Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-72crv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T08:23:23.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continuous infusion of lipoic acid rapidly reduces plasma β-hydroxybutyrate with elevation of non-esterified fatty acids in broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

Yoshio Hamano*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Bioproduction, Akita Prefectural College of Agriculture, Ohgata, Akita 010-0444, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Yoshio Hamano, fax +81 185 45 2377, email yhamano@akita-pu.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine the effects of α-lipoic acid (ALA) on fatty acid mobilisation and ketone body production in female broiler chickens. In the first experiment, chickens received an intravenous infusion of ALA (0, 25 or 50 mg/kg per h) for 90 min. Blood was drawn at 30 min intervals, and plasma glucose, NEFA, free glycerol and hydroxybutyrate were analysed. In the second experiment, ALA (100 mg/kg per h) was continuously infused to chickens fed or fasted for at least 24 h. Changes in plasma metabolites for 90 min were determined. In the first experiment, as shown by the response area, ALA infusion did not affect plasma glucose but increased (P < 0·05) plasma NEFA, regardless of the dose level. In contrast, plasma hydroxybutyrate was reduced at the lower infusion rate (P < 0·05). No significant changes in plasma free glycerol were observed. In experiment 2, ALA stimulated both plasma glucose (P < 0·01) and NEFA (P < 0·001) and the responses were greater than those of controls, regardless of the feeding state. The interaction between ALA and the feeding condition had a significant effect on plasma hydroxybutyrate (P < 0·01). ALA reduced plasma hydroxybutyrate, and this response was greater in the fasted birds than in those fed. Therefore, the present study found a lowering effect of ALA on plasma hydroxybutyrate level and suggests that the ALA-induced plasma NEFA increment was attributable to decreased hepatic fatty acid oxidation in chickens.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2007
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Changes in plasma glucose concentration with different continuous infusion levels of α-lipoic acid (ALA). Values are means for six birds with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (●), Controls; (■), 25 mg ALA/kg per h; (▲), 50 mg ALA/kg per h. The response areas under the curve and above the baseline (concentration × min) with significant difference are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1

Table 1 Areas under the curve and above the baseline of plasma metabolite responses in chickens during continuous infusion of α-lipoic acid† (Mean values with their standard errors for six birds)

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Changes in plasma NEFA concentration with different continuous infusion levels of α-lipoic acid (ALA). Values are means for six birds with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (●), Controls; (■), 25 mg ALA/kg per h; (▲), 50 mg ALA/kg per h. The response areas under the curve and above the baseline (concentration × min) with significant difference are shown in Table 1.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Changes in plasma free glycerol concentration with different continuous infusion levels of α-lipoic acid (ALA). Values are means for six birds with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (●), Controls; (■), 25 mg ALA/kg per h; (▲), 50 mg ALA/kg per h. The response areas under the curve and above the baseline (concentration ×  min) with significant difference are shown in Table 1.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Changes in plasma hydroxybutyrate concentration with different continuous infusion levels of α-lipoic acid (ALA). Values are means for six birds with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (●), Controls; (■), 25 mg ALA/kg per h; (▲), 50 mg ALA/kg per h. The response areas under the curve and above the baseline (concentration × min) with significant difference are shown in Table 1.

Figure 5

Table 2 Effects of fasting on plasma metabolites in broiler chickens before infusion of lipoic acid (Mean values with their standard errors for ten birds)

Figure 6

Fig. 5 Changes in plasma glucose concentration with a continuous infusion of α-lipoic acid (ALA) in broiler chickens either diet-fed (a) or fasted (b). Values are means for five birds with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (●), Controls; (■), 100 mg ALA/kg per h. The response areas under the curve and above the baseline (concentration × min) with significance levels from ANOVA as a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement are shown in Table 3.

Figure 7

Fig. 6 Changes in plasma NEFA concentration with a continuous infusion of α-lipoic acid (ALA) in broiler chickens either diet-fed (a) or fasted (b). Values are means for five birds with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (●), Controls; (■), 100 mg ALA/kg per h. The response areas under the curve and above the baseline (concentration × min) with significance levels from ANOVA as a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement are shown in Table 3.

Figure 8

Table 3 Areas under the curve and above the baseline of plasma metabolite responses in fed or fasted chickens during continuous infusion of α-lipoic acid (ALA)† (Mean values with their standard errors for five birds)

Figure 9

Fig. 7 Changes in plasma TAG concentration with a continuous infusion of α-lipoic acid (ALA) in broiler chickens either diet-fed (a) or fasted (b). Values are means for five birds with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (●), Controls; (■), 100 mg ALA/kg per h. The response areas under the curve and above the baseline (concentration × min) with significance levels from ANOVA as a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement are shown in Table 3.

Figure 10

Fig. 8 Changes in plasma hydroxybutyrate concentration with a continuous infusion of α-lipoic acid (ALA) in broiler chickens either diet-fed (a) or fasted (b). Values are means for five birds with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (●), Controls; (■), 100 mg ALA/kg per h. The response areas under the curve and above the baseline (concentration × min) with significance levels from ANOVA as a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement are shown in Table 3.