The authors regret that there is an error in section 3.1 of this article. When describing the Train-validation-test split, it is stated that, “The list of samples is divided into three splits: training, validation, and test, with proportions of 0.8, 0.15, and 0.15, respectively.” The true values are, “proportions of 0.7, 0.15, and 0.15 respectively.”
No CrossRef data available.