¹ Wilson, Edward O., Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975), 3, 129, 563.Google Scholar

² Wilson, Edward O., Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998).Google Scholar

³ Arnhart, Larry, Darwinian Natural Right; The Biological Ethics of Human Nature (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998).Google Scholar

⁴ “Ius naturale est, quod natura omnia animalia docuit.” Justinian, , Justinian's Institutes, ed. and trans. Birks, Peter and McLeod, Grant (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987), 1.2.Google Scholar

⁵ For the history of Ulpian's remarks in medieval thought, see Crowe, Michael Bertram, The Changing Profile of the Natural Law (The Hague, The Netherlands: Nijhoff, 1977), 43–51, 142–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Crowe finds Aquinas's use of Ulpian's definition of natural right puzzling, because Crowe wants to interpret natural law in a Kantian way, as a set of purely rational principles set apart from animal nature.

⁶ In my translations of Aquinas's Latin, I have tried to be as literal as possible.

⁷ Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologiae, I–II, q. 94, a. 2.Google Scholar

⁸ Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on Aristotle's “Nicomachean Ethics,” secs. 9, 21, 94, 106–7.Google Scholar

⁹ Aquinas, , Summa Theologiae, I, q. 59, a. 1Google Scholar; I, q. 80, a. 1; I–II, q. 1, a. 2; I–II, q. 6, a. 1–4; I–II, q. 26, a. 1; I–II, q. 35, a. 1; I–II, q. 41, a. 3.

¹⁰ Ibid., I–II, q. 94, a. 2; I–II, q. 95, a. 4, ad 1; II–II, q. 57, a. 3; Aquinas, , Commentary on Aristotle's “Nicomachean Ethics,” sec. 1019.Google Scholar

¹¹ Aquinas, , Summa Theologiae, I–II, q. 46, a. 5Google Scholar; I–II, q. 51, a. 1; I–II, q. 63, a. 1.

¹² Aristotle, , Generation of Animals, 767b24–769b31.Google Scholar

¹³ Aquinas, , Summa Theologiae, I, q. 78, a. 4Google Scholar; I, q. 80, a. 1; I, q. 83, a. 1; I–II, q. 6, a. 2; I–II, q. 40, a. 3; I–II, q. 58, a. 1; Aquinas, , Commentary on Aristotle's “De Anima,” secs. 629, 874.Google Scholar

¹⁴ For a good survey of the evidence in Aquinas's writings that supports this conclusion, see Barad, Judith, Aquinas on the Nature and Treatment of Animals (San Francisco: International Scholars Publications, 1995)Google Scholar. For the argument that Aquinas's view of human nature and natural law is rooted in a “biological paradigm,” see Lisska, Anthony J., Aquinas's Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 68, 96–109, 131, 189–91, 198–201, 218–22, 258.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Aquinas, , Summa Theologiae, II–II, q. 57, a. 3Google Scholar; Suppl., q. 41, a. 1; Aquinas, , Commentary on Aristotle's “Nicomachean Ethics,” sec. 1019.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Aquinas, , Summa Contra Gentiles, bk. 3, chap. 123.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Ibid., bk. 3, chaps. 122–23.

¹⁸ Aquinas, , Summa Theologiae, Suppl., q. 41, a. 2Google Scholar; Aquinas, , Summa Contra Gentiles, bk. 3, chap. 123.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Aquinas, , Summa Theologiae, Suppl., q. 65, a. 1Google Scholar; Aquinas, , Summa Contra Gentiles, bk. 3, chap. 124.Google Scholar

²⁰ Aquinas, , Summa Theologiae, Suppl., q. 54, a. 3Google Scholar; Aquinas, , Summa Contra Gentiles, bk. 3, chap. 125.Google Scholar

²¹ Aquinas, , Summa Contra Gentiles, bk. 3, chap. 123.Google Scholar

²² Aquinas, , Commentary on Aristotle's “De Anima,” secs. 395–98, 631–35, 643–50, 803–4, 812–46.Google Scholar

²³ See Weisheipl, James A., ed., Albertus Magnus and the Sciences (Toronto, Canada: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1980).Google Scholar

²⁴ Magnus, Albertus, On Animals: A Medieval Summa Zoologica, trans. Kitchell, Kenneth F. Jr., and Resnick, Irven Michael (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), 587.Google Scholar

²⁵ Ibid., 1415–18.

²⁶ Ibid., 766–73, 1420–25.

²⁷ Ibid., 1420–21.

²⁸ Ibid., 58–62, 64–67, 93, 745–47, 1420, 1446–47.

²⁹ Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), 401Google Scholar; Finnis, John, Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 82, 103, 116, 147–48, 153–54.Google Scholar

³⁰ McInerny, Ralph, Ethica Thomistica: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1982), 36–38, 56.Google Scholar

³¹ See Arnhart, , Darwinian Natural Right.Google Scholar

³² MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981), 56, 139, 152, 166–67, 183, 220.Google Scholar

³³ MacIntyre, Alasdair, Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues (Chicago: Open Court, 1999), x.Google Scholar

³⁴ Ibid., 5–6, 11–12.

³⁵ Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, chaps. 14–15.Google Scholar

³⁶ Hobbes, Thomas, De Cive, chap. 1.Google Scholar

³⁷ Hobbes, , Leviathan, chap. 17Google Scholar; Hobbes, , De Cive, chap. 5, par. 5Google Scholar; Hobbes, Thomas, De Homine, chap. 10.Google Scholar

³⁸ On Hobbes's dualism, see Strauss, Leo, The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, trans. Sinclair, Elsa M. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952), 7–9, 168–70.Google Scholar

³⁹ Kant, Immanuel, “Speculative Beginning of Human History,”Google Scholar in Kant, , “Perpetual Peace” and Other Essays, trans. Humphrey, Ted (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1983), 49–60Google Scholar; Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Judgment, trans. Pluhar, Werner S. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987), sees. 83–84.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ See Greene, Robert A., “Instinct of Nature: Natural Law, Synderesis, and the Moral Sense,” Journal of the History of Ideas 58, no. 2 (04 1997): 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴¹ Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976), 300–304, 321–27Google Scholar; Ross, Ian Simpson, The Life of Adam Smith (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 48–59, 159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴² Smith, , Theory of Moral Sentiments, 340–41.Google Scholar

⁴³ Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1976), 2:687.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Ibid., 9–16.

⁴⁵ Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, 1155a3–b16Google Scholar; Aquinas, , Commentary on Aristotle' s“Nicomachean Ethics,”Google Scholar secs. 1538–50.

⁴⁶ Smith, , Theory of Moral Sentiments, 116–17, 129–30, 145.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Ibid., 326.

⁴⁸ Ibid., 320.

⁴⁹ Ibid., 270–72, 319–20.

⁵⁰ Finnis, , Aquinas, 62, 74–76, 78.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, 1139a36–b6.Google Scholar

⁵² Aristotle, , De Anima, 433a10–31Google Scholar; Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, 1139a36–b6.Google Scholar

⁵³ Aquinas, , Commentary on Aristotle's “De Anima,” secs. 395–98, 631–35, 643–50, 803–4, 812–46.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Smith, , Theory of Moral Sentiments, 129, 142, 145, 219Google Scholar; Smith, Adam, Lectures on Jurisprudence, ed. Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D., and Stein, P. G. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), 141–43, 438.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Smith, , Lectures on Jurisprudence, 150–60.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ibid., 163–66, 446–47.

⁵⁷ Mandeville, Bernard, The Fable of the Bees (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924), 1:330.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Darwin, Charles, Charles Darwin's Notebooks, 1836–1844, ed. Barrett, Paul H. et al. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987), 537–38, 558, 563–64, 587–89, 618–29.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Mackintosh, James, Dissertation on the Progress of Ethical Philosophy (Edinburgh, Scotland:Adam and Charles Black, 1836).Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (London: John Murray, 1871), 1:81–82.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Ibid., 1:70–106, 2:390–94.

⁶² Ibid., 1:70.

⁶³ Ibid., 1:70–71; Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Beck, Lewis White (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956), 90.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Darwin, , Descent of Man, 1:80.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Ibid., 1:80–86.

⁶⁶ Darwin, Charles, “The Origin of Species” and “The Descent of Man” (New York: Modern Library, 1936), 485–86, 896.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Darwin, , Descent of Man, 1:82, 1:93, 1:106, 1:161–66.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Smith, , Theory of Moral Sentiments, 76–89, 94, 106.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Darwin, , Descent of Man, 1:70, 1:88–89, 1:391–92, 2:390–92.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Ibid., 1:72, 1:165–66.

⁷¹ Mivart, George Jackson, “Darwin's Descent of Man,” reprinted in Hull, David, ed., Darwin and His Critics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973), 354–84.Google Scholar

⁷² Huxley, Thomas, Evolution and Ethics, and Other Essays (New York: D. Appleton, 1894), 31, 44–45, 59, 68, 75–77, 80–85Google Scholar; Mivart, George Jackson, “Evolution in Mr. Huxley,” Popular Science Monthly 44 (05 1893): 319–33.Google Scholar

⁷³ See Farber, Paul Lawrence, The Temptations of Evolutionary Ethics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994), 58–69.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Williams, George, “A Sociobiological Expansion of Evolution and Ethics,” in Paradis, James and Williams, George, eds., Evolution and Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989), 213.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ See Stroup, Timothy, Westermarck's Ethics (Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi, 1982)Google Scholar; and Arnhart, Larry, “Westermarck's Ethics as Darwinian Natural Right” (paper presented at the International Westermarck Symposium, Helsinki, Finland, 11 19–22, 1998).Google Scholar

⁷⁶ See Fox, Robin, The Red Lamp of Incest, 2d ed. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983)Google Scholar; and Wolf, Arthur P., Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association: A Chinese Brief for Edward Westermarck (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Westermarck, Edward, The History of Human Marriage, 5th ed., 3 vols. (New York: Allerton, 1922)Google Scholar; Westermarck, Edward, The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan, 1906)Google Scholar; Westermarck, Edward, Ethical Relativity (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., 1932).Google Scholar

⁷⁸ For an example of how a Westermarckian anthropological naturalism can support Thomistic natural law, see Davitt, Thomas, The Basic Values in Law, rev. ed. (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Westermarck, , History of Human Marriage, 1:22, 1:38, 1:53, 1:71, 3:365.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Ibid., 3:104, 3:107, 3:206, 3:221–22; Westermarck, , Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, 2:387–92.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Westermarck, , History of Human Marriage, 2:82–239Google Scholar; Westermarck, , Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, 2:364–81.Google Scholar

⁸² See Wolf, , Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association, 506.Google Scholar

⁸³ Lévi-Strauss, Claude, The Elementary Structures of Kinship, trans. Bell, James Harle, von Sturmer, John Richard, and Needham, Rodney (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969), 30–31.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Westermarck, , Ethical Relativity, 109.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Westermarck, , Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, 1:10.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Ibid., 2:742.

⁸⁷ See Lewontin, Richard C., Rose, Steven, and Kamin, Leon J., Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature (New York: Pantheon, 1984), 137Google Scholar; and Kitcher, Philip, Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985), 280, 348.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Westermarck, , History of Human Marriage, 2:82, 2:88, 2:192, 2:201–3.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Wolf, , Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association, 497–515.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Ibid., 435–38.

⁹¹ Ibid., 388–422.

⁹² See Durham, William H., Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991), 293–309.Google Scholar

⁹³ Wilson, , Consilience, 3–13.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Ibid., 164.

⁹⁵ Wilson, Edward O., On Human Nature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978), 63–64Google ScholarPubMed; Wilson, , Consilience, 132–33, 161–63.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Wilson, , Consilience, 238–56.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Wilson, , On Human Nature, 37–39, 68–69, 229Google Scholar; Lumsden, Charles J. and Wilson, Edward O., Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981), 37, 71, 85–86, 147–58, 238, 357Google Scholar; Lumsden, Charles J. and Wilson, Edward O., Promethean Fire: Reflections on the Origin of Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983), 64–65, 115, 119, 124–27, 133–38, 175–80Google Scholar; Ruse, Michael and Wilson, Edward O., “Moral Philosophy as Applied Science,” Philosophy 61, no. 236 (04 1986): 173–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilson, , Consilience, 173–80Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Wilson, , Consilience, 112–15Google Scholar; Damasio, Antonio, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (New York: G.P. Putnam, 1994).Google Scholar

⁹⁹ On psychopaths as moral strangers, see Arnhart, , Darwinian Natural Right, 211–30.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ For surveys of some of the biological research on human mating and parenting, see ibid., 89–160.

¹⁰¹ For instances of this ambiguity, see Wilson, , Consilience, 55, 67–68, 70–71, 83–86, 109, 162–65, 167, 172–73, 240, 255, 263, 266, 276–77, 297–98.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Ibid., 255.

¹⁰³ Ibid., 238–39, 248, 251.

¹⁰⁴ Aquinas, , Summa Theologiae, I–II, q. 91, a. 4.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Ibid., I–II, q. 100, a. 11.

¹⁰⁶ Ibid., I–II, q. 100, a. 1.

¹⁰⁷ Ibid., III, q. 60, a. 2; Suppl., q. 42.