Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-22T08:23:42.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protests and Repression in New Democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2017

S. Erdem Aytaç ,
Luis Schiumerini  and
Susan Stokes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elected governments sometimes deal with protests by authorizing the police to use less-lethal tools of repression: water cannons, tear gas, rubber bullets, and the like. When these tactics fail to end protests and instead spark larger, backlash movements, some governments reduce the level of violence but others increase it, causing widespread injuries and loss of life. We study three recent cases of governments in new democracies facing backlash movements. Their decision to scale up or scale back police repression reflected the governments’ levels of electoral security. Secure governments with relatively unmovable majorities behind them feel freer to apply harsh measures. Less secure governments, those with volatile electoral support, contemplate that their hold on power might weaken should they inflict very harsh treatment on protesters; they have strong incentives to back down. Our original survey research and interviews with civilian authorities, police officials, and protest organizers in Turkey, Brazil, and Ukraine allow us to evaluate this explanation as well as a number of rival accounts. Our findings imply that elected governments that rest on very stable bases of support may be tempted to deploy tactics more commonly associated with authoritarian politics.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 62 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alonso, Angela and Mische, Ann. 2016. “Changing Repertoires and Partisan Ambivalence in the New Brazilian Protests.” Bulletin of Latin American Research. doi: 10.1111/blar.12470 Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2013. “ Gezi Park Protests: Brutal Denial of the Right to Peaceful Assembly in Turkey. ” London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2014. “ Venezuela: Human Rights at Risk amid Protests. ” London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Ash, Timothy. 2013. “The Orange Revolution MKII.” KyivPost, December 1. (http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/the-orange-revolution-mkii-332761.html), accessed February 20, 2015.Google Scholar
Aytaç, S. Erdem and Öniş, Ziya. 2014. “Varieties of Populism in a Changing Global Context: The Divergent Paths of Erdogan and Kirchnerismo.” Comparative Politics 47(1): 41–59.Google Scholar
BBC. 2013. “Clashes Amid Huge Ukraine Protest against U-Turn on EU.” BBC Online, December 1. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25176191, accessed February 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Beissinger, Mark. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa and Lo, James. 2012. “One Man, One Vote, One Time? A Model of Democratization in the Middle East.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 24(1): 110–46.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1999. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 609–24.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel. 2003. “Informal Institutions and the Rule of Law. The Judicial Response to State Killings in Buenos Aires and São Paulo in the 1990s.” Comparative Politics 36(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Buckley, Chris and Wong, Alan. 2014. “Crackdown on Protests by Hong Kong Police Draws More to the Streets.” New York Times, September 28. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/world/asia/clashes-in-hong-kong.html?_r=0, accessed January 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Capelouto, Susan. 2013. “Pro-EU Protesters in Kiev Call for Government’s Ouster.” CNN Online, December 2. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/01/us/ukraine-eu-protest-sunday/, accessed February 20, 2015.Google Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali. 2012. “Economic Evaluations vs. Ideology: Diagnosing the Sources of Electoral Change in Turkey, 2002–2011.” Electoral Studies 31(3): 513–21.Google Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali. 2014. “Voting Behavior.” In The Routledge Handbook of Modern Turkey, ed. Heper, Metin and Sayarı, Sabri. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chernichkin, Kostyantyn. 2013. “Police Violently Break Up Protests at 4am Today; Many Injuries Reported.” KyivPost, November 30) https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/euromaidan/reports-police-forcefully-break-up-protest-site-on-maidan-nezalezhnosti-this-morning-332674.html, accessed February 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis. 1991. Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datafolha. 2013a. Avaliação do Governador Geraldo Alckmin. Intenção de Voto para Governador de São Paulo. Datafolha Press Release, June 27–28, 2013.Google Scholar
Datafolha. 2013b. Contagem do Pu´blico da Manifestação Contra o Aumento do Transporte Pu´blico. Datafolha, June 17, 2013.Google Scholar
Datafolha. 2013c. Intenção de Voto para Presidente da Repu´blica. Datafolha Press release, June 27–28, 2013.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 1995. “Multi-dimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: An Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions.” American Journal of Political Science 39(3): 683–12.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007a. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science 10(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007b. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian and Armstrong, David. 2004. “Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 538–54.Google Scholar
Decat, Erich. 2013. “Ministro da Justiça Diz que Houve Excesso de Policiais.” Estadão, June 14. http://www.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,ministro-da-justica-diz-que-houve-excesso-de-policiais, 1042529, accessed January 17, 2015.Google Scholar
Della Coletta, Ricardo. 2013. “Cardozo Condena Violência em Manifestações em São Paulo.” Estadão, June 12. http://www.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,cardozo-condena-violencia-em-manifestacoes-em-sp, 1041581, accessed January 20, 2015.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella. 1995. Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella. 2013. Can Democracy Be Saved? Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella and Reiter, Herbert. 1998. “Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies.” In The Policing of Protest in Contemporary Democracies, ed. della Porta, Donatella and Reiter, Herbert. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella and Tarrow, Sidney. 1986. “Unwanted Children: Political Violence and the Cycle of Protest in Italy, 1966–1973.” European Journal of Political Research 14(5–6): 607–32.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella and Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. “Interactive Diffusion: The Coevolution of Police and Protest Behavior with an Application to Transnational Contention.” Comparative Political Studies 45(1): 119–52.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2015. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26(1): 141–55.Google Scholar
Do Vale, Caio. 2013. “Para Alckmin Atos de Protesta na Paulista Foram Absurdos.” Estadão, June 13. http://sao-paulo.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,para-alckmin-atos-de-protesto-na-paulista-foram-absurdos, 1039955, accessed January 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Earl, Jennifer. 2003. “Tanks, Tear Gas, and Taxes: Toward a Theory of Movement Repression.” Sociological Theory 21(1): 44–68.Google Scholar
Earl, Jennifer. 2011. “Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 261–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, Jennifer, Soule, Sarah, and McCarthy, John. 2003. “Protest under Fire. Explaining the Policing of Protest.” American Sociological Review 68(4): 581–606.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7, ed. Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Estadão. 2013a. “Puro vandalismo.” Estadão, June 8. http://opiniao.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,puro-vandalismo-imp-, 1040106, accessed January 16, 2015.Google Scholar
Estadão. 2013b. “55% dos Paulistanos São Favoraveis a Protestos Indica Pesquisa.” Estadão, June 14. http://sao-paulo.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,55-dos-paulistanos-sao-favoraveis-a-protestos-indica-pesquisa, 1042389, accessed January 16, 2015.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey and de Graaf, Nan Dirk. 2013. Political Choice Matters: Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-National Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Karen. 2011. Framing the Race in South Africa: The Political Origins of Racial Census Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Folha de São Paulo. 2013. “Retomar A Paulista.” Folha de São Paulo, June 13. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/opiniao/2013/06/1294185-editorial-retomar-a-paulista.shtml, accessed January 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Gamson, William. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, Dipak, Singh, Harinder, and Sprague, Tom. 1993. “Government Coercion of Dissidents: Deterrence or Provocation?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(2): 301–39.Google Scholar
Gürsoy, Yaprak. 2012a. “The Changing Role of the Military in Turkish Politics: Democratization through Coup Plots?” Democratization 19(4): 735–60.Google Scholar
Gürsoy, Yaprak. 2012b. “The Final Curtain for the Turkish Armed Forces? Civil-Military Relations in View of the 2011 General Elections.” Turkish Studies 13(2): 191–211.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Philip N. and Hussain, Muzammil M.. 2013. Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janys Analytics. 2013. Exclusive Summary. Janys Analytics.Google Scholar
Jasper, James. 2014. “Constructing Indignation: Anger Dynamics in Protest Movements” Emotion Review 6(3): 208–213.Google Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. 1994. “Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey: Changes and Continuities in the 1990s.” Comparative Political Studies 2(3): 402–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiev Post—see n.65.Google Scholar
KIIS. 2013-2014. Survey of Maidan Participants. Kiev: Kiev International Institute of Sociology.Google Scholar
Koesel, Karrie and Bunce, Valerie. 2013. “Diffusion-Proofing: Russian and Chinese Responses to Waves of Popular Mobilizations against Authoritarian Rulers.” Perspectives on Politics 11(3): 753–68.Google Scholar
Konda. 2013. Gezi Park Survey: Who Is Involved, What Do They Want, and Why Are They There? Istanbul. Istanbul: Konda Research & Consultancy.Google Scholar
Küçük, Mustafa. 2013. “Kışla yapılacak gaza bakılacak.” Hürriyet, June 2. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/kisla-yapilacak-gaza-bakilacak-23418164, accessed January 10, 2015.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Adria. 2016. “Repression and Activism among the Arab Spring’s First Movers: Evidence from Morocco’s February 20th Movement.” British Journal of Political Science, First View, April 26: 1–20.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2008. “Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25: 1–18.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Locatelli, Piero. 2014. Vem Pra Rua: As Revoltas de Junho Contadas pelo Jovem Rep´orter que Recebeu Passe Livre para Contar a Histo´ria do Movimento [Come Out into the Street: The June Revolts as Recounted by a Young Reporter who Received the Free Pass to Tell the Story of the Movement]. Sao Paulo: Companhia Das Letras.Google Scholar
Mardin, Şerif. 1973. “Center-periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?” Daedalus 102(1): 169–90.Google Scholar
Marinova, Dani. 2015. “A New Approach to Estimating Electoral Instability in Parties.” Political Science Research and Methods 3(2): 265–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1995. “‘Initiator’ and ‘Spin-off’ Movements: Diffusion Processes in Protest Cycles. In Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action, ed. Traugott, Mark. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug and Tarrow, Sidney. 2010. “Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements.” Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 529–42.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John and McPhail, Clark. 1998. “The Institutionalization of Protest in the United States.” In The Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century, ed. Meyer, David and Tarrow, Sidney. Boulder CO: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
McPhail, Clark, Schweingruber, David, and McCarthy, John. 2006. “Policing Protest in the United States: 1960–1995.” In The Policing of Transnational Protests, ed. della Porta, Donatella and Reiter, Herbert. Burlington VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Netto, Andrei. 2013. “Alckmin Chama Manifestantes de Baderneiros e Vândalos.” Estadão, June 12. http://www.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,alckmin-chama-manifestantes-de-baderneiros-e-vandalos, 1041555, accessed January 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1994. “Repression and Revolutionary Action: East Germany in 1989.” Rationality and Society 6(1): 101–38.Google Scholar
Oğuzlu, Tarik. 2013. “The Gezi Park Protest and Its Impact on Turkey’s Soft-Power Abroad.” Middle Eastern Analysis/Ortado˘gu Analiz 5(55): 10–15.Google Scholar
Paes Manso, Bruno and Diego, Zanchetta. 2013. “A Revolta do Gás Lacrimogêneo (Em Sete Capítulos).” Estadão, June 22. http://politica.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,a-revolta-do-gas-lacrimogeneo-em-sete-capitulos, 1045716, accessed January 17, 2015.Google Scholar
Pierskalla, Jan Henryk. 2010. “Protest, Deterrence, and Escalation: The Strategic Calculus of Government Repression.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54(1): 117–45.Google Scholar
Podufalov, Pavlo. 2013. “Yanukovych to Lose to Opposition Candidates in Second Round of Presidential Elections.” KyivPost, December 25. http://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/poll-yanukovych-to-lose-to-opposition-candidates-in-second-round-of-presidential-elections-334239.html, accessed February 20, 2015.Google Scholar
Powell, Eleanor and Tucker, Joshua. 2014. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-communist Countries: New data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science 44(1): 123–47.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, David and Zucco, Cesar. 2014. “The Power of Partisanship in Brazil: Evidence from Survey Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 58(1): 212–25.Google Scholar
Siegel, David A. 2011. “When Does Repression Work? Collective Action in Social Networks.” Journal of Politics 73(4): 993–1010.Google Scholar
Şık, Ahmet. 2015. “İplerin Koptuğu Gece.” Cumhuriyet June 13. http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/turkiye/298333/iplerin_koptugu_gece.html, accessed June 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
Trejo, Guillermo. 2012. Popular Movements in Autocracies: Religion, Repression, and Indigenous Collective Action in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trejo, Guillermo. 2014. “The Ballot and the Street: An Electoral Theory of Social Protest in Autocracies.” Perspectives on Politics 12(2): 332–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, Gabriela. 2013. “Protesto Tem Apoio de 77% dos Paulistanos.” Estadão, June 20. http://www.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,protestos-tem-apoio-de-77-dos-paulistanos, 1044753, accessed January 16, 2015.Google Scholar
Waddington, Peter. 1994. Liberty and Order: Public Order Policing in a Capital City. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Walker, Shaun. 2013. “Ukraine Protests: Outrage as Police Attack Kiev Barricades.” The Guardian, December 11. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/11/kiev-protests-police-barricades-chainsaws, accessed February 16, 2015.Google Scholar
Warth, Ane, Moraes Moura, Rafael, and Monteiro, Tânia. 2013. “Brasil Acordou Mais Forte Diz Dilma Sobre Os Protestos.” Estadão, June 18. http://politica.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,brasil-acordou-mais-forte-diz-dilma-sobre-protestos, 1043907, accessed January 16, 2015.Google Scholar
Werneck, Felipe, De Paulo, Marcos, Lincoln, Ronald Jr., and Rogero, Tiago. 2014. “Protesto Termina em Confronto no Rio.” Estadao, June 16. http://brasil.estadao.com.br/noticias/rio-de-janeiro,protesto-termina-em-confronto-no-rio-imp-, 1512727, accessed February 20, 2015.Google Scholar
Yekelchyk, Serhy. 2007. Ukraine: Birth of a Modern Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yekelchyk, Serhy. 2015. The Conflict in Ukraine: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Aytaç supplementary material

Appendix

Download Aytaç supplementary material(File)
File 139.4 KB