Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T06:18:38.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Activation of PPARγ and δ by dietary punicic acid ameliorates intestinal inflammation in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2011

Josep Bassaganya-Riera*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Immunology and Molecular Nutrition, Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Margaret DiGuardo
Affiliation:
Nutrition Therapeutics, Inc., Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Montse Climent
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Immunology and Molecular Nutrition, Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Cristina Vives
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Immunology and Molecular Nutrition, Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Adria Carbo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Immunology and Molecular Nutrition, Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Zeina E. Jouni
Affiliation:
Mead Johnson Nutrition, Evansville, IN 47721, USA
Alexandra W. C. Einerhand
Affiliation:
Lipid Nutrition BV, Channahon, IL 60410, USA
Marianne O'Shea
Affiliation:
Lipid Nutrition BV, Channahon, IL 60410, USA
Raquel Hontecillas
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Immunology and Molecular Nutrition, Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Dr J. Bassaganya-Riera, fax +1 540 231 2606, email jbassaga@vt.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to elucidate the mechanisms of immunoregulation by which dietary punicic acid (PUA) prevents or ameliorates experimental inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The expression of PPARγ and δ, their responsive genes and pro-inflammatory cytokines was assayed in the colonic mucosa. Immune cell-specific PPARγ null, PPARδ knockout and wild-type mice were treated with PUA and challenged with 2·5 % dextran sodium sulphate (DSS). The prophylactic efficacy of PUA was examined in an IL-10− / −  model of IBD. The effect of PUA on the regulatory T-cell (Treg) compartment was also examined in mice with experimental IBD. PUA ameliorated spontaneous pan-enteritis in IL-10− / −  mice and DSS colitis, up-regulated Foxp3 expression in Treg and suppressed TNF-α, but the loss of functional PPARγ or δ impaired these anti-inflammatory effects. At the cellular level, the macrophage-specific deletion of PPARγ caused a complete abrogation of the protective effect of PUA, whereas the deletion of PPARδ or intestinal epithelial cell-specific PPARγ decreased its anti-inflammatory efficacy. We provide in vivo molecular evidence demonstrating that PUA ameliorates experimental IBD by regulating macrophage and T-cell function through PPARγ- and δ-dependent mechanisms.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the diets*

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Effect of punicic acid (PUA) on disease activity indices during 42 d. (A) C57BL/6J wild-type mice fed either a control (–■–) diet or a diet supplemented with PUA (1 g/100 g; –⋄–). (B) IL-10-deficient mice with no signs of disease before day 0 of the study (IL-10− / −  P). (C) IL-10− / −  mice with severe inflammatory bowel disease on day 0 of the study (IL-10− / −  T). (D) PPARγ fl/fl; MMTV-Cre+; IL-10− / −  double knockout mice. * Mean values were significantly different between the treatments (P < 0·05, n 10).

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Effect of punicic acid (PUA) on microscopic lesions observed following 42 d of dietary supplementation. Representative photomicrographs of colons of (A and D) wild-type, (WT; B and E) IL-10− / −  P and (C and F) IL-10− / −  T mice fed a control diet (A–C) or a PUA-supplemented diet (D–F) for 42 d. The intestinal specimens were excised, stored in formalin, sectioned and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Original magnification at 40 × . (G) Wild-type, IL-10− / −  P and IL-10− / −  T and PPARγ fl/fl; MMTV-Cre+; IL-10− / −  double knockout mice were fed either a control diet (■) or a PUA-supplemented diet (□) for 42 d. Colonic histological lesions were scored by blinded observers based on size and morphology (0–4) as described in the Materials and Methods section. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05, n 10).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Quantification of mRNA expression of (A) PPARδ, (B) angiopoietin-like 4, (C) TNF-α and (D) monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in colons of IL-10− / −  mice fed a control diet or a punicic acid (PUA)-supplemented (1 g/100 g) diet using real-time RT-PCR. Colonic samples were collected from IL-10− / −  mice fed PUA preventively. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars (ten mice per group). * Mean values were significantly different (P < 0·05). cDNA, complementary DNA.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Effect of dietary punicic acid (PUA) supplementation on experimental inflammatory bowel disease during a 7 d challenge with dextran sodium sulphate. (A) Disease activity indices, (B) gross lesions in C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and PPARδ null mice fed either a control or a PUA-supplemented diet. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05, n 10). – – –, WT control; – - –, WT PUA; ——, PPARδ control; ……, PPARδ PUA.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Effect of dietary punicic acid (PUA) supplementation on experimental inflammatory bowel disease during a 7 d challenge with dextran sodium sulphate. (A) Disease activity indices, (B) gross lesions in Villin-Cre–C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and intestinal epithelial cell-specific PPARγ null (Villin-Cre+) mice fed either a control diet or a PUA-supplemented diet. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05, n 10). – – –, WT control; – - –, WT PUA; ——, VillinCre+control; ……, VillinCre+PUA.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Effect of dietary punicic acid (PUA) supplementation on experimental inflammatory bowel disease during a 7 d challenge with dextran sodium sulphate. (A) Disease activity indices, (B) gross lesions in Lysozyme M-Cre–C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and macrophage-specific PPARγ null (Lysozyme M-Cre+) mice fed either a control diet or a PUA-supplemented diet. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05, n 10). – – –, WT control; – - –, WT PUA; ——, Lysozyme M Cre+control; ……, Lysozyme M Cre+PUA.

Figure 7

Fig. 7 Dietary punicic acid modulates the percentages of regulatory T-cells in the peripheral blood of C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) mice but not in PPARδ null, macrophage-specific PPARγ null (Lysozyme M (LysM)-Cre+), intestinal epithelial cell-specific PPARγ null (Villin-Cre+ (VC+)) mice with dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) colitis. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the treatments (P < 0·05, n 10). PPARdKO, PPAR double knockout; WT no DSS, WT without DSS.