Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T11:50:17.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trans-fatty acids and cancer: the evidence reviewed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Abby K. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, ReadingRG6 6AP, UK
Danielle I. Shaw
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, ReadingRG6 6AP, UK
Anne M. Minihane
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, ReadingRG6 6AP, UK
Christine M. Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, ReadingRG6 6AP, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Professor Christine M. Williams, fax +44 118 378 5677, email c.m.williams@reading.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present review comes from the authors of the recent Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) review Update on Trans Fatty Acids and Health, and focuses on assessing the strength of the evidence for a link between trans-fatty acid (trans-FA) intake and cancer. It evaluates a range of human ecological, case–control and prospective studies with trans-FA exposure assessed using either dietary assessment methods or trans-FA levels in tissues. Relevant animal studies are also presented in order to elucidate potential mechanisms. It concludes that there is weak and inconsistent evidence for a relationship between trans-FA and breast or colorectal cancer. Evidence for an association between trans-FA and prostate cancer is limited, but a recent large case–control study has shown a strong interaction between risk and trans-FA intake for the RNASEL QQ/RQ genotype that is present in about 35 % of the population. This potential association requires further investigation. The single study on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma reported a strong positive association, but only used a single assessment of dietary trans-FA made at the start of the study in 1980, and the significant changes in trans-FA intakes between then and the end of follow-up in 1994 limit the reliability of this observation. There is insufficient evidence to allow any differentiation between the effects of trans-FA from animal or vegetable origin on cancer risk.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008
Figure 0

Table 1 Human studies investigating the association of trans-fatty acids (trans-FA) with breast cancer

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Risk of breast cancer from prospective epidemiological studies that evaluated dietary intake of trans-fatty acids (trans-FA): Voorips et al.(25) (■) and Cho et al.(21) (Δ). The current mean trans-FA intake for women in the UK has recently been estimated to be 1·0 % of total energy or 1·7 g/d(3) (). Risk of breast cancer is plotted as the relative risk (RR), with vertical bars representing the 95 % CI for intake ranges above reference (RR = 1) in each study. Data from Cho et al.(21) were converted from percentage of total energy to g/d based on an energy intake of 1700 kcal/d (7113 kJ/d).

Figure 2

Table 2 Human studies investigating the association of trans-fatty acids (trans-FA) with colorectal cancer

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Risk of colorectal cancer from case–control and prospective epidemiological studies that evaluated dietary intake of trans-fatty acids (trans-FA): McKelvey et al.(33) ( × ), Slattery et al.(34) (men □; women ■), Lin et al.(37) (◇) and Theodoratou et al.(36) (▲). The current mean trans-FA intake in the UK has recently been estimated to be 1·0 % of total energy or 1·7 g/d for women () and 1·0 % of total energy or 2·4 g/d for men ()(3). Risk of colorectal cancer is plotted as the relative risk (RR), with vertical bars representing the 95 % CI for intake ranges above reference (RR = 1) in each study. Data from Lin et al.(37) were converted from percentage of total energy to g/d based on an energy intake of 1700 kcal/d (7113 kJ/d) (study only included women).

Figure 4

Table 3 Human studies investigating the association of trans-fatty acids (trans-FA) with prostate cancer

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Risk of prostate cancer from case–control and prospective epidemiological studies that evaluated dietary intake of trans-fatty acids (trans-FA): Schuurman et al.(39) (all men ♦) and Liu et al.(38) (African-American ▲; Caucasian ■; Caucasian Q allele □; Caucasian no Q allele ░). The current mean trans-FA intake in the UK for men has recently been estimated to be 1·0 % of total energy or 2.4 g/d ()(3). Risk of prostate cancer is plotted as the relative risk (RR), with vertical bars representing the 95 % CI for intake ranges above reference (RR 1) in each study. Data from Schuurman et al.(39) were converted from percentage of total energy to g/d based on an energy intake of 2400 kcal/d (10 042 kJ/d). Reference points for Caucasians and genotypes from Liu et al.(38) are all at 2·25 g/d.

Figure 6

Table 4 Human studies investigating the association of trans-fatty acids (trans-FA) with other types of cancer