Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T04:55:41.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure, Empowerment and the Liberalization of Cross-National Abortion Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2008

Victor Asal ,
Mitchell Brown  and
Renee Gibson Figueroa
Victor Asal
Affiliation:
Rockefeller College, University at Albany, SUNY
Mitchell Brown
Affiliation:
Auburn University
Renee Gibson Figueroa
Affiliation:
Rockefeller College, University at Albany, SUNY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Economic, cultural, and political opportunity structures have been separately shown to facilitate and constrain abortion rights. We examine two central and related questions: First, which factors explain liberalization of different types of abortion laws? Second, which factor or set of factors is the most important in explaining abortion laws? The cross-national literature suggests a three-pronged explanation for the existence of abortion rights, including politics, economics, and culture. We parse these out into the structural and empowerment components of each, and posit a theory of rights in which empowerment factors are at least as important, if not more important, for explaining change than structural factors. To test this, we examine the impact of these components on the liberalization of abortion rights globally utilizing a distributed lag model. We find that an empowerment approach explains the liberalization of abortion laws better than a structural approach in terms of politics, but that a structural approach is a better predictor in terms of culture, and that both empowerment and structural factors are important predictors when economic factors are taken into account. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for understanding policy change and human rights on a global scale.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 265 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1995. “It's Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 57 (February): 176–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (July): 718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 1995. “American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (November): 1055–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asal, Victor, and Pate, Amy. 2005. “The Decline of Ethnic Political Discrimination 1990–2003.” In Peace and Conflict 2005: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and Democracy, ed. Gurr, Ted Robert and Marshall, Monty. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, 28–38.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 1996. Why Movements Succeed or Fail. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 1998. “East-West Differences in German Abortion Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (Winter): 545–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Janeen, and Kane, Emily W.. 1995. “Dependence and Independence: A Cross-National Analysis of Gender Inequality and Gender Attitudes.” Gender and Society 9 (April): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, Reed. 1993. “Abortion Law in Europe in 1991–1992.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 21 (Spring): 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, Doris, and Herman, Didi. 2003. Globalizing Family Values: The Christian Right in International Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L. 2004. “Inclusion and Democratization.” Comparative Politics 36 (July): 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, Jeff, and Truex, Lise A.. 1996. “The Question of Citizenship in the Baltics.” Journal of Democracy 7 (January): 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Isobel. 2004. “The Payoff From Women's Rights.” Foreign Affairs 83 (May/June): 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Rebecca J., and Dickens, Bernard M.. 2003. “Human Rights Dynamics of Abortion Law Reform.” Human Rights Quarterly 25 (May): 1–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahl, Robert Alan. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 1999. “Human Rights and the Democratic Proposition.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (February): 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Henry P., and Skilogianis., Joanna 1999. From Abortion to Contraception: A Resource to Public Policies and Reproductive Behavior in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the Present. Westport, CT: Westport Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Darren W., and Davenport, Christian. 1999. “Assessing the Validity of the Postmaterialism Index.” American Political Science Review 93 (September): 649–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Division for the Advancement of Women. 2005. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women 2005 [cited August 1 2005]. Available from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/.Google Scholar
Doorenspleet, Renske. 2004. “The Structural Context of Recent Transitions to Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 43 (May): 309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (Autumn): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, Patrick J. 2002. “Abortion and the Right to Life in Post-Communist Eastern Europe and Russia.” East European Quarterly 36 (Summer): 191–226.Google Scholar
Freedman, Lynn P., and Isaacs, Stephen L.. 1993. “Human Rights and Reproductive Choice.” Studies in Family Planning 24 (January/February): 18–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurr, Ted. R. 2000. People vs. States. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003a. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003b. “The True Clash of Civilizations.” Foreign Policy 62 (March/April): 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, Norris, Pippa, and Welzel, Christian. 2002. “Gender Equality and Democracy.” Comparative Sociology 321 (3/4): 321–46.Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 1995. “Women in Parliaments: 1945-1995.” Geneva, Switzerland: Inter-Parliamentary Union.Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2004. Women's Suffrage: A World Chronology of the Recognition of Women's Rights to Vote and to Stand for Election. Inter-Parliamentary Union 2004 [cited 2004]. Available from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/suffrage.htm.Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2005. Women in Parliament: Archived Data. Inter-Parliamentary Union, 2007 2005 [cited 2005]. Available from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world-arc.htm.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G., O'Donnell, John, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1993. “A Contextual Analysis of Catholicism and Abortion Attitudes in Western Europe.” Sociology of Religion 54 (Winter): 375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Malami, Melissa 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces 78 (September): 235–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legge, Jerome S. Jr. 1983a. “The Determinants of Attitudes Toward Abortion in the American Electorate.” Western Political Quarterly 36 (September): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legge, Jerome S. Jr. 1983b. “Predictors of Abortion Attitudes in the Federal Republic of Germany.” Journal of Politics 45 (August): 759–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Markoff, John. 2003. “Margins, Centers, and Democracy: The Paradigmatic History of Women's Suffrage.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society 29 (Autumn): 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2004. POLITY IV Center for International Development and Conflict Management 2003 [cited September 1 2004 2004]. Available from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/.Google Scholar
Marx, Anthony W. 1996. “Race-Making and the Nation-State.” World Politics 48 (January): 180–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Barbara D. 2001. “Female-Selective Abortion in Asia: Patterns, Policies, and Debates.” American Anthropologist 103 (December): 1083–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillai, Vijayan K., and Wang, Guang-Zhen. 1999. “Women's Reproductive Rights and Social Equality in Developing Countries.” Social Science Journal 36 (October): 459–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, Steven C., Wendel-Blunt, Dierdre, and Ho, Karl. 1997. “Global Patterns in the Achievement of Women's Human Rights to Equality.” Human Rights Quarterly 19 (November): 813–35.Google Scholar
Population Division of the United Nations Secretariat. 2005. Abortion Policies: A Global Review. United Nations 2002 [cited March 15 2005]. Available from http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. “Modernization: Theories and Facts.” World Politics 49 (January): 155–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O., and McEneaney, Elizabeth H. 1997. “From Women's Suffrage to Reproduction Rights? Cross-National Considerations.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 38 (June): 6–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, Francisco O., Soysal, Yasemin, and Shanahan, Suzanne. 1997. “The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage Rights.” American Sociological Review 62 (October): 735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes. 1990. International Human Rights: Universalism Versus Relativism. Newbury Park, SageGoogle Scholar
Sirokova, Kremena, and Buresova, Alexandra. 1993. “Abortion in Eastern Europe.” Journal of Gender Studies 2 (November): 311–14.Google Scholar
Steel, Brent S., Warner, Rebecca L., Stieber, Blair, and Lovrich, Nicholas P.. 1992. “Postmaterialist Values and Support for Feminism among Canadian and American Women and Men.” Western Political Quarterly 45 (June): 339–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Population Division of the United Nations Secretariat. 2005. Abortion Policies: A Global Review. United Nations 2002 [cited March 15 2005]. Available from http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. 2002. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2003. World Development Indicators 2003 (World Development Indicators). Washington, DC: World Bank Office of the Publisher.Google Scholar
Yamin, Alicia Ely. 1996. “Defining Questions: Situating Issues of Power in the Formulation of a Right to Health under International Law.” Human Rights Quarterly 18 (May): 398–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yishai, Yael. 1993. “Public Ideas and Public Policy: Abortion Politics in Four Democracies.” Comparative Politics 25 (January): 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar