap between the desired social situation and the existing one in older age may also relate to an internal feeling of worthlessness, being rejected, and lacking control (Kitzmüller, Clancy, Vaismoradi, Wegener, & Bondas, Reference Kitzmüller, Clancy, Vaismoradi, Wegener and Bondas2018). Additionally, these interpretations may be the mechanisms that undermine the individuals’ perceptions of their ability to successfully fulfil their parental role. This role in older age may include guiding their offspring throughout adulthood in the various tasks of life. It requires parents to have a positive self-concept as people who know what to do and who feel valuable and needed. These aspects are probably less possible for individuals who perceive themselves negatively, demonstrated in the current study among Israeli older adults.

Limitations

The current findings should be interpreted cautiously due to several study limitations. Firstly, data collection was based on a convenience sample that was recruited through social networks. Hence, the study’s questionnaire was accessible only to older adults who are exposed to these networks, and those who are familiar with technology that utilizes computed online questionnaires. In addition, self-report questionnaires might reflect social desirability. Therefore, the sample lacks representativeness, and the ability to generalize research findings is limited. Lastly, the cross-sectional design of the study does not allow for the conclusion of causality as it does not allow the ability to determine the precedence of psychological distress, social support, and loneliness to PSE. In addition, although the statistical analysis was conducted while controlling for several demographic variables (i.e., age, gender, marital status, economic status, living arrangements, years of education, number of children and age), it is a correlational study that cannot invalidate the impact of other individual differences that were not examined in the present study on the associations found. We recommend that future studies use a longitudinal design that will be more appropriate for causality inference.

Conclusions

The present study is one of the first studies to examine parental self-efficacy in older age, specifically, the first study to examine its predictors. It appears that PSE in older age and in the context of the Israeli culture is shaped by various individual and contextual characteristics. Parental psychological distress is a crucial component impacting PSE, as well as perceived informal social support and loneliness. Our results suggest that researchers, social policymakers, and practitioners working with older adults should broaden their knowledge regarding the field of parenting at an older age. There is a lacuna in the literature regarding how culture impacts PSE (David & Khatib, Reference David and Khatib2021). Therefore, it is recommended to further examine PSE among older adults in other countries and cultures, especially those who are less family-oriented than Israelis, to examine the centrality of this concept among older adults. Since the current study detected a total of 37.0 per cent of the variance of PSE in older age, future studies should examine additional possible predictors such as marital satisfaction (Sevigny & Loutzenhiser, Reference Sevigny and Loutzenhiser2010), death anxiety (Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, et al., Reference Greenblatt-Kimron, Kestler-Peleg, Even-Zohar and Lavenda2021a), quality of parent–child communication, and ethnicity (Glatz & Buchanan, Reference Glatz and Buchanan2015). It is also suggested that future studies examine dyads of spouses, or of a parent and an adult child, to examine the reciprocal effects of PSE on additional family members and functional behaviours.

In light of these research findings, mental health and physical care professionals, as well as other health care providers treating older people, should be careful not to ignore the parental components in adults’ lives. Likewise, parenting should be considered an integral part of older adults’ daily lives. Moreover, professionals should draw their attention to the varied aspects that might undermine PSE in older age. Psychological distress of older adults, which has a significant adverse effect on diverse aspects of their lives, also demonstrated in the current context of PSE among Israeli older adults, should be further addressed and assessed. Likewise, as the social condition of Israeli older adults is critical for their PSE, professionals must ensure that there are accessible solutions that enable social activities for this age. Support should be provided from both formal and informal sources. Formal support through local or national organizations should be implemented at designated locations such as older adult clubs or community centers in which older adults can be involved in social interactions and guided meetings with peer groups. Formal support should also include instrumental help. Community members or workers can visit older adult homes and offer them assistance with their duties and tasks. In addition, since the longing for closeness and belonging is often not sufficiently satisfied in older age, reflected by a sense of loneliness, and as demonstrated in the current study is detrimental to PSE, community services should create opportunities for connecting and bonding between older adults and others. Examples include projects of matching trained dogs with older adults, combined projects of older adults with adolescents enhancing their use and accessibility to social media, and the recruiting of older adult professionals for professional assistance for older adults. Similarly, informal support, examined in the present study through spouses, family, and friends, can also provide instrumental help, as well as emotional support, knowledge, advice, and a place to share and receive feedback regarding the parental role at an older age. These empowering interactions may promote and raise self-confidence in general and specifically in the parental role, consequently enriching parental function and involvement.

Based on the Israeli context, the knowledge gained from the current study may be generalized to other social, familial, and communal settings. Remote communities without formal organizations such as Israeli older adult centres can be impacted by informal settings, including community walks or feasting opportunities. Additionally, understanding the vital role PSE has among older adults can enhance the role of family caregivers in this light when there is a lack of formal community support workers. In summary, it is imperative that health care providers and informal support systems acknowledge the parental role, which is maintained in later life. The impact of PSE on the health and well-being of both parents and their children will continue to contribute to the longevity of generations and create additional opportunities for continued social support structures within the family dynamic.

Competing interest

None.

References

Albanese, A. M., Russo, G. R., & Geller, P. A. (2019). The role of parental self‐efficacy in parent and child well‐being: A systematic review of associated outcomes. Child: Care, Health and Development, 45(3), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A.(1977). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bar-Tur, L., Ifrah, K., Moore, D., Kamin, S. T., & Lang, F. R. (2018). How do emotional closeness and support from parents relate to Israeli and German students’ life satisfaction?. Journal of Family Issues, 39(11), 3096–3123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18770213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J.(1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development, 55(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129836CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedek, T.(1970). The family as a psychologic field. In: Anthony, E. J., & Benedek, T., (Eds.), Parenthood: Its psychology and psychopathology (pp. 109–136). Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00726.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brom, D., Kfir, R., & Dasberg, H. (2001). A controlled double-blind study on children of Holocaust survivors. The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 38(1), 47–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrener, U.(1979). The ecology of human development: Experience by nature and design. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burg, A. (2016). The Holocaust is over; We must rise from its ashes. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Mikels, J. A., & Mather, M. (2006). Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation, and emotion. In: Birren, J. M., and Schaie, K.W., (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6th ed.) (pp. 343–362). Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervone, D., Artistico, D., & Berry, J.M. (2006). Self-efficacy and adult development. In: Hoare, C., (Ed.), Handbook of adult development and learning (pp. 169–195). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cloutier-Fisher, D., Kobayashi, K., & Smith, A. (2011). The subjective dimension of social isolation: A qualitative investigation of older adults’ experiences in small social support networks. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(4), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (revised edition). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cohen-Mansfield, J., Hazan, H., Lerman, Y., & Shalom, V. (2016). Correlates and predictors of loneliness in older-adults: A review of quantitative results informed by qualitative insights. International Psychogeriatrics, 28(4), 557–576. https://doi.org/10/1037/0003-066X.59.8.676CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, P. K., & Karraker-Hildebrandt, K. (2000). Parenting self-efficacy among mothers of school-age children: Conceptualization, measurement, and correlates. Family Relations, 49(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00013.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connidis, I. A., & Barnett, A. E. (2019). Family Ties and Aging. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, E. Y., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crnic, K., & Ross, E. (2017). Parenting stress and parental efficacy. In: Deater-Deckard, K. Kirby, and Panneton, R., (Eds.), Parental stress and early child development. (pp. 263–284). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, V. B., & Khatib, A. (2021). Differences between Israeli Jewish and Arabs mothers in parental self-efficacy: A cultural perspective. Social Work and Social Welfare, 3(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2021.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, K. M., Lung, Y., Lin, S. L., Tong, H., Kobayashi, K. M., & Fuller-Thomson, E. (2020). Psychological distress in older adults linked to immigrant status, dietary intake, and physical health conditions in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Journal of Affective Disorders, 265, 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dykstra, P. A., van Tilburg, T. G., & de Gierveld, J. (2005). Changes in older adult loneliness: Results from a seven-year longitudinal study. Research on Aging, 27(6), 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027505279712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006). Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among US and Canadian medical students. Academic medicine, 81(4), 354–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erikson, E. H. (1993). Childhood and society. WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Ermer, A. E., Segel Karpas, D., & Benson, J. (2020). Loneliness trajectories and correlates of social connections among older adult married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000652CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Facey, A. D., Tallentire, V., Selzer, R. M., & Rotstein, L. (2015). Understanding and reducing work-related psychological distress in interns: A systematic review. Internal Medicine Journal, 45(10), 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12785CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, Y., Boelens, M., Windhorst, D. A., Raat, H., & van Grieken, A. (2021). Factors associated with parenting self‐efficacy: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(6), 2641–2661. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14767CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn University, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Fernández–Ballesteros, R.(2002). Social support and quality of life among older people in Spain. Journal of Social Issues, 58(4), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingerman, K. L., Cheng, Y.-P., Birditt, K. S., & Zarit, S. H. (2012). Only as happy as the least happy child: Multiple grown children’s problems and successes and middle-aged parents’ well-being. Journals of Gerontology Series B, 67(2), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fingerman, K. L., Huo, M., & Birditt, K. S. (2020). A decade of research on intergenerational ties: Technological, economic, political, and demographic changes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingerman, K. L., Kim, K., Birditt, K. S., & Zarit, S. H. (2016). The ties that bind: Midlife parents’ daily experiences with grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fingerman, K. L., Sechrist, J., & Birditt, K. (2013). Changing views on intergenerational ties. Gerontology, 59(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folkman, S., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1979). Cognitive processes as mediators of stress and coping. In: Hamilton, V., & Warburton, D. (Eds.), Human stress and cognition. (pp. 265–298). John Wiley.Google Scholar
Fry, P. S., & Debats, D. L. (2002). Self-efficacy beliefs as predictors of loneliness and psychological distress in older adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 55(3), 233–269. https://doi.org/10.2190/KBVP-L2TE-2ERY-BH26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, P., Zhou, C., & Meng, Q. (2020). Associations of sleep quality and frailty among the older adults with chronic disease in China: The mediation effect of psychological distress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5240–5250. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, P. J., Reed, R. G., Combs, H. L., Boggero, I. A., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2019). Longitudinal associations among older adults’ neurocognitive performance, psychological distress, and self-reported cognitive function. Psychology & Neuroscience, 12(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerino, E., Rollè, L., Sechi, C., & Brustia, P. (2017). Loneliness, resilience, mental health, and quality of life in old age: A structural equation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glatz, T., & Buchanan, C. M. (2015). Change and predictors of change in parental self-efficacy from early to middle adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 51(10), 1367–1379. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glatz, T., & Buchanan, C. M. (2021). Trends in parental self-efficacy between 1999 and 2014. Journal of Family Studies, 29, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2021.1906929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt-Kimron, L., Kestler-Peleg, M., Even-Zohar, A., & Lavenda, O. (2021a). Death anxiety and loneliness among older adults: Role of parental self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9857. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189857CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenblatt-Kimron, L., Shrira, A., Rubinstein, T., & Palgi, Y. (2021b). Event centrality and secondary traumatization among Holocaust survivors’ offspring and grandchildren: A three-generation study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 81, 102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, J., Chu, X., Song, H., & Li, Y. (2015). Social capital, socioeconomic status and self-efficacy. Applied Economics and Finance, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v2i1.607Google Scholar
Hank, K., Cavrini, G., Di Gessa, G., & Tomassini, C. (2018). What do we know about grandparents? Insights from current quantitative data and identification of future data needs. European Journal of Ageing, 15(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-018-0468-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrich, L. M., & Gullone, E. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(6), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House, J. S.(1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeste, D. V., & Oswald, A. J. (2014). Individual and societal wisdom: Explaining the paradox of human aging and high well-being. Psychiatry, 77(4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2014.77.4.317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jing, Z., Li, J., Wang, Y., Ding, L., Tang, X., Feng, Y., et al. (2020). The mediating effect of psychological distress on cognitive function and physical frailty among the elderly: Evidence from rural Shandong, China. Journal of Affective Disorders, 268, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, C., & Mash, E. J. (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1802_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. L. & Prinz, R. J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, J. R., Goldscheider, F., & García-Manglano, J. (2013). Growing parental economic power in parent–adult child households: Coresidence and financial dependency in the United States, 1960–2010. Demography, 50(4), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0196-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, R., Lowenstein, A., Halperin, D., & Tur-Sinai, A. (2015). Generational solidarity in Europe and Israel. Canadian Journal on Aging, 34(3), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980815000197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellermann, N. P. F. (2001). Perceived parental rearing behavior in children of Holocaust survivors. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 38(1), 58–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Kelley, S. J., Whitley, D. M., & Campos, P. E. (2013). Psychological distress in African American grandmothers raising grandchildren: The contribution of child behavior problems, physical health, and family resources. Research in Nursing & Health, 36(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent de Grey, R. G., Uchino, B. N., Trettevik, R., Cronan, S., & Hogan, J. N. (2018). Social support and sleep: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 37(8), 787–798. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., et al. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kestler-Peleg, M., & Lavande, O. (2018). Anxiety and defensiveness as predictors of maternal child centrism. Feminism & Psychology, 28(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353518757255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestler-Peleg, M., Lavenda, O., Stenger, V., Bendett, H., Alhalel-Lederman, S., Maayan-Metzger, A., et al. (2020). Maternal self-efficacy mediates the association between spousal support and stress among mothers of NICU hospitalized preterm babies. Early Human Development, 146, 105077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105077CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirby, J. N., & Hoang, N. P. T. (2018). Parenting of adult children: A neglected area of parenting studies. In: Sanders, M., & Morawska, A.. (Eds). Handbook of parenting and child development across the lifespan. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94598-9_29Google Scholar
Kitzmüller, G., Clancy, A., Vaismoradi, M., Wegener, C., & Bondas, T. (2018). “Trapped in an empty waiting room”- The existential human core of loneliness in old age: A meta-synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317735079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, F. R., Wagner, J., Wrzus, C., & Neyer, F. J. (2013). Personal effort in social relationships across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsson, K., Wallroth, V., & Schröder, A. (2019). “You never get used to loneliness” - Older adults’ experiences of loneliness when applying for going on a senior summer camp. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 62(8), 892–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2019.1687633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2003). The family in Israel: Between tradition and modernity. Marriage and Family Review, 35(1–2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v35n01_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavenda, O., & Kestler-Peleg, M. (2018). Intergenerational transmission of sociability – The mediating role of maternal competence and maternal child-centrism. Journal of Family Issues, 39(6), 1664–1684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17720759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahy-Warren, P., & McCarthy, G. (2011). Maternal parental self-efficacy in the postpartum period. Midwifery, 27(6), 802–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.07.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitzki, N.(2009). Parenting of adult children in an Israeli sample: Parents are always parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopata, H. Z. (2017). Widowhood in an American city. Routledge‥CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losada-Baltar, A., Jiménez-Gonzalo, L., Gallego-Alberto, L., Pedroso-Chaparro, M. D. S., Fernandes-Pires, J., & Márquez-González, M. (2021). “We are staying at home.” Association of self-perceptions of aging, personal and family resources, and loneliness with psychological distress during the lock-down period of COVID-19. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), e10–e16. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowenstein, A. (2007). Solidarity-conflict and ambivalence: Testing two conceptual frameworks and their impact on quality of life for older family members. Journal of Gerontology, 62(2), S100–S107. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.2.S100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., & Gur-Yaish, N. (2007). Reciprocity in parent–child exchange and life satisfaction among the elderly: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00541.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machielse, A., & Duyndam, J. (2020). Strategies of socially isolated older adults: Mechanisms of emergence and persistence. Journal of Aging Studies, 53, 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100852CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendonça, M., & Fontaine, A. M. (2014). The role maturity of parents of emerging adult children: Validity of a parental maturity measure. Journal of Adult Development, 21(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-014-9185-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namkung, E. H., Greenberg, J. S., Mailick, M. R., & Floyd, F. J. (2018). Lifelong parenting of adults with developmental disabilities: Growth trends over 20 years in midlife and later life. American Journal on Intellectual Development Disabilities, 123(3), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.3.228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nye, F. I. (1976). Role structure and analysis of the family. London: Sage.Google Scholar
OECD. (2015). OECD fact book 2015–2016. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
OECD. (2023). Better policies for better lives. Retrieved May 13, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/about/secretary-general/betterpoliciesforbetterlives.htmGoogle Scholar
Palgi, Y., Shrira, A., & Ben-Ezra, M. (2015). Family involvement and Holocaust salience among offspring and grandchildren of Holocaust survivors. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 13(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2015.992902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Qiu, Q. W., Qian, S., Li, J. Y., Jia, R. X., Wang, Y. Q., & Xu, Y. (2020). Risk factors for depressive symptoms among Chinese older adults: a meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Razurel, C., Kaiser, B., Antonietti, J., Epiney, M., & Sellenet, C. (2017). Relationship between perceived perinatal stress and depressive symptoms, anxiety, and parental self-efficacy in primiparous mothers and the role of social support. Women & Health, 57(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2016.1157125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roll, A., & Litwin, H. (2010). Intergenerational financial transfers and mental health: An analysis using SHARE-Israel data. Aging and Mental Health, 14(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860903191366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39(3), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, E. C., Tyas, S. L., Maxwell, C. J., Law, J., O’Connell, M. E., Konnert, C. A., et al. (2020). Association between functional social support and cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults: A protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open, 10(4), e037301. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scharf, M., & Mayseless, O. (2011). Disorganizing experiences in second- and third generation Holocaust survivors. Qualitative Health Research, 21(11), 1539–1553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310393747CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevigny, P. R., & Loutzenhiser, L. (2010). Predictors of parenting self-efficacy in mothers and fathers of toddlers. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652214.2009.00980.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shim, S. Y., & Lim, S. A. (2019). Paternal self-efficacy, fathering, and children’s behavioral problems in Korea. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(3), 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-01310-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shnoor, Y., & Cohen, Y. (Eds.). (2020). The 65+ Population in Israel: Statistical Abstract 2020. Myers-JDCL-Brookdale [Hebrew]. Retrieved https://brookdale-web.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2020/09/shnaton-2020-internet-min.pdf.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Gans, D., Lowenstein, A., Giarrusso, R., & Bengtson, V. L. (2010). Older parent–child relationships in six developed nations: Comparisons at the intersection of affection and conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00745.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. L., Banting, L., Eime, R., O’Sullivan, G., & Van Uffelen, J. G. (2017). The association between social support and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0509-8Google Scholar
Smith, J. R., & Pardasani, M. (2014). Parenting in later life: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Family Social Work, 17(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2013.879269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
StGeorge, J. M., & Fletcher, R. J. (2014). Men’s experiences of grandfatherhood: A welcome surprise. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 78(4), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.78.4.cCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taipale, S., Petrovcic, A., & Dolnicar, V. (2018). Intergenerational solidarity and ICT usage: Empirical insights from Finnish and Slovenian families. In: Taipale, S., Wilska, T.-A., & Gilleard, C. (Eds.), Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course (pp. 69–86). New York, NY: Routledge. Routledge Key Themes in Health and Society.Google Scholar
Temple, J. B., & Dow, B. (2018). The unmet support needs of carers of older Australians: Prevalence and mental health. International Psychogeriatrics, 30(12), 1849–1860. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021800042XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treas, J., & Gubernskaya, Z. (2018). Did mobile phones increase adult children’s maternal contact?. In: Van Hook, J., McHale, S., & King, V. (Eds.), Families and technology (pp. 139–153). Springer.Google Scholar
Tuominen, M., Junttila, N., Ahonen, P., & Rautava, P. (2016). The effect of relational continuity of care in maternity and child health clinics on parenting self‐efficacy of mothers and fathers with loneliness and depressive symptoms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umberson, D., Crosnoe, R., & Reczek, C. (2010). Social relationships and health behavior across life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westman, M., Etzion, D., & Horovitz, S. (2004). The toll of unemployment does not stop with the unemployed. Human Relations, 57(7), 823–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704045767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, F., & Sheng, Y. (2019). Social support network, social support, self-efficacy, health-promoting behavior and healthy aging among older adults: A pathway analysis. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 85, 103934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.103934CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, K. (2018). Longitudinal loneliness and its risk factors among older people in England. Canadian Journal on Aging, 37(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980817000526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoo, S.(2013). The context of perceived and desired social support among Korean older adults. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 18(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2012.672751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Descriptive statistic

Figure 1

Table 2. Correlation coefficients between the study’s variables

Figure 2

Table 3. Hierarchical regression coefficients for predicting parental self-efficacy at an older age by demographic and psychological variables