Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T14:53:03.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Is a Renewal Process Convexly Parameterized in Its Mean Parameterization?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

James D. Lynch
James D. Lynch
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina 29208
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The convex (concave) parameterization of a generalized renewal process is considered in this paper. It is shown that if the interrenewal times have log concave distributions or have log concave survival functions (i.e., an increasing failure rate distribution), then the renewal process is convexly (concavely) parameterized in its mean parameterization.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 43 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Barlow, R.E. & Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing: Probability Models. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
2.Durham, S., Lynch, J., & Padgett, W.J. (1990). TP2-orderings and the IFR property with applications. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 4: 73–88.Google Scholar
3.Karlin, S. (1968). Total Positivity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
4.Karlin, S. & Proschan, F. (1960). Polyn type distributions and convolutions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 31: 721–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lynch, J.D. (1988). Mixtures, generalized convexity and balayages. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 15: 203–210.Google Scholar
6.Lynch, J., Mimmack, G., & Proschan, F. (1987). Uniform stochastic orderings and total positivity. Canadian Journal of Statistics 15: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pellerey, F. (1993). Partial orderings under cumulative damage shock models. Advances in Applied Probability 25: 939–946.Google Scholar
8.Schweder, T. (1982). On the dispersion of mixtures. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 9: 165–169.Google Scholar
9.Shaked, M. (1980). On the mixtures from exponential families. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 42: 192–198.Google Scholar
10.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (1987). Temporal stochastic convexity and concavity. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 27: 1–20.Google Scholar
11.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (1988). On the first passage time of pure jump processes. Journal of Applied Probability 25: 501–509.Google Scholar
12.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (1988). Stochastic convexity and its applications. Advances in Applied Probability 20: 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (1990). Parametric stochastic convexity and concavity of stochastic processes. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 42: 509–531.Google Scholar
14.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (1994). Stochastic Orders and Their Applications. Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
15.Shanthikumar, J.G. (1988). DFR property of first passage times and its preservation under geometric compounding. Annals of Probability 16: 397–406.Google Scholar
16.Shanthikumar, J.G. & Yao, D.D. (1992). Spatiotemporal convexity of stochastic processes and applications. Probability in the Engineering and Information Sciences 6: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar