Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T09:46:31.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tracking the wines of the Judgment of Paris over time: The case of Stag's Leap Wine Cellars’ Cabernet Sauvignon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Olivier Gergaud
Affiliation:
KEDGE Business School (Bordeaux campus), Paris, France
Victor Ginsburgh
Affiliation:
ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium CORE, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Juan D. Moreno-Ternero*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, jdmoreno@upo.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The outcome of the famous 1976 Judgment of Paris, a blind wine tasting of ten wines by nine French judges, brought American wines to the forefront of the wine business. A Californian wine, the 1973 Stag's Leap Wine Cellars S.L.V. Cabernet Sauvignon, was declared the winner, surpassing four highly prized French wines (Château Mouton-Rothschild 1970, Château Montrose 1970, Château Haut-Brion 1970, and Château Léoville Las Cases 1971). We collect ratings from experts for (almost) all vintages of the same ten wines over the years 1968–2021 and find that the Stag's Leap Cabernet Sauvignon is far from being first. We conclude that either the 1973 vintage was overrated by the experts who tasted it in 1976, or 1973 was merely an outlier in this winery.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Association of Wine Economists
Figure 0

Table 1. The Paris 1976 wine tasting: Judges and ratings

Figure 1

Table 2a. Number of available ratings per vintage

Figure 2

Table 2b. Frequencies of available ratings

Figure 3

Table 3. Number of available ratings per wine and success of wines

Figure 4

Table 4. Paris ranking and later rankings